Head of School at National Child Research Center (NCRC) - Arrest warrant issued

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone thinking that a known predator didn’t abuse children when he had the opportunity is delusional. Educate yourselves.

It is possible he did not ever touch children and that his activities were limited to only be online or elsewhere. Someone or a kid would’ve said something by now.

Seriously, please educate yourself.
Or are you the troll on this thread spewing misinformation?

You are not nice. I am not a troll. I am a parent to kids at a school he was at and we talk to our kids openly and often about this sort of thing and they would have told us if something happened. I am hoping that is the case for all. Bug off. Btw You’re the one with the misinformation there are many online predators that do not take their actions in person thankfully… I am hoping for all this was one of those cases.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not sure what the obsession is over BVR (and even allegations against STA and NCS) on this thread and not a single mention of Concord Hill. It’s clear there are posters with a grip against the Cathedral schools. This man hasn’t been on the close since 2008 and no allegations of misconduct have been made about made against him during that time. Why is it more likely to have happened at BVR and not CH?

He created the discord account while at bvr. That info is 3 days old so we have no idea the damage done while he was there. But it’s likely not great. He was at CH for only 1 year and was interviewing mid year. And well the creepy Toth 3rd grade connection at bvr. And the working relationship he continued to have with bvr while at ncrc too- when he left CH he was done.

He was at bvr for 10 years, ncrc since 2018. While at ncrc since 2018 he was talking, meeting with and visiting with bvr constantly. CH connection def not great but the bvr and ncrc damage seems so much worse.

The bolded is not true. He established his mobile phone account when he was at Beauvoir. He later registered the number associated with that phone on Discord accounts that he created. But that was years after he left Beauvoir.

Sorry to say you’re wrong. It is in the complaint. It says he created his discord account with the vile handle in 2016.

Hello, with all due respect you are incorrect. The affidavit lists the creation dates of all three Discord usernames, one registered 06/09/23; and the other two on 09/11/24

There was a gmail address created on December 5, 2016 (a benign name, nothing disgusting like the Discord ones). This was the gmail address used by JC to establish a Discord account at a later date in time - likely 2023 based on the statement of facts, as the report likely would have disclosed other accounts. Also, Carroll was HOS at Concord Hill at this date, but again, his creation of the account at this time does not implicate Concord Hill School. JC is a disgusting man and I hope never sees the outside of a prison cell, but the amount of misrepresentations about basic facts that are clearly laid out is alarming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone thinking that a known predator didn’t abuse children when he had the opportunity is delusional. Educate yourselves.

It is possible he did not ever touch children and that his activities were limited to only be online or elsewhere. Someone or a kid would’ve said something by now.

Seriously, please educate yourself.
Or are you the troll on this thread spewing misinformation?

You are not nice. I am not a troll. I am a parent to kids at a school he was at and we talk to our kids openly and often about this sort of thing and they would have told us if something happened. I am hoping that is the case for all. Bug off. Btw You’re the one with the misinformation there are many online predators that do not take their actions in person thankfully… I am hoping for all this was one of those cases.

I recommend that every parent gets some minimal education about this, even just a one time class. Why not?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone thinking that a known predator didn’t abuse children when he had the opportunity is delusional. Educate yourselves.

It is possible he did not ever touch children and that his activities were limited to only be online or elsewhere. Someone or a kid would’ve said something by now.

Seriously, please educate yourself.
Or are you the troll on this thread spewing misinformation?

You are not nice. I am not a troll. I am a parent to kids at a school he was at and we talk to our kids openly and often about this sort of thing and they would have told us if something happened. I am hoping that is the case for all. Bug off. Btw You’re the one with the misinformation there are many online predators that do not take their actions in person thankfully… I am hoping for all this was one of those cases.

Don’t want to be mean, but nothing would guaranty you that your child would tell you. Most of the victims never say anything to their parents as they feel ashamed and guilty. I am a former NCRC parent myself and I talk about it to my children, but I am also very realistic. They might never ever tell me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not sure what the obsession is over BVR (and even allegations against STA and NCS) on this thread and not a single mention of Concord Hill. It’s clear there are posters with a grip against the Cathedral schools. This man hasn’t been on the close since 2008 and no allegations of misconduct have been made about made against him during that time. Why is it more likely to have happened at BVR and not CH?

