Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alright, looks like the B team has arrived. Are we going to go back and talk about how the music was playing in the room again? Albertsons vs Safeway?

TIRESOME

I hope his nomination gets withdrawn, but I also hope that his house was not actually vandalized. That is unacceptable and I hope the people who did it (if it happened) are brought to justice.

Why should it get withdrawn? None of the accusers have any evidence at all. How would like you like it if someone came out of the blue from 40 yrs ago and made baseless claims against you or one of your male relative just due to political hate for them not being a Democrat. Its sick what the Democrats are doing.

Haven't you been paying attention? Perjury.

He said nothing that perjured himself, he was defending himself from well scripted lies from the left.

The goal is to get him to perjure himself - why do you think the left wants Trump interviewed by FBI so badly? Traps well-set. All you have to do is mis-remember a small detail and there's leverage. But Ford's story is determined to be held together by dust by a well-respected prosecutor, and that's just fine.

“Misremember a small detail”? Have you had you’re head in the sand? Try to catch up if you have any intellectual honesty.

I'm sure there are lots and lots and lots of really big big big things

You wouldn’t care one way or the other. Disgusting.

Not really

Not surprising. I would be surprised though if the deplorables woke up one day and decided to have morals. Not happening today. Or any day.

My morality doesn't involve accusing a man of sexual assault, gang rape, alcoholism and pedophilia without fact. I'm damn proud of that, thank you.

So you're saying that if your daughter or best friend came to you and told you they'd been assaulted by a man, but had no "fact" to back it up beyond their tears and their memory of it, you'd toss them out with a shrug? Wow.

That is just stupid. Someone you know very, very well telling you something is very different than taking the word of someone you don't know at all. Duke and UVA false accusations show why you can't blindly believe just anyone without corroborating evidence.

Why doesn't her family support her? Is everyone else supposed to believe and support her when her own family does not? Why were they not in the court room?

You are just lying. They have said they support her. Just because she isn't parading them in front of you for "credibility," or talking about them doesn't mean what you are lying about is true. LIARS, all of you Dumpy trolls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alright, looks like the B team has arrived. Are we going to go back and talk about how the music was playing in the room again? Albertsons vs Safeway?

TIRESOME

I hope his nomination gets withdrawn, but I also hope that his house was not actually vandalized. That is unacceptable and I hope the people who did it (if it happened) are brought to justice.

Why should it get withdrawn? None of the accusers have any evidence at all. How would like you like it if someone came out of the blue from 40 yrs ago and made baseless claims against you or one of your male relative just due to political hate for them not being a Democrat. Its sick what the Democrats are doing.

Haven't you been paying attention? Perjury.

He said nothing that perjured himself, he was defending himself from well scripted lies from the left.

The goal is to get him to perjure himself - why do you think the left wants Trump interviewed by FBI so badly? Traps well-set. All you have to do is mis-remember a small detail and there's leverage. But Ford's story is determined to be held together by dust by a well-respected prosecutor, and that's just fine.

“Misremember a small detail”? Have you had you’re head in the sand? Try to catch up if you have any intellectual honesty.

I'm sure there are lots and lots and lots of really big big big things

You wouldn’t care one way or the other. Disgusting.

Not really

Not surprising. I would be surprised though if the deplorables woke up one day and decided to have morals. Not happening today. Or any day.

My morality doesn't involve accusing a man of sexual assault, gang rape, alcoholism and pedophilia without fact. I'm damn proud of that, thank you.

So you're saying that if your daughter or best friend came to you and told you they'd been assaulted by a man, but had no "fact" to back it up beyond their tears and their memory of it, you'd toss them out with a shrug? Wow.

That is just stupid. Someone you know very, very well telling you something is very different than taking the word of someone you don't know at all. Duke and UVA false accusations show why you can't blindly believe just anyone without corroborating evidence.

Why doesn't her family support her? Is everyone else supposed to believe and support her when her own family does not? Why were they not in the court room?

Stop repeating this lie. Her family answered the phone and said they 100% believe and support their daughter. They don’t wish to be part of the circus. They still have to live near where all this happened and many involved still live.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s interesting to note, by comparison, Merrick Garland’s yearbook page! https://mobile.twitter.com/MarkZJia/status/1046550315120635904

Love it!
Thanks for sharing

+1

Love it. Ha.

[Anonymous]

PP, your description of “Resistance activities” is creepy and authoritarian. We have First Amendment speech and assembly rights, as much as that bothers you.

Are you as bothered by the seemingly irrefutable evidence that Brett lied and tried to create a false story about what he did to Debbie aorez? Does perjury bother you as much as peaceful, lawful, marching?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alright, looks like the B team has arrived. Are we going to go back and talk about how the music was playing in the room again? Albertsons vs Safeway?

