Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Meghan and Harry are irrelevant, and their fans are getting desperate. The BRF has moved on and they aren’t missed.



I wish the British press would move on. Stop writing about them for gods' sake.

Focus on Andrew being sued for an $8 million debt on their Swiss chalet.
https://people.com/royals/prince-andrew-and-sarah-ferguson-face-legal-action-for-unpaid-8-million-on-swiss-ski-chalet/

Focus on Fergie embezzling from her charities.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/loans-to-duchess-of-york-under-investigation-b8vplsf3h

Focus on the future King and Queen...currently not even living in England.

Or the future future King and Queen...zooming 24/7.

Or even the current Queen who we all assume is still alive.

The Sussexs are BORING.



Those articles in British press are Meghan and Harry’s paid PR pieces by Sunshine Sachs. Just like People Magazine, Harper Bazaar. You really don’t understand that? They are paid PR pieces.


What? Meghan and Harry are paying the Daily Mail, Express, and the Sun to...write negative, sniping articles about them? You're serious?

Any time they can use her name, they are. Just forget she exists.

EXCLUSIVE: Meghan Markle's designer best friend Misha Nonoo is seen returning to NYC with baby Leo as doormen carry luggage from her packed SUV hours after telling fans she's 'not going anywhere' and is working from home


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8316357/Meghan-Markles-friend-Misha-Nonoo-says-shes-not-going-seen-returning-NYC.html

What must Charles think of Prince Harry's new father figure? He's a 70-year-old music mogul with five marriages and numerous children - now his latest love (an old chum of Meghan) says he and the Prince are like father and son, writes TOM LEONARD

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8341841/What-Charles-think-Prince-Harrys-new-father-figure-TOM-LEONARD-writes.html

Meet the Sussexes' new neighbours: Harry and Meghan expressed a desire for living in the real world - yet their new home is in one of the swankiest gated communities in Los Angeles

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8341895/Harry-Meghans-new-home-one-swankiest-gated-communities-Los-Angeles.html

Meghan and Harry spark row as fury grows over demands Sussexes return 'millions' to UK
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1283830/meghan-markle-latest-prince-harry-news-duke-duchess-sussex-frogmore-royal-family-update

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry always wanted to be ‘international royals’ claims expert

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1284063/meghan-markle-prince-harry-international-royals-wedding-anniversary-LA

Meghan Markle and Harry's tell-all book is 'soap opera' SHOCK claims from Palace
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1283518/meghan-markle-news-meghan-markle-prince-harry-book-finding-freedom-royal-news

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry ‘living at Tyler Perry’s $18million Beverly Hills mansion arranged by pal Oprah’
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11575013/meghan-markle-prince-harry-hollywood-oprah-winfrey/

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry eye up £10million LA mansion with ‘granny annexe’ flat for mum Doria
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11534911/meghan-markle-prince-harry-la-mansion-doria/



Most of these are clearly paid for PR pieces— all of the Oprah/Tyler Perry mansion/David Foster/Adele. Poster, are you one of Meghan’s paid bots?


Small tip. No one brags about staying in a friend's house for free.

Meghan lived in Canada for months and they never found out who owned the house she lived in despite trying for ages and pining it on everyone from Elton John to a Russian billionaire.

I get that you hate her -- but there is absolutely no reason for a PR company to pay to have Meghan written about in negging terms for living a lavish, luxurious life in a country that hates her for that reason.

If it was PR about her new contract or a foundation she started -- then yeah, I can see it.



The PR is about Meghan and Harry having Hollywood celebrity friends who can offer them these lavish homes. You really don’t understand PR. That whole birthday reading? That was to link Meghan to Jennifer Garner, who is championing that reading initiative. You buy into this PR spin so easily.


And you're seeing ghosts that aren't there.

Ever thought Jennifer praised Meghan of her own accord?

I mean...unless you're saying Garner can be bought. I thought she was America's sweetheart?



Meghan is trying to buddy up and get cred with the “Hollywood Mommy set” — pretty much led by Jennifer Garner — thus the book reading was set up for Archie’s birthday to support initiative championed by Jennifer Garner. See how that works? The Adele article about school for Archie was a favor to Meghan because they share Sunshine Sachs PR firm.


Okay, so all of Hollywood is selling their services to each other, including a British legend, and your problem is with Meghan because???
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Meghan and Harry are irrelevant, and their fans are getting desperate. The BRF has moved on and they aren’t missed.



I wish the British press would move on. Stop writing about them for gods' sake.

