Again, it’s Mitch who is the villain here. |
DP. This is pretty much misogyny. Lazy, stale misogyny. |
Why? Because a woman is being criticized for holding back relief for more than 20 million households? She thought she knew better than the people begging her to take the deal in October. Turns out - she didn't. |
There was never an actual $1.8T package. |
That's news to CNN. |
This! Mitch would never bring anything for a floor vote. He wasn't sure even the 500B bill would pass. |
Because they and everyone else are busy trying to pin this on Pelosi. McConnell never agreed to a $1.8T deal. |
Its times like this when I'm in full support of divesting and just letting the red states do their own thing. What possible reason would people in Kentucky want to keep Mitch McConnel in other than sticking it to democrats/blue states? Just let them go. If they want to continue to send their money to corporations and eat dust themselves, just let them. |
This. So laughable. If he agreed to that then, he should agree to it now, no? He didn’t have the votes. |
| It’s just amazing to me that he’s letting his caucus go grinch like this. It’s so clear who the problem is, do they really think people are going to blame the democrats when they can’t buy Christmas dinner much less Christmas presents this year? |
Again, he personally and his party in the Senate paid hardly any price a month ago for acting this way, so there’s nothing to keep him from continuing. It’s not like he actually cares about people. |
No, McConnell wanted it then to influence the election and because he feared the Senate might be shaky. Nancy had leverage. He has no such compunction to do a deal now. |