Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are multiple posters defending Lively fwiw.

If by multiple, you mean two, yes, we know.

I think it’s three actually but whatevs.

DP. I don’t totally disagree. Although I think one of them (or a 3rd poster) occasionally takes on the persona of a hateful anti Blake/pro Baldoni poster and then rants horrible things so that the others can run to say ‘look how ugly Baldoni people are!!!’

Look at the poster going on about the amicus lawyer. That tone doesnt match any of the posts on this chain.

Pro-Lively person here and that pro-Baldoni commenter has been posting their own particular brand of nasty for the last 400+ pages at least. It's vile and it's consistently vile and it's y'all, not us. You would surely see that sneak out in our other comments if we were like that. But nice try to make it our fault and not Team Baldoni's.

You all have just as much venom and condescesion as whomever you accuse.

I mean, I'm not accusing someone who reported being sexually harassed by her law professor of being a morally corrupt grifter who only had a fully consensual relationship with that teacher. And I'm not calling myself a male feminist while encouraging my attorney to overturn a law that protects victims of sexual assault and harassment as unconstitutional. And I'm not constantly posting mean attacks about the personal appearance of Justin Baldoni on this website or other spiteful remarks about his wife or his marriage. But that's just me.

Nah, you’re just ruining an innocent man’s life so you can be a #BossGirl and control a movie, comparing him to the most disgusting serial predators and rapists, and then running to hide behind #metoo and legit victims.

Oh, and you ruined the career of a NYT Pulitzer winning journalist (and a woman) and literally are risking the legal standard that have allowed news/media companies to do their jobs, informing the public and acting as a watch dog, etc.

But yeah, you’re all good.

All three of the things I said above are true, actual things that happened. Whereas every one of the things you posted above have yet to be proven and, for now at least, are mostly in your head. So feel free to give that another try but ymmv.

Huh? Justin didn’t do any of the things you’re saying. He’s responsible for trolls on the internet? So if he’s responsible for random posts on here, then BL is certainly responsible for the things I mentioned.

And twoheys career is clearly tainted. That’s obvious. So much for Blake caring about others.

And his lawyer made a filing in a legal motion related to a lawsuit he doesn’t deserve to have to deal with because he did not harass anyone.

Sorry, that doesn’t make him a bad person, as much as you’ve tried.

You have misunderstood. Posters on this board have done #1 and 3. Baldoni hired a lawyer who is trying to get this CA law protecting victims struck as unconstitutional. All of those things happened and are real and true. Your “facts” have yet to be shown to be true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are multiple posters defending Lively fwiw.

If by multiple, you mean two, yes, we know.

I think it’s three actually but whatevs.

DP. I don’t totally disagree. Although I think one of them (or a 3rd poster) occasionally takes on the persona of a hateful anti Blake/pro Baldoni poster and then rants horrible things so that the others can run to say ‘look how ugly Baldoni people are!!!’

Look at the poster going on about the amicus lawyer. That tone doesnt match any of the posts on this chain.

Pro-Lively person here and that pro-Baldoni commenter has been posting their own particular brand of nasty for the last 400+ pages at least. It's vile and it's consistently vile and it's y'all, not us. You would surely see that sneak out in our other comments if we were like that. But nice try to make it our fault and not Team Baldoni's.

You all have just as much venom and condescesion as whomever you accuse.

I mean, I'm not accusing someone who reported being sexually harassed by her law professor of being a morally corrupt grifter who only had a fully consensual relationship with that teacher. And I'm not calling myself a male feminist while encouraging my attorney to overturn a law that protects victims of sexual assault and harassment as unconstitutional. And I'm not constantly posting mean attacks about the personal appearance of Justin Baldoni on this website or other spiteful remarks about his wife or his marriage. But that's just me.

Nah, you’re just ruining an innocent man’s life so you can be a #BossGirl and control a movie, comparing him to the most disgusting serial predators and rapists, and then running to hide behind #metoo and legit victims.

