2019 AAP Results

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:NNAT - 87 percentile. Don't have actual scores handy
Cogat - 127/147/133 composite 144
Zip code - 22033
In pool - yes
Parent referral - No, not work samples submitted
Decision - NOT IN

Should I appeal? DS is 99 percentile for luck and grade in Cogat.

seriously wtf

[Anonymous]

I have been following these threads on and off since my oldest (now 8th grade) went thru the process and I have NEVER seen so many high scoring dc not get in.

[Anonymous]

NNAT: 111
COGAT: Composite 124, highest component score was math (131)
GBRS: (#Consistent / #Frequent / #Occasional) All four consistently, with commentary so amazing I thought they were describing an imaginary child
In-Pool: (Y/N) No
Parent Referral: (Y/N) Y
WISC: - did not take
Zip Code: 22043
AAP Decision: (IN / NOT IN) IN!

I have to say, I'm pretty happy. I did not take this for granted. Very surprised that so many higher-scoring kids did not get in, and wonder why mine did. Work samples were good but not earth-shattering. Two teacher recs (from RSM and his language teacher). He speaks three languages, maybe that was his hook. Dunno.

[Anonymous]

PP here, his DRA is 40.

[Anonymous]

NNAT: 140
COGAT: (V / Q / NV / Composite) ?/?/?/composite 121 or so
GBRS: (#Consistent / #Frequent / #Occasional) don’t know
In-Pool: (Y/N) Y
Parent Referral: (Y/N) Y questionnaire only
WISC: N/A
Zip Code: 20171
AAP Decision: (IN / NOT IN). IN

I’m not too surprised even though the COGAT wasn’t great. DD’s teachers expressed confidence about it before I even brought it up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have been following these threads on and off since my oldest (now 8th grade) went thru the process and I have NEVER seen so many high scoring dc not get in.

I can't find our NNAT scores.

DS got rejected with 141 Cogat. (124 V, 145 Q, 132 NV). He was 99th for age and local percentile.

I thought DS would have been in. He is an avid reader and loves math. I emailed AART to request the packet that was submitted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not in!

I don't have the scores on me, but was in pool. This child's scores are higher than my child who got in on the first round last year.

This child had been referred by both K and 1st grade teachers for advanced services. This child's current teacher told me she should be in AAP next year, so the GBRS should be good. I will request a copy of the packet on Monday.

Same, but our school doesn't offer any advanced services. My in-pool-but-rejected
child scored significantly higher on all the tests than his older sister, who was in first round after being referred two years ago.

This whole thread is bizarre.

My child also just got rejected with higher scores than older brother, who was in first round. Older child struggled with reading. My current 2nd grader will read multiple books per day and is a knowledge sponge. This system seems off!

[Anonymous]

Move to Alexandria!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:NNAT: 139
COGAT: (V / Q / NV / Composite) 130/133/139 Composite 140
GBRS: (#Consistent / #Frequent / #Occasional) dont' know
In-Pool: (Y/N) : N
Zip Code: 22180
AAP Decision: (IN / NOT IN) - not in

Any suggestion on what to do with our situation? DS already scored 98 & 99 percentile on cogat and nnat.

A good letter and strong work samples did the job for us last year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NNAT: 139
COGAT: (V / Q / NV / Composite) 130/133/139 Composite 140
GBRS: (#Consistent / #Frequent / #Occasional) dont' know
In-Pool: (Y/N) : N
Zip Code: 22180
AAP Decision: (IN / NOT IN) - not in

Any suggestion on what to do with our situation? DS already scored 98 & 99 percentile on cogat and nnat.

A good letter and strong work samples did the job for us last year.

Dp here. Who was the letter from?

[Anonymous]

NNAT: 119
COGAT: (V / Q / NV / Composite) 112/123/116/ Com 118
GBRS: (#Consistent / #Frequent / #Occasional) 3 F, 1 C
In-Pool: (Y/N) N
Parent Referral: (Y/N) Y
WISC: N/A
Zip Code: 22153
AAP Decision: (IN / NOT IN). IN

FYI I don't think it's about the number of Frequents vs. Consistents. It's about the teacher comments. DC had two pages of small typed detailed, specific, glowing, creative, outside the box, comments in the GBRS. Plus, DC gets advanced services in Math and Reading and is at a 38 DRA.

[Anonymous]

NNAT: 133
COGAT: (V / Q / NV / Composite) 109/131/122 Composite 125
GBRS: (#Consistent / #Frequent / #Occasional) 2 C, 2F
In-Pool: (Y/N) Y
Parent Referral: (Y/N) Y
WISC: N/A
Zip Code: 22153
AAP Decision: (IN / NOT IN). IN

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:NNAT: 119
COGAT: (V / Q / NV / Composite) 112/123/116/ Com 118
GBRS: (#Consistent / #Frequent / #Occasional) 3 F, 1 C
In-Pool: (Y/N) N
Parent Referral: (Y/N) Y
WISC: N/A
Zip Code: 22153
AAP Decision: (IN / NOT IN). IN

FYI I don't think it's about the number of Frequents vs. Consistents. It's about the teacher comments. DC had two pages of small typed detailed, specific, glowing, creative, outside the box, comments in the GBRS. Plus, DC gets advanced services in Math and Reading and is at a 38 DRA.

Congrats, but that's crazy compared the scores of those that didn't get in.

[Anonymous]

It sounds like there is an over reliance on the teacher’s observations, which is so subjective. Why bother with the tests if they don’t count for anything?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am surprised my daughter was not let in on my referral.
She barely missed the cutoff for the in CogAT test (within 1-2 points).
What can I do to generate new data at this point?

Have her take the WISC.

If you have lots of money, yes. If not, there are other ways. My DS had similar scores and was rejected. Last year we did a WISC and the scores were all over the place with some super high and some just better than average, it wasn’t clear whether it would help or hurt. I hemmed and hawed about whether to include the WISC in the appeal. As luck would have it, my ADD addled brain had me forget to bring the WISC results that day the appeal was due to be postmarked, so all I sent with the appeal was a letter and 2 work samples. It worked.