I hate Trump, but I get why a huge part of middle America loves him

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You aren't the only one starting to understand, OP. Many notable people who are considered part of the "left" are beginning to express their understanding as well.



Jamie Dimon wants his tax cuts and for the fed to stop regulating him. He knows that “populist” Dementia Don will give him what he wants.


I know that whenever I want to know what regular people think, I go ask the billionaire CEO of one of the largest banks in the world. He’s just a regular Joe!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If businesses would stop hiring undocumented immigrants, they wouldn't come.


That's just not true.
And, you realize that both the Chicago and NY mayors are wanting to fast track work permits for people in their cities that have entered illegally?
Maybe tell them to stop.

People are coming here and are living off perks given to them by blue cities. They are getting housing, health care, education, free lunch for kids, and other goods from NGOs. And, then we have our own Veteran's Administration funding care for illegal immigrants when our own veterans cannot get the help they need. https://nypost.com/2024/01/10/news/va-ripped-for-reimbursing-migrant-treatment-as-veterans-wait/

Then, there is the rampant theft by illegal migrants in many cities. I am sure these migrants need thousands of dollar of clothing from Macy's!
https://nypost.com/2024/01/20/news/group-of-newly-arrived-migrants-allegedly-behind-string-of-burglaries-plaguing-chicago-suburb-police/

People will keep coming as long as they think they can get in. And, right now, they can.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If businesses would stop hiring undocumented immigrants, they wouldn't come.


That's just not true.
And, you realize that both the Chicago and NY mayors are wanting to fast track work permits for people in their cities that have entered illegally?
Maybe tell them to stop.

People are coming here and are living off perks given to them by blue cities. They are getting housing, health care, education, free lunch for kids, and other goods from NGOs. And, then we have our own Veteran's Administration funding care for illegal immigrants when our own veterans cannot get the help they need. https://nypost.com/2024/01/10/news/va-ripped-for-reimbursing-migrant-treatment-as-veterans-wait/

Then, there is the rampant theft by illegal migrants in many cities. I am sure these migrants need thousands of dollar of clothing from Macy's!
https://nypost.com/2024/01/20/news/group-of-newly-arrived-migrants-allegedly-behind-string-of-burglaries-plaguing-chicago-suburb-police/

People will keep coming as long as they think they can get in. And, right now, they can.


They are fast tracking them so they can at least be productive. Otherwise, they will just starve in the streets. Or else the public will have to support them. At least this way, they can earn some money and pay into the tax system. What is your alternative, given they come regardless of who is president?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Trump has a great advantage. He’s quick, very funny and great at destroying his opponent with their weaknesses. He also immediately identifies wedge issues that hurt the opposition and he doesn’t stop hammering them. He informs everybody of issues, Democrat weaknesses and evil characters that the mainstream media refuses to highlight. Because of that he is a major news provider and people can’t wait to hear news nobody else gives them. He’s probably the most famous person in the world for the last 50 years and a once in a lifetime character/ talent.


He uses infantile insults against opponents. WOW such a great quality in a world leader and 80 year adult. That's something we teach preschoolers not to do.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If businesses would stop hiring undocumented immigrants, they wouldn't come.


That's just not true.
And, you realize that both the Chicago and NY mayors are wanting to fast track work permits for people in their cities that have entered illegally?
Maybe tell them to stop.

People are coming here and are living off perks given to them by blue cities. They are getting housing, health care, education, free lunch for kids, and other goods from NGOs. And, then we have our own Veteran's Administration funding care for illegal immigrants when our own veterans cannot get the help they need. https://nypost.com/2024/01/10/news/va-ripped-for-reimbursing-migrant-treatment-as-veterans-wait/

Then, there is the rampant theft by illegal migrants in many cities. I am sure these migrants need thousands of dollar of clothing from Macy's!
https://nypost.com/2024/01/20/news/group-of-newly-arrived-migrants-allegedly-behind-string-of-burglaries-plaguing-chicago-suburb-police/

People will keep coming as long as they think they can get in. And, right now, they can.


They are fast tracking them so they can at least be productive. Otherwise, they will just starve in the streets. Or else the public will have to support them. At least this way, they can earn some money and pay into the tax system. What is your alternative, given they come regardless of who is president?


