Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oooh some juicy gossip from reliable Blind Gossip:

https://blindgossip.com/the-switcheroo/


Poor Harry. Meghan seems to be a better actress than we all give her credit for. She certainly played Harry and is exactly where she wanted to be in Hollywood (though not couchsurfing).

*shrug*

So Harry wanted to raise his child part-time in Nairobi according to BG?

Fascinating. I would totally pick the beaches of Los Angeles over a neo-colonial state in East Africa where the very white families do not associate with anyone outside of their racial background.

You're surprised Meghan didn't want her part-African American child raised on a continent that has a huge problem with skin lightening and an educational system which can't touch the private schools of England or Los Angeles?

She's a mother first and Harry has proved he's a father above all else.

You left out the part where Meghan led Harry to believe she wanted that African dream, too. But she really wanted the privacy of Hollywood. Oh dear.

What makes you think they can’t have both?

With the connections and money they make in Hollywood they could buy a 50-acre lodge in the EAR this time next summer or in 2022.

They been married all of 2 years. Pregnant with a child and raising a newborn the whole time.

It’s funny that people talk about the Sussex so much because they’ve accomplished so much. I’ll be curious where all their properties will be by the end of the decade.

LOL. They are broke and need handouts from Charles and Tyler Perry. Meghan already dissed the idea of Africa, per the blind.

Yeah, I'm going to believe a blind over the obvious favoritism she showed South Africa by revealing her 3-month old son to Archbishop Desmond Tutu before doing any public appearances in England.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oooh some juicy gossip from reliable Blind Gossip:

https://blindgossip.com/the-switcheroo/


Poor Harry. Meghan seems to be a better actress than we all give her credit for. She certainly played Harry and is exactly where she wanted to be in Hollywood (though not couchsurfing).

*shrug*

So Harry wanted to raise his child part-time in Nairobi according to BG?

Fascinating. I would totally pick the beaches of Los Angeles over a neo-colonial state in East Africa where the very white families do not associate with anyone outside of their racial background.

You're surprised Meghan didn't want her part-African American child raised on a continent that has a huge problem with skin lightening and an educational system which can't touch the private schools of England or Los Angeles?

She's a mother first and Harry has proved he's a father above all else.

You left out the part where Meghan led Harry to believe she wanted that African dream, too. But she really wanted the privacy of Hollywood. Oh dear.

What makes you think they can’t have both?

With the connections and money they make in Hollywood they could buy a 50-acre lodge in the EAR this time next summer or in 2022.

They been married all of 2 years. Pregnant with a child and raising a newborn the whole time.

It’s funny that people talk about the Sussex so much because they’ve accomplished so much. I’ll be curious where all their properties will be by the end of the decade.

LOL. They are broke and need handouts from Charles and Tyler Perry. Meghan already dissed the idea of Africa, per the blind.

Yeah, I'm going to believe a blind over the obvious favoritism she showed South Africa by revealing her 3-month old son to Archbishop Desmond Tutu before doing any public appearances in England.

Huh? Blind is about Meghan dissing idea of permanently moving to anywhere in Africa, even though she led Harry to believe she shared this dream with him. The bait and switch. Hollywood was her plan all along. Why does it matter that she had a PR event with Desmond Tutu?

[Anonymous]

I find it funny how there is PR about what anniversary gift Harry gave Meghan — this kind of over the top “we are so in love” PR — is usually a surefire sign the couple is about to split. The strongest celebrity couples don’t need to convince anyone through PR puff pieces.

[Anonymous]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8344207/Meghan-Markles-experience-B-List-actress-wasnt-going-prepare-royal-expert-claims.html

I agree with Katie Nicholl.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I find it funny how there is PR about what anniversary gift Harry gave Meghan — this kind of over the top “we are so in love” PR — is usually a surefire sign the couple is about to split. The strongest celebrity couples don’t need to convince anyone through PR puff pieces.

And also the kind of pieces that further enforce their hypocrisy. They want to be left alone yet they put out these puff pieces every day!

