Kyle Rittenhouse Post-Trial

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Not guilty. A hero.

End of story.

Nope. He’s a dumbass.

Why? Because when you go looking for trouble, you’re gonna find it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Not guilty. A hero.

End of story.

lol at MAGA idea of a hero. You can have him. Tell your kids to emulate him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I learned:
Rottenhouse is broke
He’s facing two pending wrongful death lawsuits
Is working a job and living paycheck to paycheck
Lobbied the TX legislature after they considered raising assault weapon age limit from 18 to 21 after Uvalde (!!!)

He’s gonna have a short, difficult life.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/kyle-rittenhouse-broke-net-worth-b2453285.html

Are you serious? The dude is like 20 years old. Maybe 21. You might want to get out more. Unless they are a trust fund baby, most 20-21 year olds are broke, working a job, and living paycheck to paycheck.

NP. Yes, but most 20 year olds aren't nationally notorious and had over $2M donated to them before they graduated high school.

He essentially became an instant celebrity and trust fund baby and in 2 years, he's blown it all away. He's a loser.

Good grief. You think money was simply "donated" to him so he could live large. A young adult was defending themselves against a litany of criminal charges from an overzealous prosecution. He needed good legal defense and thanks to the beneficence of others, he got it.

Overzealous? He took a gun that he couldn't legally bring across state lines, brought it across state lines,.

I swear, this is literally the ONLY example in history of progressives arguing that any kind of defined border on a map (“state line”) has any significance AT ALL. As though the state line on a map that Rittenhouse crossed with a rifle is THE ONLY illegal border crossing they have ever found fault with. The ONLY time they’ve ever cared about someone crossing any line, is a state boundary, in the upper Midwest, while carrying a rifle.

The millions of other illegal crossings of other lines on our map? No problem at all. Nothing to see there. But Rittenhouse crossing into Wisconsin 3 years ago??? There STILL bleating about that being a “crime”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Not guilty. A hero.

End of story.

lol at MAGA idea of a hero. You can have him. Tell your kids to emulate him.

Tell your kids to hide behind him if they are being terrorized.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If I were facing civil lawsuits, I would be broke as well.

Did you ever grab a gun to go hunting people?

I will take things that never happened for $600, Alex.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I learned:
Rottenhouse is broke
He’s facing two pending wrongful death lawsuits
Is working a job and living paycheck to paycheck
Lobbied the TX legislature after they considered raising assault weapon age limit from 18 to 21 after Uvalde (!!!)

He’s gonna have a short, difficult life.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/kyle-rittenhouse-broke-net-worth-b2453285.html

Are you serious? The dude is like 20 years old. Maybe 21. You might want to get out more. Unless they are a trust fund baby, most 20-21 year olds are broke, working a job, and living paycheck to paycheck.

NP. Yes, but most 20 year olds aren't nationally notorious and had over $2M donated to them before they graduated high school.

He essentially became an instant celebrity and trust fund baby and in 2 years, he's blown it all away. He's a loser.

Good grief. You think money was simply "donated" to him so he could live large. A young adult was defending themselves against a litany of criminal charges from an overzealous prosecution. He needed good legal defense and thanks to the beneficence of others, he got it.

Overzealous? He took a gun that he couldn't legally bring across state lines, brought it across state lines,.

I swear, this is literally the ONLY example in history of progressives arguing that any kind of defined border on a map (“state line”) has any significance AT ALL. As though the state line on a map that Rittenhouse crossed with a rifle is THE ONLY illegal border crossing they have ever found fault with. The ONLY time they’ve ever cared about someone crossing any line, is a state boundary, in the upper Midwest, while carrying a rifle.

The millions of other illegal crossings of other lines on our map? No problem at all. Nothing to see there. But Rittenhouse crossing into Wisconsin 3 years ago??? There STILL bleating about that being a “crime”.

They also love the interstate commerce act.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Not guilty. A hero.

End of story.

lol at MAGA idea of a hero. You can have him. Tell your kids to emulate him.

Tell your kids to hide behind him if they are being terrorized.

They’d certainly be safer there than anywhere near Joseph Rosenbaum, who was a child rapist (until Rittenhouse put him down).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amount of hate you guys for a young man you do not know, three years after he was in the limelight, is disheartening.

