CNBC host stunned from a panel of Michigan voters

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Resulting in a Trump victory, which will only further empower the Israeli right. Very effective.

Yea, Arabs and Muslims who don't vote for Harris are following a "cut of my nose to spite my face" strategy.

Do they really think Trump will be good for Arabs and Muslims in the ME?

Yes, he’s pro oil and anti war. Bringing Liz Cheney to Michigan was probably the dumbest thing Kamala could do short of bringing Netanyahu to Dearborn.

I’m not even sure Liz Cheney would even move the needle with white Michigan residents.

This is nonsense. "Pro oil" means absolutely nothing relative to the Gaza conflict. He isn't "anti-war" - he just used that nonsense to try and attack Biden. He would give in to Putin - meaning even more destruction and suffering to Ukraine. That isn't "anti war." And as for Gaza, mark my words, Trump will also give Netanyahu whatever he wants.

[Anonymous]

Voting against Harris because of Gaza is an affront to this country and if they enable Trump to win, they will never recover from it down the line.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Voting against Harris because of Gaza is an affront to this country and if they enable Trump to win, they will never recover from it down the line.

This. They are showing where their allegiance lies. It’s not with the United States or democracy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Voting against Harris because of Gaza is an affront to this country and if they enable Trump to win, they will never recover from it down the line.

You are an arrogant liberal lecturing people and telling them how they should vote and what they should prioritize. These people care a great deal about Gaza and you are diminishing their concerns. Ignoring people’s concerns then lecturing them and telling them they have to vote for a specific candidate does not work. Maybe they don’t view Trump and Harris much differently given Harris’s support for Biden’s Middle Wast policies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voting against Harris because of Gaza is an affront to this country and if they enable Trump to win, they will never recover from it down the line.

You are an arrogant liberal lecturing people and telling them how they should vote and what they should prioritize. These people care a great deal about Gaza and you are diminishing their concerns. Ignoring people’s concerns then lecturing them and telling them they have to vote for a specific candidate does not work. Maybe they don’t view Trump and Harris much differently given Harris’s support for Biden’s Middle Wast policies.

This election is about making a distinction between Trump and Harris. They are not the same and put in the work to make the distinction . This is how American elections work. You have to choose between two flawed candidates.

Choose wisely because either Trump or Harris is going to be the next president in power and if you think Trump is better for the Palestinians you are out of your mind but go ahead and make that choice. Jill Stein has absolutely zero chance to win this election and you are throwing your vote away. That is allowed but it but it does not seem like a very effective way to use the small amount of power you have with your vote.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voting against Harris because of Gaza is an affront to this country and if they enable Trump to win, they will never recover from it down the line.

You are an arrogant liberal lecturing people and telling them how they should vote and what they should prioritize. These people care a great deal about Gaza and you are diminishing their concerns. Ignoring people’s concerns then lecturing them and telling them they have to vote for a specific candidate does not work. Maybe they don’t view Trump and Harris much differently given Harris’s support for Biden’s Middle Wast policies.

This election is about making a distinction between Trump and Harris. They are not the same and put in the work to make the distinction . This is how American elections work. You have to choose between two flawed candidates.

Choose wisely because either Trump or Harris is going to be the next president in power and if you think Trump is better for the Palestinians you are out of your mind but go ahead and make that choice. Jill Stein has absolutely zero chance to win this election and you are throwing your vote away. That is allowed but it but it does not seem like a very effective way to use the small amount of power you have with your vote.

Can you explain why you believe that Trump will be worse for the Palestinians?

[Anonymous]

I'll bite.

Biden-Harris are actively looking for a cease fire and a two-state solution. They are also trying to get aid into Gaza.

Trump supports Netanyahu's push to simply eradicate the Palestinians in Gaza all together (finish the job) and we also know Jared owns the rights to develop new beachfront property in Gaza.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'll bite.

Biden-Harris are actively looking for a cease fire and a two-state solution. They are also trying to get aid into Gaza.

Trump supports Netanyahu's push to simply eradicate the Palestinians in Gaza all together (finish the job) and we also know Jared owns the rights to develop new beachfront property in Gaza.

Actively looking for a ceasefire? They can literally withhold the military aid and put an arms embargo on Israel for failing to let aid into Gaza and continually committing war crimes yet they refuse to do so. Please don’t tell us how they are actively looking for a a ceasefire when they clearly are very supportive of Israel’s war crimes.

Trump is an unhinged deranged individual but he is desperate to appease the Saudis so he will tread carefully when it comes to Israel. But I am no fan of Trump. I just don’t understand why the Democrats can’t strike a balance in this war and why it has to be unchecked blind support towards Israel with no consequence for the war crimes they have committed and continue to commit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voting against Harris because of Gaza is an affront to this country and if they enable Trump to win, they will never recover from it down the line.

