new Reade/Biden thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here’s a Politico piece where several of Reade’s former acquaintanceS call her manipulative and deceitful.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/15/tara-reade-left-trail-of-aggrieved-acquaintances-260771

But if we don’t believe her yet we believe some of Trump’s accusers, we’re hypocrites, amirite Cons?

I think the hypocrisy comes in when due process is applied to neoliberal Democratic males but not others.

[Anonymous]

The Politico piece is pretty damaging. I’m not a Biden fan, but Reade just lacks credibility.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s a Politico piece where several of Reade’s former acquaintanceS call her manipulative and deceitful.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/15/tara-reade-left-trail-of-aggrieved-acquaintances-260771

But if we don’t believe her yet we believe some of Trump’s accusers, we’re hypocrites, amirite Cons?

I think the hypocrisy comes in when due process is applied to neoliberal Democratic males but not others.

Bingo. Sad that this has to be spelled out again and again.

[Anonymous]

Ever notice how, when something awful comes up about their favorite Biden accuser, the Cons here instantly trash the thread with 2-year-old stuff and totally ignore Trump’s TWO DOZEN accusers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s a Politico piece where several of Reade’s former acquaintanceS call her manipulative and deceitful.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/15/tara-reade-left-trail-of-aggrieved-acquaintances-260771

But if we don’t believe her yet we believe some of Trump’s accusers, we’re hypocrites, amirite Cons?

I think the hypocrisy comes in when due process is applied to neoliberal Democratic males but not others.

Bingo. Sad that this has to be spelled out again and again.

What’s sad is you put all your money on an accuser who can’t be trusted. Find someone credible and we’ll believe her. Really, guys, you’re pathetic (and hypocritical about Trump’s TWO DOZEN accusers).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s a Politico piece where several of Reade’s former acquaintanceS call her manipulative and deceitful.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/15/tara-reade-left-trail-of-aggrieved-acquaintances-260771

But if we don’t believe her yet we believe some of Trump’s accusers, we’re hypocrites, amirite Cons?

I think the hypocrisy comes in when due process is applied to neoliberal Democratic males but not others.

Where was Al Franken's due process? Democrats didn't give it to him. Did you demand it, or just laugh?

Did we demand "due process" for Anthony Weiner, or did we drop him as soon as the evidence proved him a liar?

What about Hillary Clinton's emails? She got due process and it was determined she had not committed a crime. Did you believe it, or did you just assume, without due process, that she was still a criminal? When they chanted "lock her up" at Trump rallies, did you ask "What about due process?"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Biden said he didn’t remember Reade.

Proven lie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden said he didn’t remember Reade.

Proven lie.

Cite please.

[Anonymous]

I read the Politico piece. Reade has no credibility. That along with the timing is too much for me to believe her. If she was concerned about him being a leader, when he ran for VP would have been the time to come out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden said he didn’t remember Reade.

Proven lie.

Cite please.

No, Biden says that he doesn't remember who Tara Reade is. This is an article from yesterday, May 15, based on an interview on Thursday, May 14:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/biden-says-he-does-not-remember-tara-reade/2020/05/15/059f6794-9655-11ea-91d7-cf4423d47683_story.html

Asked by MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell if he remembers Reade, Biden said: “To be honest with you, I don’t.”

Biden made the remarks in an interview that aired Thursday evening on “The Last Word.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sorry no one believes Reade. We know this is exactly what happened fake stories about Hillary fake stories about Obama fake stories about Biden. The more you people hammer this story the more fake it will appear.[/quote

]

Sorry, no Democrats believe Trade.

Fixed it for you.

There's still many who do, just FYI.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry no one believes Reade. We know this is exactly what happened fake stories about Hillary fake stories about Obama fake stories about Biden. The more you people hammer this story the more fake it will appear.

Sorry, no Democrats believe Trade.

Fixed it for you.

There's still many who do, just FYI.

^^ Cons who happily suspend disbelief when ordered to believe in bleach shots, Hillary’s emails or Reade.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I read the Politico piece. Reade has no credibility. That along with the timing is too much for me to believe her. If she was concerned about him being a leader, when he ran for VP would have been the time to come out.

Huh. Does it bother you when other women wait decades to allege sexual assault? Or just Reade?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I read the Politico piece. Reade has no credibility. That along with the timing is too much for me to believe her. If she was concerned about him being a leader, when he ran for VP would have been the time to come out.

Huh. Does it bother you when other women wait decades to allege sexual assault? Or just Reade?

DP. You need to read the Politico piece, and the NPR piece. They’re about how she was fired from her Senate job for poor performance, nothing else. They're about how she ripped off people who were kind to her for decades.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I read the Politico piece. Reade has no credibility. That along with the timing is too much for me to believe her. If she was concerned about him being a leader, when he ran for VP would have been the time to come out.

Huh. Does it bother you when other women wait decades to allege sexual assault? Or just Reade?

DP. You need to read the Politico piece, and the NPR piece. They’re about how she was fired from her Senate job for poor performance, nothing else. They're about how she ripped off people who were kind to her for decades.

Meant to add, yet here you are, bringing up the one thing that’s totally irrelevant to the conversation, how long she waited.