TIRESOME

I hope his nomination gets withdrawn, but I also hope that his house was not actually vandalized. That is unacceptable and I hope the people who did it (if it happened) are brought to justice.

Why should it get withdrawn? None of the accusers have any evidence at all. How would like you like it if someone came out of the blue from 40 yrs ago and made baseless claims against you or one of your male relative just due to political hate for them not being a Democrat. Its sick what the Democrats are doing.

Haven't you been paying attention? Perjury.

He said nothing that perjured himself, he was defending himself from well scripted lies from the left.

The goal is to get him to perjure himself - why do you think the left wants Trump interviewed by FBI so badly? Traps well-set. All you have to do is mis-remember a small detail and there's leverage. But Ford's story is determined to be held together by dust by a well-respected prosecutor, and that's just fine.

“Misremember a small detail”? Have you had you’re head in the sand? Try to catch up if you have any intellectual honesty.

I'm sure there are lots and lots and lots of really big big big things

You wouldn’t care one way or the other. Disgusting.

Not really

Not surprising. I would be surprised though if the deplorables woke up one day and decided to have morals. Not happening today. Or any day.

My morality doesn't involve accusing a man of sexual assault, gang rape, alcoholism and pedophilia without fact. I'm damn proud of that, thank you.

So you're saying that if your daughter or best friend came to you and told you they'd been assaulted by a man, but had no "fact" to back it up beyond their tears and their memory of it, you'd toss them out with a shrug? Wow.

That is just stupid. Someone you know very, very well telling you something is very different than taking the word of someone you don't know at all. Duke and UVA false accusations show why you can't blindly believe just anyone without corroborating evidence.

Why doesn't her family support her? Is everyone else supposed to believe and support her when her own family does not? Why were they not in the court room?

You are just lying. They have said they support her. Just because she isn't parading them in front of you for "credibility," or talking about them doesn't mean what you are lying about is true. LIARS, all of you Dumpy trolls.

Christine Blasey Ford didn’t shove her husband and sons behind her to prove she has largely excellent relationships with boys and men and thus no incentive to lie.

Brett Kavanaugh....um.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alright, looks like the B team has arrived. Are we going to go back and talk about how the music was playing in the room again? Albertsons vs Safeway?

TIRESOME

I hope his nomination gets withdrawn, but I also hope that his house was not actually vandalized. That is unacceptable and I hope the people who did it (if it happened) are brought to justice.

Why should it get withdrawn? None of the accusers have any evidence at all. How would like you like it if someone came out of the blue from 40 yrs ago and made baseless claims against you or one of your male relative just due to political hate for them not being a Democrat. Its sick what the Democrats are doing.

Haven't you been paying attention? Perjury.

He said nothing that perjured himself, he was defending himself from well scripted lies from the left.

The goal is to get him to perjure himself - why do you think the left wants Trump interviewed by FBI so badly? Traps well-set. All you have to do is mis-remember a small detail and there's leverage. But Ford's story is determined to be held together by dust by a well-respected prosecutor, and that's just fine.

“Misremember a small detail”? Have you had you’re head in the sand? Try to catch up if you have any intellectual honesty.

I'm sure there are lots and lots and lots of really big big big things

You wouldn’t care one way or the other. Disgusting.

Not really

Not surprising. I would be surprised though if the deplorables woke up one day and decided to have morals. Not happening today. Or any day.

My morality doesn't involve accusing a man of sexual assault, gang rape, alcoholism and pedophilia without fact. I'm damn proud of that, thank you.

So you're saying that if your daughter or best friend came to you and told you they'd been assaulted by a man, but had no "fact" to back it up beyond their tears and their memory of it, you'd toss them out with a shrug? Wow.

That is just stupid. Someone you know very, very well telling you something is very different than taking the word of someone you don't know at all. Duke and UVA false accusations show why you can't blindly believe just anyone without corroborating evidence.

Why doesn't her family support her? Is everyone else supposed to believe and support her when her own family does not? Why were they not in the court room?

You are just lying. They have said they support her. Just because she isn't parading them in front of you for "credibility," or talking about them doesn't mean what you are lying about is true. LIARS, all of you Dumpy trolls.

+1

No wonder these lying liars love lying Brett and lying Donald.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alright, looks like the B team has arrived. Are we going to go back and talk about how the music was playing in the room again? Albertsons vs Safeway?

TIRESOME

I hope his nomination gets withdrawn, but I also hope that his house was not actually vandalized. That is unacceptable and I hope the people who did it (if it happened) are brought to justice.

