Taylor's Feb Rec for Crown Boundary Study

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, the more dilapidated Wootton feeders. Let's replace Rockville with Gaithersburg.

Tbf the most dilapidated Wootton feeders are DuFief and Stone Mill, which are not in Rockville, but rather “North Potomac” ie Gaithersburg.

Are you trying to troll the school or the people of those schools? Do better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What should have been done that wasn’t done?

No matter what anyone tells you, you’ll assert that it was done, so you don’t really want to know. Wait for the lawsuit, then you’ll have your answer.

Why are you waiting to file the lawsuit? Shouldn't it have been done months ago? No one cares so you threatening it is silly. Just do it already. What about 20 families are involved out of 1600+ students...

Tell me you’re not a lawyer without telling me. Go look up “ripeness” in Blacks Law Dictionary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, the more dilapidated Wootton feeders. Let's replace Rockville with Gaithersburg.

Tbf the most dilapidated Wootton feeders are DuFief and Stone Mill, which are not in Rockville, but rather “North Potomac” ie Gaithersburg.

Are you trying to troll the school or the people of those schools? Do better.

That part of Rockville borders Gaithersburg and till about 20 years ago it was Gaithersburg, not North Potomac.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What should have been done that wasn’t done?

No matter what anyone tells you, you’ll assert that it was done, so you don’t really want to know. Wait for the lawsuit, then you’ll have your answer.

Why are you waiting to file the lawsuit? Shouldn't it have been done months ago? No one cares so you threatening it is silly. Just do it already. What about 20 families are involved out of 1600+ students...

Tell me you’re not a lawyer without telling me. Go look up “ripeness” in Blacks Law Dictionary.

It doesn't take long to file a lawsuit. Do you even have a lawyer?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What should have been done that wasn’t done?

Direct, fulsome answers/responses to all of the pointed, nuanced questions asked/issues raised (not just the ones hand picked as easily addressable by gatekeeping moderators),

With all questions/issues and corresponding answers/responses made public for fully informed stakeholder consideration,

With public access to the data/map construction tools used by MCPS/the consultant such that any variation could be equivalently presented for BOE consideration (if they so chose),

With timing to allow for all of that.

If Taylor admitted the current Wootton building would be closed until MCPS finds the money, it would be game over as a school closure because MCPS has to move the boundaries to relocate Wootton’s students to Crown.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What should have been done that wasn’t done?

No matter what anyone tells you, you’ll assert that it was done, so you don’t really want to know. Wait for the lawsuit, then you’ll have your answer.

Why are you waiting to file the lawsuit? Shouldn't it have been done months ago? No one cares so you threatening it is silly. Just do it already. What about 20 families are involved out of 1600+ students...

Tell me you’re not a lawyer without telling me. Go look up “ripeness” in Blacks Law Dictionary.

It doesn't take long to file a lawsuit. Do you even have a lawyer?

I guess you can’t read either…. Or are too lazy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What should have been done that wasn’t done?

No matter what anyone tells you, you’ll assert that it was done, so you don’t really want to know. Wait for the lawsuit, then you’ll have your answer.

Why are you waiting to file the lawsuit? Shouldn't it have been done months ago? No one cares so you threatening it is silly. Just do it already. What about 20 families are involved out of 1600+ students...

Tell me you’re not a lawyer without telling me. Go look up “ripeness” in Blacks Law Dictionary.

It doesn't take long to file a lawsuit. Do you even have a lawyer?

I guess you can’t read either…. Or are too lazy.

Read what? You are threatening it. Go ahead.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, the more dilapidated Wootton feeders. Let's replace Rockville with Gaithersburg.

Tbf the most dilapidated Wootton feeders are DuFief and Stone Mill, which are not in Rockville, but rather “North Potomac” ie Gaithersburg.

Are you trying to troll the school or the people of those schools? Do better.

That part of Rockville borders Gaithersburg and till about 20 years ago it was Gaithersburg, not North Potomac.

Developers love making up names to boost profits. This is why they live the idea of Wootton @ Crown.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What should have been done that wasn’t done?

Direct, fulsome answers/responses to all of the pointed, nuanced questions asked/issues raised (not just the ones hand picked as easily addressable by gatekeeping moderators),

With all questions/issues and corresponding answers/responses made public for fully informed stakeholder consideration,

With public access to the data/map construction tools used by MCPS/the consultant such that any variation could be equivalently presented for BOE consideration (if they so chose),

With timing to allow for all of that.

