Is Karen considered a racial slur?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes. It is directed at one race in particular.


+1. This is an awful slur that is for some reason tolerated. I appreciate that teacher shutting it down.


This is a bit dramatic, and honestly exactly the reason people use it to describe a certain kind of person. It's on the level of calling someone a busy body. Calling it a slur is disrespectful to the experience of people who actually get slurs lobbed at them, and is typical centering behavior of exactly the kind of person who gets called a Karen.


I view “Karen” as a way to silence women. Particularly middle aged, white women. So maybe you don’t think it’s a slur, but I do.


To be sure, when applied correctly, those women absolutely need to be silenced.


Are you hearing yourself? "Those women absolutely need to be silenced"? What year is this? It's 2023 and women have a right to speak up without being insulted about it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes. It is directed at one race in particular.


+1. This is an awful slur that is for some reason tolerated. I appreciate that teacher shutting it down.


This is a bit dramatic, and honestly exactly the reason people use it to describe a certain kind of person. It's on the level of calling someone a busy body. Calling it a slur is disrespectful to the experience of people who actually get slurs lobbed at them, and is typical centering behavior of exactly the kind of person who gets called a Karen.


I view “Karen” as a way to silence women. Particularly middle aged, white women. So maybe you don’t think it’s a slur, but I do.


To be sure, when applied correctly, those women absolutely need to be silenced.


Are you hearing yourself? "Those women absolutely need to be silenced"? What year is this? It's 2023 and women have a right to speak up without being insulted about it.


In every way in every scenario? No. So entitled.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I wonder how old you all are who are responding. The term “Karen” is offensive because it is age-ist as well as misogynist. Karen was a very popular name for a very short period of time. Karens (all ethnicities) are generally between 48 and maybe 60. They are no longer young/pretty and they are an easy target. The behavior the term Karen is used as a short-hand for is generally awful, but by describing these bad people as “Karens”, it denigrates a group of women at a very difficult time of their lives.


It's not age, appearance, gender, or race. It's behavior.


What behavior? Annoying or putting down minorities?


Generally: excessive complaining, false sense of entitlement/superiority, and aggressive nature. Race maybe comes into play for some "Karens" who think that their skin color gives them some extra false superiority.


Have you asked yourself why the name give to these specific behaviors -- complaining, entitlement, aggressive -- is a name almost exclusively associated with middle aged women, a group who historically are expected to disappear from society because they no longer serve the two purposes society has assigned to women (being sexually attractive, having babies)?

Lots of people are annoying, entitled, or aggressive. Why is the nickname for it associated mainly with women between the ages of 40/45 and 60?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes. It is directed at one race in particular.


+1. This is an awful slur that is for some reason tolerated. I appreciate that teacher shutting it down.


This is a bit dramatic, and honestly exactly the reason people use it to describe a certain kind of person. It's on the level of calling someone a busy body. Calling it a slur is disrespectful to the experience of people who actually get slurs lobbed at them, and is typical centering behavior of exactly the kind of person who gets called a Karen.


I view “Karen” as a way to silence women. Particularly middle aged, white women. So maybe you don’t think it’s a slur, but I do.


To be sure, when applied correctly, those women absolutely need to be silenced.


Are you hearing yourself? "Those women absolutely need to be silenced"? What year is this? It's 2023 and women have a right to speak up without being insulted about it.


In every way in every scenario? No. So entitled.


I thought vigilante justice was looked down on. Who made you boss?
Anonymous
Let’s break it down, and to do so we have to start with Becky first, then Karen second.

Merriam-Webster defines “Becky” as “a white woman who is ignorant of both her privilege and her prejudice.”

A Becky is “a white woman who uses her privilege as a weapon, a ladder or an excuse”—and there are five distinct categories of them.

Notable Beckys include Taylor Swift, each Kardashian, and every white woman named ‘Amber.’ Not every white woman is a Becky, of course. But all Beckys are white women.

A “Karen” is basically a graduated Becky who’s extremely aware of her privilege and weaponizes it. A Becky convinces herself—and attempts to convince others—that her whiteness doesn’t matter. A Karen doesn’t even bother to fake it. She knows it’s her Big Joker and plays it whenever necessary.

