Official Trump VP thread

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I’m hoping that JD Vance is actually a Dem plant who will turn on the Republicans. A tiger doesn’t change his stripes overnight, and he was a major critic of Trump.

Yeah but he’s not a Dem. Even when he was anti-Trump he hated Hillary and Biden and said he was voting third party.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m hoping that JD Vance is actually a Dem plant who will turn on the Republicans. A tiger doesn’t change his stripes overnight, and he was a major critic of Trump.

Yeah but he’s not a Dem. Even when he was anti-Trump he hated Hillary and Biden and said he was voting third party.

+1 I think he said he was voting for Evan McMullin. But he’s an opportunist and knows now where the GOP bread is buttered.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I love that his wife is getting a taste of what he and his cronies put other Americans through. I saw on twitter today MAGA is melting down that he's married to a brown woman and someone sarcastically tweeted "Wow, I'm sure JD will be great for immigration!" Another person said "Legal vs. illegal immigration. Look at Melania."

She's not like Melania! She's not an immigrant! She's a citizen by birthright, which her dh wants to do away with!

Get a taste of it. See what kind of discourse your dh stokes. But whatever. So glad he likes dogs and the movie Babe.


JD's OWN WORDS called his wife an "immigrant." This is a Yale educated attorney who knows what words mean. What is your source that she was born in the United States? If she was born in the U.S. why is he calling her an immigrant?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Perfectly distills what an inorganic empty suit creep VP Palantir is:

Just watched “Hillbilly Elegy” a movie about some nobody who is now likely going to be vice president. They used an A-list director and cast for what amounted to a boring and campy Lifetime movie. It’s hard to imagine this film was made for commercial purposes.

The budget is estimated at $45 million. $45 million to make a boring movie about some guy nobody’s heard of… …who then less than a year after the release of the film announced he’s running for senate and now, just 3 years after that, is Trump’s VP.

It’s also worth mentioning that the movie is based on JD Vance’s book by the same name. A book that nobody cared about and only had mediocre sales. That is, until the New York Times out of left field wrote an extensive review of the book launching it into best seller territory.

But that’s not all, the New York Times featured multiple articles and interviews with J.D. Vance to discuss his book and his story. They’ve even invited him to contribute to articles as a writer. Yes, that New York Times.

I guess good things happen when you’ve got friends like Peter Thiel, Rebekah Mercer, American Enterprise Institute, The Manhattan Institute, The Hoover Institution, etc.




Why did this dork's boring ass memoir get a $45m movie deal?


Because it had good book sales after a whole lot of people who didn't like the book recommended it as great for other people.


Book sales are easily faked. Why did the movie flop if he's so organically popular and compelling? The film made no money at all.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I love that his wife is getting a taste of what he and his cronies put other Americans through. I saw on twitter today MAGA is melting down that he's married to a brown woman and someone sarcastically tweeted "Wow, I'm sure JD will be great for immigration!" Another person said "Legal vs. illegal immigration. Look at Melania."

She's not like Melania! She's not an immigrant! She's a citizen by birthright, which her dh wants to do away with!

Get a taste of it. See what kind of discourse your dh stokes. But whatever. So glad he likes dogs and the movie Babe.


JD's OWN WORDS called his wife an "immigrant." This is a Yale educated attorney who knows what words mean. What is your source that she was born in the United States? If she was born in the U.S. why is he calling her an immigrant?


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Perfectly distills what an inorganic empty suit creep VP Palantir is:

Just watched “Hillbilly Elegy” a movie about some nobody who is now likely going to be vice president. They used an A-list director and cast for what amounted to a boring and campy Lifetime movie. It’s hard to imagine this film was made for commercial purposes.

The budget is estimated at $45 million. $45 million to make a boring movie about some guy nobody’s heard of… …who then less than a year after the release of the film announced he’s running for senate and now, just 3 years after that, is Trump’s VP.

It’s also worth mentioning that the movie is based on JD Vance’s book by the same name. A book that nobody cared about and only had mediocre sales. That is, until the New York Times out of left field wrote an extensive review of the book launching it into best seller territory.

But that’s not all, the New York Times featured multiple articles and interviews with J.D. Vance to discuss his book and his story. They’ve even invited him to contribute to articles as a writer. Yes, that New York Times.

I guess good things happen when you’ve got friends like Peter Thiel, Rebekah Mercer, American Enterprise Institute, The Manhattan Institute, The Hoover Institution, etc.




Why did this dork's boring ass memoir get a $45m movie deal?


Because it had good book sales after a whole lot of people who didn't like the book recommended it as great for other people.


Book sales are easily faked. Why did the movie flop if he's so organically popular and compelling? The film made no money at all.