You are an arrogant liberal lecturing people and telling them how they should vote and what they should prioritize. These people care a great deal about Gaza and you are diminishing their concerns. Ignoring people’s concerns then lecturing them and telling them they have to vote for a specific candidate does not work. Maybe they don’t view Trump and Harris much differently given Harris’s support for Biden’s Middle Wast policies.

Can you explain why you would vote for Jill Stein and not Trump if Trump is so great for the Palestinians?

This election is about making a distinction between Trump and Harris. They are not the same and put in the work to make the distinction . This is how American elections work. You have to choose between two flawed candidates.

Choose wisely because either Trump or Harris is going to be the next president in power and if you think Trump is better for the Palestinians you are out of your mind but go ahead and make that choice. Jill Stein has absolutely zero chance to win this election and you are throwing your vote away. That is allowed but it but it does not seem like a very effective way to use the small amount of power you have with your vote.

Can you explain why you believe that Trump will be worse for the Palestinians?

Can you explain why a person would vote for Jill Stein instead of trump if Trump is so great for the Palestinians??

[Anonymous]

I mean, that's fine, but don't expect us to protest the muslim ban this time

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I mean, that's fine, but don't expect us to protest the muslim ban this time

Or a Jewish ban.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:I mean, that's fine, but don't expect us to protest the muslim ban this time

Arab-Americans don't need any further evidence that those like you don't have values but rather act purely transactionally just as Trump does.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voting against Harris because of Gaza is an affront to this country and if they enable Trump to win, they will never recover from it down the line.

You are an arrogant liberal lecturing people and telling them how they should vote and what they should prioritize. These people care a great deal about Gaza and you are diminishing their concerns. Ignoring people’s concerns then lecturing them and telling them they have to vote for a specific candidate does not work. Maybe they don’t view Trump and Harris much differently given Harris’s support for Biden’s Middle Wast policies.

Can you explain why you would vote for Jill Stein and not Trump if Trump is so great for the Palestinians?

This election is about making a distinction between Trump and Harris. They are not the same and put in the work to make the distinction . This is how American elections work. You have to choose between two flawed candidates.

Choose wisely because either Trump or Harris is going to be the next president in power and if you think Trump is better for the Palestinians you are out of your mind but go ahead and make that choice. Jill Stein has absolutely zero chance to win this election and you are throwing your vote away. That is allowed but it but it does not seem like a very effective way to use the small amount of power you have with your vote.

Can you explain why you believe that Trump will be worse for the Palestinians?

Can you explain why a person would vote for Jill Stein instead of trump if Trump is so great for the Palestinians??

I think the Arab American community sees only bad choices in this election. Fairly equal arguments can be made in favor of Trump, Harris, or Stein. I don't think anyone believes any of the choices would be "great".

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:I'll bite.

Biden-Harris are actively looking for a cease fire and a two-state solution. They are also trying to get aid into Gaza.

Trump supports Netanyahu's push to simply eradicate the Palestinians in Gaza all together (finish the job) and we also know Jared owns the rights to develop new beachfront property in Gaza.

If Biden and Harris have not been able to arrange a ceasefire in a year, they are either incompetent or they are not really trying. As a result, either by design or incompetence, they are allowing Netanyahu to simply eradicate the Palestinians (have you been paying attention to the current expulsion of all Palestinians from northern Gaza?) and, if not Jared, someone else will soon be developing Gaza's beach front property.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'll bite.

Biden-Harris are actively looking for a cease fire and a two-state solution. They are also trying to get aid into Gaza.

Trump supports Netanyahu's push to simply eradicate the Palestinians in Gaza all together (finish the job) and we also know Jared owns the rights to develop new beachfront property in Gaza.

Actively looking for a ceasefire? They can literally withhold the military aid and put an arms embargo on Israel for failing to let aid into Gaza and continually committing war crimes yet they refuse to do so. Please don’t tell us how they are actively looking for a a ceasefire when they clearly are very supportive of Israel’s war crimes.

Trump is an unhinged deranged individual but he is desperate to appease the Saudis so he will tread carefully when it comes to Israel. But I am no fan of Trump. I just don’t understand why the Democrats can’t strike a balance in this war and why it has to be unchecked blind support towards Israel with no consequence for the war crimes they have committed and continue to commit.

Not going to disagree with you, but the optics of withholding arms right now are not great. the main problem is that Netanyahu conspired with Trump to avoid a cease fire, putting Biden-Harris in a box. Netanyahu will be rewarded by Trump with unfettered support to "finish the job"

And the Saudi's do not care about the Palestinians - no one does except for the UN and some in the US.