Fraud requires proving damages. If she was excellent at both of her jobs, there are no damages. |
She was a really good liar and fraudster. There’s no way around it. She has no integrity and hereinafter will always be perceived as untrustworthty. Stop trying to defend her. If she were Black you wouldn’t care about how allegedly hard working she was. The hardworking Asian trope doesn’t overcome duplicitous behavior or crimes. 🙄 |
Her being “excellent” is irrelevant. It’s fraud. You cannot collect checks for two full time jobs. And there is a DC statute that applies to this scenario and others have been prosecuted under it. She is not the first or the last. You are delusional and contorting yourself to defend criminal behavior. |
What “full story” could justify her having multiple jobs fraudulently? |
Wow. I am black. I actually forgot that she was Asian. I said that because I know someone who worked with her. They told me that she was really good. Not denying that it's fraud. Sensitive much? |
Clearly, you're not a lawyer. If there's a statute addressing it, then she can be prosecuted under that statute. But if they want to collect money from her for fraud, they will need to prove damages. |
Oh really, how many do you know? It isnt a weird hiring system. Every muni's city employees are required to live in the city, havent seen an exception. |
BS |
| How she get away for so long?? |
| Shouldn’t she have lived in DC, DC proper with a high salary, I believe $150k which I’m guessing she should have been making. |
Maybe we need a Netflix series on this. |
So what’s the full story?? |
Lol. There is no enforcement on this. |
What part is BS? |
There's no full story. DC Dept of Buildings has a terrible reputation. Even if she was "good," or in this case I will take it to mean, better than the average DC Dept of Buildings employee, there's no way someone working another full-time job that required her to be physically pleasant for 3/5 of her working hours at another place during core work hours was performing at their full capacity. Employees may differ in abilities, but that doesn't justify wage theft. |