Kyle Rittenhouse Post-Trial

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amount of hate you guys for a young man you do not know, three years after he was in the limelight, is disheartening.

Yes, he made some mistakes, but ultimately he was tried and found not guilty. I’m sure having to shoot the three protesters in self defense will weigh on him for the rest of his life, do we really need to make it worse by making him out to be a monster not a stupid kid who made a mistake?

“Some mistakes”? He’s a killer.

He was found not guilty in a court of law. He did not commit any crimes that night, so it’s time to move on and stop trying to ruin a kid’s life.

Ask yourself, if Kyle Rittenhouse was your son, would you want him to become a pariah because he defended himself?

+1. A jury found him not guilty. That means not guilty. There was no crime here.

For a group of people that like to hold up jury verdicts (ones they agree with, I mean) and the “rule of law” (when it comes to Trump) I find it really curious how so many here seem to cast aside this jury’s verdict, which found that Rittenhouse didn’t murder anyone.

“Justice…..as long as we agree with it”.

Yes, that means he is not a murderer. It does not change the fact that he is a killer. He killed two men, which still makes him a killer.

He killed two criminals in defense of his own life. His first assailant - Rosenbaum - was a convicted child rapist who sodomized little boys and should never have seen the outside of a prison again. He was shot after assaulting Rittenhouse and then attempting to disarm him. The second assailant - Huber - was a domestic abuser who repeatedly beat women. He was shot while trying to murder Rittenhouse with a skateboard. The third assailant - Kreutzfeld(?) - a convicted felon abd domestic abuser who couldn’t legally possess a gun - was shot in the arm and wounded as he was drawing a Glock pistol to shoot Rittenhouse.


These are the criminals Rittenhouse defended his life from. All three intended to murder him. He defended himself, and a jury picked by the State agreed.

Rittenhouse is a hero.

He had to defend himself because he violated the curfew and sought out the criminal element. Confronting them was what he was there for. You talk like he was jumped while heading to Sunday school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amount of hate you guys for a young man you do not know, three years after he was in the limelight, is disheartening.

Yes, he made some mistakes, but ultimately he was tried and found not guilty. I’m sure having to shoot the three protesters in self defense will weigh on him for the rest of his life, do we really need to make it worse by making him out to be a monster not a stupid kid who made a mistake?

“Some mistakes”? He’s a killer.

He was found not guilty in a court of law. He did not commit any crimes that night, so it’s time to move on and stop trying to ruin a kid’s life.

Ask yourself, if Kyle Rittenhouse was your son, would you want him to become a pariah because he defended himself?

+1. A jury found him not guilty. That means not guilty. There was no crime here.

For a group of people that like to hold up jury verdicts (ones they agree with, I mean) and the “rule of law” (when it comes to Trump) I find it really curious how so many here seem to cast aside this jury’s verdict, which found that Rittenhouse didn’t murder anyone.

“Justice…..as long as we agree with it”.

Yes, that means he is not a murderer. It does not change the fact that he is a killer. He killed two men, which still makes him a killer.

He killed two criminals in defense of his own life. His first assailant - Rosenbaum - was a convicted child rapist who sodomized little boys and should never have seen the outside of a prison again. He was shot after assaulting Rittenhouse and then attempting to disarm him. The second assailant - Huber - was a domestic abuser who repeatedly beat women. He was shot while trying to murder Rittenhouse with a skateboard. The third assailant - Kreutzfeld(?) - a convicted felon abd domestic abuser who couldn’t legally possess a gun - was shot in the arm and wounded as he was drawing a Glock pistol to shoot Rittenhouse.


These are the criminals Rittenhouse defended his life from. All three intended to murder him. He defended himself, and a jury picked by the State agreed.

Rittenhouse is a hero.

He’s still a killer.

Are you this obnoxious about battered women who kill their abusive partners? Do you write them off as simply killers or do you place their actions in context?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amount of hate you guys for a young man you do not know, three years after he was in the limelight, is disheartening.

Yes, he made some mistakes, but ultimately he was tried and found not guilty. I’m sure having to shoot the three protesters in self defense will weigh on him for the rest of his life, do we really need to make it worse by making him out to be a monster not a stupid kid who made a mistake?

“Some mistakes”? He’s a killer.

He was found not guilty in a court of law. He did not commit any crimes that night, so it’s time to move on and stop trying to ruin a kid’s life.

Ask yourself, if Kyle Rittenhouse was your son, would you want him to become a pariah because he defended himself?

+1. A jury found him not guilty. That means not guilty. There was no crime here.

For a group of people that like to hold up jury verdicts (ones they agree with, I mean) and the “rule of law” (when it comes to Trump) I find it really curious how so many here seem to cast aside this jury’s verdict, which found that Rittenhouse didn’t murder anyone.

“Justice…..as long as we agree with it”.

Yes, that means he is not a murderer. It does not change the fact that he is a killer. He killed two men, which still makes him a killer.

He killed two criminals in defense of his own life. His first assailant - Rosenbaum - was a convicted child rapist who sodomized little boys and should never have seen the outside of a prison again. He was shot after assaulting Rittenhouse and then attempting to disarm him. The second assailant - Huber - was a domestic abuser who repeatedly beat women. He was shot while trying to murder Rittenhouse with a skateboard. The third assailant - Kreutzfeld(?) - a convicted felon abd domestic abuser who couldn’t legally possess a gun - was shot in the arm and wounded as he was drawing a Glock pistol to shoot Rittenhouse.


These are the criminals Rittenhouse defended his life from. All three intended to murder him. He defended himself, and a jury picked by the State agreed.

Rittenhouse is a hero.

He’s still a killer.

Are you this obnoxious about battered women who kill their abusive partners? Do you write them off as simply killers or do you place their actions in context?

Oh please. Rittenhouse went spoiling for a fight and killed those men. So yes, he’s a killer. Stop making false equivalencies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amount of hate you guys for a young man you do not know, three years after he was in the limelight, is disheartening.

Yes, he made some mistakes, but ultimately he was tried and found not guilty. I’m sure having to shoot the three protesters in self defense will weigh on him for the rest of his life, do we really need to make it worse by making him out to be a monster not a stupid kid who made a mistake?

“Some mistakes”? He’s a killer.

He was found not guilty in a court of law. He did not commit any crimes that night, so it’s time to move on and stop trying to ruin a kid’s life.

Ask yourself, if Kyle Rittenhouse was your son, would you want him to become a pariah because he defended himself?

+1. A jury found him not guilty. That means not guilty. There was no crime here.

For a group of people that like to hold up jury verdicts (ones they agree with, I mean) and the “rule of law” (when it comes to Trump) I find it really curious how so many here seem to cast aside this jury’s verdict, which found that Rittenhouse didn’t murder anyone.

“Justice…..as long as we agree with it”.

Yes, that means he is not a murderer. It does not change the fact that he is a killer. He killed two men, which still makes him a killer.

He killed two criminals in defense of his own life. His first assailant - Rosenbaum - was a convicted child rapist who sodomized little boys and should never have seen the outside of a prison again. He was shot after assaulting Rittenhouse and then attempting to disarm him. The second assailant - Huber - was a domestic abuser who repeatedly beat women. He was shot while trying to murder Rittenhouse with a skateboard. The third assailant - Kreutzfeld(?) - a convicted felon abd domestic abuser who couldn’t legally possess a gun - was shot in the arm and wounded as he was drawing a Glock pistol to shoot Rittenhouse.


These are the criminals Rittenhouse defended his life from. All three intended to murder him. He defended himself, and a jury picked by the State agreed.

Rittenhouse is a hero.

He’s still a killer.

Are you this obnoxious about battered women who kill their abusive partners? Do you write them off as simply killers or do you place their actions in context?

Oh please. Rittenhouse went spoiling for a fight and killed those men. So yes, he’s a killer. Stop making false equivalencies.

+1 The lengths Republicans will go to in order to excuse flat out murder is bizarre. He went looking for trouble.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amount of hate you guys for a young man you do not know, three years after he was in the limelight, is disheartening.

Yes, he made some mistakes, but ultimately he was tried and found not guilty. I’m sure having to shoot the three protesters in self defense will weigh on him for the rest of his life, do we really need to make it worse by making him out to be a monster not a stupid kid who made a mistake?

“Some mistakes”? He’s a killer.

He was found not guilty in a court of law. He did not commit any crimes that night, so it’s time to move on and stop trying to ruin a kid’s life.

Ask yourself, if Kyle Rittenhouse was your son, would you want him to become a pariah because he defended himself?

+1. A jury found him not guilty. That means not guilty. There was no crime here.

For a group of people that like to hold up jury verdicts (ones they agree with, I mean) and the “rule of law” (when it comes to Trump) I find it really curious how so many here seem to cast aside this jury’s verdict, which found that Rittenhouse didn’t murder anyone.

“Justice…..as long as we agree with it”.

Yes, that means he is not a murderer. It does not change the fact that he is a killer. He killed two men, which still makes him a killer.

He killed two criminals in defense of his own life. His first assailant - Rosenbaum - was a convicted child rapist who sodomized little boys and should never have seen the outside of a prison again. He was shot after assaulting Rittenhouse and then attempting to disarm him. The second assailant - Huber - was a domestic abuser who repeatedly beat women. He was shot while trying to murder Rittenhouse with a skateboard. The third assailant - Kreutzfeld(?) - a convicted felon abd domestic abuser who couldn’t legally possess a gun - was shot in the arm and wounded as he was drawing a Glock pistol to shoot Rittenhouse.


These are the criminals Rittenhouse defended his life from. All three intended to murder him. He defended himself, and a jury picked by the State agreed.

Rittenhouse is a hero.

He’s still a killer.

Are you this obnoxious about battered women who kill their abusive partners? Do you write them off as simply killers or do you place their actions in context?

You can't seriously be comparing Kyle Rittenhouse to an abused spouse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amount of hate you guys for a young man you do not know, three years after he was in the limelight, is disheartening.

Yes, he made some mistakes, but ultimately he was tried and found not guilty. I’m sure having to shoot the three protesters in self defense will weigh on him for the rest of his life, do we really need to make it worse by making him out to be a monster not a stupid kid who made a mistake?

“Some mistakes”? He’s a killer.

He was found not guilty in a court of law. He did not commit any crimes that night, so it’s time to move on and stop trying to ruin a kid’s life.

Ask yourself, if Kyle Rittenhouse was your son, would you want him to become a pariah because he defended himself?

+1. A jury found him not guilty. That means not guilty. There was no crime here.

For a group of people that like to hold up jury verdicts (ones they agree with, I mean) and the “rule of law” (when it comes to Trump) I find it really curious how so many here seem to cast aside this jury’s verdict, which found that Rittenhouse didn’t murder anyone.

“Justice…..as long as we agree with it”.

Yes, that means he is not a murderer. It does not change the fact that he is a killer. He killed two men, which still makes him a killer.

He killed two criminals in defense of his own life. His first assailant - Rosenbaum - was a convicted child rapist who sodomized little boys and should never have seen the outside of a prison again. He was shot after assaulting Rittenhouse and then attempting to disarm him. The second assailant - Huber - was a domestic abuser who repeatedly beat women. He was shot while trying to murder Rittenhouse with a skateboard. The third assailant - Kreutzfeld(?) - a convicted felon abd domestic abuser who couldn’t legally possess a gun - was shot in the arm and wounded as he was drawing a Glock pistol to shoot Rittenhouse.


These are the criminals Rittenhouse defended his life from. All three intended to murder him. He defended himself, and a jury picked by the State agreed.

Rittenhouse is a hero.

He had to defend himself because he violated the curfew and sought out the criminal element. Confronting them was what he was there for. You talk like he was jumped while heading to Sunday school.

So just to be clear:

Criminal element violating curfew = totally cool with you.

KH violating curfew to volunteer to protect a local small business from looters = criminal element.



Is that a fair synopsis of your position?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amount of hate you guys for a young man you do not know, three years after he was in the limelight, is disheartening.

Yes, he made some mistakes, but ultimately he was tried and found not guilty. I’m sure having to shoot the three protesters in self defense will weigh on him for the rest of his life, do we really need to make it worse by making him out to be a monster not a stupid kid who made a mistake?

“Some mistakes”? He’s a killer.

He was found not guilty in a court of law. He did not commit any crimes that night, so it’s time to move on and stop trying to ruin a kid’s life.

Ask yourself, if Kyle Rittenhouse was your son, would you want him to become a pariah because he defended himself?

+1. A jury found him not guilty. That means not guilty. There was no crime here.

For a group of people that like to hold up jury verdicts (ones they agree with, I mean) and the “rule of law” (when it comes to Trump) I find it really curious how so many here seem to cast aside this jury’s verdict, which found that Rittenhouse didn’t murder anyone.

“Justice…..as long as we agree with it”.

Yes, that means he is not a murderer. It does not change the fact that he is a killer. He killed two men, which still makes him a killer.

He killed two criminals in defense of his own life. His first assailant - Rosenbaum - was a convicted child rapist who sodomized little boys and should never have seen the outside of a prison again. He was shot after assaulting Rittenhouse and then attempting to disarm him. The second assailant - Huber - was a domestic abuser who repeatedly beat women. He was shot while trying to murder Rittenhouse with a skateboard. The third assailant - Kreutzfeld(?) - a convicted felon abd domestic abuser who couldn’t legally possess a gun - was shot in the arm and wounded as he was drawing a Glock pistol to shoot Rittenhouse.


These are the criminals Rittenhouse defended his life from. All three intended to murder him. He defended himself, and a jury picked by the State agreed.

Rittenhouse is a hero.

He’s still a killer.

Are you this obnoxious about battered women who kill their abusive partners? Do you write them off as simply killers or do you place their actions in context?

Oh please. Rittenhouse went spoiling for a fight and killed those men. So yes, he’s a killer. Stop making false equivalencies.

It’s not a false equivalency. It’s an exact equivalency.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amount of hate you guys for a young man you do not know, three years after he was in the limelight, is disheartening.

Yes, he made some mistakes, but ultimately he was tried and found not guilty. I’m sure having to shoot the three protesters in self defense will weigh on him for the rest of his life, do we really need to make it worse by making him out to be a monster not a stupid kid who made a mistake?

“Some mistakes”? He’s a killer.

He was found not guilty in a court of law. He did not commit any crimes that night, so it’s time to move on and stop trying to ruin a kid’s life.

Ask yourself, if Kyle Rittenhouse was your son, would you want him to become a pariah because he defended himself?

+1. A jury found him not guilty. That means not guilty. There was no crime here.

For a group of people that like to hold up jury verdicts (ones they agree with, I mean) and the “rule of law” (when it comes to Trump) I find it really curious how so many here seem to cast aside this jury’s verdict, which found that Rittenhouse didn’t murder anyone.

“Justice…..as long as we agree with it”.

Yes, that means he is not a murderer. It does not change the fact that he is a killer. He killed two men, which still makes him a killer.

He killed two criminals in defense of his own life. His first assailant - Rosenbaum - was a convicted child rapist who sodomized little boys and should never have seen the outside of a prison again. He was shot after assaulting Rittenhouse and then attempting to disarm him. The second assailant - Huber - was a domestic abuser who repeatedly beat women. He was shot while trying to murder Rittenhouse with a skateboard. The third assailant - Kreutzfeld(?) - a convicted felon abd domestic abuser who couldn’t legally possess a gun - was shot in the arm and wounded as he was drawing a Glock pistol to shoot Rittenhouse.


These are the criminals Rittenhouse defended his life from. All three intended to murder him. He defended himself, and a jury picked by the State agreed.

Rittenhouse is a hero.

He had to defend himself because he violated the curfew and sought out the criminal element. Confronting them was what he was there for. You talk like he was jumped while heading to Sunday school.

So just to be clear:

Criminal element violating curfew = totally cool with you.

KH violating curfew to volunteer to protect a local small business from looters = criminal element.



Is that a fair synopsis of your position?

You say “local small business” as if Rittenhouse was local to that business. You left out “crossed state lines in order to go murder people.”

[Anonymous]

Let’s not forget, his mommy had to drive him to this place. Not his neighborhood or even his state.

He was not there “defending” anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amount of hate you guys for a young man you do not know, three years after he was in the limelight, is disheartening.

Yes, he made some mistakes, but ultimately he was tried and found not guilty. I’m sure having to shoot the three protesters in self defense will weigh on him for the rest of his life, do we really need to make it worse by making him out to be a monster not a stupid kid who made a mistake?

“Some mistakes”? He’s a killer.

He was found not guilty in a court of law. He did not commit any crimes that night, so it’s time to move on and stop trying to ruin a kid’s life.

Ask yourself, if Kyle Rittenhouse was your son, would you want him to become a pariah because he defended himself?

+1. A jury found him not guilty. That means not guilty. There was no crime here.

For a group of people that like to hold up jury verdicts (ones they agree with, I mean) and the “rule of law” (when it comes to Trump) I find it really curious how so many here seem to cast aside this jury’s verdict, which found that Rittenhouse didn’t murder anyone.

“Justice…..as long as we agree with it”.

Yes, that means he is not a murderer. It does not change the fact that he is a killer. He killed two men, which still makes him a killer.

He killed two criminals in defense of his own life. His first assailant - Rosenbaum - was a convicted child rapist who sodomized little boys and should never have seen the outside of a prison again. He was shot after assaulting Rittenhouse and then attempting to disarm him. The second assailant - Huber - was a domestic abuser who repeatedly beat women. He was shot while trying to murder Rittenhouse with a skateboard. The third assailant - Kreutzfeld(?) - a convicted felon abd domestic abuser who couldn’t legally possess a gun - was shot in the arm and wounded as he was drawing a Glock pistol to shoot Rittenhouse.


These are the criminals Rittenhouse defended his life from. All three intended to murder him. He defended himself, and a jury picked by the State agreed.

Rittenhouse is a hero.

He had to defend himself because he violated the curfew and sought out the criminal element. Confronting them was what he was there for. You talk like he was jumped while heading to Sunday school.

So just to be clear:

Criminal element violating curfew = totally cool with you.

KH violating curfew to volunteer to protect a local small business from looters = criminal element.



Is that a fair synopsis of your position?

Of course not. I have a problem with everyone who was out on the streets that night. They were all breaking the law. They were all up to no good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let’s not forget, his mommy had to drive him to this place. Not his neighborhood or even his state.

He was not there “defending” anything.

He was defending his life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s not forget, his mommy had to drive him to this place. Not his neighborhood or even his state.

He was not there “defending” anything.

He was defending his life.

He had his mommy drive him there. It's not like anyone showed up at his door. This kid went looking for people to kill and he found them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amount of hate you guys for a young man you do not know, three years after he was in the limelight, is disheartening.

Yes, he made some mistakes, but ultimately he was tried and found not guilty. I’m sure having to shoot the three protesters in self defense will weigh on him for the rest of his life, do we really need to make it worse by making him out to be a monster not a stupid kid who made a mistake?

“Some mistakes”? He’s a killer.

He was found not guilty in a court of law. He did not commit any crimes that night, so it’s time to move on and stop trying to ruin a kid’s life.

Ask yourself, if Kyle Rittenhouse was your son, would you want him to become a pariah because he defended himself?

+1. A jury found him not guilty. That means not guilty. There was no crime here.

