76/95 VA counties declare 2A sanctuaries

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't need the National Guard.

1. If we get universal background checks in all the places not participating in this gimmick that would be a big gain

2. Commonwealth can cut funding to these places. Most of them rely heavily on Commonwealth funding, esp for schools.

Wait what? You'd deprive Virginia school students of right to Virginia education state funding (derived mainly from Virginia citizen taxes) as a means to defray our constitutional rights to bear arms? Teach our kids to reason, not to be totalitarian which is not accepted in the USA.

Constitution of United States of America 1789 (rev. 1992) Article 5

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The counties around DC supply most of the tax revenue that gets used to educate the rest of the state. If they aren't willing to give up their assault weapons, then we shouldn't be paying to educate their kids.

Punish the lower income youth?

Clearly they value guns more than their children, so yes, I'm fine with that.

It's a false choice. There is no defense against "If you love children, X" because the alternative is "You hate children." The world is more than a black and white binary choice. I value my rights and love children. There is no conflict in this position.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its comical how much these snowflakes care about legal guns, while ignoring the illegal ones .

Every gun started out as a legal gun before it became an illegal one. There is no difference between the two, a gun is a gun. Period. Therefore we have to get rid of ALL of them. The fact that simple logic like this is beyond you people, or you’re simply unwilling to acknowledge this, shows the depths of your depravity. Ultimately, you’re going to have two choices ahead of you, and I don’t really care which you choose: you can give your guns to the police to dispose of, OR, you will be a criminal and will eventually be reported by someone, and will either go to jail for a very, very long time, or be killed in a confrontation with law enforcement. Your choice. Again, I don’t care which, as long as either case happens.

I really hope Northan, Herring and the General Assembly embrace the mandate they’ve been handed by voters, because it represents a truly unique opportunity to show the country how proceed against guns with real leadership, backed up by voters who swung the balance of power with common sense gun safety laws in mind. A very, very small minority of Virginians own the guns, and the rest of Virginia is sick and tired of being held hostage by them. I hope along with banning repeating or automatic guns and assault weapons and guns that use magazine clips or any other system that allows a gun to fire more than once without some kind of lengthy reloading procedure, that there will also be a law component to allow the public to report gun criminals who are hoarding banned weapons. There should be a large reward incentive offered for anonymously turning in people with banned guns, paid for with heavy fines levied on gun criminals. Once gun hoarders realize it’s only a matter of time before someone who knows them reports them, many will voluntarily surrender peacefully. This would go a long ways to reducing the number of law enforcement raids needed to seize guns from scofflaws.

You don’t sound like a particularly bright person, but I hope you are at least smart enough to realize that you simply can’t win this. The days of people having guns are over.

They tried that public reporting thing. They called it East Germany. Everyone loved it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its comical how much these snowflakes care about legal guns, while ignoring the illegal ones .

Every gun started out as a legal gun before it became an illegal one. There is no difference between the two, a gun is a gun. Period. Therefore we have to get rid of ALL of them. The fact that simple logic like this is beyond you people, or you’re simply unwilling to acknowledge this, shows the depths of your depravity. Ultimately, you’re going to have two choices ahead of you, and I don’t really care which you choose: you can give your guns to the police to dispose of, OR, you will be a criminal and will eventually be reported by someone, and will either go to jail for a very, very long time, or be killed in a confrontation with law enforcement. Your choice. Again, I don’t care which, as long as either case happens.

I really hope Northan, Herring and the General Assembly embrace the mandate they’ve been handed by voters, because it represents a truly unique opportunity to show the country how proceed against guns with real leadership, backed up by voters who swung the balance of power with common sense gun safety laws in mind. A very, very small minority of Virginians own the guns, and the rest of Virginia is sick and tired of being held hostage by them. I hope along with banning repeating or automatic guns and assault weapons and guns that use magazine clips or any other system that allows a gun to fire more than once without some kind of lengthy reloading procedure, that there will also be a law component to allow the public to report gun criminals who are hoarding banned weapons. There should be a large reward incentive offered for anonymously turning in people with banned guns, paid for with heavy fines levied on gun criminals. Once gun hoarders realize it’s only a matter of time before someone who knows them reports them, many will voluntarily surrender peacefully. This would go a long ways to reducing the number of law enforcement raids needed to seize guns from scofflaws.

You don’t sound like a particularly bright person, but I hope you are at least smart enough to realize that you simply can’t win this. The days of people having guns are over.

There you go again wishing for more violence.

