Republicans want a civil war. Especially while they are in power and control the military.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Prove me wrong. They are doing everything in their power to incite violence within our own country.

What's happening in Minneapolis can happen anywhere. And the Republicans in Congress are just allowing it. The Supreme Court is allowing it. The entire powers in charge right now are allowing it.

They want this

Maybe the left could just let law enforcement do its job and stop confronting them and creating chaos and violent confrontations. If there's an argument to be made, make the argument in court. But of course, they want the violent confrontation and chaos, so it will continue. Hard to see how you conclude that "Republicans want civil war" because of this.

How many court orders has DHS and DOJ violated?

How many laws does DHS/ICE violate on a daily basis?

What you have are Democrat district court judges, who do not have jurisdiction over immigration, issuing orders as part of the resistance. These get overturned eventually on appeal, but the goal is to slow down Trump. Shame on John Roberts for not putting a stop to it.

"Except as otherwise provided in this section, no court shall have jurisdiction, by habeas corpus ... or by any other provision of law (statutory or nonstatutory), to review such an order or such questions of law or fact."

NP: You know that's not the full statute right? What else is in that paragraph?

"...except as provided in subparagraph (D),"

What does D say?

“(D) Judicial review of certain legal claims {well loook ther actual IS judicial review}
Nothing in subparagraph (B) or (C), or in any other provision of this chapter (other than this section) which limits or eliminates judicial review, shall be construed as precluding review of constitutional claims or questions of law raised upon a petition for review filed with an appropriate court of appeals in accordance with this section.”

Then there is this whole section below it titled:”(b) Requirements for review of orders of removal” [gosh that would be a silly section to have if no review was ever allowed, huh? /s]

And then, there that whole section on what the reviewing courts should do if the defendant says they actually are a citizen. Why would that section be there, if as PP says none of it is reviewable by any court? Odd. Especially odd to have it written into the law if infallible ICE never took a citizen into custody illegally. /s

Shall we continue to subection (e), or do you just want to concede that your quote is cherry picked to be grossly misleading and is not the whole statement of the law?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Prove me wrong. They are doing everything in their power to incite violence within our own country.

What's happening in Minneapolis can happen anywhere. And the Republicans in Congress are just allowing it. The Supreme Court is allowing it. The entire powers in charge right now are allowing it.

They want this

Maybe the left could just let law enforcement do its job and stop confronting them and creating chaos and violent confrontations. If there's an argument to be made, make the argument in court. But of course, they want the violent confrontation and chaos, so it will continue. Hard to see how you conclude that "Republicans want civil war" because of this.

How many court orders has DHS and DOJ violated?

How many laws does DHS/ICE violate on a daily basis?

What you have are Democrat district court judges, who do not have jurisdiction over immigration, issuing orders as part of the resistance. These get overturned eventually on appeal, but the goal is to slow down Trump. Shame on John Roberts for not putting a stop to it.

"Except as otherwise provided in this section, no court shall have jurisdiction, by habeas corpus ... or by any other provision of law (statutory or nonstatutory), to review such an order or such questions of law or fact."

NP: You know that's not the full statute right? What else is in that paragraph?

"...except as provided in subparagraph (D),"

What does D say?

“(D) Judicial review of certain legal claims {well loook ther actual IS judicial review}
Nothing in subparagraph (B) or (C), or in any other provision of this chapter (other than this section) which limits or eliminates judicial review, shall be construed as precluding review of constitutional claims or questions of law raised upon a petition for review filed with an appropriate court of appeals in accordance with this section.”

Then there is this whole section below it titled:”(b) Requirements for review of orders of removal” [gosh that would be a silly section to have if no review was ever allowed, huh? /s]

And then, there that whole section on what the reviewing courts should do if the defendant says they actually are a citizen. Why would that section be there, if as PP says none of it is reviewable by any court? Odd. Especially odd to have it written into the law if infallible ICE never took a citizen into custody illegally. /s

Shall we continue to subection (e), or do you just want to concede that your quote is cherry picked to be grossly misleading and is not the whole statement of the law?

Only appeals courts have jurisdiction, not district courts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
How is it that Biden and Obama were able to detain and deport millions without the conflict we are seeing today? What changed?

