Kate Middleton's Relationship with Princess Beatrice and Eugene

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh, and this. http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/547143.page

I will never, ever get over that thread. It changed me. I'm a different person for having read it.

[Anonymous]

They are princesses of the blood and Kate is a commoner with a lower case c. They have zilch in common.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, and this. http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/547143.page

I will never, ever get over that thread. It changed me. I'm a different person for having read it.

How did it change you?

[Anonymous]

Yes, indeed. Kate looks so gorgeous and those girls look so fat.


quote=Anonymous]Does anyone else look at those photos and think of Cinderella and the Wicked Stepsisters? It's almost comical.

[Anonymous]

Their mother was also a commoner (and is even more common than everyone thought), so I don't think that that is necessarily it. Kate's parents sell party supplies, their mother pitched Jenny Craig. But Beatrice and Eugene were told they need to work for a living, while Kate gets to be a princess. Hard to take, I bet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Their mother was also a commoner (and is even more common than everyone thought), so I don't think that that is necessarily it. Kate's parents sell party supplies, their mother pitched Jenny Craig. But Beatrice and Eugene were told they need to work for a living, while Kate gets to be a princess. Hard to take, I bet.

The entire system is ridiculous. It is ludicrous to have some one born to the head of state and to hold that position for life, based on nothing more than who his or her parents were. The Windsors aren't the brightest bulbs in the room, or especially good, or possessing any virtue which makes them uniquely suitable to be the head of state. They aren't even particularly attractive. (Not even Kate. She's a pretty girl, but she's only a 7 or so.)

The UK should write a constitution with real protections for the people and get rid of the royal family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes, indeed. Kate looks so gorgeous and those girls look so fat.


quote=Anonymous]Does anyone else look at those photos and think of Cinderella and the Wicked Stepsisters? It's almost comical.

Unlike you, of course. You're Kate all over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Their mother was also a commoner (and is even more common than everyone thought), so I don't think that that is necessarily it. Kate's parents sell party supplies, their mother pitched Jenny Craig. But Beatrice and Eugene were told they need to work for a living, while Kate gets to be a princess. Hard to take, I bet.

The entire system is ridiculous. It is ludicrous to have some one born to the head of state and to hold that position for life, based on nothing more than who his or her parents were. The Windsors aren't the brightest bulbs in the room, or especially good, or possessing any virtue which makes them uniquely suitable to be the head of state. They aren't even particularly attractive. (Not even Kate. She's a pretty girl, but she's only a 7 or so.)

The UK should write a constitution with real protections for the people and get rid of the royal family.

This. If I were British I would be angry every time I saw Kate's wardrobe. That money has been taken from the British people.

[Anonymous]

Perhaps they are tired of her constantly flashing her ass at the cameras.

http://www.enstarz.com/articles/153886/20160413/kate-middleton-india-2016-trip-queen-elizabeth-appalled-by-her-latest-wardrobe-malfunction-video.htm

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Perhaps they are tired of her constantly flashing her ass at the cameras.

http://www.enstarz.com/articles/153886/20160413/kate-middleton-india-2016-trip-queen-elizabeth-appalled-by-her-latest-wardrobe-malfunction-video.htm

Please qualify your statement about "constantly flashing her ass" with incidents that do not include wind-blown skirts or people with long-range cameras spying on her in secluded locations. TIA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Perhaps they are tired of her constantly flashing her ass at the cameras.

http://www.enstarz.com/articles/153886/20160413/kate-middleton-india-2016-trip-queen-elizabeth-appalled-by-her-latest-wardrobe-malfunction-video.htm

Please qualify your statement about "constantly flashing her ass" with incidents that do not include wind-blown skirts or people with long-range cameras spying on her in secluded locations. TIA.

I don't need to. The rest of the royal family and most celebrities manage to get through major appearances without flashing the cameras. She does it repeatedly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Perhaps they are tired of her constantly flashing her ass at the cameras.

http://www.enstarz.com/articles/153886/20160413/kate-middleton-india-2016-trip-queen-elizabeth-appalled-by-her-latest-wardrobe-malfunction-video.htm

Please qualify your statement about "constantly flashing her ass" with incidents that do not include wind-blown skirts or people with long-range cameras spying on her in secluded locations. TIA.

I don't need to. The rest of the royal family and most celebrities manage to get through major appearances without flashing the cameras. She does it repeatedly.

Right, you can't back up your claim, as expected.

[Anonymous]

York sisters look just like two dimwits from the silly show Royals. Check it out. Both have horse teeth protruding, how can every American child get braces but royals in Britain can't? Plus those two sisters can't stand each other and compete for the spotlight, they must be crazy jealous of Kate.

[Anonymous]

Do they eat lightly fried tuna in England?