Karen is, at it’s heart, just the word people use for someone bossy and entitled. Someone authoritarian and nosy and far too involved with other people’s business.

Racial slur, eh nope. Focus on the behavior.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I use it for all races and have not gotten the impression that it’s only reserved for white women. It’s about attitude and not racial IMO.




+1

It's the behavior. My dad is the biggest Karen in my family. We've told him he's not allowed to talk to the servers anymore.


And while you are so righteously defending the servers by calling out your Dad’s behavior, do you even check to make the server’s name isn’t Karen?

Whether or not it’s racist, sexist, or ageist, or any other “ist”, stereotyping ANY group of people and using that stereotype to mock and condemn the group is cruel and bigoted.

If your Dad’s behavior is offensive, by all means call him on it. But please do so by addressing the actual behavior, rather than using it as an excuse to attack an entire group of people who have nothing to do with your Dad, and certainly aren’t responsible for his behavior.


I'm calling out my dad's obsessive complaining at restaurants. It's the behavior.

I'm not stereotyping anyone. I don't think that all older, white women complain excessively. I think some people of various ages, genders, and skin colors do.

It's not about you.


But using a name to label the behavior makes it about the name. Telling him he complains excessively is about the behavior. Calling him a Karen to criticize his behavior, makes it about the name.

I don’t think you’re stereotyping all older, white women. I think you’re stereotyping everyone named Karen. People named Karen may be predominantly (but not exclusively) older, white, women, but only a small percentage of older, white women are actually named Karen.

If you mean it’s not about me as someone named Karen, you’re absolutely correct. My name isn’t Karen.

However, just as you feel compelled to call out your father for his bad behavior, I feel compelled in the interest of fairness, compassion, and civility to call out yours. Please note that I am addressing the specific behavior without resorting to slurs and stereotypes. Incidentally, I consider the use of “Karen” as a slur to be worse than the behavior associated with that label.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I wonder how old you all are who are responding. The term “Karen” is offensive because it is age-ist as well as misogynist. Karen was a very popular name for a very short period of time. Karens (all ethnicities) are generally between 48 and maybe 60. They are no longer young/pretty and they are an easy target. The behavior the term Karen is used as a short-hand for is generally awful, but by describing these bad people as “Karens”, it denigrates a group of women at a very difficult time of their lives.


It's not age, appearance, gender, or race. It's behavior.


What behavior? Annoying or putting down minorities?


Generally: excessive complaining, false sense of entitlement/superiority, and aggressive nature. Race maybe comes into play for some "Karens" who think that their skin color gives them some extra false superiority.


Have you asked yourself why the name give to these specific behaviors -- complaining, entitlement, aggressive -- is a name almost exclusively associated with middle aged women, a group who historically are expected to disappear from society because they no longer serve the two purposes society has assigned to women (being sexually attractive, having babies)?

Lots of people are annoying, entitled, or aggressive. Why is the nickname for it associated mainly with women between the ages of 40/45 and 60?


Probably coined by someone who saw someone actually named Karen behave poorly.

It's not like someone sat down to research name popularity by age to target that demographic.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I wonder how old you all are who are responding. The term “Karen” is offensive because it is age-ist as well as misogynist. Karen was a very popular name for a very short period of time. Karens (all ethnicities) are generally between 48 and maybe 60. They are no longer young/pretty and they are an easy target. The behavior the term Karen is used as a short-hand for is generally awful, but by describing these bad people as “Karens”, it denigrates a group of women at a very difficult time of their lives.


It's not age, appearance, gender, or race. It's behavior.


You are missing the point — Karen is a name. A name of middle-aged women. Calling someone a Karen is derogatory towards that group of women.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I use it for all races and have not gotten the impression that it’s only reserved for white women. It’s about attitude and not racial IMO.




+1

It's the behavior. My dad is the biggest Karen in my family. We've told him he's not allowed to talk to the servers anymore.


