Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At the time this all took place, December to February 2016-2017, Republicans in Congress were glad Flynn went down because they thought he had shady foreign ties and a pro-Russian policy agenda they didn’t agree with.

Look how much has changed in the few years, that GOP Senators spent July 4th in Moscow, that Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan and other GOP house members with legal or other skeletons, have all magically turned to Trumpism, have turned to Russia isn't an enemy and have helped crater our economy and global standing.

I wonder why?

We have discovered that the heads of the IC, under Obama, were not trustworthy. We have had our eyes opened to the presence of rogue agents who targeted political opponents.

No, you have been manipulated by the same people who conspired with the Russians.

If you don't believe that, then demand the FULL, and unedited recordings and transcripts of Flynn's calls with Kislyak. anything short of full disclosure is a cover up.

Sure. Let's have them.
And, while we are at it, let's declassify and release Obama's and his administration's conversations with Iran during the Iran deal. And, the conversations that occurred during the Benghazi attack. Especially between Clinton and Susan Rice.
Democrats want all transcripts during the Trump admin. released. Fine - let's do the same for the previous administration.

Because that makes sense.

SMH

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At the time this all took place, December to February 2016-2017, Republicans in Congress were glad Flynn went down because they thought he had shady foreign ties and a pro-Russian policy agenda they didn’t agree with.

Look how much has changed in the few years, that GOP Senators spent July 4th in Moscow, that Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan and other GOP house members with legal or other skeletons, have all magically turned to Trumpism, have turned to Russia isn't an enemy and have helped crater our economy and global standing.

I wonder why?

We have discovered that the heads of the IC, under Obama, were not trustworthy. We have had our eyes opened to the presence of rogue agents who targeted political opponents.

No, you have been manipulated by the same people who conspired with the Russians.

If you don't believe that, then demand the FULL, and unedited recordings and transcripts of Flynn's calls with Kislyak. anything short of full disclosure is a cover up.

Sure. Let's have them.
And, while we are at it, let's declassify and release Obama's and his administration's conversations with Iran during the Iran deal. And, the conversations that occurred during the Benghazi attack. Especially between Clinton and Susan Rice.
Democrats want all transcripts during the Trump admin. released. Fine - let's do the same for the previous administration.

Since Obama didn't benefit personally from the Iran deal, I don't think this would be an issue, so sure, go ahead and declassify it. Let's have full transparency and see who the real traitors are!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At the time this all took place, December to February 2016-2017, Republicans in Congress were glad Flynn went down because they thought he had shady foreign ties and a pro-Russian policy agenda they didn’t agree with.

Look how much has changed in the few years, that GOP Senators spent July 4th in Moscow, that Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan and other GOP house members with legal or other skeletons, have all magically turned to Trumpism, have turned to Russia isn't an enemy and have helped crater our economy and global standing.

I wonder why?

We have discovered that the heads of the IC, under Obama, were not trustworthy. We have had our eyes opened to the presence of rogue agents who targeted political opponents.

No, you have been manipulated by the same people who conspired with the Russians.

If you don't believe that, then demand the FULL, and unedited recordings and transcripts of Flynn's calls with Kislyak. anything short of full disclosure is a cover up.

Sure. Let's have them.
And, while we are at it, let's declassify and release Obama's and his administration's conversations with Iran during the Iran deal. And, the conversations that occurred during the Benghazi attack. Especially between Clinton and Susan Rice.
Democrats want all transcripts during the Trump admin. released. Fine - let's do the same for the previous administration.

Since Obama didn't benefit personally from the Iran deal, I don't think this would be an issue, so sure, go ahead and declassify it. Let's have full transparency and see who the real traitors are!

And while we are at it...let's declassify any and all communications related to "I'll have more flexibility after the election".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At the time this all took place, December to February 2016-2017, Republicans in Congress were glad Flynn went down because they thought he had shady foreign ties and a pro-Russian policy agenda they didn’t agree with.

Look how much has changed in the few years, that GOP Senators spent July 4th in Moscow, that Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan and other GOP house members with legal or other skeletons, have all magically turned to Trumpism, have turned to Russia isn't an enemy and have helped crater our economy and global standing.

I wonder why?

We have discovered that the heads of the IC, under Obama, were not trustworthy. We have had our eyes opened to the presence of rogue agents who targeted political opponents.

No, you have been manipulated by the same people who conspired with the Russians.

If you don't believe that, then demand the FULL, and unedited recordings and transcripts of Flynn's calls with Kislyak. anything short of full disclosure is a cover up.