Indeed, by and large there were no objections to what Obama and Biden were doing with deportations, except from some activists.
Yet Trump comes in and suddenly there is organized opposition, because Trump.

[Anonymous]

Who are these posters justifying the murderous ICE thugs and praising that demented gasbag who despoils the white house and the presidency?

Where are you from? Not from DC, that's for sure.

Or are you bots? Not human at all?

Karoline? Is that you? (Spell your name correctly, woodja! In America, it starts with a C.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
How is it that Biden and Obama were able to detain and deport millions without the conflict we are seeing today? What changed?

Indeed, by and large there were no objections to what Obama and Biden were doing with deportations, except from some activists.
Yet Trump comes in and suddenly there is organized opposition, because Trump.

no, because gestapo tactics

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump promised to deport 100 million people.

There are only 52 million foreign-born people in the US.

Only 14 million of them lack documentation.

Who do you all suppose make up the difference in terms of who will be deported?

How do we know how many actually lack documentation ? Isn’t it unknowable if they entered illegally and just stayed ? Its one of the most disturbing things about open borders.

Yes if you do not have proof of citizenship and party affiliation when you are arrested you are illegal. This is why ICE and republicans are able to deport Americans citizens. There are no constitutional rights. Those days are over.

Well that’s only if detained. What about all those illegals in country not detained, it’s an unknowable number given it was open border for years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump promised to deport 100 million people.

There are only 52 million foreign-born people in the US.

Only 14 million of them lack documentation.

Who do you all suppose make up the difference in terms of who will be deported?

How do we know how many actually lack documentation ? Isn’t it unknowable if they entered illegally and just stayed ? Its one of the most disturbing things about open borders.

Yes if you do not have proof of citizenship and party affiliation when you are arrested you are illegal. This is why ICE and republicans are able to deport Americans citizens. There are no constitutional rights. Those days are over.

Well that’s only if detained. What about all those illegals in country not detained, it’s an unknowable number given it was open border for years.

How does that justify living in a police state?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump promised to deport 100 million people.

There are only 52 million foreign-born people in the US.

Only 14 million of them lack documentation.

Who do you all suppose make up the difference in terms of who will be deported?

How do we know how many actually lack documentation ? Isn’t it unknowable if they entered illegally and just stayed ? Its one of the most disturbing things about open borders.

Yes if you do not have proof of citizenship and party affiliation when you are arrested you are illegal. This is why ICE and republicans are able to deport Americans citizens. There are no constitutional rights. Those days are over.

Well that’s only if detained. What about all those illegals in country not detained, it’s an unknowable number given it was open border for years.

Keep the illegals, get rid of ICE agents hired after 1/20/25. That would be a huge net good for the country. Hard working people trying to make a better future versus the otherwise unemployable sociopathic slave catchers and murderers.

This is right up trumps alley. Create a problem and then solve it by reversing his own decision.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Prove me wrong. They are doing everything in their power to incite violence within our own country.

What's happening in Minneapolis can happen anywhere. And the Republicans in Congress are just allowing it. The Supreme Court is allowing it. The entire powers in charge right now are allowing it.

They want this

Maybe the left could just let law enforcement do its job and stop confronting them and creating chaos and violent confrontations. If there's an argument to be made, make the argument in court. But of course, they want the violent confrontation and chaos, so it will continue. Hard to see how you conclude that "Republicans want civil war" because of this.

How many court orders has DHS and DOJ violated?

How many laws does DHS/ICE violate on a daily basis?

What you have are Democrat district court judges, who do not have jurisdiction over immigration, issuing orders as part of the resistance. These get overturned eventually on appeal, but the goal is to slow down Trump. Shame on John Roberts for not putting a stop to it.

"Except as otherwise provided in this section, no court shall have jurisdiction, by habeas corpus ... or by any other provision of law (statutory or nonstatutory), to review such an order or such questions of law or fact."

NP: You know that's not the full statute right? What else is in that paragraph?

"...except as provided in subparagraph (D),"

What does D say?