If Taylor admitted the current Wootton building would be closed until MCPS finds the money, it would be game over as a school closure because MCPS has to move the boundaries to relocate Wootton’s students to Crown.

The building is unsafe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What should have been done that wasn’t done?

No matter what anyone tells you, you’ll assert that it was done, so you don’t really want to know. Wait for the lawsuit, then you’ll have your answer.

Why are you waiting to file the lawsuit? Shouldn't it have been done months ago? No one cares so you threatening it is silly. Just do it already. What about 20 families are involved out of 1600+ students...

Tell me you’re not a lawyer without telling me. Go look up “ripeness” in Blacks Law Dictionary.

It doesn't take long to file a lawsuit. Do you even have a lawyer?

I guess you can’t read either…. Or are too lazy.

Read what? You are threatening it. Go ahead.

You can't file a lawsuit until the vote dumbass. That's why the PP asked you to look up "ripeness".
Please stop talking about litigation if you have no idea what the law is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What should have been done that wasn’t done?

Direct, fulsome answers/responses to all of the pointed, nuanced questions asked/issues raised (not just the ones hand picked as easily addressable by gatekeeping moderators),

With all questions/issues and corresponding answers/responses made public for fully informed stakeholder consideration,

With public access to the data/map construction tools used by MCPS/the consultant such that any variation could be equivalently presented for BOE consideration (if they so chose),

With timing to allow for all of that.

If Taylor admitted the current Wootton building would be closed until MCPS finds the money, it would be game over as a school closure because MCPS has to move the boundaries to relocate Wootton’s students to Crown.

The building is unsafe.

Did MCPS declare it so?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What should have been done that wasn’t done?

Direct, fulsome answers/responses to all of the pointed, nuanced questions asked/issues raised (not just the ones hand picked as easily addressable by gatekeeping moderators),

With all questions/issues and corresponding answers/responses made public for fully informed stakeholder consideration,

With public access to the data/map construction tools used by MCPS/the consultant such that any variation could be equivalently presented for BOE consideration (if they so chose),

With timing to allow for all of that.

If Taylor admitted the current Wootton building would be closed until MCPS finds the money, it would be game over as a school closure because MCPS has to move the boundaries to relocate Wootton’s students to Crown.

I don’t understand what point you are trying to make. What would be game over? The people bringing the lawsuit have a case or MCPS following procedures?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What should have been done that wasn’t done?

Direct, fulsome answers/responses to all of the pointed, nuanced questions asked/issues raised (not just the ones hand picked as easily addressable by gatekeeping moderators),

With all questions/issues and corresponding answers/responses made public for fully informed stakeholder consideration,

With public access to the data/map construction tools used by MCPS/the consultant such that any variation could be equivalently presented for BOE consideration (if they so chose),

With timing to allow for all of that.

If Taylor admitted the current Wootton building would be closed until MCPS finds the money, it would be game over as a school closure because MCPS has to move the boundaries to relocate Wootton’s students to Crown.

The building is unsafe.

Did MCPS declare it so?

No.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What should have been done that wasn’t done?

Direct, fulsome answers/responses to all of the pointed, nuanced questions asked/issues raised (not just the ones hand picked as easily addressable by gatekeeping moderators),

With all questions/issues and corresponding answers/responses made public for fully informed stakeholder consideration,

With public access to the data/map construction tools used by MCPS/the consultant such that any variation could be equivalently presented for BOE consideration (if they so chose),

With timing to allow for all of that.

Thanks for answering. I’m not aware of every question/issue raised that has gone unanswered so I can’t really comment on that without knowing more about what answers the community needs still. I think this is what a lot of us are asking and trying to understand. I haven’t been all the posts asking so there seems to be multiple of us here wondering.

I doubt that there is any obligation or right to public access to those tools or information that you seek.

Timing… sure I guess, if the public really should have more access to this information.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What should have been done that wasn’t done?

Direct, fulsome answers/responses to all of the pointed, nuanced questions asked/issues raised (not just the ones hand picked as easily addressable by gatekeeping moderators),

With all questions/issues and corresponding answers/responses made public for fully informed stakeholder consideration,

With public access to the data/map construction tools used by MCPS/the consultant such that any variation could be equivalently presented for BOE consideration (if they so chose),

With timing to allow for all of that.

If Taylor admitted the current Wootton building would be closed until MCPS finds the money, it would be game over as a school closure because MCPS has to move the boundaries to relocate Wootton’s students to Crown.

The building is unsafe.

Did MCPS declare it so?

Wootton parents said so which is why they are closing the building.