And while you are so righteously defending the servers by calling out your Dad’s behavior, do you even check to make the server’s name isn’t Karen?

Whether or not it’s racist, sexist, or ageist, or any other “ist”, stereotyping ANY group of people and using that stereotype to mock and condemn the group is cruel and bigoted.

If your Dad’s behavior is offensive, by all means call him on it. But please do so by addressing the actual behavior, rather than using it as an excuse to attack an entire group of people who have nothing to do with your Dad, and certainly aren’t responsible for his behavior.


I'm calling out my dad's obsessive complaining at restaurants. It's the behavior.

I'm not stereotyping anyone. I don't think that all older, white women complain excessively. I think some people of various ages, genders, and skin colors do.

It's not about you.


But using a name to label the behavior makes it about the name. Telling him he complains excessively is about the behavior. Calling him a Karen to criticize his behavior, makes it about the name.

I don’t think you’re stereotyping all older, white women. I think you’re stereotyping everyone named Karen. People named Karen may be predominantly (but not exclusively) older, white, women, but only a small percentage of older, white women are actually named Karen.

If you mean it’s not about me as someone named Karen, you’re absolutely correct. My name isn’t Karen.

However, just as you feel compelled to call out your father for his bad behavior, I feel compelled in the interest of fairness, compassion, and civility to call out yours. Please note that I am addressing the specific behavior without resorting to slurs and stereotypes. Incidentally, I consider the use of “Karen” as a slur to be worse than the behavior associated with that label.



LOL. No. I have a close friend actually named Karen and she's not a "Karen" at all. Definitely not stereotyping Karens.

You think me telling my dad to chill is worse than him flagging the server to come over 100 times over inane crap? OK...
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I wonder how old you all are who are responding. The term “Karen” is offensive because it is age-ist as well as misogynist. Karen was a very popular name for a very short period of time. Karens (all ethnicities) are generally between 48 and maybe 60. They are no longer young/pretty and they are an easy target. The behavior the term Karen is used as a short-hand for is generally awful, but by describing these bad people as “Karens”, it denigrates a group of women at a very difficult time of their lives.


It's not age, appearance, gender, or race. It's behavior.


What behavior? Annoying or putting down minorities?


Generally: excessive complaining, false sense of entitlement/superiority, and aggressive nature. Race maybe comes into play for some "Karens" who think that their skin color gives them some extra false superiority.


Have you asked yourself why the name give to these specific behaviors -- complaining, entitlement, aggressive -- is a name almost exclusively associated with middle aged women, a group who historically are expected to disappear from society because they no longer serve the two purposes society has assigned to women (being sexually attractive, having babies)?

Lots of people are annoying, entitled, or aggressive. Why is the nickname for it associated mainly with women between the ages of 40/45 and 60?


Well said.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I use it for all races and have not gotten the impression that it’s only reserved for white women. It’s about attitude and not racial IMO.




+1

It's the behavior. My dad is the biggest Karen in my family. We've told him he's not allowed to talk to the servers anymore.


And while you are so righteously defending the servers by calling out your Dad’s behavior, do you even check to make the server’s name isn’t Karen?

Whether or not it’s racist, sexist, or ageist, or any other “ist”, stereotyping ANY group of people and using that stereotype to mock and condemn the group is cruel and bigoted.

If your Dad’s behavior is offensive, by all means call him on it. But please do so by addressing the actual behavior, rather than using it as an excuse to attack an entire group of people who have nothing to do with your Dad, and certainly aren’t responsible for his behavior.


I'm calling out my dad's obsessive complaining at restaurants. It's the behavior.

I'm not stereotyping anyone. I don't think that all older, white women complain excessively. I think some people of various ages, genders, and skin colors do.

It's not about you.


But using a name to label the behavior makes it about the name. Telling him he complains excessively is about the behavior. Calling him a Karen to criticize his behavior, makes it about the name.

I don’t think you’re stereotyping all older, white women. I think you’re stereotyping everyone named Karen. People named Karen may be predominantly (but not exclusively) older, white, women, but only a small percentage of older, white women are actually named Karen.

If you mean it’s not about me as someone named Karen, you’re absolutely correct. My name isn’t Karen.

However, just as you feel compelled to call out your father for his bad behavior, I feel compelled in the interest of fairness, compassion, and civility to call out yours. Please note that I am addressing the specific behavior without resorting to slurs and stereotypes. Incidentally, I consider the use of “Karen” as a slur to be worse than the behavior associated with that label.



And that is exactly the kind of white feminism the word is meant to poke at. People have literally lost their lives to white women who weoponize their privilege. Karen behavior can be deadly. But you want to act like calling someone a Karen is worse than acting like one? Give me a f#cking break.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I use it for all races and have not gotten the impression that it’s only reserved for white women. It’s about attitude and not racial IMO.




+1

It's the behavior. My dad is the biggest Karen in my family. We've told him he's not allowed to talk to the servers anymore.


And while you are so righteously defending the servers by calling out your Dad’s behavior, do you even check to make the server’s name isn’t Karen?

Whether or not it’s racist, sexist, or ageist, or any other “ist”, stereotyping ANY group of people and using that stereotype to mock and condemn the group is cruel and bigoted.

If your Dad’s behavior is offensive, by all means call him on it. But please do so by addressing the actual behavior, rather than using it as an excuse to attack an entire group of people who have nothing to do with your Dad, and certainly aren’t responsible for his behavior.


I'm calling out my dad's obsessive complaining at restaurants. It's the behavior.

I'm not stereotyping anyone. I don't think that all older, white women complain excessively. I think some people of various ages, genders, and skin colors do.

It's not about you.


But using a name to label the behavior makes it about the name. Telling him he complains excessively is about the behavior. Calling him a Karen to criticize his behavior, makes it about the name.

I don’t think you’re stereotyping all older, white women. I think you’re stereotyping everyone named Karen. People named Karen may be predominantly (but not exclusively) older, white, women, but only a small percentage of older, white women are actually named Karen.

If you mean it’s not about me as someone named Karen, you’re absolutely correct. My name isn’t Karen.

However, just as you feel compelled to call out your father for his bad behavior, I feel compelled in the interest of fairness, compassion, and civility to call out yours. Please note that I am addressing the specific behavior without resorting to slurs and stereotypes. Incidentally, I consider the use of “Karen” as a slur to be worse than the behavior associated with that label.



And that is exactly the kind of white feminism the word is meant to poke at. People have literally lost their lives to white women who weoponize their privilege. Karen behavior can be deadly. But you want to act like calling someone a Karen is worse than acting like one? Give me a f#cking break.


+1
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Let’s break it down, and to do so we have to start with Becky first, then Karen second.

Merriam-Webster defines “Becky” as “a white woman who is ignorant of both her privilege and her prejudice.”

A Becky is “a white woman who uses her privilege as a weapon, a ladder or an excuse”—and there are five distinct categories of them.

Notable Beckys include Taylor Swift, each Kardashian, and every white woman named ‘Amber.’ Not every white woman is a Becky, of course. But all Beckys are white women.

A “Karen” is basically a graduated Becky who’s extremely aware of her privilege and weaponizes it. A Becky convinces herself—and attempts to convince others—that her whiteness doesn’t matter. A Karen doesn’t even bother to fake it. She knows it’s her Big Joker and plays it whenever necessary.

Karen is, at it’s heart, just the word people use for someone bossy and entitled. Someone authoritarian and nosy and far too involved with other people’s business.

Racial slur, eh nope. Focus on the behavior.


And you are so full of that word that Jeff still allows to be used.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I wonder how old you all are who are responding. The term “Karen” is offensive because it is age-ist as well as misogynist. Karen was a very popular name for a very short period of time. Karens (all ethnicities) are generally between 48 and maybe 60. They are no longer young/pretty and they are an easy target. The behavior the term Karen is used as a short-hand for is generally awful, but by describing these bad people as “Karens”, it denigrates a group of women at a very difficult time of their lives.


It's not age, appearance, gender, or race. It's behavior.


What behavior? Annoying or putting down minorities?