Oh, and you ruined the career of a NYT Pulitzer winning journalist (and a woman) and literally are risking the legal standard that have allowed news/media companies to do their jobs, informing the public and acting as a watch dog, etc.

But yeah, you’re all good.

All three of the things I said above are true, actual things that happened. Whereas every one of the things you posted above have yet to be proven and, for now at least, are mostly in your head. So feel free to give that another try but ymmv.

Huh? Justin didn’t do any of the things you’re saying. He’s responsible for trolls on the internet? So if he’s responsible for random posts on here, then BL is certainly responsible for the things I mentioned.

And twoheys career is clearly tainted. That’s obvious. So much for Blake caring about others.

And his lawyer made a filing in a legal motion related to a lawsuit he doesn’t deserve to have to deal with because he did not harass anyone.

Sorry, that doesn’t make him a bad person, as much as you’ve tried.

You have misunderstood. Posters on this board have done #1 and 3. Baldoni hired a lawyer who is trying to get this CA law protecting victims struck as unconstitutional. All of those things happened and are real and true. Your “facts” have yet to be shown to be true.

If the law is deemed unconstitutional, it will be the fault of the people who drafted it.

I’d say that you will fight to the death for any women who claims victimhood, no matter how bad their behavior is, or how much harm they cause to others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are multiple posters defending Lively fwiw.

If by multiple, you mean two, yes, we know.

I think it’s three actually but whatevs.

DP. I don’t totally disagree. Although I think one of them (or a 3rd poster) occasionally takes on the persona of a hateful anti Blake/pro Baldoni poster and then rants horrible things so that the others can run to say ‘look how ugly Baldoni people are!!!’

Look at the poster going on about the amicus lawyer. That tone doesnt match any of the posts on this chain.

Pro-Lively person here and that pro-Baldoni commenter has been posting their own particular brand of nasty for the last 400+ pages at least. It's vile and it's consistently vile and it's y'all, not us. You would surely see that sneak out in our other comments if we were like that. But nice try to make it our fault and not Team Baldoni's.

You all have just as much venom and condescesion as whomever you accuse.

I mean, I'm not accusing someone who reported being sexually harassed by her law professor of being a morally corrupt grifter who only had a fully consensual relationship with that teacher. And I'm not calling myself a male feminist while encouraging my attorney to overturn a law that protects victims of sexual assault and harassment as unconstitutional. And I'm not constantly posting mean attacks about the personal appearance of Justin Baldoni on this website or other spiteful remarks about his wife or his marriage. But that's just me.

Nah, you’re just ruining an innocent man’s life so you can be a #BossGirl and control a movie, comparing him to the most disgusting serial predators and rapists, and then running to hide behind #metoo and legit victims.

Oh, and you ruined the career of a NYT Pulitzer winning journalist (and a woman) and literally are risking the legal standard that have allowed news/media companies to do their jobs, informing the public and acting as a watch dog, etc.

But yeah, you’re all good.

All three of the things I said above are true, actual things that happened. Whereas every one of the things you posted above have yet to be proven and, for now at least, are mostly in your head. So feel free to give that another try but ymmv.

Huh? Justin didn’t do any of the things you’re saying. He’s responsible for trolls on the internet? So if he’s responsible for random posts on here, then BL is certainly responsible for the things I mentioned.

And twoheys career is clearly tainted. That’s obvious. So much for Blake caring about others.

And his lawyer made a filing in a legal motion related to a lawsuit he doesn’t deserve to have to deal with because he did not harass anyone.

Sorry, that doesn’t make him a bad person, as much as you’ve tried.

You have misunderstood. Posters on this board have done #1 and 3. Baldoni hired a lawyer who is trying to get this CA law protecting victims struck as unconstitutional. All of those things happened and are real and true. Your “facts” have yet to be shown to be true.

If the law is deemed unconstitutional, it will be the fault of the people who drafted it.

I’d say that you will fight to the death for any women who claims victimhood, no matter how bad their behavior is, or how much harm they cause to others.

DP and I totally agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are multiple posters defending Lively fwiw.

If by multiple, you mean two, yes, we know.