Oh please. It was a bestseller. Sometimes movies do well, sometimes they don't. It doesn't usually have anything to do with the book, one way or the other.
Anonymous
“President Trump represents America’s last best hope to restore what — if lost — may never be found again,” Vance said, saying he and Trump were fighting for people like “the autoworker in Michigan, wondering why out-of-touch politicians are destroying their jobs” and “the factory worker in Wisconsin who makes things with their hands and is proud of American craftsmanship.”

How could democrats the party of labor lose the message so badly??????

Maybe because actions speak louder than words. And expanding overwhelming immigration that screws US workers is poor policy

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I love that his wife is getting a taste of what he and his cronies put other Americans through. I saw on twitter today MAGA is melting down that he's married to a brown woman and someone sarcastically tweeted "Wow, I'm sure JD will be great for immigration!" Another person said "Legal vs. illegal immigration. Look at Melania."

She's not like Melania! She's not an immigrant! She's a citizen by birthright, which her dh wants to do away with!

Get a taste of it. See what kind of discourse your dh stokes. But whatever. So glad he likes dogs and the movie Babe.


JD's OWN WORDS called his wife an "immigrant." This is a Yale educated attorney who knows what words mean. What is your source that she was born in the United States? If she was born in the U.S. why is he calling her an immigrant?




What is so unsettling about MAGAs is that instead of using an objective , credible source to fact check what their candidates tell them, they find quotes from the candidate. “Well, he says it, so it must be true.”

Seriously, the woman was born in San Diego, and I refuse to be your secretary because you are too lazy intellectually to even validate what you are posting online.

(He probably thinks of her as being an immigrant because she is not white. That is a racist response. See “forever foreign”)
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:

He is slimy little man, isn’t he?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Perfectly distills what an inorganic empty suit creep VP Palantir is:

Just watched “Hillbilly Elegy” a movie about some nobody who is now likely going to be vice president. They used an A-list director and cast for what amounted to a boring and campy Lifetime movie. It’s hard to imagine this film was made for commercial purposes.

The budget is estimated at $45 million. $45 million to make a boring movie about some guy nobody’s heard of… …who then less than a year after the release of the film announced he’s running for senate and now, just 3 years after that, is Trump’s VP.

It’s also worth mentioning that the movie is based on JD Vance’s book by the same name. A book that nobody cared about and only had mediocre sales. That is, until the New York Times out of left field wrote an extensive review of the book launching it into best seller territory.

But that’s not all, the New York Times featured multiple articles and interviews with J.D. Vance to discuss his book and his story. They’ve even invited him to contribute to articles as a writer. Yes, that New York Times.

I guess good things happen when you’ve got friends like Peter Thiel, Rebekah Mercer, American Enterprise Institute, The Manhattan Institute, The Hoover Institution, etc.




Why did this dork's boring ass memoir get a $45m movie deal?


Because it had good book sales after a whole lot of people who didn't like the book recommended it as great for other people.


Book sales are easily faked. Why did the movie flop if he's so organically popular and compelling? The film made no money at all.


Oh please. It was a bestseller. Sometimes movies do well, sometimes they don't. It doesn't usually have anything to do with the book, one way or the other.

By the time the movie came out the criticisms of the book had caught up with it and the luster was off.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:“President Trump represents America’s last best hope to restore what — if lost — may never be found again,” Vance said, saying he and Trump were fighting for people like “the autoworker in Michigan, wondering why out-of-touch politicians are destroying their jobs” and “the factory worker in Wisconsin who makes things with their hands and is proud of American craftsmanship.”

How could democrats the party of labor lose the message so badly??????

Maybe because actions speak louder than words. And expanding overwhelming immigration that screws US workers is poor policy


The GOP stands to destroy OSHA, wants and has gotten child labor back, will strip people of the ability to earn overtime pay, hates unions and generally sides with scabs and middle management.

And Republican voters are too stupid to realize that the GOP runs on immigration, which is why they had to kill the bill. You’re being used.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I love that his wife is getting a taste of what he and his cronies put other Americans through. I saw on twitter today MAGA is melting down that he's married to a brown woman and someone sarcastically tweeted "Wow, I'm sure JD will be great for immigration!" Another person said "Legal vs. illegal immigration. Look at Melania."

She's not like Melania! She's not an immigrant! She's a citizen by birthright, which her dh wants to do away with!

Get a taste of it. See what kind of discourse your dh stokes. But whatever. So glad he likes dogs and the movie Babe.


JD's OWN WORDS called his wife an "immigrant." This is a Yale educated attorney who knows what words mean. What is your source that she was born in the United States? If she was born in the U.S. why is he calling her an immigrant?




