Rose Hanbury sat at Prince William’s table

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annddd....here we go

Honestly, I'm struck by how similar Kate and Rose are. Tall, skinny, long-faced brunettes. You'd think if William were going to step out, it would be with a bouncy, buxom blonde or something.

Maybe he has a type.

[Anonymous]

Does anyone know what the pins set on the white ribbon that some of the royals were wearing are?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know what the pins set on the white ribbon that some of the royals were wearing are?

All you ever wanted to know about the Orders they are wearing (those are the pins) and some amazingly good close-ups of the tiaras and all the jewels at this really great website:

http://www.thecourtjeweller.com/2019/06/state-banquet-jewels-at-buckingham.html

[Anonymous]

That’s a lot of hardware. Maybe these gals never heard the rule about getting fully dressed and then removing one piece.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No ring on. Looking scandalously good.

Scandalously good? That woman looks like a stick insect. Is that what passes for good these days?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No ring on. Looking scandalously good.

Scandalously good? That woman looks like a stick insect. Is that what passes for good these days?

Compared to everyone else at that state banquet. Hells yes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know what the pins set on the white ribbon that some of the royals were wearing are?

All you ever wanted to know about the Orders they are wearing (those are the pins) and some amazingly good close-ups of the tiaras and all the jewels at this really great website:

http://www.thecourtjeweller.com/2019/06/state-banquet-jewels-at-buckingham.html

Thanks!

[Anonymous]

Agree with the comments about Wills having a type - they are so similar! Long-haired brunettes so skinny they could cut someone with their hip bones.

[Anonymous]

If it’s on covers of magazines (not saying that everything on these covers are true) .... I mean this had to have come from somewhere right? Like...it has to be partly true? Where there is smoke there’s fire?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No ring on. Looking scandalously good.

Scandalously good? That woman looks like a stick insect. Is that what passes for good these days?

She’s a British 10...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If it’s on covers of magazines (not saying that everything on these covers are true) .... I mean this had to have come from somewhere right? Like...it has to be partly true? Where there is smoke there’s fire?

I also think if there weren’t something there Kate and her would like take a picture together or something to that effect. Like her and Meghan did during all the “warring duchesses” stories. It’s not like they haven’t been pictured together before.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I couldn't even stand seeing those Trumptards mingling with the royal family. Such a waste of important people's time.

However, it was a time for Kate to make it v clear she is numero uno around there these days and soon will be queen and the Rose's in her life can suck it.

1) she’s not numero uno...Camilla outranks her and obviously QE2 is still on the throne 2) the only person who can make the “Rose’s in her life suck it” is prince William. No sense in petty power plays when your husband is the one giving these women relevance.

No matter what happens, Kate is the mother of the future King of England. She will have all the tiaras she wants.

Lol. Not how it works. If that were the case then wouldn’t Diana have had all the tiaras the Queen currently has?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I couldn't even stand seeing those Trumptards mingling with the royal family. Such a waste of important people's time.

However, it was a time for Kate to make it v clear she is numero uno around there these days and soon will be queen and the Rose's in her life can suck it.

1) she’s not numero uno...Camilla outranks her and obviously QE2 is still on the throne 2) the only person who can make the “Rose’s in her life suck it” is prince William. No sense in petty power plays when your husband is the one giving these women relevance.

No matter what happens, Kate is the mother of the future King of England. She will have all the tiaras she wants.

Lol. Not how it works. If that were the case then wouldn’t Diana have had all the tiaras the Queen currently has?

Had she not divorced, and not died, she would have had the whole collection of the Queen once the Queen dies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No ring on. Looking scandalously good.

Scandalously good? That woman looks like a stick insect. Is that what passes for good these days?

She’s a British 10...

I love that dress and she looks great, but not appropriate for buckingham palace, it's better for a gala in a warm climate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I couldn't even stand seeing those Trumptards mingling with the royal family. Such a waste of important people's time.

However, it was a time for Kate to make it v clear she is numero uno around there these days and soon will be queen and the Rose's in her life can suck it.

1) she’s not numero uno...Camilla outranks her and obviously QE2 is still on the throne 2) the only person who can make the “Rose’s in her life suck it” is prince William. No sense in petty power plays when your husband is the one giving these women relevance.

No matter what happens, Kate is the mother of the future King of England. She will have all the tiaras she wants.

Lol. Not how it works. If that were the case then wouldn’t Diana have had all the tiaras the Queen currently has?

Had she not divorced, and not died, she would have had the whole collection of the Queen once the Queen dies.

That’s not the same thing as saying Kate gets the tiaras because she is the”mother of the future king.” Or does your crystal ball tell you she too will never get divorced or die?