Yes, he made some mistakes, but ultimately he was tried and found not guilty. I’m sure having to shoot the three protesters in self defense will weigh on him for the rest of his life, do we really need to make it worse by making him out to be a monster not a stupid kid who made a mistake?

“Some mistakes”? He’s a killer.

He was found not guilty in a court of law. He did not commit any crimes that night, so it’s time to move on and stop trying to ruin a kid’s life.

Ask yourself, if Kyle Rittenhouse was your son, would you want him to become a pariah because he defended himself?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amount of hate you guys for a young man you do not know, three years after he was in the limelight, is disheartening.

Yes, he made some mistakes, but ultimately he was tried and found not guilty. I’m sure having to shoot the three protesters in self defense will weigh on him for the rest of his life, do we really need to make it worse by making him out to be a monster not a stupid kid who made a mistake?

“Some mistakes”? He’s a killer.

He was found not guilty in a court of law. He did not commit any crimes that night, so it’s time to move on and stop trying to ruin a kid’s life.

Ask yourself, if Kyle Rittenhouse was your son, would you want him to become a pariah because he defended himself?

+1. A jury found him not guilty. That means not guilty. There was no crime here.

For a group of people that like to hold up jury verdicts (ones they agree with, I mean) and the “rule of law” (when it comes to Trump) I find it really curious how so many here seem to cast aside this jury’s verdict, which found that Rittenhouse didn’t murder anyone.


“Justice…..as long as we agree with it”.

[Anonymous]

OJ was also found “not guilty”

Does anyone actually believe he didn’t murder 2 people?

Juries aren’t always right

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amount of hate you guys for a young man you do not know, three years after he was in the limelight, is disheartening.

Yes, he made some mistakes, but ultimately he was tried and found not guilty. I’m sure having to shoot the three protesters in self defense will weigh on him for the rest of his life, do we really need to make it worse by making him out to be a monster not a stupid kid who made a mistake?

“Some mistakes”? He’s a killer.

He was found not guilty in a court of law. He did not commit any crimes that night, so it’s time to move on and stop trying to ruin a kid’s life.

Ask yourself, if Kyle Rittenhouse was your son, would you want him to become a pariah because he defended himself?

He went itching for a fight and killed 2 people. Those are facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amount of hate you guys for a young man you do not know, three years after he was in the limelight, is disheartening.

Yes, he made some mistakes, but ultimately he was tried and found not guilty. I’m sure having to shoot the three protesters in self defense will weigh on him for the rest of his life, do we really need to make it worse by making him out to be a monster not a stupid kid who made a mistake?

“Some mistakes”? He’s a killer.

He was found not guilty in a court of law. He did not commit any crimes that night, so it’s time to move on and stop trying to ruin a kid’s life.

Ask yourself, if Kyle Rittenhouse was your son, would you want him to become a pariah because he defended himself?

+1. A jury found him not guilty. That means not guilty. There was no crime here.

For a group of people that like to hold up jury verdicts (ones they agree with, I mean) and the “rule of law” (when it comes to Trump) I find it really curious how so many here seem to cast aside this jury’s verdict, which found that Rittenhouse didn’t murder anyone.


“Justice…..as long as we agree with it”.

He’s still a killer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Not guilty. A hero.

End of story.

lol at MAGA idea of a hero. You can have him. Tell your kids to emulate him.

Tell your kids to hide behind him if they are being terrorized.

He’s just a likely to shoot them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amount of hate you guys for a young man you do not know, three years after he was in the limelight, is disheartening.

Yes, he made some mistakes, but ultimately he was tried and found not guilty. I’m sure having to shoot the three protesters in self defense will weigh on him for the rest of his life, do we really need to make it worse by making him out to be a monster not a stupid kid who made a mistake?

“Some mistakes”? He’s a killer.

He was found not guilty in a court of law. He did not commit any crimes that night, so it’s time to move on and stop trying to ruin a kid’s life.

Ask yourself, if Kyle Rittenhouse was your son, would you want him to become a pariah because he defended himself?

I would be deeply ashamed if he were my son. And would tell him to lie low and not bring attention to himself, to do some work to do penance for taking 2 people’s lives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Not guilty. A hero.

End of story.

lol at MAGA idea of a hero. You can have him. Tell your kids to emulate him.

Tell your kids to hide behind him if they are being terrorized.

He’s just a likely to shoot them.

Are they uncivilized terrorists ?