“(D) Judicial review of certain legal claims {well loook ther actual IS judicial review}
Nothing in subparagraph (B) or (C), or in any other provision of this chapter (other than this section) which limits or eliminates judicial review, shall be construed as precluding review of constitutional claims or questions of law raised upon a petition for review filed with an appropriate court of appeals in accordance with this section.”

Then there is this whole section below it titled:”(b) Requirements for review of orders of removal” [gosh that would be a silly section to have if no review was ever allowed, huh? /s]

And then, there that whole section on what the reviewing courts should do if the defendant says they actually are a citizen. Why would that section be there, if as PP says none of it is reviewable by any court? Odd. Especially odd to have it written into the law if infallible ICE never took a citizen into custody illegally. /s

Shall we continue to subection (e), or do you just want to concede that your quote is cherry picked to be grossly misleading and is not the whole statement of the law?

Only appeals courts have jurisdiction, not district courts.

You need to read the entire statute. You are embarrassing yourself and are doubling down on your stupid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump promised to deport 100 million people.

There are only 52 million foreign-born people in the US.

Only 14 million of them lack documentation.

Who do you all suppose make up the difference in terms of who will be deported?

How do we know how many actually lack documentation ? Isn’t it unknowable if they entered illegally and just stayed ? Its one of the most disturbing things about open borders.

Yes if you do not have proof of citizenship and party affiliation when you are arrested you are illegal. This is why ICE and republicans are able to deport Americans citizens. There are no constitutional rights. Those days are over.

Well that’s only if detained. What about all those illegals in country not detained, it’s an unknowable number given it was open border for years.

Keep the illegals, get rid of ICE agents hired after 1/20/25. That would be a huge net good for the country. Hard working people trying to make a better future versus the otherwise unemployable sociopathic slave catchers and murderers.

This is right up trumps alley. Create a problem and then solve it by reversing his own decision.

Wrong

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump promised to deport 100 million people.

There are only 52 million foreign-born people in the US.

Only 14 million of them lack documentation.

Who do you all suppose make up the difference in terms of who will be deported?

How do we know how many actually lack documentation ? Isn’t it unknowable if they entered illegally and just stayed ? Its one of the most disturbing things about open borders.

Yes if you do not have proof of citizenship and party affiliation when you are arrested you are illegal. This is why ICE and republicans are able to deport Americans citizens. There are no constitutional rights. Those days are over.

Well that’s only if detained. What about all those illegals in country not detained, it’s an unknowable number given it was open border for years.

Keep the illegals, get rid of ICE agents hired after 1/20/25. That would be a huge net good for the country. Hard working people trying to make a better future versus the otherwise unemployable sociopathic slave catchers and murderers.

This is right up trumps alley. Create a problem and then solve it by reversing his own decision.

Wrong

The illegals are a net good for America, we should give them a path to cotizenship. ICE is bad. A lot of the agents are going to jail, anyway, and then we have to pay for their care and feeding. At least undocumented people work for a living.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump promised to deport 100 million people.

There are only 52 million foreign-born people in the US.

Only 14 million of them lack documentation.

Who do you all suppose make up the difference in terms of who will be deported?

Citizens that are brown.

Then Jews
Then Catholics
Then........

Jews and Catholics should be deported if here illegally.

Why is this hard.

Every Normie Democrat I talk to has no issue with ICE deporting illegals.

Progressive weirdos are an online phenomenon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump promised to deport 100 million people.

There are only 52 million foreign-born people in the US.

Only 14 million of them lack documentation.

Who do you all suppose make up the difference in terms of who will be deported?

Citizens that are brown.

Then Jews
Then Catholics
Then........

Jews and Catholics should be deported if here illegally.

Why is this hard.

Every Normie Democrat I talk to has no issue with ICE deporting illegals.

Progressive weirdos are an online phenomenon.

Is that why public polling shows a majority of people oppose Trump’s immigration policies?

[Anonymous]

Ah I see lazy liberals like to pick on migrants. When they have to confront Americans, they act like its war or something.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ah I see lazy liberals like to pick on migrants. When they have to confront Americans, they act like it’s war or something.

I think your LLM broke. Nothing you said makes sense in the context of this thread, or even in isolation.