I think it’s three actually but whatevs.

DP. I don’t totally disagree. Although I think one of them (or a 3rd poster) occasionally takes on the persona of a hateful anti Blake/pro Baldoni poster and then rants horrible things so that the others can run to say ‘look how ugly Baldoni people are!!!’

Look at the poster going on about the amicus lawyer. That tone doesnt match any of the posts on this chain.

Pro-Lively person here and that pro-Baldoni commenter has been posting their own particular brand of nasty for the last 400+ pages at least. It's vile and it's consistently vile and it's y'all, not us. You would surely see that sneak out in our other comments if we were like that. But nice try to make it our fault and not Team Baldoni's.

You all have just as much venom and condescesion as whomever you accuse.

I mean, I'm not accusing someone who reported being sexually harassed by her law professor of being a morally corrupt grifter who only had a fully consensual relationship with that teacher. And I'm not calling myself a male feminist while encouraging my attorney to overturn a law that protects victims of sexual assault and harassment as unconstitutional. And I'm not constantly posting mean attacks about the personal appearance of Justin Baldoni on this website or other spiteful remarks about his wife or his marriage. But that's just me.

Nah, you’re just ruining an innocent man’s life so you can be a #BossGirl and control a movie, comparing him to the most disgusting serial predators and rapists, and then running to hide behind #metoo and legit victims.

Oh, and you ruined the career of a NYT Pulitzer winning journalist (and a woman) and literally are risking the legal standard that have allowed news/media companies to do their jobs, informing the public and acting as a watch dog, etc.

But yeah, you’re all good.

All three of the things I said above are true, actual things that happened. Whereas every one of the things you posted above have yet to be proven and, for now at least, are mostly in your head. So feel free to give that another try but ymmv.

Huh? Justin didn’t do any of the things you’re saying. He’s responsible for trolls on the internet? So if he’s responsible for random posts on here, then BL is certainly responsible for the things I mentioned.

And twoheys career is clearly tainted. That’s obvious. So much for Blake caring about others.

And his lawyer made a filing in a legal motion related to a lawsuit he doesn’t deserve to have to deal with because he did not harass anyone.

Sorry, that doesn’t make him a bad person, as much as you’ve tried.

You have misunderstood. Posters on this board have done #1 and 3. Baldoni hired a lawyer who is trying to get this CA law protecting victims struck as unconstitutional. All of those things happened and are real and true. Your “facts” have yet to be shown to be true.

If the law is deemed unconstitutional, it will be the fault of the people who drafted it.

I’d say that you will fight to the death for any women who claims victimhood, no matter how bad their behavior is, or how much harm they cause to others.

DP and I also agree with this and it's why I don't think the Lively posters are paid shills. I think they are just very attached to an ideology.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are multiple posters defending Lively fwiw.

If by multiple, you mean two, yes, we know.

I think it’s three actually but whatevs.

DP. I don’t totally disagree. Although I think one of them (or a 3rd poster) occasionally takes on the persona of a hateful anti Blake/pro Baldoni poster and then rants horrible things so that the others can run to say ‘look how ugly Baldoni people are!!!’

Look at the poster going on about the amicus lawyer. That tone doesnt match any of the posts on this chain.

Pro-Lively person here and that pro-Baldoni commenter has been posting their own particular brand of nasty for the last 400+ pages at least. It's vile and it's consistently vile and it's y'all, not us. You would surely see that sneak out in our other comments if we were like that. But nice try to make it our fault and not Team Baldoni's.

You all have just as much venom and condescesion as whomever you accuse.

I mean, I'm not accusing someone who reported being sexually harassed by her law professor of being a morally corrupt grifter who only had a fully consensual relationship with that teacher. And I'm not calling myself a male feminist while encouraging my attorney to overturn a law that protects victims of sexual assault and harassment as unconstitutional. And I'm not constantly posting mean attacks about the personal appearance of Justin Baldoni on this website or other spiteful remarks about his wife or his marriage. But that's just me.

Nah, you’re just ruining an innocent man’s life so you can be a #BossGirl and control a movie, comparing him to the most disgusting serial predators and rapists, and then running to hide behind #metoo and legit victims.

Oh, and you ruined the career of a NYT Pulitzer winning journalist (and a woman) and literally are risking the legal standard that have allowed news/media companies to do their jobs, informing the public and acting as a watch dog, etc.

But yeah, you’re all good.

All three of the things I said above are true, actual things that happened. Whereas every one of the things you posted above have yet to be proven and, for now at least, are mostly in your head. So feel free to give that another try but ymmv.

Huh? Justin didn’t do any of the things you’re saying. He’s responsible for trolls on the internet? So if he’s responsible for random posts on here, then BL is certainly responsible for the things I mentioned.

And twoheys career is clearly tainted. That’s obvious. So much for Blake caring about others.

And his lawyer made a filing in a legal motion related to a lawsuit he doesn’t deserve to have to deal with because he did not harass anyone.

Sorry, that doesn’t make him a bad person, as much as you’ve tried.

You have misunderstood. Posters on this board have done #1 and 3. Baldoni hired a lawyer who is trying to get this CA law protecting victims struck as unconstitutional. All of those things happened and are real and true. Your “facts” have yet to be shown to be true.

If the law is deemed unconstitutional, it will be the fault of the people who drafted it.

I’d say that you will fight to the death for any women who claims victimhood, no matter how bad their behavior is, or how much harm they cause to others.

DP and I totally agree.

Funny how you guys can agree with one another like this in this thread over and over without constantly being accused by the Lively supporters of being the same poster, or bots, or paid shills. And how it's the Lively supporters who are accepting other victims who reported sexual harassment and abuse even if imperfect, while the Baldoni supporters are deriding them both here and on the IEWL subreddit. And how you all think that if Liman overturns as unconstitutional this CA law protecting survivors, it certainly won't be Baldoni's fault, or Freedman's, and that Baldoni's legal position here and his defamation suit against Lively for a remarkable 400 million dollars are perfectly consistent with his "stance" as a male feminist. One side keeps going low and imho the other side does not, but your comments suggest we are terrible villains. It's a mystery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are multiple posters defending Lively fwiw.

If by multiple, you mean two, yes, we know.

I think it’s three actually but whatevs.

DP. I don’t totally disagree. Although I think one of them (or a 3rd poster) occasionally takes on the persona of a hateful anti Blake/pro Baldoni poster and then rants horrible things so that the others can run to say ‘look how ugly Baldoni people are!!!’

Look at the poster going on about the amicus lawyer. That tone doesnt match any of the posts on this chain.

Pro-Lively person here and that pro-Baldoni commenter has been posting their own particular brand of nasty for the last 400+ pages at least. It's vile and it's consistently vile and it's y'all, not us. You would surely see that sneak out in our other comments if we were like that. But nice try to make it our fault and not Team Baldoni's.

You all have just as much venom and condescesion as whomever you accuse.

I mean, I'm not accusing someone who reported being sexually harassed by her law professor of being a morally corrupt grifter who only had a fully consensual relationship with that teacher. And I'm not calling myself a male feminist while encouraging my attorney to overturn a law that protects victims of sexual assault and harassment as unconstitutional. And I'm not constantly posting mean attacks about the personal appearance of Justin Baldoni on this website or other spiteful remarks about his wife or his marriage. But that's just me.

Nah, you’re just ruining an innocent man’s life so you can be a #BossGirl and control a movie, comparing him to the most disgusting serial predators and rapists, and then running to hide behind #metoo and legit victims.

Oh, and you ruined the career of a NYT Pulitzer winning journalist (and a woman) and literally are risking the legal standard that have allowed news/media companies to do their jobs, informing the public and acting as a watch dog, etc.

But yeah, you’re all good.

All three of the things I said above are true, actual things that happened. Whereas every one of the things you posted above have yet to be proven and, for now at least, are mostly in your head. So feel free to give that another try but ymmv.