Focus on Andrew being sued for an $8 million debt on their Swiss chalet.
https://people.com/royals/prince-andrew-and-sarah-ferguson-face-legal-action-for-unpaid-8-million-on-swiss-ski-chalet/

Focus on Fergie embezzling from her charities.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/loans-to-duchess-of-york-under-investigation-b8vplsf3h

Focus on the future King and Queen...currently not even living in England.

Or the future future King and Queen...zooming 24/7.

Or even the current Queen who we all assume is still alive.

The Sussexs are BORING.



Those articles in British press are Meghan and Harry’s paid PR pieces by Sunshine Sachs. Just like People Magazine, Harper Bazaar. You really don’t understand that? They are paid PR pieces.


What? Meghan and Harry are paying the Daily Mail, Express, and the Sun to...write negative, sniping articles about them? You're serious?

Any time they can use her name, they are. Just forget she exists.

EXCLUSIVE: Meghan Markle's designer best friend Misha Nonoo is seen returning to NYC with baby Leo as doormen carry luggage from her packed SUV hours after telling fans she's 'not going anywhere' and is working from home


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8316357/Meghan-Markles-friend-Misha-Nonoo-says-shes-not-going-seen-returning-NYC.html

What must Charles think of Prince Harry's new father figure? He's a 70-year-old music mogul with five marriages and numerous children - now his latest love (an old chum of Meghan) says he and the Prince are like father and son, writes TOM LEONARD

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8341841/What-Charles-think-Prince-Harrys-new-father-figure-TOM-LEONARD-writes.html

Meet the Sussexes' new neighbours: Harry and Meghan expressed a desire for living in the real world - yet their new home is in one of the swankiest gated communities in Los Angeles

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8341895/Harry-Meghans-new-home-one-swankiest-gated-communities-Los-Angeles.html

Meghan and Harry spark row as fury grows over demands Sussexes return 'millions' to UK
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1283830/meghan-markle-latest-prince-harry-news-duke-duchess-sussex-frogmore-royal-family-update

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry always wanted to be ‘international royals’ claims expert

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1284063/meghan-markle-prince-harry-international-royals-wedding-anniversary-LA

Meghan Markle and Harry's tell-all book is 'soap opera' SHOCK claims from Palace
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1283518/meghan-markle-news-meghan-markle-prince-harry-book-finding-freedom-royal-news

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry ‘living at Tyler Perry’s $18million Beverly Hills mansion arranged by pal Oprah’
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11575013/meghan-markle-prince-harry-hollywood-oprah-winfrey/

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry eye up £10million LA mansion with ‘granny annexe’ flat for mum Doria
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11534911/meghan-markle-prince-harry-la-mansion-doria/



Most of these are clearly paid for PR pieces— all of the Oprah/Tyler Perry mansion/David Foster/Adele. Poster, are you one of Meghan’s paid bots?


Small tip. No one brags about staying in a friend's house for free.

Meghan lived in Canada for months and they never found out who owned the house she lived in despite trying for ages and pining it on everyone from Elton John to a Russian billionaire.

I get that you hate her -- but there is absolutely no reason for a PR company to pay to have Meghan written about in negging terms for living a lavish, luxurious life in a country that hates her for that reason.

If it was PR about her new contract or a foundation she started -- then yeah, I can see it.



The PR is about Meghan and Harry having Hollywood celebrity friends who can offer them these lavish homes. You really don’t understand PR. That whole birthday reading? That was to link Meghan to Jennifer Garner, who is championing that reading initiative. You buy into this PR spin so easily.


And you're seeing ghosts that aren't there.

Ever thought Jennifer praised Meghan of her own accord?

I mean...unless you're saying Garner can be bought. I thought she was America's sweetheart?



Meghan is trying to buddy up and get cred with the “Hollywood Mommy set” — pretty much led by Jennifer Garner — thus the book reading was set up for Archie’s birthday to support initiative championed by Jennifer Garner. See how that works? The Adele article about school for Archie was a favor to Meghan because they share Sunshine Sachs PR firm.


Sounds like pretty standard behavior for the new mommy in the neighborhood. Why wouldn't she want to get cred with the "Hollywood Mommy set"? That's where she lives. She's a famous Hollywood mommy. Seems like the other famous Hollywood mommies would be pretty sensible women to try to befriend. See how that works?
Anonymous
I’m just pointing out that the posters on here saying “that the mean old British media won’t leave poor Harry and Meghan alone” don’t understand that it is their very own PR paying for these stories to run in the tabloids that Meghan and Harry profess to hate. It is all a PR game.




Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Meghan and Harry are irrelevant, and their fans are getting desperate. The BRF has moved on and they aren’t missed.



I wish the British press would move on. Stop writing about them for gods' sake.

Focus on Andrew being sued for an $8 million debt on their Swiss chalet.
https://people.com/royals/prince-andrew-and-sarah-ferguson-face-legal-action-for-unpaid-8-million-on-swiss-ski-chalet/

Focus on Fergie embezzling from her charities.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/loans-to-duchess-of-york-under-investigation-b8vplsf3h

Focus on the future King and Queen...currently not even living in England.

Or the future future King and Queen...zooming 24/7.

Or even the current Queen who we all assume is still alive.

The Sussexs are BORING.



Those articles in British press are Meghan and Harry’s paid PR pieces by Sunshine Sachs. Just like People Magazine, Harper Bazaar. You really don’t understand that? They are paid PR pieces.


What? Meghan and Harry are paying the Daily Mail, Express, and the Sun to...write negative, sniping articles about them? You're serious?

Any time they can use her name, they are. Just forget she exists.

EXCLUSIVE: Meghan Markle's designer best friend Misha Nonoo is seen returning to NYC with baby Leo as doormen carry luggage from her packed SUV hours after telling fans she's 'not going anywhere' and is working from home


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8316357/Meghan-Markles-friend-Misha-Nonoo-says-shes-not-going-seen-returning-NYC.html

What must Charles think of Prince Harry's new father figure? He's a 70-year-old music mogul with five marriages and numerous children - now his latest love (an old chum of Meghan) says he and the Prince are like father and son, writes TOM LEONARD

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8341841/What-Charles-think-Prince-Harrys-new-father-figure-TOM-LEONARD-writes.html

Meet the Sussexes' new neighbours: Harry and Meghan expressed a desire for living in the real world - yet their new home is in one of the swankiest gated communities in Los Angeles

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8341895/Harry-Meghans-new-home-one-swankiest-gated-communities-Los-Angeles.html

Meghan and Harry spark row as fury grows over demands Sussexes return 'millions' to UK
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1283830/meghan-markle-latest-prince-harry-news-duke-duchess-sussex-frogmore-royal-family-update

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry always wanted to be ‘international royals’ claims expert

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1284063/meghan-markle-prince-harry-international-royals-wedding-anniversary-LA

Meghan Markle and Harry's tell-all book is 'soap opera' SHOCK claims from Palace
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1283518/meghan-markle-news-meghan-markle-prince-harry-book-finding-freedom-royal-news

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry ‘living at Tyler Perry’s $18million Beverly Hills mansion arranged by pal Oprah’
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11575013/meghan-markle-prince-harry-hollywood-oprah-winfrey/

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry eye up £10million LA mansion with ‘granny annexe’ flat for mum Doria
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11534911/meghan-markle-prince-harry-la-mansion-doria/



Most of these are clearly paid for PR pieces— all of the Oprah/Tyler Perry mansion/David Foster/Adele. Poster, are you one of Meghan’s paid bots?


Small tip. No one brags about staying in a friend's house for free.

Meghan lived in Canada for months and they never found out who owned the house she lived in despite trying for ages and pining it on everyone from Elton John to a Russian billionaire.

I get that you hate her -- but there is absolutely no reason for a PR company to pay to have Meghan written about in negging terms for living a lavish, luxurious life in a country that hates her for that reason.

If it was PR about her new contract or a foundation she started -- then yeah, I can see it.



The PR is about Meghan and Harry having Hollywood celebrity friends who can offer them these lavish homes. You really don’t understand PR. That whole birthday reading? That was to link Meghan to Jennifer Garner, who is championing that reading initiative. You buy into this PR spin so easily.


And you're seeing ghosts that aren't there.

Ever thought Jennifer praised Meghan of her own accord?

I mean...unless you're saying Garner can be bought. I thought she was America's sweetheart?



Meghan is trying to buddy up and get cred with the “Hollywood Mommy set” — pretty much led by Jennifer Garner — thus the book reading was set up for Archie’s birthday to support initiative championed by Jennifer Garner. See how that works? The Adele article about school for Archie was a favor to Meghan because they share Sunshine Sachs PR firm.


Okay, so all of Hollywood is selling their services to each other, including a British legend, and your problem is with Meghan because???


Not PP. but because she claimed to want to be out of the spotlight. Her husband’s has trauma when he hears camera clicks. Don’t you see the hypocrisy??
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Meghan and Harry are irrelevant, and their fans are getting desperate. The BRF has moved on and they aren’t missed.



I wish the British press would move on. Stop writing about them for gods' sake.

Focus on Andrew being sued for an $8 million debt on their Swiss chalet.
https://people.com/royals/prince-andrew-and-sarah-ferguson-face-legal-action-for-unpaid-8-million-on-swiss-ski-chalet/

Focus on Fergie embezzling from her charities.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/loans-to-duchess-of-york-under-investigation-b8vplsf3h

Focus on the future King and Queen...currently not even living in England.

Or the future future King and Queen...zooming 24/7.

Or even the current Queen who we all assume is still alive.

The Sussexs are BORING.



Those articles in British press are Meghan and Harry’s paid PR pieces by Sunshine Sachs. Just like People Magazine, Harper Bazaar. You really don’t understand that? They are paid PR pieces.


What? Meghan and Harry are paying the Daily Mail, Express, and the Sun to...write negative, sniping articles about them? You're serious?

Any time they can use her name, they are. Just forget she exists.

EXCLUSIVE: Meghan Markle's designer best friend Misha Nonoo is seen returning to NYC with baby Leo as doormen carry luggage from her packed SUV hours after telling fans she's 'not going anywhere' and is working from home


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8316357/Meghan-Markles-friend-Misha-Nonoo-says-shes-not-going-seen-returning-NYC.html

What must Charles think of Prince Harry's new father figure? He's a 70-year-old music mogul with five marriages and numerous children - now his latest love (an old chum of Meghan) says he and the Prince are like father and son, writes TOM LEONARD

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8341841/What-Charles-think-Prince-Harrys-new-father-figure-TOM-LEONARD-writes.html

Meet the Sussexes' new neighbours: Harry and Meghan expressed a desire for living in the real world - yet their new home is in one of the swankiest gated communities in Los Angeles

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8341895/Harry-Meghans-new-home-one-swankiest-gated-communities-Los-Angeles.html

Meghan and Harry spark row as fury grows over demands Sussexes return 'millions' to UK
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1283830/meghan-markle-latest-prince-harry-news-duke-duchess-sussex-frogmore-royal-family-update

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry always wanted to be ‘international royals’ claims expert

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1284063/meghan-markle-prince-harry-international-royals-wedding-anniversary-LA

Meghan Markle and Harry's tell-all book is 'soap opera' SHOCK claims from Palace
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1283518/meghan-markle-news-meghan-markle-prince-harry-book-finding-freedom-royal-news

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry ‘living at Tyler Perry’s $18million Beverly Hills mansion arranged by pal Oprah’
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11575013/meghan-markle-prince-harry-hollywood-oprah-winfrey/

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry eye up £10million LA mansion with ‘granny annexe’ flat for mum Doria
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11534911/meghan-markle-prince-harry-la-mansion-doria/



Most of these are clearly paid for PR pieces— all of the Oprah/Tyler Perry mansion/David Foster/Adele. Poster, are you one of Meghan’s paid bots?


Small tip. No one brags about staying in a friend's house for free.

Meghan lived in Canada for months and they never found out who owned the house she lived in despite trying for ages and pining it on everyone from Elton John to a Russian billionaire.

I get that you hate her -- but there is absolutely no reason for a PR company to pay to have Meghan written about in negging terms for living a lavish, luxurious life in a country that hates her for that reason.

If it was PR about her new contract or a foundation she started -- then yeah, I can see it.



The PR is about Meghan and Harry having Hollywood celebrity friends who can offer them these lavish homes. You really don’t understand PR. That whole birthday reading? That was to link Meghan to Jennifer Garner, who is championing that reading initiative. You buy into this PR spin so easily.


And you're seeing ghosts that aren't there.

Ever thought Jennifer praised Meghan of her own accord?

I mean...unless you're saying Garner can be bought. I thought she was America's sweetheart?



Meghan is trying to buddy up and get cred with the “Hollywood Mommy set” — pretty much led by Jennifer Garner — thus the book reading was set up for Archie’s birthday to support initiative championed by Jennifer Garner. See how that works? The Adele article about school for Archie was a favor to Meghan because they share Sunshine Sachs PR firm.


Okay, so all of Hollywood is selling their services to each other, including a British legend, and your problem is with Meghan because???


