
You are my new favorite person. Well done. |
Different goals for different people. Some families are not shooting for fluency, only proficiency and that’s OK. Really who would not want to get out of poorly performing schools with behavior issues into schools and have their kid learn another language, no matter what the language is. It is not only another challenge but studies have also shown to help cognitive function and executive functioning skills. We are shooting for fluency and will support because we can and have the financial means. But if other families are not, that’s OK and their decision. If your premise is that you have to be fluent to learn another language for it to be worthwhile, then 80% or more of kids in the US would not be fluent and should not learn another language. BTW I also would say that the most vocal proponents who push fluency as the only way to go are those who are not happy or insecure at the school they attend to put down other schools. |
Pure whataboutism. The main point is that 80% of the kids at Sela are below grade level in math and English, the Hebrew instruction is not great either, and they are learning a niche language with virtually no practical value to them. The fact is that most of the kids who end up there were shut out of Chinese/Spanish/French charters or other charters and have lousy in-bounds options. |
This was already disproved earlier in the thread. And if you aren’t familiar with Hebrew and don’t have a kid there, how do you know the quality of the Hebrew instruction? Your point that many families would rather be at one of the other language charters probably is not wrong, but I’m really not sure why it matters. The kids seem to be doing well, families seem to like it, and language immersion at a young age does have proven benefits even if it’s not a popular language. I don’t understand your beef against Sela. You don’t have to send your kids there. |
It was such a sad day when dumb people decided that using the term whataboutism was any kind of argument. |
Cite? |
Crazy is as crazy does. Your stats are wrong. And also you apparently have no idea is what the population of the school is. Try harder, low-information voter. |
Wishful thinking. You can lie. The numbers don't. A staggering 80% of Sela is below-grade in BOTH English and math. Latest PARCC proficiency scores Sela ELA 21.15 Math 21.15 Yu Ying ELA 48.37 Math 61.96 LAMB ELA 43.38 Math 46.32 DCB ELA 45.36 Math 39.34 |
Ok, now compare to schools with similar student bodies... They're doing better |
Cite |
Hi - Just found this forum and this page. Why did the PCSB approve a Hebrew Immersion and not maybe ask them to expand to offer Amharic and Arabic which are more widely spoke in the city. As I look through the thread it looks like people got into the politics and religion piece, neither has a place in our city funded schools! |
You think the PBSB could have turned down and otherwise strong charter application on the grounds that Hebrew is an inappropriate language and they should do Arabic instead? Ok. |
Perhaps families with an interest in Amharic or Arabic language immersion should take the initiative to create a charter school like the families with an interest in Hebrew language immersion did. If you're interested in who the school serves and how, I recommended reading the school's FAQ: https://selapcs.org/about/faq/ and this profile in the Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/how-a-hebrew-language-charter-school-found-its-way-to-dc/2018/12/07/b4ca0f3a-f421-11e8-80d0-f7e1948d55f4_story.html |
I thought there was a school that applied for Arabic immersion charter school? Why not make a school that offers several options including Amharic and others. I think the lack of options and leadership at the board to look for school options that can really help serve the most underserved students in the city. It is true population of students in the city that really need the support of an immersion school would benefit more from French, Amharic, Igbo, Arabic. Have those underserved parents been given support to start a school, a lot of this is based on proximity to power and access. Many of those parents may not know how, doesn’t mean they would not want these options for their children, or that they have not tried. |
Zombie thread but as well inject some critical thinking.
% students at grade level is not the measure of teaching quality. It is a measure of peer groups academic level. To measure teaching quality, it's better to look at years of growth per year of school. also, % students at grade level is extra useless when the number is low. A better measure is average performance level (performing 0,1,2,3 grades below nominal grade level) |