Huh? Justin didn’t do any of the things you’re saying. He’s responsible for trolls on the internet? So if he’s responsible for random posts on here, then BL is certainly responsible for the things I mentioned.

And twoheys career is clearly tainted. That’s obvious. So much for Blake caring about others.

And his lawyer made a filing in a legal motion related to a lawsuit he doesn’t deserve to have to deal with because he did not harass anyone.

Sorry, that doesn’t make him a bad person, as much as you’ve tried.

You have misunderstood. Posters on this board have done #1 and 3. Baldoni hired a lawyer who is trying to get this CA law protecting victims struck as unconstitutional. All of those things happened and are real and true. Your “facts” have yet to be shown to be true.

If the law is deemed unconstitutional, it will be the fault of the people who drafted it.

I’d say that you will fight to the death for any women who claims victimhood, no matter how bad their behavior is, or how much harm they cause to others.

DP and I totally agree.

Funny how you guys can agree with one another like this in this thread over and over without constantly being accused by the Lively supporters of being the same poster, or bots, or paid shills. And how it's the Lively supporters who are accepting other victims who reported sexual harassment and abuse even if imperfect, while the Baldoni supporters are deriding them both here and on the IEWL subreddit. And how you all think that if Liman overturns as unconstitutional this CA law protecting survivors, it certainly won't be Baldoni's fault, or Freedman's, and that Baldoni's legal position here and his defamation suit against Lively for a remarkable 400 million dollars are perfectly consistent with his "stance" as a male feminist. One side keeps going low and imho the other side does not, but your comments suggest we are terrible villains. It's a mystery.

Because your talking points and strategy are obvious

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are multiple posters defending Lively fwiw.

If by multiple, you mean two, yes, we know.

I think it’s three actually but whatevs.

DP. I don’t totally disagree. Although I think one of them (or a 3rd poster) occasionally takes on the persona of a hateful anti Blake/pro Baldoni poster and then rants horrible things so that the others can run to say ‘look how ugly Baldoni people are!!!’

Look at the poster going on about the amicus lawyer. That tone doesnt match any of the posts on this chain.

Pro-Lively person here and that pro-Baldoni commenter has been posting their own particular brand of nasty for the last 400+ pages at least. It's vile and it's consistently vile and it's y'all, not us. You would surely see that sneak out in our other comments if we were like that. But nice try to make it our fault and not Team Baldoni's.

You all have just as much venom and condescesion as whomever you accuse.

I mean, I'm not accusing someone who reported being sexually harassed by her law professor of being a morally corrupt grifter who only had a fully consensual relationship with that teacher. And I'm not calling myself a male feminist while encouraging my attorney to overturn a law that protects victims of sexual assault and harassment as unconstitutional. And I'm not constantly posting mean attacks about the personal appearance of Justin Baldoni on this website or other spiteful remarks about his wife or his marriage. But that's just me.

Nah, you’re just ruining an innocent man’s life so you can be a #BossGirl and control a movie, comparing him to the most disgusting serial predators and rapists, and then running to hide behind #metoo and legit victims.

Oh, and you ruined the career of a NYT Pulitzer winning journalist (and a woman) and literally are risking the legal standard that have allowed news/media companies to do their jobs, informing the public and acting as a watch dog, etc.

But yeah, you’re all good.

All three of the things I said above are true, actual things that happened. Whereas every one of the things you posted above have yet to be proven and, for now at least, are mostly in your head. So feel free to give that another try but ymmv.

Huh? Justin didn’t do any of the things you’re saying. He’s responsible for trolls on the internet? So if he’s responsible for random posts on here, then BL is certainly responsible for the things I mentioned.

And twoheys career is clearly tainted. That’s obvious. So much for Blake caring about others.

And his lawyer made a filing in a legal motion related to a lawsuit he doesn’t deserve to have to deal with because he did not harass anyone.

Sorry, that doesn’t make him a bad person, as much as you’ve tried.

You have misunderstood. Posters on this board have done #1 and 3. Baldoni hired a lawyer who is trying to get this CA law protecting victims struck as unconstitutional. All of those things happened and are real and true. Your “facts” have yet to be shown to be true.

If the law is deemed unconstitutional, it will be the fault of the people who drafted it.

I’d say that you will fight to the death for any women who claims victimhood, no matter how bad their behavior is, or how much harm they cause to others.

DP and I also agree with this and it's why I don't think the Lively posters are paid shills. I think they are just very attached to an ideology.

I don’t think it’s an ideology. It’s just a strategy and message points that they try to distill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are multiple posters defending Lively fwiw.

If by multiple, you mean two, yes, we know.

I think it’s three actually but whatevs.

DP. I don’t totally disagree. Although I think one of them (or a 3rd poster) occasionally takes on the persona of a hateful anti Blake/pro Baldoni poster and then rants horrible things so that the others can run to say ‘look how ugly Baldoni people are!!!’

Look at the poster going on about the amicus lawyer. That tone doesnt match any of the posts on this chain.

Pro-Lively person here and that pro-Baldoni commenter has been posting their own particular brand of nasty for the last 400+ pages at least. It's vile and it's consistently vile and it's y'all, not us. You would surely see that sneak out in our other comments if we were like that. But nice try to make it our fault and not Team Baldoni's.

You all have just as much venom and condescesion as whomever you accuse.

I mean, I'm not accusing someone who reported being sexually harassed by her law professor of being a morally corrupt grifter who only had a fully consensual relationship with that teacher. And I'm not calling myself a male feminist while encouraging my attorney to overturn a law that protects victims of sexual assault and harassment as unconstitutional. And I'm not constantly posting mean attacks about the personal appearance of Justin Baldoni on this website or other spiteful remarks about his wife or his marriage. But that's just me.

Nah, you’re just ruining an innocent man’s life so you can be a #BossGirl and control a movie, comparing him to the most disgusting serial predators and rapists, and then running to hide behind #metoo and legit victims.

Oh, and you ruined the career of a NYT Pulitzer winning journalist (and a woman) and literally are risking the legal standard that have allowed news/media companies to do their jobs, informing the public and acting as a watch dog, etc.

But yeah, you’re all good.

All three of the things I said above are true, actual things that happened. Whereas every one of the things you posted above have yet to be proven and, for now at least, are mostly in your head. So feel free to give that another try but ymmv.

Huh? Justin didn’t do any of the things you’re saying. He’s responsible for trolls on the internet? So if he’s responsible for random posts on here, then BL is certainly responsible for the things I mentioned.

And twoheys career is clearly tainted. That’s obvious. So much for Blake caring about others.

And his lawyer made a filing in a legal motion related to a lawsuit he doesn’t deserve to have to deal with because he did not harass anyone.

Sorry, that doesn’t make him a bad person, as much as you’ve tried.

You have misunderstood. Posters on this board have done #1 and 3. Baldoni hired a lawyer who is trying to get this CA law protecting victims struck as unconstitutional. All of those things happened and are real and true. Your “facts” have yet to be shown to be true.

What do posters on here have to do with Baldoni or wayfarer?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
I mean, I'm not accusing someone who reported being sexually harassed by her law professor of being a morally corrupt grifter who only had a fully consensual relationship with that teacher. And I'm not calling myself a male feminist while encouraging my attorney to overturn a law that protects victims of sexual assault and harassment as unconstitutional. And I'm not constantly posting mean attacks about the personal appearance of Justin Baldoni on this website or other spiteful remarks about his wife or his marriage. But that's just me.

Sorry, I only pop into this thread once every few days. Who is this in reference to? The only law professor scandal I know was Amy Chua's husband Jed Rubenfeld at YLS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are multiple posters defending Lively fwiw.

If by multiple, you mean two, yes, we know.

I think it’s three actually but whatevs.

DP. I don’t totally disagree. Although I think one of them (or a 3rd poster) occasionally takes on the persona of a hateful anti Blake/pro Baldoni poster and then rants horrible things so that the others can run to say ‘look how ugly Baldoni people are!!!’

Look at the poster going on about the amicus lawyer. That tone doesnt match any of the posts on this chain.

Pro-Lively person here and that pro-Baldoni commenter has been posting their own particular brand of nasty for the last 400+ pages at least. It's vile and it's consistently vile and it's y'all, not us. You would surely see that sneak out in our other comments if we were like that. But nice try to make it our fault and not Team Baldoni's.

You all have just as much venom and condescesion as whomever you accuse.

I mean, I'm not accusing someone who reported being sexually harassed by her law professor of being a morally corrupt grifter who only had a fully consensual relationship with that teacher. And I'm not calling myself a male feminist while encouraging my attorney to overturn a law that protects victims of sexual assault and harassment as unconstitutional. And I'm not constantly posting mean attacks about the personal appearance of Justin Baldoni on this website or other spiteful remarks about his wife or his marriage. But that's just me.

Nah, you’re just ruining an innocent man’s life so you can be a #BossGirl and control a movie, comparing him to the most disgusting serial predators and rapists, and then running to hide behind #metoo and legit victims.

Oh, and you ruined the career of a NYT Pulitzer winning journalist (and a woman) and literally are risking the legal standard that have allowed news/media companies to do their jobs, informing the public and acting as a watch dog, etc.

But yeah, you’re all good.

All three of the things I said above are true, actual things that happened. Whereas every one of the things you posted above have yet to be proven and, for now at least, are mostly in your head. So feel free to give that another try but ymmv.

Huh? Justin didn’t do any of the things you’re saying. He’s responsible for trolls on the internet? So if he’s responsible for random posts on here, then BL is certainly responsible for the things I mentioned.

And twoheys career is clearly tainted. That’s obvious. So much for Blake caring about others.

And his lawyer made a filing in a legal motion related to a lawsuit he doesn’t deserve to have to deal with because he did not harass anyone.

Sorry, that doesn’t make him a bad person, as much as you’ve tried.

You have misunderstood. Posters on this board have done #1 and 3. Baldoni hired a lawyer who is trying to get this CA law protecting victims struck as unconstitutional. All of those things happened and are real and true. Your “facts” have yet to be shown to be true.

If the law is deemed unconstitutional, it will be the fault of the people who drafted it.

I’d say that you will fight to the death for any women who claims victimhood, no matter how bad their behavior is, or how much harm they cause to others.

DP and I totally agree.

Funny how you guys can agree with one another like this in this thread over and over without constantly being accused by the Lively supporters of being the same poster, or bots, or paid shills. And how it's the Lively supporters who are accepting other victims who reported sexual harassment and abuse even if imperfect, while the Baldoni supporters are deriding them both here and on the IEWL subreddit. And how you all think that if Liman overturns as unconstitutional this CA law protecting survivors, it certainly won't be Baldoni's fault, or Freedman's, and that Baldoni's legal position here and his defamation suit against Lively for a remarkable 400 million dollars are perfectly consistent with his "stance" as a male feminist. One side keeps going low and imho the other side does not, but your comments suggest we are terrible villains. It's a mystery.

Remind me, which “side” is accused of filing a sham lawsuit, has dropped allegations from complaint when rebutted by video evidence, and is also accused of witness intimidation?

[Anonymous]

Really interesting: a stunt woman is suing Kevin Costner and the producers of a film he directed for being made to perform an unscripted and violent rape scene without an IC present.

She's alleging that unbeknownst to her, the actress for whom she was the stunt double (Ella Hunt) had refused to do the scene specifically because of the proposed rape sequence, which was not in the script. So the stunt woman (Devyn LaBella) was brought in and made to do the scene even though she had no notice of it and there was no intimacy coordinator present.

LaBella is also claiming the set was not closed for the scene even though it was supposed to be, and that the scene was "broadcast on public monitors" so that anyone on the crew could walk by and see the scene being performed.

More here: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2025/may/28/kevin-costner-sued-stunt-performer-horizon-an-american-saga-ntwnfb

Costner is denying this happened and his lawyer says LaBella consented to the scene after a rehearsal and that she sent the stunt coordinator a positive texts thanking them for the experience after the scene was shot.

A lot of similarities with the IEWU case, obviously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I mean, I'm not accusing someone who reported being sexually harassed by her law professor of being a morally corrupt grifter who only had a fully consensual relationship with that teacher. And I'm not calling myself a male feminist while encouraging my attorney to overturn a law that protects victims of sexual assault and harassment as unconstitutional. And I'm not constantly posting mean attacks about the personal appearance of Justin Baldoni on this website or other spiteful remarks about his wife or his marriage. But that's just me.

Sorry, I only pop into this thread once every few days. Who is this in reference to? The only law professor scandal I know was Amy Chua's husband Jed Rubenfeld at YLS.

It the Joshua Wright Title IX case at George Mason Law School where Wright spent his time between teaching and being an FTC Commissioner/antitrust advisor (lolol!) to Google, Amazon, etc, and also regularly got his law student who he hired as research assistants etc. to sleep with him. The school did eventually find out and he resigned before he was about to be terminated.

But I have also read the Chua/Rubenfeld story. I actually worked with Rubenfeld once on a law review article and found him lovely, but never actually met him in person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I mean, I'm not accusing someone who reported being sexually harassed by her law professor of being a morally corrupt grifter who only had a fully consensual relationship with that teacher. And I'm not calling myself a male feminist while encouraging my attorney to overturn a law that protects victims of sexual assault and harassment as unconstitutional. And I'm not constantly posting mean attacks about the personal appearance of Justin Baldoni on this website or other spiteful remarks about his wife or his marriage. But that's just me.

Sorry, I only pop into this thread once every few days. Who is this in reference to? The only law professor scandal I know was Amy Chua's husband Jed Rubenfeld at YLS.

Oh this female lawyer filed an amicus brief to support the newish (I think) CA law that Blake is trying to rely on to shield her from defamation liability for making SH claims and to recoup legal fees. Freedman had objected to its use, claiming she doesn’t merit the protection because she acted with malice (lied), and also claiming the law may be unconstitutional. In theory, the law might be a good idea- protect SH victims from being sued for defamation by their abusers. But obviously a lot of people don’t think Blake is really a victim and this is a misuse of the law.

The amicus lawyer was in a relationship with a married law school professor (who also worked for the FTC and had great connections) that continued after she graduated. He helped her land various cushy jobs, etc. She reported him at some point, apparently only after she found out he was having simultaneous affairs with other students/former students. He sued her for defamation. I believe she helped get this law passed.

Some poster on here was criticizing the lawyer, claiming she didn’t seem like a true victim, blah blah. It seemed to be primarily one poster, but the pro BL duo/trio are trying to use it to paint a picture of anyone pro Baldoni as a perverted woman hater who shits on all victims of SH. (And of course BL is a victim).

Personally I think it’s potentially a pro BL poster trying another angle to make Baldoni look bad.. one BL poster even keeps acting as if Baldoni orchestrated these random posts on DCUM- bizarre unless you consider, of course, that these PR shills might assume three are others like them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elyse Dorsey isn't an "imperfect victim." She's not a victim at all. That relationship was consensual.

Especially when she was a student and Wright was her professor — that was totally great. And the subsequent 6 students he tried it on with.

Honestly, it’s depressing to hear you guys do this and make these arguments. Do you know you’re just proving my point? Maybe you should add some negative comments about her appearance, too, just to get it out of your system?

Who cares, she was a consenting adult. White women are perfect angels and have no agency in your worldview, we get it. Doesn't change the reality that she's a #metoo grifter.

Just found out she was married too, wow. So she's not just a grifter, but she's a cheater herself. Or are cheaters exempt from being morally bankrupt because they're students?

Will the poster who wrote this comment please explain what you mean more and talk about some of the other comments you have written in this thread?

[Anonymous]

I got a notification several hours ago for an "Intervene" filing on the main docket (1:24-cv-10049) as entry 252, but nothing ever appeared there. Anyone know what is up with that?