[Anonymous]

You don’t need to quote the entire thread! Just post your comment. These are impossible to read.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it funny how there is PR about what anniversary gift Harry gave Meghan — this kind of over the top “we are so in love” PR — is usually a surefire sign the couple is about to split. The strongest celebrity couples don’t need to convince anyone through PR puff pieces

And also the kind of pieces that further enforce their hypocrisy. They want to be left alone yet they put out these puff pieces every day!

But without those puff pieces you’d have no life, right? I mean what would you talk about, what would your life revolve around if not the latest on H&M?

[Anonymous]

So bored. No longer interesting. Not royals lost their shine. Baby is cute though. I predict Harry back in UK by this time next year.

[Anonymous]

Oprah is now denying that she helped Harry and Meghan land Tyler Perry’s house — and why is the news that they are at Tyler’s house only alleged—

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/amp32630428/prince-harry-meghan-markle-home-not-arranged-by-oprah/


Why is Oprah distancing herself from them? Everything is always so shady smoke-and-mirrors with them. They live here, no they are there, no really they are here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oprah is now denying that she helped Harry and Meghan land Tyler Perry’s house — and why is the news that they are at Tyler’s house only alleged—

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/amp32630428/prince-harry-meghan-markle-home-not-arranged-by-oprah/


Why is Oprah distancing herself from them? Everything is always so shady smoke-and-mirrors with them. They live here, no they are there, no really they are here.

Wait, is Tyler Perry's house that great? Is he a has-been or did he upgrade?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oprah is now denying that she helped Harry and Meghan land Tyler Perry’s house — and why is the news that they are at Tyler’s house only alleged—

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/amp32630428/prince-harry-meghan-markle-home-not-arranged-by-oprah/


Why is Oprah distancing herself from them? Everything is always so shady smoke-and-mirrors with them. They live here, no they are there, no really they are here.

Wait, is Tyler Perry's house that great? Is he a has-been or did he upgrade?

The house is considered very tacky — dated, dark Tuscan interior. It has been for sale for some time. Rumors are that Meghan and Harry are being paid to live there to raise its profile and sales prospects.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oprah is now denying that she helped Harry and Meghan land Tyler Perry’s house — and why is the news that they are at Tyler’s house only alleged—

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/amp32630428/prince-harry-meghan-markle-home-not-arranged-by-oprah/


Why is Oprah distancing herself from them? Everything is always so shady smoke-and-mirrors with them. They live here, no they are there, no really they are here.

Wait, is Tyler Perry's house that great? Is he a has-been or did he upgrade?

The house is considered very tacky — dated, dark Tuscan interior. It has been for sale for some time. Rumors are that Meghan and Harry are being paid to live there to raise its profile and sales prospects.

I’m really interested in why Oprah is dumping them. Doesn’t look good for them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I find it funny how there is PR about what anniversary gift Harry gave Meghan — this kind of over the top “we are so in love” PR — is usually a surefire sign the couple is about to split. The strongest celebrity couples don’t need to convince anyone through PR puff pieces.

Have you seen this latest “leak” of their anniversary gifts to each other — yep, over the top lovey-dovey PR. Their marriage is definitely on the rocks:

https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-prince-harry-second-anniversary-gifts/

[Anonymous]

Ugh. They are both so insufferable.

[Anonymous]

To the poster upthread commenting on Frogmore Cottage repayment — Harry and Meghan are not repaying “rent.” They are repaying the cost of renovations that were paid by the British taxpayers.

The Queen gifted them the cottage to live in, and there were approximately 3 million pound renovations done on the home to suit their wishes (renovations paid for by British taxpayers). There was such disgust that the renovations were done and the couple didn’t choose to live there after all that Harry and Meghan agreed to pay a meager 18000 pounds per month to the British taxpayers for the renovations. Really not a lot of money, if they are supposedly wealthy.

https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-and-prince-harry-begin-to-pay-back-refurbishment-cost-of-their-u-k-home/