Boundary Review Meetings

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok let’s call it 100 townhouses in that area added to WSHS

150 single family homes lost to Cherry Run/LBSS

200ish lost to Sangster/LBSS

Net loss is ~250 households.

Please stop with the nonsense.

What WSHS houses are getting moved to Cherry Run?

Do you mean White Oaks?

I guess. Whatever that large section by Huntsman and Old Keene Mill is b

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How are they justifying adding another neighborhood to WSHS and moving a small single family neighborhood to Sangster ? I thought the whole point was to eliminate overcrowding.

Numbers changed and it’s no longer projected to be overcrowded

Like magically changed? Changed how?

The most recent numbers posted. They were on here somewhere. Reid also came out and said county wide numbers are down (and blamed ICE)

Wshs was not affected by ICE.

Do you need your hand held and get led to the numbers showing Keene Mill HVES, etc all projecting less?

Hunt Valley is not losing people to ice.

That loss in enrollment was well known before trump was even elected.

[Anonymous]

If anyone is watching the phase 2 meeting at Robinson, they had three split feeders...surprise, surprise they kept all three as split feeders in the pyramid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They already have a plan. This is all for show.

Meaning what? Another (final) version in January?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How are they justifying adding another neighborhood to WSHS and moving a small single family neighborhood to Sangster ? I thought the whole point was to eliminate overcrowding.

Numbers changed and it’s no longer projected to be overcrowded

Like magically changed? Changed how?

The most recent numbers posted. They were on here somewhere. Reid also came out and said county wide numbers are down (and blamed ICE)

Wshs was not affected by ICE.

Do you need your hand held and get led to the numbers showing Keene Mill HVES, etc all projecting less?

Those are from covid losses and feds moving due to the riff.

It has nothing whatsoever to do with ICE.

WSHS has one of the lowest esol populations in the entire county.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How are they justifying adding another neighborhood to WSHS and moving a small single family neighborhood to Sangster ? I thought the whole point was to eliminate overcrowding.

Numbers changed and it’s no longer projected to be overcrowded

Like magically changed? Changed how?

The most recent numbers posted. They were on here somewhere. Reid also came out and said county wide numbers are down (and blamed ICE)

Wshs was not affected by ICE.

Do you need your hand held and get led to the numbers showing Keene Mill HVES, etc all projecting less?

Those are from covid losses and feds moving due to the riff.

It has nothing whatsoever to do with ICE.

WSHS has one of the lowest esol populations in the entire county.

And by covid losses, specifically the covid baby bust.

It has nothing to do with ice. What a foolish thing to suggest

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok let’s call it 100 townhouses in that area added to WSHS

150 single family homes lost to Cherry Run/LBSS

200ish lost to Sangster/LBSS

Net loss is ~250 households.

Please stop with the nonsense.

WSHS loses only 99 kids from Sangster.

PP was arguing the impact to WSHS of those based on number of homes, especially those townhomes. WSHS gains 100 townhomes and loses 350 single family homes in this scenario.

https://schoolprofiles.fcps.edu/schlprfl/f?p=108:8


Go ahead and look up the latest September enrollment numbers also.

The Sangster WSHS neighborhood also has townhomes in it, right across the street from sangster

[Anonymous]

Apologies, WSHS loses even more homes. Those are townhomes over there, no SFH. Not going to count but will if this nonsense continues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If anyone is watching the phase 2 meeting at Robinson, they had three split feeders...surprise, surprise they kept all three as split feeders in the pyramid.

Ooh.

Dish more please

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does this plan reflect kids zoned for KAA, or will that be a reshuffle later?

KAA will re-shuffle again, they’re currently developing draft impacts and sounded like those would come out next month.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ok let’s call it 100 townhouses in that area added to WSHS

150 single family homes lost to Cherry Run/LBSS

200ish lost to Sangster/LBSS

Net loss is ~250 households.

Please stop with the nonsense.

There are 200 townhomes in those neighborhoods. So it's basically a swap.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:South lakes is IB. What if the students does not want Ib and wants to transfer to Ap school. Which would be the choice?

Closest OPEN AP school. You have to provide your own transportation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How are they justifying adding another neighborhood to WSHS and moving a small single family neighborhood to Sangster ? I thought the whole point was to eliminate overcrowding.

Numbers changed and it’s no longer projected to be overcrowded

Like magically changed? Changed how?

The most recent numbers posted. They were on here somewhere. Reid also came out and said county wide numbers are down (and blamed ICE)

Wshs was not affected by ICE.

Do you need your hand held and get led to the numbers showing Keene Mill HVES, etc all projecting less?

Those are from covid losses and feds moving due to the riff.

It has nothing whatsoever to do with ICE.

WSHS has one of the lowest esol populations in the entire county.

And by covid losses, specifically the covid baby bust.

It has nothing to do with ice. What a foolish thing to suggest

Yeah most of the schools are losing enrollment across the board. Reid was talking out of her ass about the ICE stuff. WSHS won’t see a big drop as quickly as some of the other schools due to a large class of current 7th graders at Irving. But the demographics still don’t favor huge additional growth across the county. Some areas will see shrinkage in school age populations, some will see stagnation, a few will see growth especially if they have room for more development.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok let’s call it 100 townhouses in that area added to WSHS

150 single family homes lost to Cherry Run/LBSS

200ish lost to Sangster/LBSS

Net loss is ~250 households.

Please stop with the nonsense.

There are 200 townhomes in those neighborhoods. So it's basically a swap.

It all circles back to the fack that FCPS should have done a residency check of WSHS as the first step in the rezoning process

[Anonymous]

In scenario 4, does the layer for the White Oak/Cherry Run boundaries change depending on your zoom for anyone else?