So, on one hand, we need to stop hiring illegal immigrants so they won't come, and on the other hand, when they DO come, we need to fast track work permits. And, if they come regardless of who is president, do we give them work permits or not? Your response is schizophrenic.
Good Lord. Which is it?
And, anyone who refuses to admit that this border crisis is of Biden's own making is just not living in reality.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The millions of immigrants talking point doesn’t make sense other than as a talking point.

Trump was President for four years. He had control of the house and senate when he came to power. He didn’t fix immigration. Some of the biggest obstacles to fixing immigration come from interests in his party.

So…why do you think he’ll fix it?

This point might have any intellectual resonance if it was “neither candidate currently running has made the progress I want on immigration” but it’s not a pro Trump point.

Unless you’re a troll.



Is this gaslighting? Because illegal migration fell sharply under Turnip. *Sharply*. And the Democrats fought him tooth and nail the entire time. They opposed every single thing he did to control migration. Remember the children in cages they ranted and screamed about, never mind that it started under Obama?

When Biden took office, illegal migration exploded. Don't you remember the first caravan of 100k illegal migrants marching through Mexico telling the whole world they were going for the border and effectively daring Biden to let them in. And he did. And that sent a message to the world.

But it's hard not to believe that the reason illegal crossings have gotten out of control is because the WH really doesn't care and has no interest in doing anything about it because the policy makers and staffers are firm believers in open borders. Which is why they - do nothing - and sue the border states for actually doing something to control the tide of migration.

Regarding Turnip's popularity, when he was president, he by and large didn't do very much. Cut taxes and made noises about the border and the border wall with some noticeable effects, and did a lot of international diplomacy that, intentional or not, corresponded with a world that had no wars or invasions and yet breakthroughs like the Abrahamic Accords. He was derided for making noises about China and Russia that later turned out to be true (remember when the Germans hysterically blew him off when he told them not to build the Nord Stream pipeline as it would only embolden Putin? Har har). But at home, he left people alone. There was no massive swathes of new bureaucracy, new regulations, new policies, no cancel culture, no judging or shaming or pretending to have the higher moral road. He made fun of the progressive left, but he also left them alone at the same time.

One cannot say that about the Democrats under Biden.


Your version of events under Trump is not even close to accurate. But keep living in your alternate fact based universe. Maybe someday you will come back to Earth prime.


If you turn off your phone, 2016-2020 was not a bad time for our country.

I plan on voting for Trump, if he wins the nomination. I say this after voting for Biden.

So you truly believe that Trump will not take revenge and threaten our democracy? Seriously?


I am not the PP but I agree and plan to vote Trump. And no, I do not think Trump will seek revenge or threaten our democracy. That is not something I am worried about. I am very worried about immigration and crime and both of those are actually happening.


How is it even possible for you to think he won't seek revenge when he couldn't even accept the results of the election with dignity, incited an insurrection and tried to overthrow his own government. You are too stupid to be allowed to vote.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If businesses would stop hiring undocumented immigrants, they wouldn't come.


That's just not true.
And, you realize that both the Chicago and NY mayors are wanting to fast track work permits for people in their cities that have entered illegally?
Maybe tell them to stop.

People are coming here and are living off perks given to them by blue cities. They are getting housing, health care, education, free lunch for kids, and other goods from NGOs. And, then we have our own Veteran's Administration funding care for illegal immigrants when our own veterans cannot get the help they need. https://nypost.com/2024/01/10/news/va-ripped-for-reimbursing-migrant-treatment-as-veterans-wait/

Then, there is the rampant theft by illegal migrants in many cities. I am sure these migrants need thousands of dollar of clothing from Macy's!
https://nypost.com/2024/01/20/news/group-of-newly-arrived-migrants-allegedly-behind-string-of-burglaries-plaguing-chicago-suburb-police/

People will keep coming as long as they think they can get in. And, right now, they can.

And yet the GOP still refuses to legislate on immigration. It’s kind of like they don’t want resolution.

Actually per their own words they don’t want to resolve it because it might make people think better of the Democrats.

So here we have Republican voters being used and with no awareness of it, happy to hate the brown people. Trump is a natural in your party.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The millions of immigrants talking point doesn’t make sense other than as a talking point.

Trump was President for four years. He had control of the house and senate when he came to power. He didn’t fix immigration. Some of the biggest obstacles to fixing immigration come from interests in his party.

So…why do you think he’ll fix it?

This point might have any intellectual resonance if it was “neither candidate currently running has made the progress I want on immigration” but it’s not a pro Trump point.

