I think this is all a scare tactic by admissions. They hope the request for documentation will cause some parents to decline offers but the parents will fight to hold onto those seats even if it means filing a lawsuit. Once the breakdown of low income by school data is available it may become obvious which families likely cheated. If FCPS does not fix this the assumption will be that at least some families cheated their way into the school. |
To salvage any bit of respect, they need to go with option 2. Do it right or resign. |
I guarantee that there are parents of admitted students hiring lawyers to respond. FCPS caused this situation by not asking the question clearly for two years in a row despite many parents pointing out the issues.
If admitted parents band together, I don’t see how FCPS can fight them affectively. There are statements on the FCPS website, in email blasts and in news bulletins from school board members. Many of these contain the words “all students are eligible for free meals”. The TJ admissions office should have done their jobs and figured out a solution BEFORE sending out offers. Not after the sh!t is already out of the horse. |
Better late than never. My DC (All A's, Algebra II, 600s in Math SOLs since 3rd grade, and in (previous) feeder school) was waitlisted and we had come to terms with the outcome. This is despite numerous kids jeering that "they had done nothing to get into TJ except to answer yes to the meals question." Let's just say that a lot of the acceptances were big surprises given some of the historical performances of these other kids (and their household income status). I mean they openly were boasting about getting in despite B's in math and science classes. We are still okay going to base school, but hopefully some of these other kids who misrepresented (and boasted about it) sweats a little. My DC didn't answer the question by the way (it was optional) because didn't know how to given the special COVID circumstances. |
With the admission standard set so low, it is impossible to know who cheated. |
+1 I don't even live in Virginia so I have no dog in this race, but was no one in TJ administration capable of writing a clear question with a big impact on admissions? |
When responsibility falls on so may people, it falls on no one in particular. |
How does the TJ Admissions staff still have their jobs? I don’t see how they can fix this and the legal bills are going to be astronomical.
A lottery would have been better than this mess. |
Who signed the email today? Jeremy Shughart, ED.S. Director of Admissions Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology Fairfax County Public Schools 571-423-3770 |
Agreed, and yet here we are. So what is the best way out of this mess? There need not be any penalty for answering yes. We can agree that anyone who answered yes answered truthfully. But we're now being told that the question about eligibility for free meals was meant to determine economically disadvantaged status (despite its not having been clearly worded as such and being a poor proxy for such in light of pandemic policies). And getting free lunch because everyone got free lunch during the pandemic is, we can all agree, *not* the same as being economically disadvantaged. The admissions criterion is being economically disadvantaged, not eligibility for free lunch. Nobody has grounds to argue that they deserve the EF points because of pandemic eligibility for free lunch. Families with sufficiently low income have documentation of such and can provide it; they and only they should get FRM experience factor points. There is already a lawsuit about the admission process more generally. I think that there would be grounds for a lawsuit if some applicants undeservedly got FRM EF points just by answering yes, so that needs to be rectified and it seems that it will be. There might also be grounds for a lawsuit if offers of admission are rescinded, but that strikes me as the right bullet to bite in this case. It's a mess either way, but getting closer to the right grout of admittees has to be the preferred goal. |
This is after the fiasco. He is trying to fix it. |
After this episode is sorted out, can TJ ask to verify if the remote essay testing was independently performed right before the school starts? |
It was on the parent portion of the application. And I don’t think it was optional? Better to leave blank than misrepresent. |
I think it was a legacy question from previous years when answering it did mean that you were low-income. |
No, he is the director of admissions. The application was his responsibility and he didn’t ask the right questions, including asking for proof of income to meet the factor set by the Board. |