Mother of 2 from VERY prominent Richmond family arrested by FBI for child p@rn, exploitation, etc

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just email the Daily Mail for goodness sake, they’ll have a typo-strewn story up in two hours.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I took a look at the charging document and there's so much disgusting about it. Starting with the fact that guys like the one the undercover agent was pretending to be do exist. And also her story that she was trying to sting him. ugh ugh ugh. Her communications are just so sick. Good thing she didn't try harder to cover her tracks.

The UC was a creep for asking for naked photos of her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I took a look at the charging document and there's so much disgusting about it. Starting with the fact that guys like the one the undercover agent was pretending to be do exist. And also her story that she was trying to sting him. ugh ugh ugh. Her communications are just so sick. Good thing she didn't try harder to cover her tracks.

The UC was a creep for asking for naked photos of her.

What are you, her sister?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I took a look at the charging document and there's so much disgusting about it. Starting with the fact that guys like the one the undercover agent was pretending to be do exist. And also her story that she was trying to sting him. ugh ugh ugh. Her communications are just so sick. Good thing she didn't try harder to cover her tracks.

The UC was a creep for asking for naked photos of her.

Read the charging documents. It was probably a plow to help identify her. She apparently shows her face in the nudes and the FBI used that to match against her FB profile.

But way to be a weirdo. The FBI agent was a woman.

[Anonymous]

Who tipped off the FBI?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I took a look at the charging document and there's so much disgusting about it. Starting with the fact that guys like the one the undercover agent was pretending to be do exist. And also her story that she was trying to sting him. ugh ugh ugh. Her communications are just so sick. Good thing she didn't try harder to cover her tracks.

The UC was a creep for asking for naked photos of her.

You do not have much brains, do you? Pervs exchange and ask for naked pictures. The UC was not pretending to be a church nun. Lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I took a look at the charging document and there's so much disgusting about it. Starting with the fact that guys like the one the undercover agent was pretending to be do exist. And also her story that she was trying to sting him. ugh ugh ugh. Her communications are just so sick. Good thing she didn't try harder to cover her tracks.

The UC was a creep for asking for naked photos of her.

Read the charging documents. It was probably a plow to help identify her. She apparently shows her face in the nudes and the FBI used that to match against her FB profile.

But way to be a weirdo. The FBI agent was a woman.

Huh? Where does it say the identity of the agent?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who tipped off the FBI?

It sounds like UCs monitor the chat groups.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She had to have been sexually abused at one point.

Who gaf? I was abused as a child. Guess what I don't do? Yup, I don't abuse children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I took a look at the charging document and there's so much disgusting about it. Starting with the fact that guys like the one the undercover agent was pretending to be do exist. And also her story that she was trying to sting him. ugh ugh ugh. Her communications are just so sick. Good thing she didn't try harder to cover her tracks.

The UC was a creep for asking for naked photos of her.

What are you, her sister?

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who tipped off the FBI?

Hopefully 99.9% of people would have if they’d known.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She had to have been sexually abused at one point.

Who gaf? I was abused as a child. Guess what I don't do? Yup, I don't abuse children.

This!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A female relative of mine, who was a high school teacher at the time, was caught f*** students. So a woman is definitely capable of being a pedophile.!

No excuse, since it is obviously very wrong to have sex with people that much younger and who are still minors, but technically someone is a pedophile only if the victim has not yet gone through puberty. Most high school kids have gone through puberty.

A high school teacher f($king their students is a pedo. A man doing it would be called one and everyone would agree.

No they wouldn’t! I wouldn’t. I think they’re awful and a sexual predator. But they aren’t a pedophile. Most men think 16-17 year old fully mature girls are attractive. It doesn’t mean they’ll sleep with them HOPEFULLY. But it’s a far cry from finding a 6 year old “attractive”.

Uh what? Are you legit saying “most men” are creeps?

Uh, I’m saying most men would be sexually attracted to a fully mature, adult-dressed 17 year old. Not up for debate. Doesn’t mean they LIKE them or would want to sleep with them but a late teen is not a child

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just email the Daily Mail for goodness sake, they’ll have a typo-strewn story up in two hours.

LOL. That's where I go for breaking news while the NYT and WP are still fact-checking and talking to their lawyers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A female relative of mine, who was a high school teacher at the time, was caught f*** students. So a woman is definitely capable of being a pedophile.!

No excuse, since it is obviously very wrong to have sex with people that much younger and who are still minors, but technically someone is a pedophile only if the victim has not yet gone through puberty. Most high school kids have gone through puberty.

A high school teacher f($king their students is a pedo. A man doing it would be called one and everyone would agree.

No they wouldn’t! I wouldn’t. I think they’re awful and a sexual predator. But they aren’t a pedophile. Most men think 16-17 year old fully mature girls are attractive. It doesn’t mean they’ll sleep with them HOPEFULLY. But it’s a far cry from finding a 6 year old “attractive”.

Uh what? Are you legit saying “most men” are creeps?

I agree with the PP. There is a world of difference between a fully developed/mature 16/17 yo and a 6 yo.