Agree. Even after earning an MBA degree, engineers are often a bit too analytical to understand the big picture. |
I would assume that all the Stanford & MIT STEM grads that go on to start companies are part of the leadership group which is why both rank so highly. |
If not for tobacco money and James B. Duke, Duke would be Trinity College or defunct. |
Which has worked out great for Boeing. Used to be an engineering run company. Now it's the MBAs. And the MBAs have been doing a super awesome job at Boeing. Really wonderful results in recent years. And totally great for the brand. Thank goodness for the MBAs. |
Right? GE totally sucked when the engineers ran the company. Thank goodness the finance guys came in and made it the wonderful company it is today. |
Great straw man. My retort was about Emory and Gatech. Last time I checked Gatech also has an mba program. |
Given the small size of these schools and their lack of any professional schools (law, business, and medicine), these SLACs seem outstanding. |
Exactly. This "ranking" is absurd when there's a 20-way tie. |
Supposedly the rankings adjusted for school size…and how do you explain Princeton ranking #7 which also doesn’t have any professional schools you refer. Nice try though |
Nah, too smart to join the rat race. Engineers understand diminishing marginal utility. Enjoying WFH, high pay, short hour, low stress jobs. |
Huh? Engineer Jack Welch kept the company afloat on financial skulduggery for 20 years. |
| The ranking is obviously biased in favor of schools with a lot of professional schools. For example, it's much easier for law schools to produce a politician than an engineering school to produce a Nobel prize winner. Therefore, schools like MIT and Princeton are at disadvantage. |
MIT is 5 and Princeton 7. Seems like they did just fine. |
When you look at the “score,” these schools earn an 81, which ranks as high as 37, so these schools are not really in the 90s. Further, a score of 82 ranks as high as 20 and a score of 83 ranks as high as 13. Assuming that the scoring is linear, there’s not much difference between 81 and 82, or even 83. |
Yeah, but both much better than Penn for undergrad yet behind Penn/Wharton. . . |