If you refuse to disarm, you have become a criminal. An armed criminal. And you need to be dealt with harshly. Violently, if necessary, because that will set an example for others, which will hopefully reduce the need for such violence in the future.

You can stop this. Just give up your guns. That’s all it takes to prevent it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its comical how much these snowflakes care about legal guns, while ignoring the illegal ones .

Every gun started out as a legal gun before it became an illegal one. There is no difference between the two, a gun is a gun. Period. Therefore we have to get rid of ALL of them. The fact that simple logic like this is beyond you people, or you’re simply unwilling to acknowledge this, shows the depths of your depravity. Ultimately, you’re going to have two choices ahead of you, and I don’t really care which you choose: you can give your guns to the police to dispose of, OR, you will be a criminal and will eventually be reported by someone, and will either go to jail for a very, very long time, or be killed in a confrontation with law enforcement. Your choice. Again, I don’t care which, as long as either case happens.

I really hope Northan, Herring and the General Assembly embrace the mandate they’ve been handed by voters, because it represents a truly unique opportunity to show the country how proceed against guns with real leadership, backed up by voters who swung the balance of power with common sense gun safety laws in mind. A very, very small minority of Virginians own the guns, and the rest of Virginia is sick and tired of being held hostage by them. I hope along with banning repeating or automatic guns and assault weapons and guns that use magazine clips or any other system that allows a gun to fire more than once without some kind of lengthy reloading procedure, that there will also be a law component to allow the public to report gun criminals who are hoarding banned weapons. There should be a large reward incentive offered for anonymously turning in people with banned guns, paid for with heavy fines levied on gun criminals. Once gun hoarders realize it’s only a matter of time before someone who knows them reports them, many will voluntarily surrender peacefully. This would go a long ways to reducing the number of law enforcement raids needed to seize guns from scofflaws.

You don’t sound like a particularly bright person, but I hope you are at least smart enough to realize that you simply can’t win this. The days of people having guns are over.

They tried that public reporting thing. They called it East Germany. Everyone loved it.

Did Rush Limbaugh tell you to say that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its comical how much these snowflakes care about legal guns, while ignoring the illegal ones .

Every gun started out as a legal gun before it became an illegal one. There is no difference between the two, a gun is a gun. Period. Therefore we have to get rid of ALL of them. The fact that simple logic like this is beyond you people, or you’re simply unwilling to acknowledge this, shows the depths of your depravity. Ultimately, you’re going to have two choices ahead of you, and I don’t really care which you choose: you can give your guns to the police to dispose of, OR, you will be a criminal and will eventually be reported by someone, and will either go to jail for a very, very long time, or be killed in a confrontation with law enforcement. Your choice. Again, I don’t care which, as long as either case happens.

I really hope Northan, Herring and the General Assembly embrace the mandate they’ve been handed by voters, because it represents a truly unique opportunity to show the country how proceed against guns with real leadership, backed up by voters who swung the balance of power with common sense gun safety laws in mind. A very, very small minority of Virginians own the guns, and the rest of Virginia is sick and tired of being held hostage by them. I hope along with banning repeating or automatic guns and assault weapons and guns that use magazine clips or any other system that allows a gun to fire more than once without some kind of lengthy reloading procedure, that there will also be a law component to allow the public to report gun criminals who are hoarding banned weapons. There should be a large reward incentive offered for anonymously turning in people with banned guns, paid for with heavy fines levied on gun criminals. Once gun hoarders realize it’s only a matter of time before someone who knows them reports them, many will voluntarily surrender peacefully. This would go a long ways to reducing the number of law enforcement raids needed to seize guns from scofflaws.

You don’t sound like a particularly bright person, but I hope you are at least smart enough to realize that you simply can’t win this. The days of people having guns are over.

LMAO. Now thats cute.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its comical how much these snowflakes care about legal guns, while ignoring the illegal ones .

Every gun started out as a legal gun before it became an illegal one. There is no difference between the two, a gun is a gun. Period. Therefore we have to get rid of ALL of them. The fact that simple logic like this is beyond you people, or you’re simply unwilling to acknowledge this, shows the depths of your depravity. Ultimately, you’re going to have two choices ahead of you, and I don’t really care which you choose: you can give your guns to the police to dispose of, OR, you will be a criminal and will eventually be reported by someone, and will either go to jail for a very, very long time, or be killed in a confrontation with law enforcement. Your choice. Again, I don’t care which, as long as either case happens.

I really hope Northan, Herring and the General Assembly embrace the mandate they’ve been handed by voters, because it represents a truly unique opportunity to show the country how proceed against guns with real leadership, backed up by voters who swung the balance of power with common sense gun safety laws in mind. A very, very small minority of Virginians own the guns, and the rest of Virginia is sick and tired of being held hostage by them. I hope along with banning repeating or automatic guns and assault weapons and guns that use magazine clips or any other system that allows a gun to fire more than once without some kind of lengthy reloading procedure, that there will also be a law component to allow the public to report gun criminals who are hoarding banned weapons. There should be a large reward incentive offered for anonymously turning in people with banned guns, paid for with heavy fines levied on gun criminals. Once gun hoarders realize it’s only a matter of time before someone who knows them reports them, many will voluntarily surrender peacefully. This would go a long ways to reducing the number of law enforcement raids needed to seize guns from scofflaws.

You don’t sound like a particularly bright person, but I hope you are at least smart enough to realize that you simply can’t win this. The days of people having guns are over.

There you go again wishing for more violence.

If you refuse to disarm, you have become a criminal. An armed criminal. And you need to be dealt with harshly. Violently, if necessary, because that will set an example for others, which will hopefully reduce the need for such violence in the future.

You can stop this. Just give up your guns. That’s all it takes to prevent it.

Jesus, Im glad you don't own any firearms. You sound like a danger to society.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't need the National Guard.

1. If we get universal background checks in all the places not participating in this gimmick that would be a big gain

2. Commonwealth can cut funding to these places. Most of them rely heavily on Commonwealth funding, esp for schools.

Wait what? You'd deprive Virginia school students of right to Virginia education state funding (derived mainly from Virginia citizen taxes) as a means to defray our constitutional rights to bear arms? Teach our kids to reason, not to be totalitarian which is not accepted in the USA.

Constitution of United States of America 1789 (rev. 1992) Article 5

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The counties around DC supply most of the tax revenue that gets used to educate the rest of the state. If they aren't willing to give up their assault weapons, then we shouldn't be paying to educate their kids.

Punish the lower income youth?

Clearly they value guns more than their children, so yes, I'm fine with that.

It's a false choice. There is no defense against "If you love children, X" because the alternative is "You hate children." The world is more than a black and white binary choice. I value my rights and love children. There is no conflict in this position.

Except your fetish is used to murder classrooms full of our children. I don’t give a damn about your rights. You don’t have a right to a gun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its comical how much these snowflakes care about legal guns, while ignoring the illegal ones .

Every gun started out as a legal gun before it became an illegal one. There is no difference between the two, a gun is a gun. Period. Therefore we have to get rid of ALL of them. The fact that simple logic like this is beyond you people, or you’re simply unwilling to acknowledge this, shows the depths of your depravity. Ultimately, you’re going to have two choices ahead of you, and I don’t really care which you choose: you can give your guns to the police to dispose of, OR, you will be a criminal and will eventually be reported by someone, and will either go to jail for a very, very long time, or be killed in a confrontation with law enforcement. Your choice. Again, I don’t care which, as long as either case happens.

I really hope Northan, Herring and the General Assembly embrace the mandate they’ve been handed by voters, because it represents a truly unique opportunity to show the country how proceed against guns with real leadership, backed up by voters who swung the balance of power with common sense gun safety laws in mind. A very, very small minority of Virginians own the guns, and the rest of Virginia is sick and tired of being held hostage by them. I hope along with banning repeating or automatic guns and assault weapons and guns that use magazine clips or any other system that allows a gun to fire more than once without some kind of lengthy reloading procedure, that there will also be a law component to allow the public to report gun criminals who are hoarding banned weapons. There should be a large reward incentive offered for anonymously turning in people with banned guns, paid for with heavy fines levied on gun criminals. Once gun hoarders realize it’s only a matter of time before someone who knows them reports them, many will voluntarily surrender peacefully. This would go a long ways to reducing the number of law enforcement raids needed to seize guns from scofflaws.

You don’t sound like a particularly bright person, but I hope you are at least smart enough to realize that you simply can’t win this. The days of people having guns are over.

There you go again wishing for more violence.

If you refuse to disarm, you have become a criminal. An armed criminal. And you need to be dealt with harshly. Violently, if necessary, because that will set an example for others, which will hopefully reduce the need for such violence in the future.

You can stop this. Just give up your guns. That’s all it takes to prevent it.

Jesus, Im glad you don't own any firearms. You sound like a danger to society.

You think I’M a danger to society?!? What kind of society do you want??? Because it’s clearly not one that a civilized person would recognize. You want anarchy. I want an orderly civilization where no one has the ability to murder someone else with a gun over the most petty disputes. I think the only the police and army should have guns, and no one else. And you call me at threat? That’s rich. You’re a loon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its comical how much these snowflakes care about legal guns, while ignoring the illegal ones .

Every gun started out as a legal gun before it became an illegal one. There is no difference between the two, a gun is a gun. Period. Therefore we have to get rid of ALL of them. The fact that simple logic like this is beyond you people, or you’re simply unwilling to acknowledge this, shows the depths of your depravity. Ultimately, you’re going to have two choices ahead of you, and I don’t really care which you choose: you can give your guns to the police to dispose of, OR, you will be a criminal and will eventually be reported by someone, and will either go to jail for a very, very long time, or be killed in a confrontation with law enforcement. Your choice. Again, I don’t care which, as long as either case happens.

I really hope Northan, Herring and the General Assembly embrace the mandate they’ve been handed by voters, because it represents a truly unique opportunity to show the country how proceed against guns with real leadership, backed up by voters who swung the balance of power with common sense gun safety laws in mind. A very, very small minority of Virginians own the guns, and the rest of Virginia is sick and tired of being held hostage by them. I hope along with banning repeating or automatic guns and assault weapons and guns that use magazine clips or any other system that allows a gun to fire more than once without some kind of lengthy reloading procedure, that there will also be a law component to allow the public to report gun criminals who are hoarding banned weapons. There should be a large reward incentive offered for anonymously turning in people with banned guns, paid for with heavy fines levied on gun criminals. Once gun hoarders realize it’s only a matter of time before someone who knows them reports them, many will voluntarily surrender peacefully. This would go a long ways to reducing the number of law enforcement raids needed to seize guns from scofflaws.

You don’t sound like a particularly bright person, but I hope you are at least smart enough to realize that you simply can’t win this. The days of people having guns are over.

There you go again wishing for more violence.

If you refuse to disarm, you have become a criminal. An armed criminal. And you need to be dealt with harshly. Violently, if necessary, because that will set an example for others, which will hopefully reduce the need for such violence in the future.

You can stop this. Just give up your guns. That’s all it takes to prevent it.

Okay you are starting to sound like a troll, no liberal person would think this way.

Criminals need to be dealt with violently to set an example? We already have a broken criminal justice system that unfairly targets people of color and lower income whites. Please tell me you aren't serious. Or just come out and tell us which extremist group you belong to. New Nazi Party? ANTIFA? Or just a racist?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its comical how much these snowflakes care about legal guns, while ignoring the illegal ones .

Every gun started out as a legal gun before it became an illegal one. There is no difference between the two, a gun is a gun. Period. Therefore we have to get rid of ALL of them. The fact that simple logic like this is beyond you people, or you’re simply unwilling to acknowledge this, shows the depths of your depravity. Ultimately, you’re going to have two choices ahead of you, and I don’t really care which you choose: you can give your guns to the police to dispose of, OR, you will be a criminal and will eventually be reported by someone, and will either go to jail for a very, very long time, or be killed in a confrontation with law enforcement. Your choice. Again, I don’t care which, as long as either case happens.

I really hope Northan, Herring and the General Assembly embrace the mandate they’ve been handed by voters, because it represents a truly unique opportunity to show the country how proceed against guns with real leadership, backed up by voters who swung the balance of power with common sense gun safety laws in mind. A very, very small minority of Virginians own the guns, and the rest of Virginia is sick and tired of being held hostage by them. I hope along with banning repeating or automatic guns and assault weapons and guns that use magazine clips or any other system that allows a gun to fire more than once without some kind of lengthy reloading procedure, that there will also be a law component to allow the public to report gun criminals who are hoarding banned weapons. There should be a large reward incentive offered for anonymously turning in people with banned guns, paid for with heavy fines levied on gun criminals. Once gun hoarders realize it’s only a matter of time before someone who knows them reports them, many will voluntarily surrender peacefully. This would go a long ways to reducing the number of law enforcement raids needed to seize guns from scofflaws.

You don’t sound like a particularly bright person, but I hope you are at least smart enough to realize that you simply can’t win this. The days of people having guns are over.

There you go again wishing for more violence.