He created the discord account while at bvr. That info is 3 days old so we have no idea the damage done while he was there. But it’s likely not great. He was at CH for only 1 year and was interviewing mid year. And well the creepy Toth 3rd grade connection at bvr. And the working relationship he continued to have with bvr while at ncrc too- when he left CH he was done.

He was at bvr for 10 years, ncrc since 2018. While at ncrc since 2018 he was talking, meeting with and visiting with bvr constantly. CH connection def not great but the bvr and ncrc damage seems so much worse.

The bolded is not true. He established his mobile phone account when he was at Beauvoir. He later registered the number associated with that phone on Discord accounts that he created. But that was years after he left Beauvoir.

Sorry to say you’re wrong. It is in the complaint. It says he created his discord account with the vile handle in 2016.

Hello, with all due respect you are incorrect. The affidavit lists the creation dates of all three Discord usernames, one registered 06/09/23; and the other two on 09/11/24

There was a gmail address created on December 5, 2016 (a benign name, nothing disgusting like the Discord ones). This was the gmail address used by JC to establish a Discord account at a later date in time - likely 2023 based on the statement of facts, as the report likely would have disclosed other accounts. Also, Carroll was HOS at Concord Hill at this date, but again, his creation of the account at this time does not implicate Concord Hill School. JC is a disgusting man and I hope never sees the outside of a prison cell, but the amount of misrepresentations about basic facts that are clearly laid out is alarming.

The discord employee reported JC in September and the arrest was made this week. The complaint was focused on his Discord acct. activity. They now have all of his devises and will definitely be looking at all of his activity during his time at CH, BVR and NCRC.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not sure what the obsession is over BVR (and even allegations against STA and NCS) on this thread and not a single mention of Concord Hill. It’s clear there are posters with a grip against the Cathedral schools. This man hasn’t been on the close since 2008 and no allegations of misconduct have been made about made against him during that time. Why is it more likely to have happened at BVR and not CH?

He created the discord account while at bvr. That info is 3 days old so we have no idea the damage done while he was there. But it’s likely not great. He was at CH for only 1 year and was interviewing mid year. And well the creepy Toth 3rd grade connection at bvr. And the working relationship he continued to have with bvr while at ncrc too- when he left CH he was done.

He was at bvr for 10 years, ncrc since 2018. While at ncrc since 2018 he was talking, meeting with and visiting with bvr constantly. CH connection def not great but the bvr and ncrc damage seems so much worse.

The bolded is not true. He established his mobile phone account when he was at Beauvoir. He later registered the number associated with that phone on Discord accounts that he created. But that was years after he left Beauvoir.

Sorry to say you’re wrong. It is in the complaint. It says he created his discord account with the vile handle in 2016.

Hello, with all due respect you are incorrect. The affidavit lists the creation dates of all three Discord usernames, one registered 06/09/23; and the other two on 09/11/24

There was a gmail address created on December 5, 2016 (a benign name, nothing disgusting like the Discord ones). This was the gmail address used by JC to establish a Discord account at a later date in time - likely 2023 based on the statement of facts, as the report likely would have disclosed other accounts. Also, Carroll was HOS at Concord Hill at this date, but again, his creation of the account at this time does not implicate Concord Hill School. JC is a disgusting man and I hope never sees the outside of a prison cell, but the amount of misrepresentations about basic facts that are clearly laid out is alarming.

Thank you for saving me the trouble of writing essentially the same post.

[Anonymous]

To 14:15, As long as we prioritize being nice over the safety of children, predators will continue to abuse children. Nice parents and nice children is part of the profile of what they look for, people who would never report to the police until they had absolute proof of abuse. By then, it’s too late, people. The children have already been abused and traumatized.

You need to be on high alert for any slight ‘creepy’ or ‘off’ behavior. Get educated. Do whatever it takes for him to know you prioritize your child’s safety over being nice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not sure what the obsession is over BVR (and even allegations against STA and NCS) on this thread and not a single mention of Concord Hill. It’s clear there are posters with a grip against the Cathedral schools. This man hasn’t been on the close since 2008 and no allegations of misconduct have been made about made against him during that time. Why is it more likely to have happened at BVR and not CH?

He created the discord account while at bvr. That info is 3 days old so we have no idea the damage done while he was there. But it’s likely not great. He was at CH for only 1 year and was interviewing mid year. And well the creepy Toth 3rd grade connection at bvr. And the working relationship he continued to have with bvr while at ncrc too- when he left CH he was done.

He was at bvr for 10 years, ncrc since 2018. While at ncrc since 2018 he was talking, meeting with and visiting with bvr constantly. CH connection def not great but the bvr and ncrc damage seems so much worse.

I doubt he had access to kids at BVR though after he left. He may have used his computer there which is gross but if he was there it would have been to meet with admissions people.

He worked at BVR until 2016.

There is no evidence in the affidavit that he ever used his computer at Beauvoir (though obviously he did when he worked there). Beauvoir is only mentioned one time in the affidavit and that is in connection to the school's address being used on his AT&T mobile phone account.

He did work there though until 2016 as he was the outplacement director for us.

I understand. But the affidavit does not cover any activities from that time period. Posters keep suggesting that he engaged in his nefarious activities at Beauvoir. He may have, but there has been no evidence of that so far.

I certainly hope not as I just found out he was meeting with kids alone as outplacement director despite the previous head saying teachers and staff were NOT allowed alone with kids as a safety measure post Toth…..

He was outplacement director for my kids at Beauvoir.

I will add we had no red flags about him at all. We love Beauvoir and are not looking to blame them or anyone. He kept up a very British professional manner and I would not have guessed any of it.

British-ness lets a lot of people get away with a lot of stuff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone thinking that a known predator didn’t abuse children when he had the opportunity is delusional. Educate yourselves.

It is possible he did not ever touch children and that his activities were limited to only be online or elsewhere. Someone or a kid would’ve said something by now.

Seriously, please educate yourself.
Or are you the troll on this thread spewing misinformation?

You are not nice. I am not a troll. I am a parent to kids at a school he was at and we talk to our kids openly and often about this sort of thing and they would have told us if something happened. I am hoping that is the case for all. Bug off. Btw You’re the one with the misinformation there are many online predators that do not take their actions in person thankfully… I am hoping for all this was one of those cases.

Jeff posted about this earlier, but there is some basis for hoping/believing this to be the case. In the affidavit, the UC agent asks if he has carried out any of these acts in real life and he says no, would be great, but no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone thinking that a known predator didn’t abuse children when he had the opportunity is delusional. Educate yourselves.

It is possible he did not ever touch children and that his activities were limited to only be online or elsewhere. Someone or a kid would’ve said something by now.

Seriously, please educate yourself.
Or are you the troll on this thread spewing misinformation?

You are not nice. I am not a troll. I am a parent to kids at a school he was at and we talk to our kids openly and often about this sort of thing and they would have told us if something happened. I am hoping that is the case for all. Bug off. Btw You’re the one with the misinformation there are many online predators that do not take their actions in person thankfully… I am hoping for all this was one of those cases.

Jeff posted about this earlier, but there is some basis for hoping/believing this to be the case. In the affidavit, the UC agent asks if he has carried out any of these acts in real life and he says no, would be great, but no.

After the fact, all one can do is hope for the best.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fact: A shocking percentage of the male employees at NCRC/BVR are abusers

What?

How do you know this as a fact?

And if you do know it, have you reported it? If not, you are complicit.

And if you just wrote that for a reaction, shame on you.

Yes it was reported.

Child was pressured to recant her account of assault by adults so charges were never filed.

I am a Beauvoir parent. Why did you allow your child to recant? Why are you being complicit in protecting the assailant? You either know something and are failing to protect children or are lying.

What is this thread referring to?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone thinking that a known predator didn’t abuse children when he had the opportunity is delusional. Educate yourselves.

It is possible he did not ever touch children and that his activities were limited to only be online or elsewhere. Someone or a kid would’ve said something by now.

Seriously, please educate yourself.
Or are you the troll on this thread spewing misinformation?

You are not nice. I am not a troll. I am a parent to kids at a school he was at and we talk to our kids openly and often about this sort of thing and they would have told us if something happened. I am hoping that is the case for all. Bug off. Btw You’re the one with the misinformation there are many online predators that do not take their actions in person thankfully… I am hoping for all this was one of those cases.

Jeff posted about this earlier, but there is some basis for hoping/believing this to be the case. In the affidavit, the UC agent asks if he has carried out any of these acts in real life and he says no, would be great, but no.

I posted this earlier, hoping/believing this to be the case as well and I was attacked by so many people on this board saying that I was minimizing the crime. And somehow being selfish for not wanting my kids to be the ones who had been touched by this monster. I said the same thing, and I was attacked for hoping that it was only an online activity, and that somehow I was ignorant and not understanding that abuse was still happening to innocent victims because of his online activity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fact: A shocking percentage of the male employees at NCRC/BVR are abusers

What?

How do you know this as a fact?

And if you do know it, have you reported it? If not, you are complicit.

And if you just wrote that for a reaction, shame on you.

Yes it was reported.

Child was pressured to recant her account of assault by adults so charges were never filed.

I am a Beauvoir parent. Why did you allow your child to recant? Why are you being complicit in protecting the assailant? You either know something and are failing to protect children or are lying.

What is this thread referring to?

Not sure because I haven’t read all the posts… Are you saying that a Beauvoir or NCRC student reported the abuse and was forced to recant? Or are you talking about about another school and another situation? I can’t find the beginning of this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
To 14:15, As long as we prioritize being nice over the safety of children, predators will continue to abuse children. Nice parents and nice children is part of the profile of what they look for, people who would never report to the police until they had absolute proof of abuse. By then, it’s too late, people. The children have already been abused and traumatized.

You need to be on high alert for any slight ‘creepy’ or ‘off’ behavior. Get educated. Do whatever it takes for him to know you prioritize your child’s safety over being nice.

You are absolutely right! I am a former parent at NCRC, and I can tell you that people keep their children in a bubble that doesn’t exist. Everyone is so nice, and the world feels like Disney. On top of that, while the school has a strong focus on social-emotional learning, any time a parent raises a concern, it’s dismissed almost immediately. I’m talking about issues like annoying behavior between kids, concerns about new students’ behavior, or even teachers hugging children (WTF?).

It also seems like NCRC tries to calm parents’ emotions over the last scandal, almost to the point of dismissal. Nobody has been violent or anything, but when parents express worries, it’s met with responses like, ‘No, no, please stay calm,’ even when nobody is yelling. It’s so hypocritical—they teach kids to express themselves through social-emotional learning, but when parents try to voice concerns, they’re brushed off. It’s a mess!

People there are overly nice, it is kind of a protection. How to be critical to someone who is so nice. Parents have to wake up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s crazy how people lose complete perspective in this area. It’s horrible this happened and everyone can agree on that, including NCRC, but to act like it’s this rampant problem with males in preschools isn’t true.
We have 3000 preschools in metro area, and lots of guys work at these schools. One or two cases, as evil as they were, does not mean that males shouldn’t work with children.
It’s not a common thing here, so get a grip, people.

The point is that the severity of and individual incident of sexual abuse is very high, even if uncommon. And certain institutions facilitate it - namely, ones that serve children and especially if they have a culture of hierarchy, secrecy, and placing protection of the institution reputation above other values; and do not have clear policies in place to make the risk of abuse outweigh the risk of a ding on the school’s reputation. This means that a high profile preschool or elementary school is absolutely the type of at-risk environment where abuse can happen. And yes we know that males are much more likely to be offenders.

So this means that if you send your child to a high profile institution with a lot of make caretakers … you should be wary if the school has a board that tightly controls the image and also if “cults of personality” seem to abound (“Mr Larlo is SO WONDERFUL! A little awkward with adults but so great with the kids …”)

Once again, chances are way higher that someone in your family or inner circle will abuse your child than a teacher at school.

Once again we are talking about abuse at school.