Ketanji Brown Jackson confirmation hearing

[Anonymous]

Blackburn asking if parents at GDS were calling to complain about the curriculum shows how totally out of touch she is with how the world works or a private school operates. Especially this one school. Dumb as a box of rocks.

[Anonymous]

Why would she ask about GDS? She sounds clueless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why would she ask about GDS? She sounds clueless.

Because Jackson’s kids went there. It’s ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why would she ask about GDS? She sounds clueless.

Ted Cruz started it. She is on the GDS Board and Cruz suggested GDS’s curriculum is all CRT & LGBTQ content and she is responsible for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would she ask about GDS? She sounds clueless.

Ted Cruz started it. She is on the GDS Board and Cruz suggested GDS’s curriculum is all CRT & LGBTQ content and she is responsible for it.

Do you think Cruz is that big of a dipshit naturally, or does he have to work at being so offensive to decent human beings?

[Anonymous]

I don't think he works at being a dipshit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Blackburn asking if parents at GDS were calling to complain about the curriculum shows how totally out of touch she is with how the world works or a private school operates. Especially this one school. Dumb as a box of rocks.

Guarantee that GDS is going to be harassed by calls from stupid rubes for a while because of this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is the origin of Kentaji -- such a beautiful name.

She explained in her introduction. Kentanji means “lovely one” in one of the African languages.

It’s Ketanji. Not Kentaji.

[Anonymous]

She’s not qualified. She won’t protect white rights. We are under attack.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'd like to see a non-lawyer on the court eventually, and if not, definitely not someone from an Ivy.

Oh yes let's have a businessman. That seems to work out well. (S) Do you know how ignorant you are? Their job is to interpret subtleties in the law using their years of case knowledge. How would a non lawyer even know how to look up precedent? I think Thomas, with years on the EEOC and a couple of years as an appeals judge had very thin qualifications. He had never tried a case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'd like to see a non-lawyer on the court eventually, and if not, definitely not someone from an Ivy.

Amy didn’t go to an Ivy.

She isn't much of a lawyer either.

[Anonymous]

Senator Whitehouse makes a great point. I still wonder who paid all Kavenaugh's debts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s not qualified. She won’t protect white rights. We are under attack.

I think we’ll survive. Somehow. — white person

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s not qualified. She won’t protect white rights. We are under attack.

No, we’re not.

The only people who feel like steps toward equality mean “attack” are people who know full well that the system has been rigged by White people for their own benefit. In a phrase, white supremacists. She’s well qualified. White rights don’t need protecting. Take off your hood and open your eyes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Find yourself a partner who tears up at your confirmation hearings (and now I am tearing up, too)

+10000. She seems to have “won” in life in having an amazing family, regardless of what happens at the hearing.