If you refuse to disarm, you have become a criminal. An armed criminal. And you need to be dealt with harshly. Violently, if necessary, because that will set an example for others, which will hopefully reduce the need for such violence in the future.

You can stop this. Just give up your guns. That’s all it takes to prevent it.

Jesus, Im glad you don't own any firearms. You sound like a danger to society.

You think I’M a danger to society?!? What kind of society do you want??? Because it’s clearly not one that a civilized person would recognize. You want anarchy. I want an orderly civilization where no one has the ability to murder someone else with a gun over the most petty disputes. I think the only the police and army should have guns, and no one else. And you call me at threat? That’s rich. You’re a loon.

Just like the majority of us I'm a responsible gun owner, not a loon. And I do not support the gun loons, they make us look bad. I call you a threat because because of how devoid from reason you are, and your fantasy of violence upon your peers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How will this law be enforced? Seems like folly that could end in serious violence.

I hate guns, and I hope American gets to this vision one day, but it will take time. This bill seems incredibly unrealistic.

To add, I'm a teacher and I'm against screwing kids for their parents' actions. Find another leverage.

I do not think there is a constitutional requirement for the state to send funds to local school systems. If a locality loses state ed funding because of declaring themselves a 2A sanctuary, they can make up the dollars by raising local taxes. Do you think ANY change in state school funding formulas that reduces $ for any jurisdiction is "screwing kids"? I do not. (And to note again this need not mean a net decrease to state ed funding - you could increase the funding to other jurisdictions)

But if this is too much of a hot button, I am fine with cutting some other funds going from the Commonwealth to localities instead.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’ll preface this by saying I don’t live in VA, but rather in MD, and I’m worried about this sanctuary movement gaining more traction here, outside of the racist parts of the state where it is now.

Northam needs to make his stand on this next year. Because if he doesn’t, it threatens to basically negate the power of state governance as a operating model. You can’t have a bunch of elected county yahoos deciding what laws get enforced in their inbred little fiefdoms.

If that means Northan has to call up the National Guard to enforce gun laws, so be it. And any cop who doesn’t enforce the new laws needs to be fired. And the state needs to cut off all funding for any county that declares itself a gun sanctuary. Lastly, I really do think some examples are going to have to be made, quickly, and dramatically, when the new laws come into effect, especially for banning assault weapons. There needs to be in overwhelming show of force directed at gun nutters who aren’t complying, and they need to face the full fury of police and National Guard. Once the rest of them see that clinging to their guns might literally get them pulled from their cold dead hands like their bumper sticker says, those cowards will fall in line pretty quick. But examples will have to be made at first. I hope Northam is up to the task. He weathered the storm about the yearbook pretty well, so that’s encouraging, since he’s got the character for a fight. But I worry that he’ll relent on this the first time some trailer trash or rednecks with assault weapons get massacred by a police SWAT team.

You sound like an awfully angry, fearful, violent person. I hope you don't own any firearms.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: If you are curious about a specific one(s) or all of them, I will be more than happy to explain further what each means.

Which ones do you have? All of them?

And do you have any high-capacity magazines?

Yes to: Folding/telescoping stock, Pistol grip, Secondary grip, Compensator/ Flash hider/ Muzzle brake, and threaded barrel. I don't see what is wrong with any of these features and they are commonplace among most modern rifles.

I don't have a firearm with a bayonet lug, they really aren't my thing, but the majority of pre 1960 services rifles have them as a standard feature. I don't really see how the ability to mount a bayonet turns your great granddads bolt action Mauser/Springfield into an assault weapon.


LMAO no Grenade launchers, Im not sure where they are getting this from, I want to say I had a flare gun in an old Vietnam era emergency kit that was given by a neighbor. But I haven't seen that in years.

I have a few NFA items like suppressors. In addition to the standard NICS background check you go through when you buy a gun there was a 9-14 month wait, a $200 check to ATF, the submission of fingerprints and passport style photographs to law enforcement. You are also required to notify the CLEO of your City/County of your intended purchase. All of this occurs every time you wish to purchase a NFA item.

I have standard capacity magazines, no 100 round drums or anything. Just the magazine that were intended to be utilized for the specific firearms.

Do you masturbate to the fantasy of storming into a kindergarten class with your ar15 and literally blowing children’s bodies apart? Blowing off little arms and legs with high action ammunition? Hearing their screams as they die? Does that make you feel like a big powerful man? Does that get you off?