Why should it get withdrawn? None of the accusers have any evidence at all. How would like you like it if someone came out of the blue from 40 yrs ago and made baseless claims against you or one of your male relative just due to political hate for them not being a Democrat. Its sick what the Democrats are doing.

Haven't you been paying attention? Perjury.

He said nothing that perjured himself, he was defending himself from well scripted lies from the left.

The goal is to get him to perjure himself - why do you think the left wants Trump interviewed by FBI so badly? Traps well-set. All you have to do is mis-remember a small detail and there's leverage. But Ford's story is determined to be held together by dust by a well-respected prosecutor, and that's just fine.

“Misremember a small detail”? Have you had you’re head in the sand? Try to catch up if you have any intellectual honesty.

I'm sure there are lots and lots and lots of really big big big things

You wouldn’t care one way or the other. Disgusting.

Not really

Not surprising. I would be surprised though if the deplorables woke up one day and decided to have morals. Not happening today. Or any day.

My morality doesn't involve accusing a man of sexual assault, gang rape, alcoholism and pedophilia without fact. I'm damn proud of that, thank you.

So you're saying that if your daughter or best friend came to you and told you they'd been assaulted by a man, but had no "fact" to back it up beyond their tears and their memory of it, you'd toss them out with a shrug? Wow.

That is just stupid. Someone you know very, very well telling you something is very different than taking the word of someone you don't know at all. Duke and UVA false accusations show why you can't blindly believe just anyone without corroborating evidence.

Why doesn't her family support her? Is everyone else supposed to believe and support her when her own family does not? Why were they not in the court room?

You are just lying. They have said they support her. Just because she isn't parading them in front of you for "credibility," or talking about them doesn't mean what you are lying about is true. LIARS, all of you Dumpy trolls.

Christine Blasey Ford didn’t shove her husband and sons behind her to prove she has largely excellent relationships with boys and men and thus no incentive to lie.

Brett Kavanaugh....um.

Yes, Brett has no problem using a whole team of girls for his own benefit. Instead of protecting his friends and family, he uses them. Fits with the character descriptions from his younger years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:PP, your description of “Resistance activities” is creepy and authoritarian. We have First Amendment speech and assembly rights, as much as that bothers you.

Are you as bothered by the seemingly irrefutable evidence that Brett lied and tried to create a false story about what he did to Debbie aorez? Does perjury bother you as much as peaceful, lawful, marching?

But, but, but...they wore VAGINA costumes. Obviously that's way worse than perjury.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alright, looks like the B team has arrived. Are we going to go back and talk about how the music was playing in the room again? Albertsons vs Safeway?

TIRESOME

I hope his nomination gets withdrawn, but I also hope that his house was not actually vandalized. That is unacceptable and I hope the people who did it (if it happened) are brought to justice.

Why should it get withdrawn? None of the accusers have any evidence at all. How would like you like it if someone came out of the blue from 40 yrs ago and made baseless claims against you or one of your male relative just due to political hate for them not being a Democrat. Its sick what the Democrats are doing.

Haven't you been paying attention? Perjury.

He said nothing that perjured himself, he was defending himself from well scripted lies from the left.

The goal is to get him to perjure himself - why do you think the left wants Trump interviewed by FBI so badly? Traps well-set. All you have to do is mis-remember a small detail and there's leverage. But Ford's story is determined to be held together by dust by a well-respected prosecutor, and that's just fine.

“Misremember a small detail”? Have you had you’re head in the sand? Try to catch up if you have any intellectual honesty.

I'm sure there are lots and lots and lots of really big big big things

You wouldn’t care one way or the other. Disgusting.

Not really

Not surprising. I would be surprised though if the deplorables woke up one day and decided to have morals. Not happening today. Or any day.

My morality doesn't involve accusing a man of sexual assault, gang rape, alcoholism and pedophilia without fact. I'm damn proud of that, thank you.

So you're saying that if your daughter or best friend came to you and told you they'd been assaulted by a man, but had no "fact" to back it up beyond their tears and their memory of it, you'd toss them out with a shrug? Wow.

That is just stupid. Someone you know very, very well telling you something is very different than taking the word of someone you don't know at all. Duke and UVA false accusations show why you can't blindly believe just anyone without corroborating evidence.

Why doesn't her family support her? Is everyone else supposed to believe and support her when her own family does not? Why were they not in the court room?

You are just lying. They have said they support her. Just because she isn't parading them in front of you for "credibility," or talking about them doesn't mean what you are lying about is true. LIARS, all of you Dumpy trolls.

Christine Blasey Ford didn’t shove her husband and sons behind her to prove she has largely excellent relationships with boys and men and thus no incentive to lie.

Brett Kavanaugh....um.

What is her relationship with men like? I can’t be good.

