Indictment of Southern Policy Law Center

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

SPLC fundraising after Charlottesville went from $51 million a year to $131 million a year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to see if other orgs who pay informants (e.g., Project Veritas) are subjected to the same scrutiny.

These were NOT "informants". They were funding and fomenting riots.

These were Color Revolutions the SPLC was behind.

STOP DEFENDING THE SPLC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Ooh a member of a chat group. Was that person held civilly responsible by a federal grand jury for organizing and funding the rally? No.

Someone doesn’t understand what a grand jury is!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The question is did they do more than inform? Were they paid to plan and purchase transportation, for example?

To be an informant you have to be participating in what the group is doing. Have you ever seen the Sopranos or literally any other crime show? You can’t be the guy in the back just listening at the meetings to what the group puts out publicly.

They paid them to break state and federal laws.

Quit trying to defend this corrupt organization.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Ooh a member of a chat group. Was that person held civilly responsible by a federal grand jury for organizing and funding the rally? No.

Someone doesn’t understand what a grand jury is!

Apologies, that was a trial jury.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The question is did they do more than inform? Were they paid to plan and purchase transportation, for example?

To be an informant you have to be participating in what the group is doing. Have you ever seen the Sopranos or literally any other crime show? You can’t be the guy in the back just listening at the meetings to what the group puts out publicly.

I’m not sure this really matters. The SPLC isn’t a law enforcement agency. The fact that the FBI uses a certain investigative technique doesn’t mean the SPLC can necessarily use the same technique.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The question is did they do more than inform? Were they paid to plan and purchase transportation, for example?

To be an informant you have to be participating in what the group is doing. Have you ever seen the Sopranos or literally any other crime show? You can’t be the guy in the back just listening at the meetings to what the group puts out publicly.

I’m not sure this really matters. The SPLC isn’t a law enforcement agency. The fact that the FBI uses a certain investigative technique doesn’t mean the SPLC can necessarily use the same technique.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The question is did they do more than inform? Were they paid to plan and purchase transportation, for example?

To be an informant you have to be participating in what the group is doing. Have you ever seen the Sopranos or literally any other crime show? You can’t be the guy in the back just listening at the meetings to what the group puts out publicly.

They paid them to break state and federal laws.

Quit trying to defend this corrupt organization.

Peacefully celebrating America’s God-blessed Western Europe’s history and traditions breaks state and federal laws? Wow. I didn’t know that.

[Anonymous]

Why is DOJ attacking white Americans exercising their free speech rights like this? This stinks of woke DEI.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This fake crap happens all over.

My daughter was an undergraduate at UMich in 2015 and 2016 when 3 viral alleged “hate crime” incidents were committed and blamed on far-right extremism. Huge protests, multi-million giveaways, and the president of the university blamed Trump and MAGA.

Police fairly quickly discovered all 3 were hoaxes - committed by a middle aged black man, a college aged white girl, and a college aged Muslim girl on a student visa. Of course the fact they were hoaxes got 1/100th the original viral coverage received.

So you are arguing there is no far right extremism??

Yep. All fake to keep us scared, divided and conquered. Create fake boogeymen so the masses never collectively focus on the real boogeymen.

I think the exposed Young Republican chats or TPUSA chapter chats disagree with your fake boogeyman claims.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/14/private-chat-among-young-gop-club-members-00592146

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article314988093.html

DP to add, if you want to call out real boogeymen, let's see Republican outrage over Trump's World Liberty Foundation scam, ya hypocrites.

As a three-time Trump voter, I'm outraged by his unbridled scams. However, Dems can't complain because they lied so much about him (e.g., Russiagate) that he's now bulletproof--no one will believe anything the media claims any more.

As for the indictment, even Alex Jones knew SPLC was funding this stuff years ago. It's not a secret but too many Dems have sought censorship and are now shocked by a little bit of sunlight. Guys, the call is coming from inside your house. SPLC's wire fraud deserves to be punished and it's past time for a little bit of accountability. Stuff like this is why Bondi was fired, by the way.

Bondi was fired because she was facing a subpoena for covering up sex trafficking by Donald Trump. Funny that there’s no indictment for that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Am I living in some upside down world? It seems like people have forgotten how informants work. Someone pinch me.

MAGA world is an upside down world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:NP. The indictment is pretty troubling and I say this as someone who has been an SPLC donor.

I don’t see anything troubling about it? They had informants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. The indictment is pretty troubling and I say this as someone who has been an SPLC donor.

I don’t see anything troubling about it? They had informants.

No, they were paying people to create violence. They are not a law enforcement organization.

Biden had the investigation shut down. This while the DNC and its affinity groups were calling everyone a white supremacist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. The indictment is pretty troubling and I say this as someone who has been an SPLC donor.

I don’t see anything troubling about it? They had informants.

They solicited donations by representing to the public they were fighting specific, identifiable individuals, when in fact they were giving money to these same individuals. I understand that these people may have been serving as informants, but you can’t see why that might be troubling to some people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. The indictment is pretty troubling and I say this as someone who has been an SPLC donor.

I don’t see anything troubling about it? They had informants.

No, they were paying people to create violence. They are not a law enforcement organization.

Biden had the investigation shut down. This while the DNC and its affinity groups were calling everyone a white supremacist.

I am the other poster defending the incitement, but to be clear, there’s no allegation that they were paying anyone to create violence.