Unless you’re a troll.



Is this gaslighting? Because illegal migration fell sharply under Turnip. *Sharply*. And the Democrats fought him tooth and nail the entire time. They opposed every single thing he did to control migration. Remember the children in cages they ranted and screamed about, never mind that it started under Obama?

When Biden took office, illegal migration exploded. Don't you remember the first caravan of 100k illegal migrants marching through Mexico telling the whole world they were going for the border and effectively daring Biden to let them in. And he did. And that sent a message to the world.

But it's hard not to believe that the reason illegal crossings have gotten out of control is because the WH really doesn't care and has no interest in doing anything about it because the policy makers and staffers are firm believers in open borders. Which is why they - do nothing - and sue the border states for actually doing something to control the tide of migration.

Regarding Turnip's popularity, when he was president, he by and large didn't do very much. Cut taxes and made noises about the border and the border wall with some noticeable effects, and did a lot of international diplomacy that, intentional or not, corresponded with a world that had no wars or invasions and yet breakthroughs like the Abrahamic Accords. He was derided for making noises about China and Russia that later turned out to be true (remember when the Germans hysterically blew him off when he told them not to build the Nord Stream pipeline as it would only embolden Putin? Har har). But at home, he left people alone. There was no massive swathes of new bureaucracy, new regulations, new policies, no cancel culture, no judging or shaming or pretending to have the higher moral road. He made fun of the progressive left, but he also left them alone at the same time.

One cannot say that about the Democrats under Biden.


Your version of events under Trump is not even close to accurate. But keep living in your alternate fact based universe. Maybe someday you will come back to Earth prime.


If you turn off your phone, 2016-2020 was not a bad time for our country.

I plan on voting for Trump, if he wins the nomination. I say this after voting for Biden.

So you truly believe that Trump will not take revenge and threaten our democracy? Seriously?


I am not the PP but I agree and plan to vote Trump. And no, I do not think Trump will seek revenge or threaten our democracy. That is not something I am worried about. I am very worried about immigration and crime and both of those are actually happening.


How is it even possible for you to think he won't seek revenge when he couldn't even accept the results of the election with dignity, incited an insurrection and tried to overthrow his own government. You are too stupid to be allowed to vote.


And he also says over and over that he’s going to seek revenge.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I'm reading this book right now When McKinsey Comes to Town. McKinsey's consultants, largely made up on uber elitists from ivy league schools who live on the coasts, have for years been the architects of wealth inequality. McKinsey consultants were the ones who came up with idea that CEOs needed to make 300x the average worker. It was McKinsey consultants who constantly pushed the idea of off shoring and downsizing that have gutted manufacturing and many middle class jobs. McKinsey consultants are also the ones who also worked for the FDA while simultaneously consulting for Purdue to supercharge sales of opioids. And who paid the price and had their families and lives ruined? All of the poor in those areas the disgusting elitists call flyover country. In another example, McKisney also consulted for the Chinese CCP on artificial island building in the South China Sea while working for the US department of defense. And who'll be sent into the meat grinder when there's a conflict in the SCS? All of the poor people and their kids. There are just so many examples in the book - it's so disturbing.

And people wonder why huge swaths of America hate the liberal costal elitists. I mean just look how many McKinsey almuni infect our govt like virus (Pete Buttgeig, Lael Brainard, etc.). Trump has appeal because he isn't from the same swamp producing and employing the likes of McKinsey consultsnts that have been ruining the country for the last 50 years and creating massive wealth inequality. It's largely the elite college educated, urban Democrats who choose to go work for companies like McKinsey, Wall St. etc. that have been gutting their jobs and destroying the livelihood of the middle class.


And it’s the GOP that largely heads them up. Virginia’s current GQP governor was a vulture capitalist in his last life. Rich elites might be putting in 5 years at McKinsey to pay off the loans, but don’t fool yourself into thinking Dems are leading the charge to deregulate industries or strip corporate tax rates to zero.

Trump isn’t from the same swamp as McKinsey because he inherited his millions and didn’t have to work for them. His companies have shafted working people on numerous occasions. He stuffed a small business owner for pianos for crying out loud- pianos! His campaign doesn’t pay its bills, and Trump himself doesn’t pay his lawyers. He spreads his cheeks for foreign interests and sold out our foreign policy for stays at the Trump Hotel.

And let’s not forget his signature tax policies.

Trump is a dumb man’s idea of a populist hero.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The millions of immigrants talking point doesn’t make sense other than as a talking point.

Trump was President for four years. He had control of the house and senate when he came to power. He didn’t fix immigration. Some of the biggest obstacles to fixing immigration come from interests in his party.

So…why do you think he’ll fix it?

This point might have any intellectual resonance if it was “neither candidate currently running has made the progress I want on immigration” but it’s not a pro Trump point.

Unless you’re a troll.



Is this gaslighting? Because illegal migration fell sharply under Turnip. *Sharply*. And the Democrats fought him tooth and nail the entire time. They opposed every single thing he did to control migration. Remember the children in cages they ranted and screamed about, never mind that it started under Obama?

When Biden took office, illegal migration exploded. Don't you remember the first caravan of 100k illegal migrants marching through Mexico telling the whole world they were going for the border and effectively daring Biden to let them in. And he did. And that sent a message to the world.

But it's hard not to believe that the reason illegal crossings have gotten out of control is because the WH really doesn't care and has no interest in doing anything about it because the policy makers and staffers are firm believers in open borders. Which is why they - do nothing - and sue the border states for actually doing something to control the tide of migration.

Regarding Turnip's popularity, when he was president, he by and large didn't do very much. Cut taxes and made noises about the border and the border wall with some noticeable effects, and did a lot of international diplomacy that, intentional or not, corresponded with a world that had no wars or invasions and yet breakthroughs like the Abrahamic Accords. He was derided for making noises about China and Russia that later turned out to be true (remember when the Germans hysterically blew him off when he told them not to build the Nord Stream pipeline as it would only embolden Putin? Har har). But at home, he left people alone. There was no massive swathes of new bureaucracy, new regulations, new policies, no cancel culture, no judging or shaming or pretending to have the higher moral road. He made fun of the progressive left, but he also left them alone at the same time.

One cannot say that about the Democrats under Biden.


Your version of events under Trump is not even close to accurate. But keep living in your alternate fact based universe. Maybe someday you will come back to Earth prime.


If you turn off your phone, 2016-2020 was not a bad time for our country.

I plan on voting for Trump, if he wins the nomination. I say this after voting for Biden.

So you truly believe that Trump will not take revenge and threaten our democracy? Seriously?


I am not the PP but I agree and plan to vote Trump. And no, I do not think Trump will seek revenge or threaten our democracy. That is not something I am worried about. I am very worried about immigration and crime and both of those are actually happening.


How is it even possible for you to think he won't seek revenge when he couldn't even accept the results of the election with dignity, incited an insurrection and tried to overthrow his own government. You are too stupid to be allowed to vote.


And he also says over and over that he’s going to seek revenge.



I guess the days of libs persecuting their opponents without revenge are over? That’s an outrage!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The millions of immigrants talking point doesn’t make sense other than as a talking point.

Trump was President for four years. He had control of the house and senate when he came to power. He didn’t fix immigration. Some of the biggest obstacles to fixing immigration come from interests in his party.

So…why do you think he’ll fix it?

This point might have any intellectual resonance if it was “neither candidate currently running has made the progress I want on immigration” but it’s not a pro Trump point.

Unless you’re a troll.



Is this gaslighting? Because illegal migration fell sharply under Turnip. *Sharply*. And the Democrats fought him tooth and nail the entire time. They opposed every single thing he did to control migration. Remember the children in cages they ranted and screamed about, never mind that it started under Obama?

When Biden took office, illegal migration exploded. Don't you remember the first caravan of 100k illegal migrants marching through Mexico telling the whole world they were going for the border and effectively daring Biden to let them in. And he did. And that sent a message to the world.

But it's hard not to believe that the reason illegal crossings have gotten out of control is because the WH really doesn't care and has no interest in doing anything about it because the policy makers and staffers are firm believers in open borders. Which is why they - do nothing - and sue the border states for actually doing something to control the tide of migration.

Regarding Turnip's popularity, when he was president, he by and large didn't do very much. Cut taxes and made noises about the border and the border wall with some noticeable effects, and did a lot of international diplomacy that, intentional or not, corresponded with a world that had no wars or invasions and yet breakthroughs like the Abrahamic Accords. He was derided for making noises about China and Russia that later turned out to be true (remember when the Germans hysterically blew him off when he told them not to build the Nord Stream pipeline as it would only embolden Putin? Har har). But at home, he left people alone. There was no massive swathes of new bureaucracy, new regulations, new policies, no cancel culture, no judging or shaming or pretending to have the higher moral road. He made fun of the progressive left, but he also left them alone at the same time.

