Indictment of Southern Policy Law Center

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. The indictment is pretty troubling and I say this as someone who has been an SPLC donor.

I don’t see anything troubling about it? They had informants.

No, they were paying people to create violence. They are not a law enforcement organization.

Biden had the investigation shut down. This while the DNC and its affinity groups were calling everyone a white supremacist.

I am the other poster defending the incitement, but to be clear, there’s no allegation that they were paying anyone to create violence.

Indictment, not incitement, obviously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. The indictment is pretty troubling and I say this as someone who has been an SPLC donor.

I don’t see anything troubling about it? They had informants.

They solicited donations by representing to the public they were fighting specific, identifiable individuals, when in fact they were giving money to these same individuals. I understand that these people may have been serving as informants, but you can’t see why that might be troubling to some people?

No, I can see it is a way for MAGA to take down an enemy though. The vast majority of donors probably agree with the SPLC tactic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. The indictment is pretty troubling and I say this as someone who has been an SPLC donor.

I don’t see anything troubling about it? They had informants.

No, they were paying people to create violence. They are not a law enforcement organization.

Biden had the investigation shut down. This while the DNC and its affinity groups were calling everyone a white supremacist.

There’s no evidence for that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. The indictment is pretty troubling and I say this as someone who has been an SPLC donor.

I don’t see anything troubling about it? They had informants.

No, they were paying people to create violence. They are not a law enforcement organization.

Biden had the investigation shut down. This while the DNC and its affinity groups were calling everyone a white supremacist.

I am the other poster defending the incitement, but to be clear, there’s no allegation that they were paying anyone to create violence.

One million dollars to a KKK Grand Cyclops?

Yes, they were paying both sides for violence. They were taking part in creating a Color Revolution on US soil.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. The indictment is pretty troubling and I say this as someone who has been an SPLC donor.

I don’t see anything troubling about it? They had informants.

They solicited donations by representing to the public they were fighting specific, identifiable individuals, when in fact they were giving money to these same individuals. I understand that these people may have been serving as informants, but you can’t see why that might be troubling to some people?

No, I can see it is a way for MAGA to take down an enemy though. The vast majority of donors probably agree with the SPLC tactic.

What is that based on? Vibes?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. The indictment is pretty troubling and I say this as someone who has been an SPLC donor.

I don’t see anything troubling about it? They had informants.

No, they were paying people to create violence. They are not a law enforcement organization.

Biden had the investigation shut down. This while the DNC and its affinity groups were calling everyone a white supremacist.

I am the other poster defending the incitement, but to be clear, there’s no allegation that they were paying anyone to create violence.

One million dollars to a KKK Grand Cyclops?

Yes, they were paying both sides for violence. They were taking part in creating a Color Revolution on US soil.

That is not the allegation contained in the indictment.

[Anonymous]

Regardless of how this plays out, isn’t it contradictory that Trump pardoned the Proud Boys and Oathkeepers yet advocates prosecuting SPLC? Nothing this administration does makes any sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. The indictment is pretty troubling and I say this as someone who has been an SPLC donor.

I don’t see anything troubling about it? They had informants.

No, they were paying people to create violence. They are not a law enforcement organization.

Biden had the investigation shut down. This while the DNC and its affinity groups were calling everyone a white supremacist.

There’s no evidence for that.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/federal-grand-jury-charges-southern-poverty-law-center-wire-fraud-false-statements-and

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. The indictment is pretty troubling and I say this as someone who has been an SPLC donor.

I don’t see anything troubling about it? They had informants.

No, they were paying people to create violence. They are not a law enforcement organization.

Biden had the investigation shut down. This while the DNC and its affinity groups were calling everyone a white supremacist.

There’s no evidence for that.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/federal-grand-jury-charges-southern-poverty-law-center-wire-fraud-false-statements-and

Nothing in that suggests that the SPLC was paying these extremists to engage in violence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. The indictment is pretty troubling and I say this as someone who has been an SPLC donor.

I don’t see anything troubling about it? They had informants.

No, they were paying people to create violence. They are not a law enforcement organization.

Biden had the investigation shut down. This while the DNC and its affinity groups were calling everyone a white supremacist.

There’s no evidence for that.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/federal-grand-jury-charges-southern-poverty-law-center-wire-fraud-false-statements-and

Nothing in that suggests that the SPLC was paying these extremists to engage in violence.

Watch the press conference where Todd Blanche speaks about the indictment. He stated the SPLC was not paying for information. They were paying
to incite violence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. The indictment is pretty troubling and I say this as someone who has been an SPLC donor.

I don’t see anything troubling about it? They had informants.

No, they were paying people to create violence. They are not a law enforcement organization.

Biden had the investigation shut down. This while the DNC and its affinity groups were calling everyone a white supremacist.

There’s no evidence for that.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/federal-grand-jury-charges-southern-poverty-law-center-wire-fraud-false-statements-and

Nothing in that suggests that the SPLC was paying these extremists to engage in violence.

Nothing suggests they weren’t, either.

So it’s entirely fair to suggest that the SPLC was funding terrorist hate groups committing violent crimes, in order to have an enemy they can “fight” for purposes of fundraising.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. The indictment is pretty troubling and I say this as someone who has been an SPLC donor.

I don’t see anything troubling about it? They had informants.

No, they were paying people to create violence. They are not a law enforcement organization.

Biden had the investigation shut down. This while the DNC and its affinity groups were calling everyone a white supremacist.

There’s no evidence for that.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/federal-grand-jury-charges-southern-poverty-law-center-wire-fraud-false-statements-and

Nothing in that suggests that the SPLC was paying these extremists to engage in violence.

Nothing suggests they weren’t, either.

So it’s entirely fair to suggest that the SPLC was funding terrorist hate groups committing violent crimes, in order to have an enemy they can “fight” for purposes of fundraising.

Then why not say that in the indictment? If DOJ believed SPLC was funding acts of violence they would have charged SPLC as a conspirator in those violent acts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. The indictment is pretty troubling and I say this as someone who has been an SPLC donor.

I don’t see anything troubling about it? They had informants.

No, they were paying people to create violence. They are not a law enforcement organization.

Biden had the investigation shut down. This while the DNC and its affinity groups were calling everyone a white supremacist.

There’s no evidence for that.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/federal-grand-jury-charges-southern-poverty-law-center-wire-fraud-false-statements-and

Nothing in that suggests that the SPLC was paying these extremists to engage in violence.

Watch the press conference where Todd Blanche speaks about the indictment. He stated the SPLC was not paying for information. They were paying to incite violence.

DOJ and DHS officials lie all the time in press conferences. In ways they don’t usually lie in court papers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. The indictment is pretty troubling and I say this as someone who has been an SPLC donor.

I don’t see anything troubling about it? They had informants.

No, they were paying people to create violence. They are not a law enforcement organization.

Biden had the investigation shut down. This while the DNC and its affinity groups were calling everyone a white supremacist.

There’s no evidence for that.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/federal-grand-jury-charges-southern-poverty-law-center-wire-fraud-false-statements-and

Nothing in that suggests that the SPLC was paying these extremists to engage in violence.

Nothing suggests they weren’t, either.

So it’s entirely fair to suggest that the SPLC was funding terrorist hate groups committing violent crimes, in order to have an enemy they can “fight” for purposes of fundraising.

Then why not say that in the indictment? If DOJ believed SPLC was funding acts of violence they would have charged SPLC as a conspirator in those violent acts.

Because obviously they’re trying to flip someone inside to testify about further crimes that haven’t been brought before their grand jury yet.


FFS, even my high schoolers would know this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. The indictment is pretty troubling and I say this as someone who has been an SPLC donor.

I don’t see anything troubling about it? They had informants.

No, they were paying people to create violence. They are not a law enforcement organization.

Biden had the investigation shut down. This while the DNC and its affinity groups were calling everyone a white supremacist.

There’s no evidence for that.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/federal-grand-jury-charges-southern-poverty-law-center-wire-fraud-false-statements-and

Nothing in that suggests that the SPLC was paying these extremists to engage in violence.

Nothing suggests they weren’t, either.

So it’s entirely fair to suggest that the SPLC was funding terrorist hate groups committing violent crimes, in order to have an enemy they can “fight” for purposes of fundraising.

Then why not say that in the indictment? If DOJ believed SPLC was funding acts of violence they would have charged SPLC as a conspirator in those violent acts.

Because obviously they’re trying to flip someone inside to testify about further crimes that haven’t been brought before their grand jury yet.


FFS, even my high schoolers would know this.

That’s nonsensical. I don’t think you have any understanding of how a criminal investigation works. You don’t indict the big fish to get the little fish to flip. You do exactly the opposite.