lol. Everyone in Central America does hit and runs and runs off into the field. “No can prove me driving.” Hang out in Georgia Ave long enough you’ll see these uninsured illegals who don’t know road rules smack another car and all 5 of them will literally get out and run away. Ditch you and the old krap vehicle they were driving. |
Making $8/hr here instead of $2/hr there is all they care about. And when they’re so unskilled and not in demand, they turn to gangs and crimes. And have a few bebes |
Pelosi and pritzer have always been pro illegal immigration - for cheap labor, for votes, |
There is no way Latino illegals wouldve been able to last this long undocumented, in gangs like MS13, bringing all the cocaina in, making anchor babies, not knowing English, with high teen pregnancy and drop out rates if they were black or Asian immigrants. Latinos get preferential treatment by the immigration system and they get babies with press 2 for espanol. Even white immigrants from eastern Europe or Italy don’t get the seatbelts they get here in the US.
|
They get babied* |
+1 Dcum’s slaves are being denied to them, they are pi$$ed. |
The amended Act contains two provisions that, taken together, appear to effectively ban the use of E-Verify in Illinois: Section 12(a) reads, “Nothing in this Act shall be construed to require an employer to enroll in any Electronic Employment Verification System, including the E-Verify program . . . beyond those obligations that have been imposed upon them by federal law.” Section 13(b) asserts that “An employer shall not impose work authorization verification or re-verification requirements greater than those required by federal law.” These provisions seem to state that Illinois employers who are not federally mandated to enroll in E-Verify are not required to — and thus, “shall not” — do so. 2007, the Illinois legislature tried to prohibit the use of E-Verify on the basis that it may be overinclusive, providing inaccurate information regarding work authorization to the detriment of would-be employees. In short order, however, the 2007 law was struck down by a federal court as an unconstitutional violation of the Supremacy Clause. If the most recent amendments to the Act are considered a total ban of all voluntary use of E-Verify, on their face or in practice, similar constitutional challenges may be asserted and prevail. https://www.taftlaw.com/n...-explains/ How does linking to an e-verify poster refute the above explanation? |
MoCo has a huge illegal immigrant population. Do you know what it doesn't have? Farms and slaughterhouses. Neither does NYC, Chicago, Denver etc. These people are not doing the work Americans won't do. They are taking blue-collar jobs that used to be middle-class income and driving wages down, pushing out citizens who would do those jobs. |
That is the brilliance of having no one documented; they can act shocked(!) when they realize they let in a serial killer from Venezuela who has murdered no less than 20 people. True story, BTW. |
You have to be documented to enter a government building but apparently not the country. |
Dey tuk our jerbs! |
Not mine because it requires an education. But do go on, Americans love being mocked by democrats. |
I guess the 400 law enforcement officials who meandered over to the mass shooting at Uvalde elementary school and did ABSOLUTELY nothing were previously catching illegal immigrants. No! They were fat systemic failures. Kids were ALIVE for more than hour— calling 911, speaking quietly and calmly to the dispatchers while those fat asses did nothing. Trump killed 2 border bills during Biden’s term. W Bush killed the assault weapons ban. MAGA 2A derangement syndrome. Securing the border, mandatory universal gun laws, and assault weapon bans aren’t mutually exclusive. GOP and Congress cronies do nothing but concocting and manipulating amongst themselves, shutting down the government, and blocking common sense bills. Good luck with your installed losers and tax increasing tariffs. Nothing will get done. Enjoy your expensive eggs this morning. |
quoth the democrats, about the presidency |