Not PP. but because she claimed to want to be out of the spotlight. Her husband’s has trauma when he hears camera clicks. Don’t you see the hypocrisy??


She never said that. Ever. The British Press did however. As for Harry and his camera clicks - he's allowed to have PTSD after finding out reporters took pictures of his mother as she was dying in the back of a limo. Many of the same paparazzi who followed him as a child. William has also spoken on how the memories affected him but you don't see the tabloids calling the heir 'weak'. Only the one that actually served in a warzone.

The only thing Meghan and Harry asked for together was 'fairness'. They wanted a British Press that did not write 5-10 articles a day from the moment she was announced that she was his girlfriend about how much they hated her.

From what I've seen - the American press have taken a much more measured approach and they aren't racing to write articles about how Meghan's love of avocados is linked to terrorism and her wearing an off-the-shoulder dress is a crime against humanity. Which sad to say - is a massive improvement.

Anonymous
Oooh some juicy gossip from reliable Blind Gossip:

https://blindgossip.com/the-switcheroo/


Poor Harry. Meghan seems to be a better actress than we all give her credit for. She certainly played Harry and is exactly where she wanted to be in Hollywood (though not couchsurfing).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Oooh some juicy gossip from reliable Blind Gossip:

https://blindgossip.com/the-switcheroo/


Poor Harry. Meghan seems to be a better actress than we all give her credit for. She certainly played Harry and is exactly where she wanted to be in Hollywood (though not couchsurfing).


*shrug*

So Harry wanted to raise his child part-time in Nairobi according to BG?

Fascinating. I would totally pick the beaches of Los Angeles over a neo-colonial state in East Africa where the very white families do not associate with anyone outside of their racial background.

You're surprised Meghan didn't want her part-African American child raised on a continent that has a huge problem with skin lightening and an educational system which can't touch the private schools of England or Los Angeles?

She's a mother first and Harry has proved he's a father above all else.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Oooh some juicy gossip from reliable Blind Gossip:

https://blindgossip.com/the-switcheroo/


Poor Harry. Meghan seems to be a better actress than we all give her credit for. She certainly played Harry and is exactly where she wanted to be in Hollywood (though not couchsurfing).



Meghan would never have moved anywhere in Africa because that was Harry’s former girlfriend Chelsy Davy’s territory. Meghan has always been jealous/threatened by Chelsy and Cressida.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oooh some juicy gossip from reliable Blind Gossip:

https://blindgossip.com/the-switcheroo/


Poor Harry. Meghan seems to be a better actress than we all give her credit for. She certainly played Harry and is exactly where she wanted to be in Hollywood (though not couchsurfing).



Meghan would never have moved anywhere in Africa because that was Harry’s former girlfriend Chelsy Davy’s territory. Meghan has always been jealous/threatened by Chelsy and Cressida.


Cressida absolutely. She's gorgeous. Chelsy looks like a dog. And her 'territory'? The woman lives in London.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oooh some juicy gossip from reliable Blind Gossip:

https://blindgossip.com/the-switcheroo/


Poor Harry. Meghan seems to be a better actress than we all give her credit for. She certainly played Harry and is exactly where she wanted to be in Hollywood (though not couchsurfing).



Meghan would never have moved anywhere in Africa because that was Harry’s former girlfriend Chelsy Davy’s territory. Meghan has always been jealous/threatened by Chelsy and Cressida.


Cressida absolutely. She's gorgeous. Chelsy looks like a dog. And her 'territory'? The woman lives in London.



Chelsy divides her time between her homes in South Africa and London. She is from Zimbabwe and has her own African travel company and jewelry company featuring African designers and materials. Yep, people associate Chelsy with Africa.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oooh some juicy gossip from reliable Blind Gossip:

https://blindgossip.com/the-switcheroo/


Poor Harry. Meghan seems to be a better actress than we all give her credit for. She certainly played Harry and is exactly where she wanted to be in Hollywood (though not couchsurfing).


*shrug*

So Harry wanted to raise his child part-time in Nairobi according to BG?

Fascinating. I would totally pick the beaches of Los Angeles over a neo-colonial state in East Africa where the very white families do not associate with anyone outside of their racial background.

You're surprised Meghan didn't want her part-African American child raised on a continent that has a huge problem with skin lightening and an educational system which can't touch the private schools of England or Los Angeles?

She's a mother first and Harry has proved he's a father above all else.



