Mass Deportation: this is going to be expensive

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Legal to harass Hispanics. Lovely.

Should a thought about that before you opened the borders, eh? Oh, but Democrats don't care about that, they don't care about your rights. They're just using your rights as an excuse. They will never defend your rights against their interest. How's it feel to be a piece of TP?

What happens to the elites when their polices go South? Nothing, they crawl back into their gilded mansions and into their ivory towers and wait it out, meanwhile everyone they promised "A pathway to citizenship", "a right to immigrate" gets rounded up and shipped back. I feel sorry for you believing them, but they never asked us if we thought it was a good idea for them to come here in the first place. Maybe you should do that next time. Because people who live here, we have rights.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No special treatment for South Korea. If they are going to go after Mexicans and Indians, they have to go after anyone else who isn't following immigration law.
Hyundai will get these people the proper visas.

Lmao, the Koreans are going to take this personally and likely not even open the plant(s).

This dumbass maga stunt likely just killed thousands of skilled labor jobs in Georgia. Back to picking peanuts, I guess.

So you’re saying we should allow foreign companies to trample on our laws because it brings jobs? 1/3 of the jobs at the plant weren’t even going to Americans in America.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No special treatment for South Korea. If they are going to go after Mexicans and Indians, they have to go after anyone else who isn't following immigration law.
Hyundai will get these people the proper visas.

Lmao, the Koreans are going to take this personally and likely not even open the plant(s).

This dumbass maga stunt likely just killed thousands of skilled labor jobs in Georgia. Back to picking peanuts, I guess.

So you’re saying we should allow foreign companies to trample on our laws because it brings jobs? 1/3 of the jobs at the plant weren’t even going to Americans in America.

No one is saying that. The Koreans were here temporarily to set up the plant, which would have opened 600+ high skilled jobs to the people of Georgia. There were administrative delays - thank you, DOGE - extending the temporary work visas, and this would have under a normal government been taken care of diplomatically and efficiently. Now our reckless President has destroyed diplomatic ties with a country that is only going to be more important to the global economy in the years ahead. How stupid and obtuse do you have to be to not get how disastrous and short-sighted this is for the American people?

[Anonymous]

Overturned.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Overturned.

It’s very wrong, but the SC is bought paid for. Dissent spells out why it’s all unconstitutional. The good news is in 2029 we can start detaining people based on whether or not they look maga.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No special treatment for South Korea. If they are going to go after Mexicans and Indians, they have to go after anyone else who isn't following immigration law.
Hyundai will get these people the proper visas.

Lmao, the Koreans are going to take this personally and likely not even open the plant(s).

This dumbass maga stunt likely just killed thousands of skilled labor jobs in Georgia. Back to picking peanuts, I guess.

So you’re saying we should allow foreign companies to trample on our laws because it brings jobs? 1/3 of the jobs at the plant weren’t even going to Americans in America.

No one is saying that. The Koreans were here temporarily to set up the plant, which would have opened 600+ high skilled jobs to the people of Georgia. There were administrative delays - thank you, DOGE - extending the temporary work visas, and this would have under a normal government been taken care of diplomatically and efficiently. Now our reckless President has destroyed diplomatic ties with a country that is only going to be more important to the global economy in the years ahead. How stupid and obtuse do you have to be to not get how disastrous and short-sighted this is for the American people?

The 9/11 terrorists were on business visas; this is no small matter.

Our government is stretched very thin when it comes to immigration. How much "special treatment" do you think they need?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Overturned.

It’s very wrong, but the SC is bought paid for. Dissent spells out why it’s all unconstitutional. The good news is in 2029 we can start detaining people based on whether or not they look maga.

No. It is the correct ruling. The raids are based on reasonable suspicion.

If LA or California is unhappy with the ruling maybe they should start working with ICE and turning over criminal illegal aliens so the raids would be unnecessary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Overturned.

So schools cannot use race in the admissions process but ICE can use race in the harassment process. Got it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Overturned.

It’s very wrong, but the SC is bought paid for. Dissent spells out why it’s all unconstitutional. The good news is in 2029 we can start detaining people based on whether or not they look maga.

No. It is the correct ruling. The raids are based on reasonable suspicion.

If LA or California is unhappy with the ruling maybe they should start working with ICE and turning over criminal illegal aliens so the raids would be unnecessary.

In a normal society with justice, there has to be a warrant signed by a judge by a justice department bringing evidence to a court. Lawless raids because of 'feels" are authoritarian. Pulling people over because of their skin color is racist and authoritiarian. By right leaning white people are perfectly fine with some people being tread on, as long as it isn't them, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Overturned.

It’s very wrong, but the SC is bought paid for. Dissent spells out why it’s all unconstitutional. The good news is in 2029 we can start detaining people based on whether or not they look maga.

No. It is the correct ruling. The raids are based on reasonable suspicion.

If LA or California is unhappy with the ruling maybe they should start working with ICE and turning over criminal illegal aliens so the raids would be unnecessary.

In a normal society with justice, there has to be a warrant signed by a judge by a justice department bringing evidence to a court. Lawless raids because of 'feels" are authoritarian. Pulling people over because of their skin color is racist and authoritiarian. By right leaning white people are perfectly fine with some people being tread on, as long as it isn't them, right?

The raids are not based on skin color. They are based on reasonable suspicion and most often on tips.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Overturned.

It’s very wrong, but the SC is bought paid for. Dissent spells out why it’s all unconstitutional. The good news is in 2029 we can start detaining people based on whether or not they look maga.

No. It is the correct ruling. The raids are based on reasonable suspicion.

If LA or California is unhappy with the ruling maybe they should start working with ICE and turning over criminal illegal aliens so the raids would be unnecessary.

In a normal society with justice, there has to be a warrant signed by a judge by a justice department bringing evidence to a court. Lawless raids because of 'feels" are authoritarian. Pulling people over because of their skin color is racist and authoritiarian. By right leaning white people are perfectly fine with some people being tread on, as long as it isn't them, right?

That is for criminal arrest. This is about enforcing immigration laws.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Overturned.

It’s very wrong, but the SC is bought paid for. Dissent spells out why it’s all unconstitutional. The good news is in 2029 we can start detaining people based on whether or not they look maga.

No. It is the correct ruling. The raids are based on reasonable suspicion.

If LA or California is unhappy with the ruling maybe they should start working with ICE and turning over criminal illegal aliens so the raids would be unnecessary.

In a normal society with justice, there has to be a warrant signed by a judge by a justice department bringing evidence to a court. Lawless raids because of 'feels" are authoritarian. Pulling people over because of their skin color is racist and authoritiarian. By right leaning white people are perfectly fine with some people being tread on, as long as it isn't them, right?

So where is the bill proposing this change to the Immigration and Nationality Act?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No special treatment for South Korea. If they are going to go after Mexicans and Indians, they have to go after anyone else who isn't following immigration law.
Hyundai will get these people the proper visas.

Lmao, the Koreans are going to take this personally and likely not even open the plant(s).

This dumbass maga stunt likely just killed thousands of skilled labor jobs in Georgia. Back to picking peanuts, I guess.

So you’re saying we should allow foreign companies to trample on our laws because it brings jobs? 1/3 of the jobs at the plant weren’t even going to Americans in America.

No one is saying that. The Koreans were here temporarily to set up the plant, which would have opened 600+ high skilled jobs to the people of Georgia. There were administrative delays - thank you, DOGE - extending the temporary work visas, and this would have under a normal government been taken care of diplomatically and efficiently. Now our reckless President has destroyed diplomatic ties with a country that is only going to be more important to the global economy in the years ahead. How stupid and obtuse do you have to be to not get how disastrous and short-sighted this is for the American people?

The 9/11 terrorists were on business visas; this is no small matter.

Our government is stretched very thin when it comes to immigration. How much "special treatment" do you think they need?

School shooters obtain their guns legally. This is no small matter. How much special treatment do you think gun owners need?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Overturned.

It’s very wrong, but the SC is bought paid for. Dissent spells out why it’s all unconstitutional. The good news is in 2029 we can start detaining people based on whether or not they look maga.

And do what with them? You do realize that people are being detained for deportation because they are not lawfully present in the U.S. We already knew you lot wanted to punish your political enemies, but I see leftists are not even trying to hide it anymore. Sorry you can’t deport your fellow American citizens for the “crime” of not voting for your preferred candidate.

[Anonymous]

The MAGA projection is off the charts.

Cultist never realize they are in a cult…always some reason why their actions are “good” or “right.” Who needs morality and ethics?

False Christianity at its zenith with MAGA.