What is so unsettling about MAGAs is that instead of using an objective , credible source to fact check what their candidates tell them, they find quotes from the candidate. “Well, he says it, so it must be true.”

Seriously, the woman was born in San Diego, and I refuse to be your secretary because you are too lazy intellectually to even validate what you are posting online.

(He probably thinks of her as being an immigrant because she is not white. That is a racist response. See “forever foreign”)

I mean, maybe? Usually Republicans refuse to fact check but generally speaking about one’s own spouse, you would think they would be accurate. I’m not disputing that the woman is American, and can only assume that Vance is racist and doing the “forever foreign” thing.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I thought his wife is a natural born American (born in California)? Why does he calling her a South Asian immigrant?

"I'm married to a South Asian immigrant. One of the great gifts of India to the world is ghee."



You can't be serious. Will you back off and leave this woman alone? She is an American who is the daughter of Indian immigrants. No doubt that's how she refers to herself too.


NP here - mmm, sorry, no. If you are born in the US you don’t refer to yourself as an immigrant. You would refer to your self as an Indian American/asian American, etc. my parents immigrated and I have never called myself an immigrant - bc I am not. I’m a child of immigrants. For him to say otherwise is reading “but, but, I have black friends”


my parents are Pakistani immigrants. I was born here but I call myself an immigrant all the time- especially after the trump presidency. my parents raised us in the Reagan era and thought of themselves as Americans and taught us the same but history matters. I teach my third gen kids that they are immigrants/3rd culture kids b/c I married another non-white American . post 1970s 100 % nonwhites will never be Americans in the way that white immigrants became. we will have to breed the color out - usha's grandkids will be fully American.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:“President Trump represents America’s last best hope to restore what — if lost — may never be found again,” Vance said, saying he and Trump were fighting for people like “the autoworker in Michigan, wondering why out-of-touch politicians are destroying their jobs” and “the factory worker in Wisconsin who makes things with their hands and is proud of American craftsmanship.”

How could democrats the party of labor lose the message so badly??????

Maybe because actions speak louder than words. And expanding overwhelming immigration that screws US workers is poor policy


The GOP stands to destroy OSHA, wants and has gotten child labor back, will strip people of the ability to earn overtime pay, hates unions and generally sides with scabs and middle management.

And Republican voters are too stupid to realize that the GOP runs on immigration, which is why they had to kill the bill. You’re being used.



But trump is a star so they let him do it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Perfectly distills what an inorganic empty suit creep VP Palantir is:

Just watched “Hillbilly Elegy” a movie about some nobody who is now likely going to be vice president. They used an A-list director and cast for what amounted to a boring and campy Lifetime movie. It’s hard to imagine this film was made for commercial purposes.

The budget is estimated at $45 million. $45 million to make a boring movie about some guy nobody’s heard of… …who then less than a year after the release of the film announced he’s running for senate and now, just 3 years after that, is Trump’s VP.

It’s also worth mentioning that the movie is based on JD Vance’s book by the same name. A book that nobody cared about and only had mediocre sales. That is, until the New York Times out of left field wrote an extensive review of the book launching it into best seller territory.

But that’s not all, the New York Times featured multiple articles and interviews with J.D. Vance to discuss his book and his story. They’ve even invited him to contribute to articles as a writer. Yes, that New York Times.

I guess good things happen when you’ve got friends like Peter Thiel, Rebekah Mercer, American Enterprise Institute, The Manhattan Institute, The Hoover Institution, etc.




Why did this dork's boring ass memoir get a $45m movie deal?


Because it had good book sales after a whole lot of people who didn't like the book recommended it as great for other people.


Book sales are easily faked. Why did the movie flop if he's so organically popular and compelling? The film made no money at all.


Oh please. It was a bestseller. Sometimes movies do well, sometimes they don't. It doesn't usually have anything to do with the book, one way or the other.

By the time the movie came out the criticisms of the book had caught up with it and the luster was off.


Look at who funds AEI, where Vance was groomed. Sackler family via Purdue Pharma. What are the Sacklers famous for? What was the thesis of Vance’s fake memoir? Demonizing and blaming low stock flyover state white Americans for being wiped out by opioids; they’re all lazy racist drug addicts who deserve to lose their good paying blue collar jobs. Read it wasn’t the Sackler family or Wall Street’s fault for destroying middle America, it was those dumb lazy entitled white trash. Those white proles deserve to be replaced with harder working immigrants.

Inside Purdue Pharma’s Media Playbook: How It Planted the Opioid “Anti-Story”
https://www.propublica.org/article/inside-purdue-pharma-media-playbook-how-it-planted-the-opioid-anti-story



post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: