Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
Those articles in British press are Meghan and Harry’s paid PR pieces by Sunshine Sachs. Just like People Magazine, Harper Bazaar. You really don’t understand that? They are paid PR pieces. |
Anonymous
Yet here you are, talking about them. Yup seems irrelevant to me! |
Anonymous
Agree he deserved the blowback, but Nazis don't marry and have children outside their race, so. . . . |
Anonymous
What? Meghan and Harry are paying the Daily Mail, Express, and the Sun to...write negative, sniping articles about them? You're serious? Any time they can use her name, they are. Just forget she exists. EXCLUSIVE: Meghan Markle's designer best friend Misha Nonoo is seen returning to NYC with baby Leo as doormen carry luggage from her packed SUV hours after telling fans she's 'not going anywhere' and is working from home https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8316357/Meghan-Markles-friend-Misha-Nonoo-says-shes-not-going-seen-returning-NYC.html What must Charles think of Prince Harry's new father figure? He's a 70-year-old music mogul with five marriages and numerous children - now his latest love (an old chum of Meghan) says he and the Prince are like father and son, writes TOM LEONARD https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8341841/What-Charles-think-Prince-Harrys-new-father-figure-TOM-LEONARD-writes.html Meet the Sussexes' new neighbours: Harry and Meghan expressed a desire for living in the real world - yet their new home is in one of the swankiest gated communities in Los Angeles https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8341895/Harry-Meghans-new-home-one-swankiest-gated-communities-Los-Angeles.html Meghan and Harry spark row as fury grows over demands Sussexes return 'millions' to UK https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1283830/meghan-markle-latest-prince-harry-news-duke-duchess-sussex-frogmore-royal-family-update Meghan Markle and Prince Harry always wanted to be ‘international royals’ claims expert https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1284063/meghan-markle-prince-harry-international-royals-wedding-anniversary-LA Meghan Markle and Harry's tell-all book is 'soap opera' SHOCK claims from Palace https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1283518/meghan-markle-news-meghan-markle-prince-harry-book-finding-freedom-royal-news Meghan Markle and Prince Harry ‘living at Tyler Perry’s $18million Beverly Hills mansion arranged by pal Oprah’ https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11575013/meghan-markle-prince-harry-hollywood-oprah-winfrey/ Meghan Markle and Prince Harry eye up £10million LA mansion with ‘granny annexe’ flat for mum Doria https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11534911/meghan-markle-prince-harry-la-mansion-doria/ |
Anonymous
I’m just reading cause I’m bored. I like the BRF, but Meghan and Garry are really disappointing. |
Anonymous
^^Harry |
Anonymous
Most of these are clearly paid for PR pieces— all of the Oprah/Tyler Perry mansion/David Foster/Adele. Poster, are you one of Meghan’s paid bots? |
Anonymous
I think you need to think through what you're contending. Harry and Meghan left because they felt poorly treated and undefended by the royal family. Their critics claim they are snowflakes and were actually treated well and warmly welcomed into the family. YOU are suggesting that the Queen deliberately chose the date of their wedding because a prior king had a woman who married into the family beheaded. |
Anonymous
Small tip. No one brags about staying in a friend's house for free. Meghan lived in Canada for months and they never found out who owned the house she lived in despite trying for ages and pining it on everyone from Elton John to a Russian billionaire. I get that you hate her -- but there is absolutely no reason for a PR company to pay to have Meghan written about in negging terms for living a lavish, luxurious life in a country that hates her for that reason. If it was PR about her new contract or a foundation she started -- then yeah, I can see it. |
Anonymous
The PR is about Meghan and Harry having Hollywood celebrity friends who can offer them these lavish homes. You really don’t understand PR. That whole birthday reading? That was to link Meghan to Jennifer Garner, who is championing that reading initiative. You buy into this PR spin so easily. |
Anonymous
And you're seeing ghosts that aren't there. Ever thought Jennifer praised Meghan of her own accord? I mean...unless you're saying Garner can be bought. I thought she was America's sweetheart? |
Anonymous
| I can't figure out why they had the stopover in Canada. Was it strategic? Was it to see if they liked living in North America? |
Anonymous
|
Anonymous
I think it was strategic. By saying they were going to North America, they covered their bases. They were still living in a Commonwealth country but they weren't spending 3 months in the U.S. on the taxpayer dime (Oct/Nov until January when they were supposed to return). However I think they felt so at home back on Canadian/U.S. soil, so much more relaxed, no longer hounded that they decided to stay. Especially since the palace made no effort to take their side in their fight against the press and was probably pressuring them the whole time to 'act right' and drop the lawsuits. Why go back to hell when they could take it one step forward and just move on to L.A. and their version of heaven? I do not think they intended to move to the U.S. quite so soon, but with the borders closing they made a emergency decision and luckily they have rich friends who can put them up for months at a time in mansions. - a fan of Meghan |
Anonymous
Meghan is trying to buddy up and get cred with the “Hollywood Mommy set” — pretty much led by Jennifer Garner — thus the book reading was set up for Archie’s birthday to support initiative championed by Jennifer Garner. See how that works? The Adele article about school for Archie was a favor to Meghan because they share Sunshine Sachs PR firm. |