You left out the part where Meghan led Harry to believe she wanted that African dream, too. But she really wanted the privacy of Hollywood. Oh dear.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oooh some juicy gossip from reliable Blind Gossip:

https://blindgossip.com/the-switcheroo/


Poor Harry. Meghan seems to be a better actress than we all give her credit for. She certainly played Harry and is exactly where she wanted to be in Hollywood (though not couchsurfing).


*shrug*

So Harry wanted to raise his child part-time in Nairobi according to BG?

Fascinating. I would totally pick the beaches of Los Angeles over a neo-colonial state in East Africa where the very white families do not associate with anyone outside of their racial background.

You're surprised Meghan didn't want her part-African American child raised on a continent that has a huge problem with skin lightening and an educational system which can't touch the private schools of England or Los Angeles?

She's a mother first and Harry has proved he's a father above all else.



You left out the part where Meghan led Harry to believe she wanted that African dream, too. But she really wanted the privacy of Hollywood. Oh dear.


What makes you think they can’t have both?

With the connections and money they make in Hollywood they could buy a 50-acre lodge in the EAR this time next summer or in 2022.

They been married all of 2 years. Pregnant with a child and raising a newborn the whole time.

It’s funny that people talk about the Sussex so much because they’ve accomplished so much. I’ll be curious where all their properties will be by the end of the decade.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oooh some juicy gossip from reliable Blind Gossip:

https://blindgossip.com/the-switcheroo/


Poor Harry. Meghan seems to be a better actress than we all give her credit for. She certainly played Harry and is exactly where she wanted to be in Hollywood (though not couchsurfing).



Meghan would never have moved anywhere in Africa because that was Harry’s former girlfriend Chelsy Davy’s territory. Meghan has always been jealous/threatened by Chelsy and Cressida.


Cressida absolutely. She's gorgeous. Chelsy looks like a dog. And her 'territory'? The woman lives in London.



Chelsy divides her time between her homes in South Africa and London. She is from Zimbabwe and has her own African travel company and jewelry company featuring African designers and materials. Yep, people associate Chelsy with Africa.


So she’s merching herself and Africa like her life depends on it (I thought Chelsy had a law degree?) but Meghan is the problem?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oooh some juicy gossip from reliable Blind Gossip:

https://blindgossip.com/the-switcheroo/


Poor Harry. Meghan seems to be a better actress than we all give her credit for. She certainly played Harry and is exactly where she wanted to be in Hollywood (though not couchsurfing).



Meghan would never have moved anywhere in Africa because that was Harry’s former girlfriend Chelsy Davy’s territory. Meghan has always been jealous/threatened by Chelsy and Cressida.


Cressida absolutely. She's gorgeous. Chelsy looks like a dog. And her 'territory'? The woman lives in London.



Chelsy divides her time between her homes in South Africa and London. She is from Zimbabwe and has her own African travel company and jewelry company featuring African designers and materials. Yep, people associate Chelsy with Africa.


So she’s merching herself and Africa like her life depends on it (I thought Chelsy had a law degree?) but Meghan is the problem?



Chelsy is a businesswoman who loves her homeland. She created and owns her own companies— AYA and Aya Africa Travel. She is a businesswoman with a law degree. I don’t understand your point — how is that is bad?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oooh some juicy gossip from reliable Blind Gossip:

https://blindgossip.com/the-switcheroo/


Poor Harry. Meghan seems to be a better actress than we all give her credit for. She certainly played Harry and is exactly where she wanted to be in Hollywood (though not couchsurfing).


*shrug*

So Harry wanted to raise his child part-time in Nairobi according to BG?

Fascinating. I would totally pick the beaches of Los Angeles over a neo-colonial state in East Africa where the very white families do not associate with anyone outside of their racial background.

You're surprised Meghan didn't want her part-African American child raised on a continent that has a huge problem with skin lightening and an educational system which can't touch the private schools of England or Los Angeles?

She's a mother first and Harry has proved he's a father above all else.



You left out the part where Meghan led Harry to believe she wanted that African dream, too. But she really wanted the privacy of Hollywood. Oh dear.


What makes you think they can’t have both?

With the connections and money they make in Hollywood they could buy a 50-acre lodge in the EAR this time next summer or in 2022.

They been married all of 2 years. Pregnant with a child and raising a newborn the whole time.

It’s funny that people talk about the Sussex so much because they’ve accomplished so much. I’ll be curious where all their properties will be by the end of the decade.



LOL. They are broke and need handouts from Charles and Tyler Perry. Meghan already dissed the idea of Africa, per the blind.
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: