Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't see how they can confirm with all this mounting evidence that he lied under oath. It's not about the sexual assault anymore. That would be a "he said, she said" and it's not possible to make a conclusion. But all these people coming out to say he was a belligerent drunk, in contradiction to his testimony, will bring him down.

I think DJT is thinking about dumping him. Trump doesn't like alcoholics. I think DJT is really mad that he was persuaded by whomever to nominate this guy and *now* it's coming out that the guy had or has drinking issues. DJT is unpredictable, he's not a lock-step, dedicated Republican, he'd sandbag this guy in a second if he's angry.

In the end I think Trump will go by the (foxnews) polls and his personal feelings.

Which is why there was a pivot. Whether some considered him a 'belligerent drunk' in high school/college is of no never mind, when followed by years and years of provable success. Nor does it mean Ford's story is more credible.

Ask Mr. 'Choom Gang'.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brett had trouble back in 2006, the second time Bush nominates him for Court of Appeals. ABA lowered their rating for him then.

“The group’s judicial investigator had recently interviewed dozens of lawyers, judges and others who had worked with Kavanaugh, the ABA announced at the time, and some of them raised red flags about “his professional experience and the question of his freedom from bias and open-mindedness.””

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/28/american-bar-association-had-kavanaugh-concerns-years-ago-republicans-dismissed-those-too/?utm_term=.34824ec86ca9

He had trouble getting confirmed for the Court of Appeals - had to be nominated twice by his Yale fraternity brother, Bush - because of his conduct, including LYING in court.

The same few papers have been reporting garbage about him for weeks, then having to amend/retract their stories. Why trust a darn thing they say?

Did you read it? Which parts of the article are “garbage”?

Here is the 2006 article:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/08/AR2006050801422.html?tid=a_inl_manual

The WaPo and other papers have twisted fact to the degree that reading anything is simply of no never mind. I know an attack when I see one.

Frankly? After that political cartoon about his daughter, any shred of credibility re: Democrats is gone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't see how they can confirm with all this mounting evidence that he lied under oath. It's not about the sexual assault anymore. That would be a "he said, she said" and it's not possible to make a conclusion. But all these people coming out to say he was a belligerent drunk, in contradiction to his testimony, will bring him down.

I think DJT is thinking about dumping him. Trump doesn't like alcoholics. I think DJT is really mad that he was persuaded by whomever to nominate this guy and *now* it's coming out that the guy had or has drinking issues. DJT is unpredictable, he's not a lock-step, dedicated Republican, he'd sandbag this guy in a second if he's angry.

In the end I think Trump will go by the (foxnews) polls and his personal feelings.

It doesn’t matter if Brett stood up on the table at the hearing and dropped his pants. The GOP - and Trump - have already sold their souls to the devil for this SCOTUS seat. They are ALL IN. No backing out now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alright, looks like the B team has arrived. Are we going to go back and talk about how the music was playing in the room again? Albertsons vs Safeway?

TIRESOME

I hope his nomination gets withdrawn, but I also hope that his house was not actually vandalized. That is unacceptable and I hope the people who did it (if it happened) are brought to justice.

Why should it get withdrawn? None of the accusers have any evidence at all. How would like you like it if someone came out of the blue from 40 yrs ago and made baseless claims against you or one of your male relative just due to political hate for them not being a Democrat. Its sick what the Democrats are doing.

Haven't you been paying attention? Perjury.

He said nothing that perjured himself, he was defending himself from well scripted lies from the left.

The goal is to get him to perjure himself - why do you think the left wants Trump interviewed by FBI so badly? Traps well-set. All you have to do is mis-remember a small detail and there's leverage. But Ford's story is determined to be held together by dust by a well-respected prosecutor, and that's just fine.

“Misremember a small detail”? Have you had you’re head in the sand? Try to catch up if you have any intellectual honesty.

I'm sure there are lots and lots and lots of really big big big things

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see how they can confirm with all this mounting evidence that he lied under oath. It's not about the sexual assault anymore. That would be a "he said, she said" and it's not possible to make a conclusion. But all these people coming out to say he was a belligerent drunk, in contradiction to his testimony, will bring him down.

