Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I do not trust these investigations. I mean the school hired the private firm. My guess is the board is interested only in getting a good recommendation for their kids to go to next school - which is not done by making the school look bad. It is mind boggling why given the choice, any parent would enroll a sibling, or any new parent would enroll here. There were so many cultural issues already, and then this. No parent ever asked too many questions because they were focused on getting to the coveted next school. And frankly because the school was so popular, the school had enough power (demand) that it wasn’t worth questioning the (lack of) teaching, the quality of some of the teachers, or the disconnectedness (and frankly oddness) of the head of school (or any of his many administrators). I hve no idea but my guess is the new intake is tiny.
This is a dumb take. The school has lots of safeguards (eg, cameras in the stairwell), and NOTHING happened at the school. No one has made any allegation that any kid was mistreated.
Frankly, the risk was at Beauvoir because that was consistent with the age of the kids that he said online were his interest (gross!). But even there, there were no allegations against him at Beauvoir, even when his colleague was unveiled as a pedophile.
NCRC was not a bad or irresponsible actor here. There is nothing about the school that makes it riskier than any other school.