Oh, you! First by assuming "stature" is a thing that matters and can be put on a scale. Second by starting your list with "Harvard" which literally has been the generic term for the #1 college since it's inception in 1636. You silly person! Just stop! |
Not even close. It was om the 30s this year after 41 last year, I think. |
| On the other hand, Columbia has gone up, and has done it by messing with the numbers provided to USNWR. What does that say about this whole process? |
| Based on rankings/selectivity, Bryn Mawr and Smith. I guess the appeal of single-sex college is waning. Wellesley seems to be fairing better. But there seems to be great demand for all schools in Boston area, beyond just Harvard and MIT -- eg. Tufts, BC, BU, NE, HC. There is no significant difference in academic rigor/amenities between Bryn Mawr and Haverford (or Swarthmore for that matter), but perception/ranking/selectivity is SWAT > HC > BMC |
Try googling. Google says 51% |
You are too young to remember the 90s? |
It kind of baffles me that, given their location, schools like Emerson, Suffolk, Simmons, Emmanuel and others are not in vogue. |
X10000000 |
Brown, Dartmouth, Berkeley down. Cornell down too (just look at rankings) UP: JHU, Stanford and Chicago |
It affects perception which affects reality. And enrollment directly affects school culture and class sizes. |
What's the source of acceptance rate in the 30s? 2020 was 51% according to Google. They joined the Common App in the same year and became test-optional due to COVID, which explains the 10% drop to 40% for 2021. |
That's for 2020. For 2021 it was 40%. |
JMU joined common app in 22 https://www.breezejmu.org/news/jmu-joins-the-common-app-to-create-more-diversity-on-campus/article_da69b09e-7f09-11ec-8ba8-3f26ecbaf5b6.html |
Do you really think acceptance rate is an indication of quality? You are misguided. Wow. Any school can market to get more apps and reject more students in order to lower their acceptance rate. See: U of Chicago. |
Same. I think it's gone up. |