I think DJT is thinking about dumping him. Trump doesn't like alcoholics. I think DJT is really mad that he was persuaded by whomever to nominate this guy and *now* it's coming out that the guy had or has drinking issues. DJT is unpredictable, he's not a lock-step, dedicated Republican, he'd sandbag this guy in a second if he's angry.

In the end I think Trump will go by the (foxnews) polls and his personal feelings.

It doesn’t matter if Brett stood up on the table at the hearing and dropped his pants. The GOP - and Trump - have already sold their souls to the devil for this SCOTUS seat. They are ALL IN. No backing out now.

I think the Dems have sold their souls to the devil for this smear campaign.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see how they can confirm with all this mounting evidence that he lied under oath. It's not about the sexual assault anymore. That would be a "he said, she said" and it's not possible to make a conclusion. But all these people coming out to say he was a belligerent drunk, in contradiction to his testimony, will bring him down.

I think DJT is thinking about dumping him. Trump doesn't like alcoholics. I think DJT is really mad that he was persuaded by whomever to nominate this guy and *now* it's coming out that the guy had or has drinking issues. DJT is unpredictable, he's not a lock-step, dedicated Republican, he'd sandbag this guy in a second if he's angry.

In the end I think Trump will go by the (foxnews) polls and his personal feelings.

1. Lied under oath? According to who? Twitter and the liberal press? Yeah. Good luck with that.
2. Belligerent drunk? Seriously? And, this was never revealed during his 6 FBI background investigations? Again, good luck with that.
3. Alcoholic? LOL - refer to #2

This is pure desperation.

But there was ICE involved. ICE! So it all MUST be true. LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
1. Lied under oath? According to who? Twitter and the liberal press? Yeah. Good luck with that.

He said before Congress under oath, "

Kavanaugh told Congress he heard of the Ramirez allegation *after September 23*—when according to NBC, we now have *text messages proving* that that was a lie.

ORRIN HATCH: When did you first hear of [Deborah] Ramirez’s allegations against you?

KAVANAUGH: In the last — in the period since then, the New Yorker story.

(Sept 23)

In a series of texts before the publication of the New Yorker story, Yarasavage wrote that she had been in contact with “Brett’s guy,” and also with “Brett,” who wanted her to go on the record to refute Ramirez. According to Berchem, Yarasavage also told her friend that she turned over a copy of the wedding party photo to Kavanaugh, writing in a text: “I had to send it to Brett’s team too.”

….The texts show Kavanaugh may need to be questioned about how far back he anticipated that Ramirez would air allegations against him. Berchem says in her memo that Kavanaugh “and/or” his friends “may have initiated an anticipatory narrative” as early as July to “conceal or discredit” Ramirez.

The preceeding information can be verified through an FBI investigation of texts, emails and phone records.

If true, Kavanaugh knew about the Ramirez allegation as early as July and therefore life under oath.

Perjury.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see how they can confirm with all this mounting evidence that he lied under oath. It's not about the sexual assault anymore. That would be a "he said, she said" and it's not possible to make a conclusion. But all these people coming out to say he was a belligerent drunk, in contradiction to his testimony, will bring him down.

I think DJT is thinking about dumping him. Trump doesn't like alcoholics. I think DJT is really mad that he was persuaded by whomever to nominate this guy and *now* it's coming out that the guy had or has drinking issues. DJT is unpredictable, he's not a lock-step, dedicated Republican, he'd sandbag this guy in a second if he's angry.

In the end I think Trump will go by the (foxnews) polls and his personal feelings.

It doesn’t matter if Brett stood up on the table at the hearing and dropped his pants. The GOP - and Trump - have already sold their souls to the devil for this SCOTUS seat. They are ALL IN. No backing out now.

I think the Dems have sold their souls to the devil for this smear campaign.

It's going to be interesting as to how they use the same playbook against a woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alright, looks like the B team has arrived. Are we going to go back and talk about how the music was playing in the room again? Albertsons vs Safeway?

TIRESOME

I hope his nomination gets withdrawn, but I also hope that his house was not actually vandalized. That is unacceptable and I hope the people who did it (if it happened) are brought to justice.

Why should it get withdrawn? None of the accusers have any evidence at all. How would like you like it if someone came out of the blue from 40 yrs ago and made baseless claims against you or one of your male relative just due to political hate for them not being a Democrat. Its sick what the Democrats are doing.

Haven't you been paying attention? Perjury.

He said nothing that perjured himself, he was defending himself from well scripted lies from the left.

The goal is to get him to perjure himself - why do you think the left wants Trump interviewed by FBI so badly? Traps well-set. All you have to do is mis-remember a small detail and there's leverage. But Ford's story is determined to be held together by dust by a well-respected prosecutor, and that's just fine.

Nope. How was it a trap to ask him about things like stolen memos and the Renata alumni club? He CHOSE to lie about both big thing and small things. It would have been so much better if he had just admitted to drinking too much and disrespecting that girl as high school boys frequently do. It actually would have made the assault denials more believable if you could trust that he was willing to admit some bad behavior instead of lying to all our faces about a weak stomach and trying to honor that girl in their yearbook.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
I think the Dems have sold their souls to the devil for this smear campaign.

Other way around.

The Republicans have sold their souls repeatedly. Evidence will show that they knew about the allegations against Kavanaugh very early on and ignored it for some reason -- they wanted him on the Supreme Court so desperately they were willing to cover up that they knew about it and didn't care.

Vile and disgusting. Kavanaugh is no choir boy and wasn't back then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
1. Lied under oath? According to who? Twitter and the liberal press? Yeah. Good luck with that.

He said before Congress under oath, "

Kavanaugh told Congress he heard of the Ramirez allegation *after September 23*—when according to NBC, we now have *text messages proving* that that was a lie.

ORRIN HATCH: When did you first hear of [Deborah] Ramirez’s allegations against you?

KAVANAUGH: In the last — in the period since then, the New Yorker story.

(Sept 23)

In a series of texts before the publication of the New Yorker story, Yarasavage wrote that she had been in contact with “Brett’s guy,” and also with “Brett,” who wanted her to go on the record to refute Ramirez. According to Berchem, Yarasavage also told her friend that she turned over a copy of the wedding party photo to Kavanaugh, writing in a text: “I had to send it to Brett’s team too.”

….The texts show Kavanaugh may need to be questioned about how far back he anticipated that Ramirez would air allegations against him. Berchem says in her memo that Kavanaugh “and/or” his friends “may have initiated an anticipatory narrative” as early as July to “conceal or discredit” Ramirez.

The preceeding information can be verified through an FBI investigation of texts, emails and phone records.

If true, Kavanaugh knew about the Ramirez allegation as early as July and therefore life under oath.

Perjury.

Here's the problem with this. There are actual legal allegations and there is catching wind of a rumor and trying to figure out whether or not what you are hearing is true, i.e. that someone is trying to find dirt on you.

From Webster: specifically : a statement by a party to a legal action of what the party undertakes to prove

Kavanaugh is a lawyer and a judge, and was referring to the actual legal definition of allegation when he gave the date.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see how they can confirm with all this mounting evidence that he lied under oath. It's not about the sexual assault anymore. That would be a "he said, she said" and it's not possible to make a conclusion. But all these people coming out to say he was a belligerent drunk, in contradiction to his testimony, will bring him down.

I think DJT is thinking about dumping him. Trump doesn't like alcoholics. I think DJT is really mad that he was persuaded by whomever to nominate this guy and *now* it's coming out that the guy had or has drinking issues. DJT is unpredictable, he's not a lock-step, dedicated Republican, he'd sandbag this guy in a second if he's angry.

In the end I think Trump will go by the (foxnews) polls and his personal feelings.

It doesn’t matter if Brett stood up on the table at the hearing and dropped his pants. The GOP - and Trump - have already sold their souls to the devil for this SCOTUS seat. They are ALL IN. No backing out now.

I think the Dems have sold their souls to the devil for this smear campaign.

It's going to be interesting as to how they use the same playbook against a woman.

They'll come up with something else: someone who saw her selling drugs in high school or being in appropriate with a child. Or wait. I remember seeing her steal a piece of jewelry from a store! I can't remember which store, or when it was, but I am positive it was her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see how they can confirm with all this mounting evidence that he lied under oath. It's not about the sexual assault anymore. That would be a "he said, she said" and it's not possible to make a conclusion. But all these people coming out to say he was a belligerent drunk, in contradiction to his testimony, will bring him down.

I think DJT is thinking about dumping him. Trump doesn't like alcoholics. I think DJT is really mad that he was persuaded by whomever to nominate this guy and *now* it's coming out that the guy had or has drinking issues. DJT is unpredictable, he's not a lock-step, dedicated Republican, he'd sandbag this guy in a second if he's angry.

In the end I think Trump will go by the (foxnews) polls and his personal feelings.

1. Lied under oath? According to who? Twitter and the liberal press? Yeah. Good luck with that.
2. Belligerent drunk? Seriously? And, this was never revealed during his 6 FBI background investigations? Again, good luck with that.
3. Alcoholic? LOL - refer to #2

This is pure desperation.

Belligerent drunk - did you see the article about the bar fight? There is a police report.
Did you note the statements of former roommates and classmates who indicate he was a belligerent drunk?
The lies? Not going to waste my time retyping them all here. There are plenty of articles out there now dissecting that. https://www.gq.com/story/all-of-brett-kavanaughs-lies

Bart O Kavanaugh has a long, documented history of having a drinking problem, and the evidence is mounting by the day. President Trump said yesterday the guy has a drinking problem. Did you see the President's remarks? https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/01/politics/donald-trump-brett-kavanaugh-drinking/index.html


Look, I come from a long line of Irish alcoholics. We are all smart, respectable, hard working accomplished people, and alcoholism runs in our family. It is possible to go to Yale, be very educated and accomplshed, by a nice person and a good parent and *still* have a drinking problem. Alcoholism is the curse of the Irish. That and small penises. https://alcohol.addictionblog.org/why-do-irish-people-drink-a-lot/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see how they can confirm with all this mounting evidence that he lied under oath. It's not about the sexual assault anymore. That would be a "he said, she said" and it's not possible to make a conclusion. But all these people coming out to say he was a belligerent drunk, in contradiction to his testimony, will bring him down.

I think DJT is thinking about dumping him. Trump doesn't like alcoholics. I think DJT is really mad that he was persuaded by whomever to nominate this guy and *now* it's coming out that the guy had or has drinking issues. DJT is unpredictable, he's not a lock-step, dedicated Republican, he'd sandbag this guy in a second if he's angry.

In the end I think Trump will go by the (foxnews) polls and his personal feelings.

1. Lied under oath? According to who? Twitter and the liberal press? Yeah. Good luck with that.
2. Belligerent drunk? Seriously? And, this was never revealed during his 6 FBI background investigations? Again, good luck with that.
3. Alcoholic? LOL - refer to #2

This is pure desperation.

But there was ICE involved. ICE! So it all MUST be true. LOL

Yep. It’s all fun and games until someone starts throwing ice! This is a game changer for me. Anyone who throws ice MUST be a sexual assaulter, an alcoholic, and a perjurer!

[Anonymous]

Based on the reporting on The Daily today, Kavanaugh's classmates from both Prep and Yale thought that the way he perjured/misled/ deceived at the hearing was a bridge too far. It sounds as if several classmates who had planned on staying quiet because boorish behavior and drinking a lot in high school and college is no big deal, have decided that it was too much to listen to him try and paint himself as someone who was busy going to church and doing service projects and of course GETTING IN TO YALE!! rather than admit that he partied a lot and doesn't remember some stuff.

At this point, he deserves what is coming at him.