Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
It was the point of several of the PPs, if you had bothered to read any of them. Several people are saying it shouldn't exist because barely anyone speaks Hebrew. |
#obsessed#paternalism#lazy AF#deeplyunsatisfiedwithlifethusmustspewinnerbileatblueribbonschoolforkicks |
Yep, to the poster above, it’s a zero sum game. Let’s only care about the 10% bottom. No one else. The other kids will be alive and employable and that’s all that matters. It doesn’t matter that they learned nothing, wasted what potential they have. These kids don’t matter and rightly so. It’s amazing the hypocritical thinking and rationale of the poster above all the while arguing DCUM posters are ignoring poor kids. But it’s OK to ignore everyone else but the bottom 10%. Poster above is also living in the past. These studies she is quoting are old and dates from generations ago at a different time and place. Let’s use these relics to justify policies in DCPS today that is not working. Absolutely no tracking or higher challenging curriculum when you have specifics schools in other places like NYC who tracks/are tests in that comprises of majority low SES kids. Absolutely no suspensions and I’ll add no consequences whatsoever when right here in DC, KIPP does so much better than DCPS because they do enforce consequences and does not tolerate behavior issues. Lastly of course, absolutely no retention even when there are more recent studies showing benefits in the early elementary grades. The problem is not tracking, suspension, or retention as poster above argues. The crux of the problem is that DCPS is unable to support these kids with what they need. Instead they give excuses like the poster above not to implement programs or strategies to help all the other kids. It’s sad and because of above, the schools in DC are one of the most segregated schools in the country. How is that all working out for you, SJW? |
I’m the person you’re responding to. I think “it’s not up to me to come up with solutions” is a bit of a cop out. If you advocate for policy positions, then it’s only responsible to actually do the research and understand the impact of those positions. And, in policy analysis, you can’t say “there are problems, so these policies must be bad.” The question is, would outcomes be even worse with different policies. And if we’re honest, the only possible true answer is “we have no idea” because there hasn’t been rigorous program evaluation done of DCPS policy initiatives recently as far as I know (there was some evaluation of Rhee era stuff, but not so much since then). There was an extensive, long term evaluation of tracking in Chicago schools that demonstrated that it benefitted many of the kids that advocates would expect — smart low income kids. So that might be a good policy initiative, but only if you can convince parents. And to do that, advocates need to know and understand the history and be willing to work with other parents. As for suspension/expulsion, I think kids who have not been started on the school to prison pipeline because of a dumb mistake as a 10 year old would argue that current policies are good. But - by many reports, behavior in the schools is really bad, and something needs to change. Which is why I say it makes sense to focus on how to help/reduce harm from kids for whom regular school isn’t the right environment. This is something close to my heart, because I went to out of control violent schools, and 2 of the kids who terrorized me killed another kid and ended up going to grown up jail. The school would have been a totally different place if about 10 of the consistent offenders (constantly in and out of juvenile detention) were move somewhere more appropriate (our school was actually where they sent kids transitioning out of juvenile detention, which was insane). |
This claim is factaully incorrect. |
This is where DCPS falls down and where I hope we're almost past the vocal minority who argues that anyone who cares about the upper 90% (let along the top 10%) must be a racist. |
I am happy to hear that a well run school exists! |
|
Question: how much do people think Sela is tied to the terrrrrible politics of Israel these days? Does the Hebrew-is-one-country's-language-only thing mean it is inextricably linked to Israel's internal fights over whether it is a democracy with the rule of law, the interminable insurgency and settler radicalism, and the general/growing international perception that it is operating an apartheid state (in all but name)?
I for one spent most of my life thinking Israel was like the U.S., founded on great principles mixed with some problems but headed the right direction, but the past thirty years seem to have been an uneven slide toward emphasizing everything bad about it. (The U.S. has been a bit like this too, but nowhere near the scope of Israel's drama.) |
Wanted to say I loved your brilliant letter to Mundo Verde telling them to take down those awful Dominican Republic, Salvadoran, and Mexican flags because of your strong opinions on their internal politics - but your ten page blank verse soliloquy to Yu Ying about the evils of Communism was even better. Writing to Stokes with perfect usage of le subjunctif to protest police violence in les banlieues? Chapeau! Like you, I believe strongly in collective punishment, especially when kiddos are involved. Well-run school? Classical language? Obvi just a front for those rootless cosmopolitans/globalists, wink wink. |
Perfection. |
Dumb. Sela was also set up to focus on the "culture and people of contemporary Israel" (see below). Most of the Hebrew materials are, of course, are from Israel or involve Israel. You can't have a Hebrew immersion school that does not get into Israeli culture and political issues. For some (for example, Palestinians) that may be a non-starter. "In addition, as students learn the Hebrew language they will also be exposed to the culture and people of contemporary Israel. And this culture is uniquely equipped to provide students with a model of creativity and innovation that can inspire them, and equip them, with practical values and skills for life. Israel is unusual and notable in its culture, which is very young and yet provides extraordinarily fertile ground for creativity." |
Interesting. This is from the Sela charter application: "In addition to the materials mentioned above, and because HLPCS [Sela] is committed to the Hebrew language as a core curricular element, we will align our Social Studies curriculum to this language by looking at modern Israel as a model for both democracy and diversity." Does Yu Ying describe modern China as a "model for both democracy and diversity"? |
Then they don't have to attend. It's a charter school; nobody is forced to go there. |
| I trust you also have concerns regarding Yu Ying? |
Focus on real issues. The French put mayo on French fries! Why does Stokes French program still exist??? |