Jimmy Kimmel show cancelled.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Left wing echo chamber of approval.

Your post is what cope looks like. You had the victory of free speech cancellation robbed from you I guess...

PP here. I'm a Harris voter and a Christian. I think Kimmel's comments were highly inappropriate after someone's death.

In what way, Harris voter? Please tell us what specifically you found inappropriate about what he said? The reality is that his comment had little to do with the person's death, and more to do with the circus surrounding that persons death. That you are more offended by someone pointing that out, that the actual circus being made, well, that says a lot of about you, Harris voter.

Not either PP.

Kimmel's comments that got him in trouble were classic gaslighting. That was the problem, and from the clip I saw of his monologue, it is still the problem.

Initially, he implied that the kid was MAGA and that MAGA was trying to disassociate themselves from him. That was blatantly false.
In the clip I saw of last night's monologue, he did not apologize for saying that. He said he was sorry if he was insensitive, but never apologized for gaslighting.

+100

I'll just cut and paste from the previous poster since it captures entirely the BS MAGA is trying to peddle.

"He did not imply the kid was MAGA. You clearly struggle with nuance and comprehension. This is the incorrect leap being made. But you all are morons, so to be expected.

He DID say that MAGA was trying to disassociate him from them. In what way is that false? Did MAGA not immediately and without evidence begin making accusations of the left?

You know what isn't ambiguous, and was actually offensive? A Fox commentator saying the homeless should be involuntarily euthanized. Saying we should blow up the UN. Saying we are at war with the Left."

You’re right. He didn’t imply the killer is MAGA. He pretty much said it outright.
He was gaslighting. The killer leans left. His parents have stated that.

P O I N T T O T H E W O R D S.

Please post and paste the words that said the Jimmy Kimmel thought the kid was MAGA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Left wing echo chamber of approval.

Your post is what cope looks like. You had the victory of free speech cancellation robbed from you I guess...

PP here. I'm a Harris voter and a Christian. I think Kimmel's comments were highly inappropriate after someone's death.

In what way, Harris voter? Please tell us what specifically you found inappropriate about what he said? The reality is that his comment had little to do with the person's death, and more to do with the circus surrounding that persons death. That you are more offended by someone pointing that out, that the actual circus being made, well, that says a lot of about you, Harris voter.

Not either PP.

Kimmel's comments that got him in trouble were classic gaslighting. That was the problem, and from the clip I saw of his monologue, it is still the problem.

Initially, he implied that the kid was MAGA and that MAGA was trying to disassociate themselves from him. That was blatantly false.
In the clip I saw of last night's monologue, he did not apologize for saying that. He said he was sorry if he was insensitive, but never apologized for gaslighting.

+100

I'll just cut and paste from the previous poster since it captures entirely the BS MAGA is trying to peddle.

"He did not imply the kid was MAGA. You clearly struggle with nuance and comprehension. This is the incorrect leap being made. But you all are morons, so to be expected.

He DID say that MAGA was trying to disassociate him from them. In what way is that false? Did MAGA not immediately and without evidence begin making accusations of the left?

You know what isn't ambiguous, and was actually offensive? A Fox commentator saying the homeless should be involuntarily euthanized. Saying we should blow up the UN. Saying we are at war with the Left."

You’re right. He didn’t imply the killer is MAGA. He pretty much said it outright.
He was gaslighting. The killer leans left. His parents have stated that.

"The killer leans left". Mitt Romney leans left compared to MAGA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Left wing echo chamber of approval.

Your post is what cope looks like. You had the victory of free speech cancellation robbed from you I guess...

PP here. I'm a Harris voter and a Christian. I think Kimmel's comments were highly inappropriate after someone's death.

In what way, Harris voter? Please tell us what specifically you found inappropriate about what he said? The reality is that his comment had little to do with the person's death, and more to do with the circus surrounding that persons death. That you are more offended by someone pointing that out, that the actual circus being made, well, that says a lot of about you, Harris voter.

Not either PP.

Kimmel's comments that got him in trouble were classic gaslighting. That was the problem, and from the clip I saw of his monologue, it is still the problem.

Initially, he implied that the kid was MAGA and that MAGA was trying to disassociate themselves from him. That was blatantly false.
In the clip I saw of last night's monologue, he did not apologize for saying that. He said he was sorry if he was insensitive, but never apologized for gaslighting.

+100

I'll just cut and paste from the previous poster since it captures entirely the BS MAGA is trying to peddle.

"He did not imply the kid was MAGA. You clearly struggle with nuance and comprehension. This is the incorrect leap being made. But you all are morons, so to be expected.

He DID say that MAGA was trying to disassociate him from them. In what way is that false? Did MAGA not immediately and without evidence begin making accusations of the left?

You know what isn't ambiguous, and was actually offensive? A Fox commentator saying the homeless should be involuntarily euthanized. Saying we should blow up the UN. Saying we are at war with the Left."

You’re right. He didn’t imply the killer is MAGA. He pretty much said it outright.
He was gaslighting. The killer leans left. His parents have stated that.

Let's try this again. Don't be vague. No "he pretty much said it." Show me the quote where he said what you allege.

Tell me what you believe gaslighting means.

And help connect the dots between how his parents saying he leans left means Kimmel was wrong today that MAGA was doing a lot to distance themselves from the shooter.

Don't just say stuff. Explain yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Left wing echo chamber of approval.

Your post is what cope looks like. You had the victory of free speech cancellation robbed from you I guess...

PP here. I'm a Harris voter and a Christian. I think Kimmel's comments were highly inappropriate after someone's death.

In what way, Harris voter? Please tell us what specifically you found inappropriate about what he said? The reality is that his comment had little to do with the person's death, and more to do with the circus surrounding that persons death. That you are more offended by someone pointing that out, that the actual circus being made, well, that says a lot of about you, Harris voter.

Not either PP.

Kimmel's comments that got him in trouble were classic gaslighting. That was the problem, and from the clip I saw of his monologue, it is still the problem.

Initially, he implied that the kid was MAGA and that MAGA was trying to disassociate themselves from him. That was blatantly false.
In the clip I saw of last night's monologue, he did not apologize for saying that. He said he was sorry if he was insensitive, but never apologized for gaslighting.

What do you believe gaslighting means?

The word has absolutely no meaning anymore apparently.

[Anonymous]

Here’s the full quote. To paraphrase from Hamilton, he didn’t say anything that wasn’t true.

“We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who m***dered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here’s the full quote. To paraphrase from Hamilton, he didn’t say anything that wasn’t true.

“We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who m***dered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”

We all know what he said. The point of asking them to point to actual words supporting their claims is to show that they literally can't.

Nothing Kimmel said was celebratory of Kirks death. Nothing Kimmel said about MAGA was false. Nothing that happened was gaslighting. If MAGA isn't lying, they aren't breathing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Left wing echo chamber of approval.

Your post is what cope looks like. You had the victory of free speech cancellation robbed from you I guess...

PP here. I'm a Harris voter and a Christian. I think Kimmel's comments were highly inappropriate after someone's death.

In what way, Harris voter? Please tell us what specifically you found inappropriate about what he said? The reality is that his comment had little to do with the person's death, and more to do with the circus surrounding that persons death. That you are more offended by someone pointing that out, that the actual circus being made, well, that says a lot of about you, Harris voter.

Not either PP.

Kimmel's comments that got him in trouble were classic gaslighting. That was the problem, and from the clip I saw of his monologue, it is still the problem.

Initially, he implied that the kid was MAGA and that MAGA was trying to disassociate themselves from him. That was blatantly false.
In the clip I saw of last night's monologue, he did not apologize for saying that. He said he was sorry if he was insensitive, but never apologized for gaslighting.

+100

I'll just cut and paste from the previous poster since it captures entirely the BS MAGA is trying to peddle.

"He did not imply the kid was MAGA. You clearly struggle with nuance and comprehension. This is the incorrect leap being made. But you all are morons, so to be expected.

He DID say that MAGA was trying to disassociate him from them. In what way is that false? Did MAGA not immediately and without evidence begin making accusations of the left?

You know what isn't ambiguous, and was actually offensive? A Fox commentator saying the homeless should be involuntarily euthanized. Saying we should blow up the UN. Saying we are at war with the Left."

You’re right. He didn’t imply the killer is MAGA. He pretty much said it outright.
He was gaslighting. The killer leans left. His parents have stated that.

No, he didn't. You are projecting content to him that he didn't actually say. That is a "you" issue. As the PP said, nuance and comprehension appears to be a major issue for MAGA. You all only hear what you want to hear or think you heard. The same goes for Trump political speeches. He makes references to highly racial and anti-semitic symbols, he was overt about tariffs and his plans for this administration and yet you all simply ignore it all and blame Biden, or Obama, or Clinton, or anyone but yourselves or Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s the full quote. To paraphrase from Hamilton, he didn’t say anything that wasn’t true.

“We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who m***dered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”

We all know what he said. The point of asking them to point to actual words supporting their claims is to show that they literally can't.

Nothing Kimmel said was celebratory of Kirks death. Nothing Kimmel said about MAGA was false. Nothing that happened was gaslighting. If MAGA isn't lying, they aren't breathing.

to the contrary, Kimmel put out a statement after the murder, but before the above statement was made, that expressed his condolences and asked to turn the hate down form all involved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He got his show back, so what is there to argue about? Public pressure works.

Not fully. Sinclair stations aren’t running his show.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here’s the full quote. To paraphrase from Hamilton, he didn’t say anything that wasn’t true.

“We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who m***dered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”

If they are going to try to punish Kimmel, we need to get to work punishing all of the maga chuds that are whipping up hate against trans people and democrats without any evidence or reason other than their own sex fantasies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He got his show back, so what is there to argue about? Public pressure works.

Not fully. Sinclair stations aren’t running his show.

They'll relent, eventually. Too many people (thankfully) value free speech.

Jimmy Kimmel will win. Jimmy Kimmel is winning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s the full quote. To paraphrase from Hamilton, he didn’t say anything that wasn’t true.

“We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who m***dered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”

If they are going to try to punish Kimmel, we need to get to work punishing all of the maga chuds that are whipping up hate against trans people and democrats without any evidence or reason other than their own sex fantasies.

seriously

where are the consequences for the actual shtheads?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He got his show back, so what is there to argue about? Public pressure works.

Not fully. Sinclair stations aren’t running his show.

They'll relent, eventually. Too many people (thankfully) value free speech.

Jimmy Kimmel will win. Jimmy Kimmel is winning.

It's scary how much of the media is controlled by RW wackos.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He got his show back, so what is there to argue about? Public pressure works.

Not fully. Sinclair stations aren’t running his show.

And Trump still wants to use the government to silence anyone critical of him, posting "I think we're going to test ABC out on this."

[Anonymous]

The Free Speech president is once again threatening a major network.