One cannot say that about the Democrats under Biden.


Your version of events under Trump is not even close to accurate. But keep living in your alternate fact based universe. Maybe someday you will come back to Earth prime.


If you turn off your phone, 2016-2020 was not a bad time for our country.

I plan on voting for Trump, if he wins the nomination. I say this after voting for Biden.

So you truly believe that Trump will not take revenge and threaten our democracy? Seriously?


I am not the PP but I agree and plan to vote Trump. And no, I do not think Trump will seek revenge or threaten our democracy. That is not something I am worried about. I am very worried about immigration and crime and both of those are actually happening.


How is it even possible for you to think he won't seek revenge when he couldn't even accept the results of the election with dignity, incited an insurrection and tried to overthrow his own government. You are too stupid to be allowed to vote.


And he also says over and over that he’s going to seek revenge.



I guess the days of libs persecuting their opponents without revenge are over? That’s an outrage!


So now you admit he is going to seek revenge. Get your story straight.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The millions of immigrants talking point doesn’t make sense other than as a talking point.

Trump was President for four years. He had control of the house and senate when he came to power. He didn’t fix immigration. Some of the biggest obstacles to fixing immigration come from interests in his party.

So…why do you think he’ll fix it?

This point might have any intellectual resonance if it was “neither candidate currently running has made the progress I want on immigration” but it’s not a pro Trump point.

Unless you’re a troll.



Is this gaslighting? Because illegal migration fell sharply under Turnip. *Sharply*. And the Democrats fought him tooth and nail the entire time. They opposed every single thing he did to control migration. Remember the children in cages they ranted and screamed about, never mind that it started under Obama?

When Biden took office, illegal migration exploded. Don't you remember the first caravan of 100k illegal migrants marching through Mexico telling the whole world they were going for the border and effectively daring Biden to let them in. And he did. And that sent a message to the world.

But it's hard not to believe that the reason illegal crossings have gotten out of control is because the WH really doesn't care and has no interest in doing anything about it because the policy makers and staffers are firm believers in open borders. Which is why they - do nothing - and sue the border states for actually doing something to control the tide of migration.

Regarding Turnip's popularity, when he was president, he by and large didn't do very much. Cut taxes and made noises about the border and the border wall with some noticeable effects, and did a lot of international diplomacy that, intentional or not, corresponded with a world that had no wars or invasions and yet breakthroughs like the Abrahamic Accords. He was derided for making noises about China and Russia that later turned out to be true (remember when the Germans hysterically blew him off when he told them not to build the Nord Stream pipeline as it would only embolden Putin? Har har). But at home, he left people alone. There was no massive swathes of new bureaucracy, new regulations, new policies, no cancel culture, no judging or shaming or pretending to have the higher moral road. He made fun of the progressive left, but he also left them alone at the same time.

One cannot say that about the Democrats under Biden.


Your version of events under Trump is not even close to accurate. But keep living in your alternate fact based universe. Maybe someday you will come back to Earth prime.


If you turn off your phone, 2016-2020 was not a bad time for our country.

I plan on voting for Trump, if he wins the nomination. I say this after voting for Biden.

So you truly believe that Trump will not take revenge and threaten our democracy? Seriously?


I am not the PP but I agree and plan to vote Trump. And no, I do not think Trump will seek revenge or threaten our democracy. That is not something I am worried about. I am very worried about immigration and crime and both of those are actually happening.


How is it even possible for you to think he won't seek revenge when he couldn't even accept the results of the election with dignity, incited an insurrection and tried to overthrow his own government. You are too stupid to be allowed to vote.


And he also says over and over that he’s going to seek revenge.



I guess the days of libs persecuting their opponents without revenge are over? That’s an outrage!


So now you admit he is going to seek revenge. Get your story straight.


What goes around comes around.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The millions of immigrants talking point doesn’t make sense other than as a talking point.

Trump was President for four years. He had control of the house and senate when he came to power. He didn’t fix immigration. Some of the biggest obstacles to fixing immigration come from interests in his party.

So…why do you think he’ll fix it?

