Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There are multiple posters defending Lively fwiw. [/quote] If by multiple, you mean two, yes, we know.[/quote] I think it’s three actually but whatevs. [/quote] DP. I don’t totally disagree. Although I think one of them (or a 3rd poster) occasionally takes on the persona of a hateful anti Blake/pro Baldoni poster and then rants horrible things so that the others can run to say ‘look how ugly Baldoni people are!!!’ Look at the poster going on about the amicus lawyer. That tone doesnt match any of the posts on this chain. [/quote] Pro-Lively person here and that pro-Baldoni commenter has been posting their own particular brand of nasty for the last 400+ pages at least. It's vile and it's consistently vile and it's y'all, not us. You would surely see that sneak out in our other comments if we were like that. But nice try to make it our fault and not Team Baldoni's.[/quote] You all have just as much venom and condescesion as whomever you accuse. [/quote] I mean, I'm not accusing someone who reported being sexually harassed by her law professor of being a morally corrupt grifter who only had a fully consensual relationship with that teacher. And I'm not calling myself a male feminist while encouraging my attorney to overturn a law that protects victims of sexual assault and harassment as unconstitutional. And I'm not constantly posting mean attacks about the personal appearance of Justin Baldoni on this website or other spiteful remarks about his wife or his marriage. But that's just me. [/quote] Nah, you’re just ruining an innocent man’s life so you can be a #BossGirl and control a movie, comparing him to the most disgusting serial predators and rapists, and then running to hide behind #metoo and legit victims. Oh, and you ruined the career of a NYT Pulitzer winning journalist (and a woman) and literally are risking the legal standard that have allowed news/media companies to do their jobs, informing the public and acting as a watch dog, etc. But yeah, you’re all good. [/quote] All three of the things I said above are true, actual things that happened. Whereas every one of the things you posted above have yet to be proven and, for now at least, are mostly in your head. So feel free to give that another try but ymmv.[/quote] Huh? Justin didn’t do any of the things you’re saying. He’s responsible for trolls on the internet? So if he’s responsible for random posts on here, then BL is certainly responsible for the things I mentioned. And twoheys career is clearly tainted. That’s obvious. So much for Blake caring about others. And his lawyer made a filing in a legal motion related to a lawsuit he doesn’t deserve to have to deal with because he did not harass anyone. Sorry, that doesn’t make him a bad person, as much as you’ve tried. [/quote] You have misunderstood. Posters on this board have done #1 and 3. Baldoni hired a lawyer who is trying to get this CA law protecting victims struck as unconstitutional. All of those things happened and are real and true. Your “facts” have yet to be shown to be true. [/quote] If the law is deemed unconstitutional, it will be the fault of the people who drafted it. I’d say that you will fight to the death for any women who claims victimhood, no matter how bad their behavior is, or how much harm they cause to others. [/quote] DP and I also agree with this and it's why I don't think the Lively posters are paid shills. I think they are just very attached to an ideology. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics