Friends is the dopiest, most basic show

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Friends was stupid, basic, and not funny even when it first came out and it’s very cringe now.
I was in high school when it was first airing so I should’ve been part of their target audience.


No, the target audience was older. Target demos for broadcast television are rarely minors because advertisers want to target buyers. Based on the stuff that used to get advertised during Friends, I would guess the target demo was something like 25-50 white people with and without kids, mostly suburban or lower density (not urban and not rural). I'm sure some HS students watched it, but largely because it was what the rest of the family was watching.


How long was Friends on? 10 seasons? So people in high school when it started would have been target audience by the time it was done. And should’ve been hooking them in during high school early college years. It’s a bad show.


No, that's not how it works, because the show also ages and the characters generally age too. So viewers age with the characters and the storylines. That's why Friends started out being about somewhat directionless people in their 20s with money problems, all single, many trying to make ends meet and break into careers, and by the time it ended, they'd all experienced career progression and success, several had kids and been married (and/or divorced), their friendships had evolved, they were in very different financial situations, etc. So no, the show is unlikely to hook new viewers because it is no longer the show it was when it first aired, it's about different things and the characters are in a different part of life, and a person in their early to mid 20s won't be able to identify or be as interested. They'll be targeted by other shows.

I think people really forget how different appointment viewing was for the TV. Streaming changes everything becsue anyone can start a show from the pilot whenever they want. So if I decide I want to watch The West Wing tomorrow, I can watch it for the first time starting with the first episode and draw my own conclusions based on who I am today. But in the 90s it didn't work that way. Target demos used to be a much bigger deal because television revolved around advertising, and because in order to get someone to watch a show, you needed to be able to entice them when the show is airing. So airing the right shows at the right time on the right nights to capture the right audience was an art form, called programming, and networks invested a lot of money in it. Friends was engineered to capture a specific audience. You were not part of that audience. It's okay, neither was I. But it ran for 10 years, went into syndication, launched major careers for half a dozen actors, and made a TON of money. It was a successful show regardless of what you think of it.


I didn’t deny that the show was successful-it obviously was. I still think it’s a dumb, not funny at all show. How many people love that show just proves how many people love corny jokes and stupid story lines.


I think Veep and Arrested Development are far funnier and more clever than Friends but I still love Friends for what it is.

These critiques remind me of the time I heard a movie critic panning Wayne's World and comparing it to some Oscar-winning film to prove how bad it was. The thing is, Wayne's World was never supposed to be an Oscar contender. It wasn't a serious film. It was dopey and stupid but also likeable and funny. I feel like people who say Friends wasn't funny, etc., aren't appreciating it for what it was. It wasn't Seinfeld or Frasier, which were wittier and more clever. It was cinnamon toast when you're home sick. Chicken nuggets with fries when you've had a bad day. It was comfort food in the form of a show.

You're still entitled to not like it, of course. But I feel like panning it for being dopey and basic is really missing the point. That's exactly what it was supposed to be!


That’s fine if that is “comfort” to you. I’m not a snob. My comfort show that I watch when I’ve had a bad day or feel ill or whatever is Seinfeld. It makes me laugh, even though I’ve seen it so many times and a lot of it is kind of silly or ridiculous. I still find it funny and entertaining all these years later. Friends just never captured my interest at all. I never thought it was funny or relatable in any way. And I get what you mean that it was intended to be basic. That’s fine. It’s just not my thing.
Anonymous
It’s so weird to me that someone would think Friends was dumb but Seinfeld is great. It’s the same corny-joke shit.
Anonymous
I still like to watch friends reruns. Easy to just sit back and be moderately entertained for a short time. I want simple when I want a little escapism.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It’s so weird to me that someone would think Friends was dumb but Seinfeld is great. It’s the same corny-joke shit.


DP. Seinfeld's main cast were selfish characters. The storylines were increasingly unrealistic. The laughs were goofy. And yet it rose above this formula and became a hit.

Friends had earnest characters, more relationship-based stories, lots of dumb running jokes. But it also rose above the formula and became a hit.

Really they are more similar than not. I would agree Seinfeld was more clever because it was more creative and didn't lean on the same relationship tropes over and over.

Two flavors, what's wrong with each appealing to a different audience.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It is the Cheesecake Factory of TV shows. How on earth is it, or was it ever, popular? Truly.
Phoebe had no character beyond being a ditz and a flake. NOBODY acts like this in real life.
Shrewish Monica was unlikable and Cox couldn't act her way out of a paper sack.
Aniston was boring, blah, and basic.
Joey was one-note and LeBlanc was a painfully weak actor.
Schwimmer/Ross was punchable.
And poor Matthew Perry/Chandler Bing - he was actually a talented comic but was lost in this sad muddle of a cheezeball show.

Oh, and this was supposed to take place in NY? More like Disney.


I randomly just watched a couple of episodes and got caught in a loop on YouTube of some “best of” clips.

Honestly can’t believe I ever found the show funny. Either it has aged horribly or was never funny in the first place.

I got cringe chills multiple times realizing I used to laugh at this corny slop.
Anonymous
Every “super popular” show ever has been essentially a psy op. The entire media and Hollywood apparatus boosts these shows and brainwashes cattle (the audience) into watching. Nowadays they’re boosted with the help of paid influencers, podcasters, and fake viral trends.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Seinfeld and GG were brilliant. Friends was like sipping lukewarm chowder.


+1. Friends is basic and dull. GG and Seinfeld had far better writing and actors with great timing.
Anonymous
Must’ve had something, the actors still get 20 million a year from syndication.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Every “super popular” show ever has been essentially a psy op. The entire media and Hollywood apparatus boosts these shows and brainwashes cattle (the audience) into watching. Nowadays they’re boosted with the help of paid influencers, podcasters, and fake viral trends.


Oh wait - you forgot to use your usual "astroturf"!
Anonymous
Frasier >>>>>>>>>>Friends and Seinfeld
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Seinfeld and GG were brilliant. Friends was like sipping lukewarm chowder.


+1. Friends is basic and dull. GG and Seinfeld had far better writing and actors with great timing.


I thought Seinfeld was dumb and not funny. Let’s walk around a garage all day because we are too dumb between the four of us to know where we parked.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Never watched it. As a black woman, there was nothing in it for me. Plus it was a rip off of Living Single.


Ross had a black girlfriend.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:That's why I prefer to watch thunderstorms. Better than any video.

Anyway, they spend all their time sinning.

Isha Yiras Hashem


Yeah, thunderstorms are huge sluts like that. Glad you enjoy them.


What’s this interaction about? I’m lost
Anonymous
Love it and don’t care.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Seinfeld and GG were brilliant. Friends was like sipping lukewarm chowder.


+1. Friends is basic and dull. GG and Seinfeld had far better writing and actors with great timing.


I thought Seinfeld was dumb and not funny. Let’s walk around a garage all day because we are too dumb between the four of us to know where we parked.


I like Seinfeld and this episode had me rolling! Seinfeld took little things, brought them to an extreme so you could laugh about them. I still thing about the cart people whenever I go to an airport.

Friends I liked in the beginning (which was high school for me) and then I stopped watching in college because there were better things to do. My roommate post college was a fan and after a couple of episodes I found it grueling to sit through. Inevitably, someone would deliver a line and punch line would be SO predictable I would say it before the character. It took all the fun out of watching and was automatic on my part.
post reply Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Message Quick Reply
Go to: