Lock him up indictment FL

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was planning on voting for DeSantis in the 2024 primary, mainly due to age of Trump and Biden. After yesterday's news, I've changed my mind and will protest vote for Teflon Don.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I think you’ll be surprised that a lot of voters feel this way. Remember how the right’s great achievement of overturning Roe came back to bite them in the midterm? For every action there’s an equal and opposite reaction.

Sure. Go ahead and make him your candidate. You’re not picking up Dems or Independents with these indictments.

[Anonymous]

Always the sign of a great team, including a player to be named later.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He's been impeached twice.
He's been indicted twice.
He's been found liable for sexual abuse & defamation.
He's under investigation for attempting to overturn a legitimate Presidential election, both federally and on the state level.
And despite ALL of this - there is STILL a very strong chance that the Republican Party will once again put Donald Trump at the top of their ticket.
GET THE HECK OUT OF HERE.

It tells you how much the average Republican voter prizes their party over their country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guess who is the initial judge assigned to Trump's case?

The summons sent to former President Donald Trump and his legal team late Thursday indicates that U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon will be assigned to oversee his case, at least initially, according to sources briefed on the matter.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-aileen-cannon-trump-appointee-initially-assigned-oversee/story?id=99956910

Our failure as a country is being exposed. This is ridiculous.

The court rules give the chief judge power to bend them "whenever necessary in the interest of justice and expediency, the Court may modify the assignments made to active or senior Judges"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Coming from one of the losers who worked for and attempted to legitimize Trump, he can go sit quietly in the corner. They knew what he was and what he was doing (imagine the crimes each of them witnessed that we don’t even know about yet!) but they thought they could ride the tiger. I have no interest in anything said by any idiot Republican on this subject.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guess who is the initial judge assigned to Trump's case?

The summons sent to former President Donald Trump and his legal team late Thursday indicates that U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon will be assigned to oversee his case, at least initially, according to sources briefed on the matter.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-aileen-cannon-trump-appointee-initially-assigned-oversee/story?id=99956910

Our failure as a country is being exposed. This is ridiculous.

The court rules give the chief judge power to bend them "whenever necessary in the interest of justice and expediency, the Court may modify the assignments made to active or senior Judges"

I assume this report just means that she signed the summons. That's the only logical place for the judge's name to appear on the summons. The report also says that Magistrate Judge Reinhart is also on there. Magistrate judges often handle arraignments instead of district judges, but I can't figure out why two judges would sign it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guess who is the initial judge assigned to Trump's case?

The summons sent to former President Donald Trump and his legal team late Thursday indicates that U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon will be assigned to oversee his case, at least initially, according to sources briefed on the matter.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-aileen-cannon-trump-appointee-initially-assigned-oversee/story?id=99956910

Our failure as a country is being exposed. This is ridiculous.

The court rules give the chief judge power to bend them "whenever necessary in the interest of justice and expediency, the Court may modify the assignments made to active or senior Judges"

I assume this report just means that she signed the summons. That's the only logical place for the judge's name to appear on the summons. The report also says that Magistrate Judge Reinhart is also on there. Magistrate judges often handle arraignments instead of district judges, but I can't figure out why two judges would sign it.

Also should add that, while I've never practiced in SDFL, in every federal court I'm familiar with, the trial judge gets assigned after the arraignment, not before. This all seems premature worrying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

The Presidential Records Act allows presidents to take their records with them when they leave office.

Yeah I know this is what Trump says but like almost everything else that Trump says, it’s exactly wrong.
https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/laws/1978-act.html

I was just about to quote the archive director. Forgive me, early morning insomnia when watching an interview, so paraphrasing. Private records, such as the presidents “personal diary” can be kept. Probably personal letters, things like that. Everything else belongs to the “American people.” He wanted to make it clear that these documents belong to us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Always the sign of a great team, including a player to be named later.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden will probably pardon him.

Yeah, because that worked out so well for Gerald Ford, not to mention thwarting a precedent that could have helped in this instance 🙄

This doesn't work out well no matter what happens. I think Trump should be tried - and then let's see what happens re: pardons. Trump is such a devil that there are never any good options when it comes to him.

If he’s pardoned that’s like telling any future POTUS that they are above the law and can do anything they want. At a minimum he should be under home confinement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Omg I agree with Bolton.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guess who is the initial judge assigned to Trump's case?

The summons sent to former President Donald Trump and his legal team late Thursday indicates that U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon will be assigned to oversee his case, at least initially, according to sources briefed on the matter.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-aileen-cannon-trump-appointee-initially-assigned-oversee/story?id=99956910

Our failure as a country is being exposed. This is ridiculous.

The court rules give the chief judge power to bend them "whenever necessary in the interest of justice and expediency, the Court may modify the assignments made to active or senior Judges"

I assume this report just means that she signed the summons. That's the only logical place for the judge's name to appear on the summons. The report also says that Magistrate Judge Reinhart is also on there. Magistrate judges often handle arraignments instead of district judges, but I can't figure out why two judges would sign it.

Also should add that, while I've never practiced in SDFL, in every federal court I'm familiar with, the trial judge gets assigned after the arraignment, not before. This all seems premature worrying.

Agree it may be premature, but everybody is remembering that she is in the circuit and could be assigned permanently.

[Anonymous]

WaPo reporting that Trump says valet Walt Nauta, who moved the boxes at Mar-a-Lago, was also indicted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Equal justice under the law" doesn't apply if you have an R behind your name.

The equal justice is that he IS being indicted for crimes HE allegedly committed. If he wasn't charged THAT would be two tiered. Are you suggesting a former president is above the law? Because in the old days, that would be a king. We had a revolution over that, remember?

+1 And he’s been treated with kid gloves for two years. He basically begged DOJ to prosecute. Anyone else would have been in prison by now.

Mitt Romney agrees with me on this (but probably very little else)