Sure. Let's have them.
And, while we are at it, let's declassify and release Obama's and his administration's conversations with Iran during the Iran deal. And, the conversations that occurred during the Benghazi attack. Especially between Clinton and Susan Rice.
Democrats want all transcripts during the Trump admin. released. Fine - let's do the same for the previous administration.

Since Obama didn't benefit personally from the Iran deal, I don't think this would be an issue, so sure, go ahead and declassify it. Let's have full transparency and see who the real traitors are!

And while we are at it...let's declassify any and all communications related to "I'll have more flexibility after the election".

I am all for it. Terrific!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At the time this all took place, December to February 2016-2017, Republicans in Congress were glad Flynn went down because they thought he had shady foreign ties and a pro-Russian policy agenda they didn’t agree with.

Look how much has changed in the few years, that GOP Senators spent July 4th in Moscow, that Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan and other GOP house members with legal or other skeletons, have all magically turned to Trumpism, have turned to Russia isn't an enemy and have helped crater our economy and global standing.

I wonder why?

We have discovered that the heads of the IC, under Obama, were not trustworthy. We have had our eyes opened to the presence of rogue agents who targeted political opponents.

No, you have been manipulated by the same people who conspired with the Russians.

If you don't believe that, then demand the FULL, and unedited recordings and transcripts of Flynn's calls with Kislyak. anything short of full disclosure is a cover up.

LOL. We have seen the texts between Strzok and Page. We have seen the IG's FISA report.
Those that conspired with Russia seem to be the DNC and the Clinton campaign. And, those groups will never manipulate me.

Yes, they will never determine your secret location in your mom’s basement!

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Aha! That proves that Flynn's lying to the FBI was immaterial and likewise his failure to file as a foreign agent or disclose payments from Russia!

Somehow.

Let's charge Obama today! With the crime of [not sure what goes here]!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Aha! That proves that Flynn's lying to the FBI was immaterial and likewise his failure to file as a foreign agent or disclose payments from Russia!

Somehow.

Let's charge Obama today! With the crime of [not sure what goes here]!

And the Turks (for kidnapping a US resident) and the Saudis (for selling US nuclear secrets) and the Israelis (for trying to change votes on a UN Security Council vote)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aha! That proves that Flynn's lying to the FBI was immaterial and likewise his failure to file as a foreign agent or disclose payments from Russia!

Somehow.

Let's charge Obama today! With the crime of [not sure what goes here]!

And the Turks (for kidnapping a US resident) and the Saudis (for selling US nuclear secrets) and the Israelis (for trying to change votes on a UN Security Council vote)

"Did not find derogatory information"

[Anonymous]

In testimony, Yates said she also thought that Brennan was in the room.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In testimony, Yates said she also thought that Brennan was in the room.

Interestingly, she never stated that Susan Rice was in the room.

So, either she omitted her name from her testimony OR Susan Rice wasn't actually there. Yet, she drafted an email saying she was.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In testimony, Yates said she also thought that Brennan was in the room.

Interestingly, she never stated that Susan Rice was in the room.

So, either she omitted her name from her testimony OR Susan Rice wasn't actually there. Yet, she drafted an email saying she was.

Go look at her memo. One would assume she was in the room, but the wording leaves room for speculation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In testimony, Yates said she also thought that Brennan was in the room.

Interestingly, she never stated that Susan Rice was in the room.

So, either she omitted her name from her testimony OR Susan Rice wasn't actually there. Yet, she drafted an email saying she was.

Go look at her memo. One would assume she was in the room, but the wording leaves room for speculation.

No, it really doesn't.

“On January 5, following a briefing by IC leadership on Russian hacking during the 2016 Presidential election, President Obama had a brief follow-on conversation with FBI Director Jim Comey and Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates in the Oval Office. Vice President Biden and I were also present,” Rice wrote in a portion of the email that was declassified.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In testimony, Yates said she also thought that Brennan was in the room.

Interestingly, she never stated that Susan Rice was in the room.

So, either she omitted her name from her testimony OR Susan Rice wasn't actually there. Yet, she drafted an email saying she was.

Go look at her memo. One would assume she was in the room, but the wording leaves room for speculation.

Her testimony indicates she wasn't there. Yates does not say she was there, but thought that Brennan was........

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In testimony, Yates said she also thought that Brennan was in the room.

Interestingly, she never stated that Susan Rice was in the room.

So, either she omitted her name from her testimony OR Susan Rice wasn't actually there. Yet, she drafted an email saying she was.

Go look at her memo. One would assume she was in the room, but the wording leaves room for speculation.

Her testimony indicates she wasn't there. Yates does not say she was there, but thought that Brennan was........

Looks like both Yates and Rice need to testify again to clarify.
Yates doesn't indicate she was there. Rice's memo to self says she was. Who to believe?