I don't know about the poster you're "responding to," but you seem to have very detailed and active fantasies along these lines. Have you thought about seeing someone to deal with your own violent impulses?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its comical how much these snowflakes care about legal guns, while ignoring the illegal ones .

Every gun started out as a legal gun before it became an illegal one. There is no difference between the two, a gun is a gun. Period. Therefore we have to get rid of ALL of them. The fact that simple logic like this is beyond you people, or you’re simply unwilling to acknowledge this, shows the depths of your depravity. Ultimately, you’re going to have two choices ahead of you, and I don’t really care which you choose: you can give your guns to the police to dispose of, OR, you will be a criminal and will eventually be reported by someone, and will either go to jail for a very, very long time, or be killed in a confrontation with law enforcement. Your choice. Again, I don’t care which, as long as either case happens.

I really hope Northan, Herring and the General Assembly embrace the mandate they’ve been handed by voters, because it represents a truly unique opportunity to show the country how proceed against guns with real leadership, backed up by voters who swung the balance of power with common sense gun safety laws in mind. A very, very small minority of Virginians own the guns, and the rest of Virginia is sick and tired of being held hostage by them. I hope along with banning repeating or automatic guns and assault weapons and guns that use magazine clips or any other system that allows a gun to fire more than once without some kind of lengthy reloading procedure, that there will also be a law component to allow the public to report gun criminals who are hoarding banned weapons. There should be a large reward incentive offered for anonymously turning in people with banned guns, paid for with heavy fines levied on gun criminals. Once gun hoarders realize it’s only a matter of time before someone who knows them reports them, many will voluntarily surrender peacefully. This would go a long ways to reducing the number of law enforcement raids needed to seize guns from scofflaws.

You don’t sound like a particularly bright person, but I hope you are at least smart enough to realize that you simply can’t win this. The days of people having guns are over.

There you go again wishing for more violence.

If you refuse to disarm, you have become a criminal. An armed criminal. And you need to be dealt with harshly. Violently, if necessary, because that will set an example for others, which will hopefully reduce the need for such violence in the future.

You can stop this. Just give up your guns. That’s all it takes to prevent it.

Okay you are starting to sound like a troll, no liberal person would think this way.

Criminals need to be dealt with violently to set an example? We already have a broken criminal justice system that unfairly targets people of color and lower income whites. Please tell me you aren't serious. Or just come out and tell us which extremist group you belong to. New Nazi Party? ANTIFA? Or just a racist?

I have been reading this thread often and have full support for police crackdown on gun people when new laws become the law. All the time being scared the white man behind me at the coffee store is to go crazy to kill everyone in the place. They need to make for having guns like the same murder with life long sentences. You got the gun you get 20 or life. I came here from a country being very high with crimes where no one has the guns if people did they have war with one and the other because each small argument.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its comical how much these snowflakes care about legal guns, while ignoring the illegal ones .

Every gun started out as a legal gun before it became an illegal one. There is no difference between the two, a gun is a gun. Period. Therefore we have to get rid of ALL of them. The fact that simple logic like this is beyond you people, or you’re simply unwilling to acknowledge this, shows the depths of your depravity. Ultimately, you’re going to have two choices ahead of you, and I don’t really care which you choose: you can give your guns to the police to dispose of, OR, you will be a criminal and will eventually be reported by someone, and will either go to jail for a very, very long time, or be killed in a confrontation with law enforcement. Your choice. Again, I don’t care which, as long as either case happens.

I really hope Northan, Herring and the General Assembly embrace the mandate they’ve been handed by voters, because it represents a truly unique opportunity to show the country how proceed against guns with real leadership, backed up by voters who swung the balance of power with common sense gun safety laws in mind. A very, very small minority of Virginians own the guns, and the rest of Virginia is sick and tired of being held hostage by them. I hope along with banning repeating or automatic guns and assault weapons and guns that use magazine clips or any other system that allows a gun to fire more than once without some kind of lengthy reloading procedure, that there will also be a law component to allow the public to report gun criminals who are hoarding banned weapons. There should be a large reward incentive offered for anonymously turning in people with banned guns, paid for with heavy fines levied on gun criminals. Once gun hoarders realize it’s only a matter of time before someone who knows them reports them, many will voluntarily surrender peacefully. This would go a long ways to reducing the number of law enforcement raids needed to seize guns from scofflaws.

You don’t sound like a particularly bright person, but I hope you are at least smart enough to realize that you simply can’t win this. The days of people having guns are over.

- if only that pesky U.S. Constitution would just go away, along with those Justices who keep upholding it!