[Anonymous]

So if multiple FBI background checks would have already found everything about kavanaugh, why didn’t we know the police were called because of a bar fight he started?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:PP, your description of “Resistance activities” is creepy and authoritarian. We have First Amendment speech and assembly rights, as much as that bothers you.

Are you as bothered by the seemingly irrefutable evidence that Brett lied and tried to create a false story about what he did to Debbie aorez? Does perjury bother you as much as peaceful, lawful, marching?

Please cite where he lied.

He said he drank too much. He said he didn't blackout.

Did you read The New Yorker story? It was not corroborated at all. NYT refused to run the story. It was basically her accusation.

And, yes, perjury bothers me. And, just because Ford comes across as pitiful, does not mean she did not commit perjury. At first, I thought she believed what she was saying. After reading the holes in her story, I'm not so sure--especially where she crossed out "early" in "early 1980s" for the polygraph. Remember, her first story to the therapist was that she was in her "late teens." The floor plan of the party house has changed, the number of people at the party has changed, and the number of the people in the room has changed. We never heard about the Safeway incident until her testimony--and, that could be bogus, too.

As for Ramirez story--Kavanaugh testified that he knew she was calling around for dirt on him. That is different from knowing what her allegation was. Not perjury.

And, the Swetnick story is absolutely insane. It has changed and it is horrible. She has a very dubious and litigious background. One thing that she said yesterday when asked how she knew he went to Georgetown Prep was to say they wore their uniforms. Which is interesting, since the "uniform" was coat and tie. (Yes, I looked at the yearbook.) Her story is a waste of time for the FBI.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

As for Ramirez story--Kavanaugh testified that he knew she was calling around for dirt on him. That is different from knowing what her allegation was. Not perjury.

"..since you graduated from college, but before the New Yorker article publication on September 23rd, have you ever discussed or heard discussion about the incident matching the description given by Ms. Ramirez to the New Yorker?"

BK: "No"

--

Seems like a lie to me

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So if multiple FBI background checks would have already found everything about Kavanaugh, why didn’t we know the police were called because of a bar fight he started?

Because when there are federal background checks and you (the person being investigated) identify people for the FBI to talk to, you do not identify people that were with you when you got into a bar fight. You identify good friends who know better than to talk about the bar fight or refer the FBI agent to someone that was there for the bar fight.

I never got into a bar fight, but I certainly was thoughtful about who I put on the list for the investigators to talk to. I have both had background investigations and spoken to the FBI re someone else's background investigation, as I suspect many in DC have. This is not surprising.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

As for Ramirez story--Kavanaugh testified that he knew she was calling around for dirt on him. That is different from knowing what her allegation was. Not perjury.

"..since you graduated from college, but before the New Yorker article publication on September 23rd, have you ever discussed or heard discussion about the incident matching the description given by Ms. Ramirez to the New Yorker?"

BK: "No"

--

Seems like a lie to me

The defenders claim is that he wasn't aware of the specific allegation, but rather as a general matter that Ramierez was cooking something up that he caught wind of. Not sure why that would warrant trying to discredit her if her allegations were lies. His activities, again, make him look guilty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP, your description of “Resistance activities” is creepy and authoritarian. We have First Amendment speech and assembly rights, as much as that bothers you.

Are you as bothered by the seemingly irrefutable evidence that Brett lied and tried to create a false story about what he did to Debbie aorez? Does perjury bother you as much as peaceful, lawful, marching?

Please cite where he lied.

He said he drank too much. He said he didn't blackout.

Did you read The New Yorker story? It was not corroborated at all. NYT refused to run the story. It was basically her accusation.

And, yes, perjury bothers me. And, just because Ford comes across as pitiful, does not mean she did not commit perjury. At first, I thought she believed what she was saying. After reading the holes in her story, I'm not so sure--especially where she crossed out "early" in "early 1980s" for the polygraph. Remember, her first story to the therapist was that she was in her "late teens." The floor plan of the party house has changed, the number of people at the party has changed, and the number of the people in the room has changed. We never heard about the Safeway incident until her testimony--and, that could be bogus, too.

As for Ramirez story--Kavanaugh testified that he knew she was calling around for dirt on him. That is different from knowing what her allegation was. Not perjury.

And, the Swetnick story is absolutely insane. It has changed and it is horrible. She has a very dubious and litigious background. One thing that she said yesterday when asked how she knew he went to Georgetown Prep was to say they wore their uniforms. Which is interesting, since the "uniform" was coat and tie. (Yes, I looked at the yearbook.) Her story is a waste of time for the FBI.

They aren’t investigating her case. As I have repeatedly posted here, she mentioned it 3 years ago to me. Also victims of trauma can have messy lives due to the trauma.