Government Shutdown - September, 2025 Editiion

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We bailed out Argentina but Republicans are fighting not to pay Feds. America first indeed? WTF?

Dems need to hammer them on this. Also, the 50M to Greenland's polar bears when starving kids are dying because they couldn't get USAID food.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Good. If Dems cave now it makes the entire shutdown pointless.

Are you saying Dems caused the shutdown?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Good. If Dems cave now it makes the entire shutdown pointless.

Are you saying Dems caused the shutdown?

No, Mike Johnson caused the shutdown by refusing to negotiate at all. Democrats had a chance to avert it but decided the role of the Senate is not to be a rubber stamp for Mike Johnson.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We bailed out Argentina but Republicans are fighting not to pay Feds. America first indeed? WTF?

Argentina actually received a 49 billion dollar bailout, courtesy of Trump and company. In April, Trump pressured the IMF to give Argentina 20 billion dollars. Now the USA is directly bailing Argentina out with an additional 20 billion dollars. All because Melie came to the USA, screaming as he handed Musk/Trump a chainsaw.

[Anonymous]

As we enter day 10 of the ScHU mEr shutDown, I remind dcum that the DNC is hosting a $30 million fundraiser in Napa this weekend

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As we enter day 10 of the ScHU mEr shutDown, I remind dcum that the DNC is hosting a $30 million fundraiser in Napa this weekend

And how much was spent by Republicans last week at the NRSC’s fall meeting?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As we enter day 10 of the ScHU mEr shutDown, I remind dcum that the DNC is hosting a $30 million fundraiser in Napa this weekend

I like how you recognize that the Senate exists but act they are obligated to approve anything the House sends their way. Maybe, just maybe, the House should be back in Washington negotiating something that actually could pass the Senate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Good. If Dems cave now it makes the entire shutdown pointless.

Are you saying Dems caused the shutdown?

No, Mike Johnson caused the shutdown by refusing to negotiate at all. Democrats had a chance to avert it but decided the role of the Senate is not to be a rubber stamp for Mike Johnson.

There was nothing to negotiate. It’s a clean CR.

Schumer believes the shut down is good for “his side.” Hopefully voters will prove him wrong next year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As we enter day 10 of the ScHU mEr shutDown, I remind dcum that the DNC is hosting a $30 million fundraiser in Napa this weekend

I like how you recognize that the Senate exists but act they are obligated to approve anything the House sends their way. Maybe, just maybe, the House should be back in Washington negotiating something that actually could pass the Senate.

Senate is out till Tuesday.
House is out indefinitely.
Proves how much GOP takes governing seriously.

Let them eat 🍜

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As we enter day 10 of the ScHU mEr shutDown, I remind dcum that the DNC is hosting a $30 million fundraiser in Napa this weekend

I like how you recognize that the Senate exists but act they are obligated to approve anything the House sends their way. Maybe, just maybe, the House should be back in Washington negotiating something that actually could pass the Senate.

The house isn't in session because Mike Johnson doesn't want to seat Adelita Grijalva because he doesn't want the discharge petition to pass. Maybe Mike Johnson should stop supporting pedophiles and start supporting the American people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As we enter day 10 of the ScHU mEr shutDown, I remind dcum that the DNC is hosting a $30 million fundraiser in Napa this weekend

I like how you recognize that the Senate exists but act they are obligated to approve anything the House sends their way. Maybe, just maybe, the House should be back in Washington negotiating something that actually could pass the Senate.

The house isn't in session because Mike Johnson doesn't want to seat Adelita Grijalva because he doesn't want the discharge petition to pass. Maybe Mike Johnson should stop supporting pedophiles and start supporting the American people.

He can’t. It is a core tenant of the maga and republicans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Good. If Dems cave now it makes the entire shutdown pointless.

Are you saying Dems caused the shutdown?

No, Mike Johnson caused the shutdown by refusing to negotiate at all. Democrats had a chance to avert it but decided the role of the Senate is not to be a rubber stamp for Mike Johnson.

There was nothing to negotiate. It’s a clean CR.

Schumer believes the shut down is good for “his side.” Hopefully voters will prove him wrong next year.

Schumer voted for the clean CR in March but is voting against this one. Why is that? Because in between the "Big Beautiful Bill" passed without the support of 60 senators, making health insurance much more expensive for millions of Americans. This is Schumer's only chance to undo that damage before open enrollment starts next month.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Good. If Dems cave now it makes the entire shutdown pointless.

Are you saying Dems caused the shutdown?

No, Mike Johnson caused the shutdown by refusing to negotiate at all. Democrats had a chance to avert it but decided the role of the Senate is not to be a rubber stamp for Mike Johnson.

There was nothing to negotiate. It’s a clean CR.

Schumer believes the shut down is good for “his side.” Hopefully voters will prove him wrong next year.

Schumer voted for the clean CR in March but is voting against this one. Why is that? Because in between the "Big Beautiful Bill" passed without the support of 60 senators, making health insurance much more expensive for millions of Americans. This is Schumer's only chance to undo that damage before open enrollment starts next month.

BBB didn't make anything more expensive. Obamacare did that all on its own. The only thing is the temporary covid subsidies are expiring. BBB had nothing to do with that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Good. If Dems cave now it makes the entire shutdown pointless.

Are you saying Dems caused the shutdown?

No, Mike Johnson caused the shutdown by refusing to negotiate at all. Democrats had a chance to avert it but decided the role of the Senate is not to be a rubber stamp for Mike Johnson.

There was nothing to negotiate. It’s a clean CR.

Schumer believes the shut down is good for “his side.” Hopefully voters will prove him wrong next year.

Schumer voted for the clean CR in March but is voting against this one. Why is that? Because in between the "Big Beautiful Bill" passed without the support of 60 senators, making health insurance much more expensive for millions of Americans. This is Schumer's only chance to undo that damage before open enrollment starts next month.

BBB didn't make anything more expensive. Obamacare did that all on its own. The only thing is the temporary covid subsidies are expiring. BBB had nothing to do with that.

There are Medicaid cuts in the BBB that have nothing to do with the ACA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Good. If Dems cave now it makes the entire shutdown pointless.

Are you saying Dems caused the shutdown?

No, Mike Johnson caused the shutdown by refusing to negotiate at all. Democrats had a chance to avert it but decided the role of the Senate is not to be a rubber stamp for Mike Johnson.

There was nothing to negotiate. It’s a clean CR.

Schumer believes the shut down is good for “his side.” Hopefully voters will prove him wrong next year.

Schumer voted for the clean CR in March but is voting against this one. Why is that? Because in between the "Big Beautiful Bill" passed without the support of 60 senators, making health insurance much more expensive for millions of Americans. This is Schumer's only chance to undo that damage before open enrollment starts next month.

BBB didn't make anything more expensive. Obamacare did that all on its own. The only thing is the temporary covid subsidies are expiring. BBB had nothing to do with that.

There are Medicaid cuts in the BBB that have nothing to do with the ACA.

Yes, and Democrats do want to restore that as well in their bill. Can't let illegals be denied Medicaid.