This point might have any intellectual resonance if it was “neither candidate currently running has made the progress I want on immigration” but it’s not a pro Trump point.

Unless you’re a troll.



Is this gaslighting? Because illegal migration fell sharply under Turnip. *Sharply*. And the Democrats fought him tooth and nail the entire time. They opposed every single thing he did to control migration. Remember the children in cages they ranted and screamed about, never mind that it started under Obama?

When Biden took office, illegal migration exploded. Don't you remember the first caravan of 100k illegal migrants marching through Mexico telling the whole world they were going for the border and effectively daring Biden to let them in. And he did. And that sent a message to the world.

But it's hard not to believe that the reason illegal crossings have gotten out of control is because the WH really doesn't care and has no interest in doing anything about it because the policy makers and staffers are firm believers in open borders. Which is why they - do nothing - and sue the border states for actually doing something to control the tide of migration.

Regarding Turnip's popularity, when he was president, he by and large didn't do very much. Cut taxes and made noises about the border and the border wall with some noticeable effects, and did a lot of international diplomacy that, intentional or not, corresponded with a world that had no wars or invasions and yet breakthroughs like the Abrahamic Accords. He was derided for making noises about China and Russia that later turned out to be true (remember when the Germans hysterically blew him off when he told them not to build the Nord Stream pipeline as it would only embolden Putin? Har har). But at home, he left people alone. There was no massive swathes of new bureaucracy, new regulations, new policies, no cancel culture, no judging or shaming or pretending to have the higher moral road. He made fun of the progressive left, but he also left them alone at the same time.

One cannot say that about the Democrats under Biden.


Your version of events under Trump is not even close to accurate. But keep living in your alternate fact based universe. Maybe someday you will come back to Earth prime.


If you turn off your phone, 2016-2020 was not a bad time for our country.

I plan on voting for Trump, if he wins the nomination. I say this after voting for Biden.

So you truly believe that Trump will not take revenge and threaten our democracy? Seriously?


I am not the PP but I agree and plan to vote Trump. And no, I do not think Trump will seek revenge or threaten our democracy. That is not something I am worried about. I am very worried about immigration and crime and both of those are actually happening.


How is it even possible for you to think he won't seek revenge when he couldn't even accept the results of the election with dignity, incited an insurrection and tried to overthrow his own government. You are too stupid to be allowed to vote.


And he also says over and over that he’s going to seek revenge.



I guess the days of libs persecuting their opponents without revenge are over? That’s an outrage!


So now you admit he is going to seek revenge. Get your story straight.


What goes around comes around.


Thanks for admitting you’re a liar.
Anonymous
When I see Trump voters, I see the spiritual (and sometimes actual) descendants of people that joined the German American Bund during WWII. Same level of ignorance and fear, combined with impotent frustration and a desire to blow up everything that makes America great and kill whoever needs to be killed to bring back some distorted idea of what was. Not surprisingly, it’s uneducated white guys both times.

Discouraging to see that Americans really haven’t advanced in the last century. Still the same ignorant, debased animals we always were.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If businesses would stop hiring undocumented immigrants, they wouldn't come.


That's just not true.
And, you realize that both the Chicago and NY mayors are wanting to fast track work permits for people in their cities that have entered illegally?
Maybe tell them to stop.

People are coming here and are living off perks given to them by blue cities. They are getting housing, health care, education, free lunch for kids, and other goods from NGOs. And, then we have our own Veteran's Administration funding care for illegal immigrants when our own veterans cannot get the help they need. https://nypost.com/2024/01/10/news/va-ripped-for-reimbursing-migrant-treatment-as-veterans-wait/

Then, there is the rampant theft by illegal migrants in many cities. I am sure these migrants need thousands of dollar of clothing from Macy's!
https://nypost.com/2024/01/20/news/group-of-newly-arrived-migrants-allegedly-behind-string-of-burglaries-plaguing-chicago-suburb-police/

People will keep coming as long as they think they can get in. And, right now, they can.


They are fast tracking them so they can at least be productive. Otherwise, they will just starve in the streets. Or else the public will have to support them. At least this way, they can earn some money and pay into the tax system. What is your alternative, given they come regardless of who is president?


Trump voters would rather these people be placed into concentration camps along the Mexican border. If they stay in the hopes they’ll get a fair shake until international laws, then they deserve whatever parade of horribles that happens to them there.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: