Jimmy Kimmel show cancelled.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Left wing echo chamber of approval.

Wow, so tart. Much sour.

Face facts; this thread is indeed an echo chamber.

You obviously dont know what the phrase echo chamber means.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Left wing echo chamber of approval.

Your post is what cope looks like. You had the victory of free speech cancellation robbed from you I guess...

PP here. I'm a Harris voter and a Christian. I think Kimmel's comments were highly inappropriate after someone's death.

In what way, Harris voter? Please tell us what specifically you found inappropriate about what he said? The reality is that his comment had little to do with the person's death, and more to do with the circus surrounding that persons death. That you are more offended by someone pointing that out, that the actual circus being made, well, that says a lot of about you, Harris voter.

Not either PP.

Kimmel's comments that got him in trouble were classic gaslighting. That was the problem, and from the clip I saw of his monologue, it is still the problem.

Initially, he implied that the kid was MAGA and that MAGA was trying to disassociate themselves from him. That was blatantly false.
In the clip I saw of last night's monologue, he did not apologize for saying that. He said he was sorry if he was insensitive, but never apologized for gaslighting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Left wing echo chamber of approval.

Wow, so tart. Much sour.

Face facts; this thread is indeed an echo chamber.

You obviously dont know what the phrase echo chamber means.

Apparently, you don't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Left wing echo chamber of approval.

Your post is what cope looks like. You had the victory of free speech cancellation robbed from you I guess...

PP here. I'm a Harris voter and a Christian. I think Kimmel's comments were highly inappropriate after someone's death.

What did you specifically find so inappropriate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Left wing echo chamber of approval.

Your post is what cope looks like. You had the victory of free speech cancellation robbed from you I guess...

PP here. I'm a Harris voter and a Christian. I think Kimmel's comments were highly inappropriate after someone's death.

In what way, Harris voter? Please tell us what specifically you found inappropriate about what he said? The reality is that his comment had little to do with the person's death, and more to do with the circus surrounding that persons death. That you are more offended by someone pointing that out, that the actual circus being made, well, that says a lot of about you, Harris voter.

Not either PP.

Kimmel's comments that got him in trouble were classic gaslighting. That was the problem, and from the clip I saw of his monologue, it is still the problem.

Initially, he implied that the kid was MAGA and that MAGA was trying to disassociate themselves from him. That was blatantly false.
In the clip I saw of last night's monologue, he did not apologize for saying that. He said he was sorry if he was insensitive, but never apologized for gaslighting.

Show me the gaslighting. Don't be vague. What specifically did he say that you believe warranted his suspension?

He did not imply the kid was MAGA. You clearly struggle with nuance and comprehension. This is the incorrect leap being made. But you all are morons, so to be expected.

He DID say that MAGA was trying to disassociate him from them. In what way is that false? Did MAGA not immediately and without evidence begin making accusations of the left?

You know what isn't ambiguous, and was actually offensive? A Fox commentator saying the homeless should be involuntarily euthanized. Saying we should blow up the UN. Saying we are at war with the Left.

Saying MAGA sure is doing a lot to make this anyone's fault but theirs is not mocking anyone's death. It's mocking MAGA for the mockery they made of that death.

Your hypocrisy is transparent, and your idiocy abundant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Left wing echo chamber of approval.

Wow, so tart. Much sour.

Face facts; this thread is indeed an echo chamber.

You obviously dont know what the phrase echo chamber means.

Apparently, you don't.

A real cogent argument. I am thoroughly discredited.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Left wing echo chamber of approval.

Your post is what cope looks like. You had the victory of free speech cancellation robbed from you I guess...

PP here. I'm a Harris voter and a Christian. I think Kimmel's comments were highly inappropriate after someone's death.

In what way, Harris voter? Please tell us what specifically you found inappropriate about what he said? The reality is that his comment had little to do with the person's death, and more to do with the circus surrounding that persons death. That you are more offended by someone pointing that out, that the actual circus being made, well, that says a lot of about you, Harris voter.

Not either PP.

Kimmel's comments that got him in trouble were classic gaslighting. That was the problem, and from the clip I saw of his monologue, it is still the problem.

Initially, he implied that the kid was MAGA and that MAGA was trying to disassociate themselves from him. That was blatantly false.
In the clip I saw of last night's monologue, he did not apologize for saying that. He said he was sorry if he was insensitive, but never apologized for gaslighting.

What do you believe gaslighting means?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Left wing echo chamber of approval.

Your post is what cope looks like. You had the victory of free speech cancellation robbed from you I guess...

PP here. I'm a Harris voter and a Christian. I think Kimmel's comments were highly inappropriate after someone's death.

In what way, Harris voter? Please tell us what specifically you found inappropriate about what he said? The reality is that his comment had little to do with the person's death, and more to do with the circus surrounding that persons death. That you are more offended by someone pointing that out, that the actual circus being made, well, that says a lot of about you, Harris voter.

Not either PP.

Kimmel's comments that got him in trouble were classic gaslighting. That was the problem, and from the clip I saw of his monologue, it is still the problem.

Initially, he implied that the kid was MAGA and that MAGA was trying to disassociate themselves from him. That was blatantly false.
In the clip I saw of last night's monologue, he did not apologize for saying that. He said he was sorry if he was insensitive, but never apologized for gaslighting.

Here is the difference. Kimmel is a comedian and social commentator. What is the GOP excuse for the gaslighting they do every day? The evangelicals? The MAGAs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Left wing echo chamber of approval.

Your post is what cope looks like. You had the victory of free speech cancellation robbed from you I guess...

PP here. I'm a Harris voter and a Christian. I think Kimmel's comments were highly inappropriate after someone's death.

In what way, Harris voter? Please tell us what specifically you found inappropriate about what he said? The reality is that his comment had little to do with the person's death, and more to do with the circus surrounding that persons death. That you are more offended by someone pointing that out, that the actual circus being made, well, that says a lot of about you, Harris voter.

Not either PP.

Kimmel's comments that got him in trouble were classic gaslighting. That was the problem, and from the clip I saw of his monologue, it is still the problem.

Initially, he implied that the kid was MAGA and that MAGA was trying to disassociate themselves from him. That was blatantly false.
In the clip I saw of last night's monologue, he did not apologize for saying that. He said he was sorry if he was insensitive, but never apologized for gaslighting.

+100

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Left wing echo chamber of approval.

Your post is what cope looks like. You had the victory of free speech cancellation robbed from you I guess...

PP here. I'm a Harris voter and a Christian. I think Kimmel's comments were highly inappropriate after someone's death.

In what way, Harris voter? Please tell us what specifically you found inappropriate about what he said? The reality is that his comment had little to do with the person's death, and more to do with the circus surrounding that persons death. That you are more offended by someone pointing that out, that the actual circus being made, well, that says a lot of about you, Harris voter.

Not either PP.

Kimmel's comments that got him in trouble were classic gaslighting. That was the problem, and from the clip I saw of his monologue, it is still the problem.

Initially, he implied that the kid was MAGA and that MAGA was trying to disassociate themselves from him. That was blatantly false.
In the clip I saw of last night's monologue, he did not apologize for saying that. He said he was sorry if he was insensitive, but never apologized for gaslighting.

+100

I'll just cut and paste from the previous poster since it captures entirely the BS MAGA is trying to peddle.

"He did not imply the kid was MAGA. You clearly struggle with nuance and comprehension. This is the incorrect leap being made. But you all are morons, so to be expected.

He DID say that MAGA was trying to disassociate him from them. In what way is that false? Did MAGA not immediately and without evidence begin making accusations of the left?

You know what isn't ambiguous, and was actually offensive? A Fox commentator saying the homeless should be involuntarily euthanized. Saying we should blow up the UN. Saying we are at war with the Left."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Left wing echo chamber of approval.

Your post is what cope looks like. You had the victory of free speech cancellation robbed from you I guess...

PP here. I'm a Harris voter and a Christian. I think Kimmel's comments were highly inappropriate after someone's death.

In what way, Harris voter? Please tell us what specifically you found inappropriate about what he said? The reality is that his comment had little to do with the person's death, and more to do with the circus surrounding that persons death. That you are more offended by someone pointing that out, that the actual circus being made, well, that says a lot of about you, Harris voter.

Not either PP.

Kimmel's comments that got him in trouble were classic gaslighting. That was the problem, and from the clip I saw of his monologue, it is still the problem.

Initially, he implied that the kid was MAGA and that MAGA was trying to disassociate themselves from him. That was blatantly false.
In the clip I saw of last night's monologue, he did not apologize for saying that. He said he was sorry if he was insensitive, but never apologized for gaslighting.

What he said, and meant is that MAGA created the shooter. He was raised by a MAGA family in a MAGA area. Product of MAGA. Never listened to or was affiliated with any left organizations.

[Anonymous]

Kimmel's problem is he didn't apologize for something he didn't say.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Left wing echo chamber of approval.

Wow, so tart. Much sour.

Face facts; this thread is indeed an echo chamber.

And that pucker on you is just the chef's kiss. Facts are facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Left wing echo chamber of approval.

Your post is what cope looks like. You had the victory of free speech cancellation robbed from you I guess...

PP here. I'm a Harris voter and a Christian. I think Kimmel's comments were highly inappropriate after someone's death.

In what way, Harris voter? Please tell us what specifically you found inappropriate about what he said? The reality is that his comment had little to do with the person's death, and more to do with the circus surrounding that persons death. That you are more offended by someone pointing that out, that the actual circus being made, well, that says a lot of about you, Harris voter.

Not either PP.

Kimmel's comments that got him in trouble were classic gaslighting. That was the problem, and from the clip I saw of his monologue, it is still the problem.

Initially, he implied that the kid was MAGA and that MAGA was trying to disassociate themselves from him. That was blatantly false.
In the clip I saw of last night's monologue, he did not apologize for saying that. He said he was sorry if he was insensitive, but never apologized for gaslighting.

+100

I'll just cut and paste from the previous poster since it captures entirely the BS MAGA is trying to peddle.

"He did not imply the kid was MAGA. You clearly struggle with nuance and comprehension. This is the incorrect leap being made. But you all are morons, so to be expected.

He DID say that MAGA was trying to disassociate him from them. In what way is that false? Did MAGA not immediately and without evidence begin making accusations of the left?

You know what isn't ambiguous, and was actually offensive? A Fox commentator saying the homeless should be involuntarily euthanized. Saying we should blow up the UN. Saying we are at war with the Left."

You’re right. He didn’t imply the killer is MAGA. He pretty much said it outright.
He was gaslighting. The killer leans left. His parents have stated that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Left wing echo chamber of approval.

Your post is what cope looks like. You had the victory of free speech cancellation robbed from you I guess...

PP here. I'm a Harris voter and a Christian. I think Kimmel's comments were highly inappropriate after someone's death.

In what way, Harris voter? Please tell us what specifically you found inappropriate about what he said? The reality is that his comment had little to do with the person's death, and more to do with the circus surrounding that persons death. That you are more offended by someone pointing that out, that the actual circus being made, well, that says a lot of about you, Harris voter.

Not either PP.

Kimmel's comments that got him in trouble were classic gaslighting. That was the problem, and from the clip I saw of his monologue, it is still the problem.

Initially, he implied that the kid was MAGA and that MAGA was trying to disassociate themselves from him. That was blatantly false.
In the clip I saw of last night's monologue, he did not apologize for saying that. He said he was sorry if he was insensitive, but never apologized for gaslighting.

+100

I'll just cut and paste from the previous poster since it captures entirely the BS MAGA is trying to peddle.

"He did not imply the kid was MAGA. You clearly struggle with nuance and comprehension. This is the incorrect leap being made. But you all are morons, so to be expected.

He DID say that MAGA was trying to disassociate him from them. In what way is that false? Did MAGA not immediately and without evidence begin making accusations of the left?

You know what isn't ambiguous, and was actually offensive? A Fox commentator saying the homeless should be involuntarily euthanized. Saying we should blow up the UN. Saying we are at war with the Left."

You’re right. He didn’t imply the killer is MAGA. He pretty much said it outright.
He was gaslighting. The killer leans left. His parents have stated that.

Pot, meet kettle.