For a group of people that like to hold up jury verdicts (ones they agree with, I mean) and the “rule of law” (when it comes to Trump) I find it really curious how so many here seem to cast aside this jury’s verdict, which found that Rittenhouse didn’t murder anyone.

“Justice…..as long as we agree with it”.

Yes, that means he is not a murderer. It does not change the fact that he is a killer. He killed two men, which still makes him a killer.

He killed two criminals in defense of his own life. His first assailant - Rosenbaum - was a convicted child rapist who sodomized little boys and should never have seen the outside of a prison again. He was shot after assaulting Rittenhouse and then attempting to disarm him. The second assailant - Huber - was a domestic abuser who repeatedly beat women. He was shot while trying to murder Rittenhouse with a skateboard. The third assailant - Kreutzfeld(?) - a convicted felon abd domestic abuser who couldn’t legally possess a gun - was shot in the arm and wounded as he was drawing a Glock pistol to shoot Rittenhouse.


These are the criminals Rittenhouse defended his life from. All three intended to murder him. He defended himself, and a jury picked by the State agreed.

Rittenhouse is a hero.

He’s still a killer.

Are you this obnoxious about battered women who kill their abusive partners? Do you write them off as simply killers or do you place their actions in context?

Oh please. Rittenhouse went spoiling for a fight and killed those men. So yes, he’s a killer. Stop making false equivalencies.

It’s not a false equivalency. It’s an exact equivalency.

No it’s not. You can’t be this dumb,

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amount of hate you guys for a young man you do not know, three years after he was in the limelight, is disheartening.

Yes, he made some mistakes, but ultimately he was tried and found not guilty. I’m sure having to shoot the three protesters in self defense will weigh on him for the rest of his life, do we really need to make it worse by making him out to be a monster not a stupid kid who made a mistake?

“Some mistakes”? He’s a killer.

He was found not guilty in a court of law. He did not commit any crimes that night, so it’s time to move on and stop trying to ruin a kid’s life.

Ask yourself, if Kyle Rittenhouse was your son, would you want him to become a pariah because he defended himself?

+1. A jury found him not guilty. That means not guilty. There was no crime here.

For a group of people that like to hold up jury verdicts (ones they agree with, I mean) and the “rule of law” (when it comes to Trump) I find it really curious how so many here seem to cast aside this jury’s verdict, which found that Rittenhouse didn’t murder anyone.

“Justice…..as long as we agree with it”.

Yes, that means he is not a murderer. It does not change the fact that he is a killer. He killed two men, which still makes him a killer.

He killed two criminals in defense of his own life. His first assailant - Rosenbaum - was a convicted child rapist who sodomized little boys and should never have seen the outside of a prison again. He was shot after assaulting Rittenhouse and then attempting to disarm him. The second assailant - Huber - was a domestic abuser who repeatedly beat women. He was shot while trying to murder Rittenhouse with a skateboard. The third assailant - Kreutzfeld(?) - a convicted felon abd domestic abuser who couldn’t legally possess a gun - was shot in the arm and wounded as he was drawing a Glock pistol to shoot Rittenhouse.


These are the criminals Rittenhouse defended his life from. All three intended to murder him. He defended himself, and a jury picked by the State agreed.

Rittenhouse is a hero.

He had to defend himself because he violated the curfew and sought out the criminal element. Confronting them was what he was there for. You talk like he was jumped while heading to Sunday school.

So just to be clear:

Criminal element violating curfew = totally cool with you.

KH violating curfew to volunteer to protect a local small business from looters = criminal element.



Is that a fair synopsis of your position?

NP... You are basically admitting that Rittenhouse was every bit as much of a criminal as the people he shot.

Way to lose an argument. 👏

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s not forget, his mommy had to drive him to this place. Not his neighborhood or even his state.

He was not there “defending” anything.

He was defending his life.

He had his mommy drive him there. It's not like anyone showed up at his door. This kid went looking for people to kill and he found them.

+100