Generally: excessive complaining, false sense of entitlement/superiority, and aggressive nature. Race maybe comes into play for some "Karens" who think that their skin color gives them some extra false superiority.


Have you asked yourself why the name give to these specific behaviors -- complaining, entitlement, aggressive -- is a name almost exclusively associated with middle aged women, a group who historically are expected to disappear from society because they no longer serve the two purposes society has assigned to women (being sexually attractive, having babies)?

Lots of people are annoying, entitled, or aggressive. Why is the nickname for it associated mainly with women between the ages of 40/45 and 60?


Probably coined by someone who saw someone actually named Karen behave poorly.

It's not like someone sat down to research name popularity by age to target that demographic.


You don't have to research the popularity of a name to know that if you meet a Karen, odds are going to be good that she is a white woman in her 40s or 50s. It's instinctive.

But you didn't answer the question. Why is the nickname for being annoying, entitled, and aggressive, a name associated primarily with middle aged white women? Are they the MOST annoying, entitled, aggressive demographic? Or it it possible that middle aged women are assumed to deserve nothing and have nothing of interest to say, and thus anything they say and do is interpreted as annoying and entitled?

Even the stereotype of a Karen as someone who wants to "talk to the manager" raises questions. Sure, sometimes this is the behavior of an entitled, maybe racist person. But what if you've just been charged for something you didn't order and never received, and the server was dismissive and rude to you when you pointed out the error. Is it okay in that situation to ask to speak to a manager? What if the person who rang you up called you a "dumb b***h" when you couldn't get the credit card machine to work? Are you allowed to talk to the manager then?

Is it so hard to imagine that a middle aged white woman might have valid reasons to request better customer service, or to complain about how she's being treated by someone else? Or are middle aged white women simply supposed to accept whatever treatment someone wants to offer, because if she asks for better, she's "entitled, aggressive, annoying"?

And are you really going to tell me that white women are MORE entitled, aggressive, and annoying than white men? Or is it just that white men have more real power to command respect and compliance than anyone else, so they don't have to ask to speak with the manager -- they get better service from the jump and can successfully bully someone into treating them better without needing to call a higher authority.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I use it for all races and have not gotten the impression that it’s only reserved for white women. It’s about attitude and not racial IMO.




+1

It's the behavior. My dad is the biggest Karen in my family. We've told him he's not allowed to talk to the servers anymore.


And while you are so righteously defending the servers by calling out your Dad’s behavior, do you even check to make the server’s name isn’t Karen?

Whether or not it’s racist, sexist, or ageist, or any other “ist”, stereotyping ANY group of people and using that stereotype to mock and condemn the group is cruel and bigoted.

If your Dad’s behavior is offensive, by all means call him on it. But please do so by addressing the actual behavior, rather than using it as an excuse to attack an entire group of people who have nothing to do with your Dad, and certainly aren’t responsible for his behavior.


I'm calling out my dad's obsessive complaining at restaurants. It's the behavior.

I'm not stereotyping anyone. I don't think that all older, white women complain excessively. I think some people of various ages, genders, and skin colors do.

It's not about you.


But using a name to label the behavior makes it about the name. Telling him he complains excessively is about the behavior. Calling him a Karen to criticize his behavior, makes it about the name.

I don’t think you’re stereotyping all older, white women. [b] I think you’re stereotyping everyone named Karen.[/b] People named Karen may be predominantly (but not exclusively) older, white, women, but only a small percentage of older, white women are actually named Karen.

If you mean it’s not about me as someone named Karen, you’re absolutely correct. My name isn’t Karen.

However, just as you feel compelled to call out your father for his bad behavior, I feel compelled in the interest of fairness, compassion, and civility to call out yours. Please note that I am addressing the specific behavior without resorting to slurs and stereotypes. Incidentally, I consider the use of “Karen” as a slur to be worse than the behavior associated with that label.

Omg, have you read any of the posts? Karen is shorthand for a middle-age woman because most women named Karen are middle-aged. There’s a reason “Tiffany” or [insert currently popular name] isn’t used in this derogatory way.

Forum Index » Off-Topic
Go to: