Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are multiple posters defending Lively fwiw.

If by multiple, you mean two, yes, we know.

I think it’s three actually but whatevs.

DP. I don’t totally disagree. Although I think one of them (or a 3rd poster) occasionally takes on the persona of a hateful anti Blake/pro Baldoni poster and then rants horrible things so that the others can run to say ‘look how ugly Baldoni people are!!!’

Look at the poster going on about the amicus lawyer. That tone doesnt match any of the posts on this chain.

Pro-Lively person here and that pro-Baldoni commenter has been posting their own particular brand of nasty for the last 400+ pages at least. It's vile and it's consistently vile and it's y'all, not us. You would surely see that sneak out in our other comments if we were like that. But nice try to make it our fault and not Team Baldoni's.

You all have just as much venom and condescesion as whomever you accuse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are multiple posters defending Lively fwiw.

If by multiple, you mean two, yes, we know.

I think it’s three actually but whatevs.

DP. I don’t totally disagree. Although I think one of them (or a 3rd poster) occasionally takes on the persona of a hateful anti Blake/pro Baldoni poster and then rants horrible things so that the others can run to say ‘look how ugly Baldoni people are!!!’

Look at the poster going on about the amicus lawyer. That tone doesnt match any of the posts on this chain.

Pro-Lively person here and that pro-Baldoni commenter has been posting their own particular brand of nasty for the last 400+ pages at least. It's vile and it's consistently vile and it's y'all, not us. You would surely see that sneak out in our other comments if we were like that. But nice try to make it our fault and not Team Baldoni's.

You all have just as much venom and condescesion as whomever you accuse.

Dp. Exactly. And that’s why I would not put it past them to fake being ugly pro Baldoni posters. Of course it’s possible that the nasty poster is just a regular old troll, but I’d put almost nothing past these shills. They are determined and clearly well paid. It’s every day, all day long.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand what the big bombshell is supposed to be in that podcast.

It was a live version of the podcast broadcast at the Wilshire Ebelle theater. It's plainly obvious it's going to be used in court to support Baldoni's defamation case. Ari severed Baldoni's employment based on defamatory statements by Ryan Reynolds and allegations from the suit. If Reynold's statements to Ari (and others he spoke with) are proven to be libelous, this will he was defamed and fired as a result. He may be deposed.

The Blake and Ryan shills are full of it. They know full well how damaging those comments were and why the podcast disappeared (which frankly should be considered attempted destruction of evidence). Nobody could objectively think that was a nothing-burger. It was a most powerful Hollywood executive laughing and bragging on record to a crowd of people he helped destroy the career and reputation of an innocent man for his two clients, who he considers good friends. That is retaliation and smells like a choreographed conspiracy along with the NYT hit piece and everything else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are multiple posters defending Lively fwiw.

If by multiple, you mean two, yes, we know.

I think it’s three actually but whatevs.

DP. I don’t totally disagree. Although I think one of them (or a 3rd poster) occasionally takes on the persona of a hateful anti Blake/pro Baldoni poster and then rants horrible things so that the others can run to say ‘look how ugly Baldoni people are!!!’

Look at the poster going on about the amicus lawyer. That tone doesnt match any of the posts on this chain.

Pro-Lively person here and that pro-Baldoni commenter has been posting their own particular brand of nasty for the last 400+ pages at least. It's vile and it's consistently vile and it's y'all, not us. You would surely see that sneak out in our other comments if we were like that. But nice try to make it our fault and not Team Baldoni's.

You all have just as much venom and condescesion as whomever you accuse.

I mean, I'm not accusing someone who reported being sexually harassed by her law professor of being a morally corrupt grifter who only had a fully consensual relationship with that teacher. And I'm not calling myself a male feminist while encouraging my attorney to overturn a law that protects victims of sexual assault and harassment as unconstitutional. And I'm not constantly posting mean attacks about the personal appearance of Justin Baldoni on this website or other spiteful remarks about his wife or his marriage. But that's just me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are multiple posters defending Lively fwiw.

If by multiple, you mean two, yes, we know.

I think it’s three actually but whatevs.

DP. I don’t totally disagree. Although I think one of them (or a 3rd poster) occasionally takes on the persona of a hateful anti Blake/pro Baldoni poster and then rants horrible things so that the others can run to say ‘look how ugly Baldoni people are!!!’

Look at the poster going on about the amicus lawyer. That tone doesnt match any of the posts on this chain.

Pro-Lively person here and that pro-Baldoni commenter has been posting their own particular brand of nasty for the last 400+ pages at least. It's vile and it's consistently vile and it's y'all, not us. You would surely see that sneak out in our other comments if we were like that. But nice try to make it our fault and not Team Baldoni's.

You all have just as much venom and condescesion as whomever you accuse.

I mean, I'm not accusing someone who reported being sexually harassed by her law professor of being a morally corrupt grifter who only had a fully consensual relationship with that teacher. And I'm not calling myself a male feminist while encouraging my attorney to overturn a law that protects victims of sexual assault and harassment as unconstitutional. And I'm not constantly posting mean attacks about the personal appearance of Justin Baldoni on this website or other spiteful remarks about his wife or his marriage. But that's just me.

Nah, you’re just ruining an innocent man’s life so you can be a #BossGirl and control a movie, comparing him to the most disgusting serial predators and rapists, and then running to hide behind #metoo and legit victims.

Oh, and you ruined the career of a NYT Pulitzer winning journalist (and a woman) and literally are risking the legal standard that have allowed news/media companies to do their jobs, informing the public and acting as a watch dog, etc.

But yeah, you’re all good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are multiple posters defending Lively fwiw.

If by multiple, you mean two, yes, we know.

I think it’s three actually but whatevs.

DP. I don’t totally disagree. Although I think one of them (or a 3rd poster) occasionally takes on the persona of a hateful anti Blake/pro Baldoni poster and then rants horrible things so that the others can run to say ‘look how ugly Baldoni people are!!!’

Look at the poster going on about the amicus lawyer. That tone doesnt match any of the posts on this chain.

Pro-Lively person here and that pro-Baldoni commenter has been posting their own particular brand of nasty for the last 400+ pages at least. It's vile and it's consistently vile and it's y'all, not us. You would surely see that sneak out in our other comments if we were like that. But nice try to make it our fault and not Team Baldoni's.

You all have just as much venom and condescesion as whomever you accuse.

I mean, I'm not accusing someone who reported being sexually harassed by her law professor of being a morally corrupt grifter who only had a fully consensual relationship with that teacher. And I'm not calling myself a male feminist while encouraging my attorney to overturn a law that protects victims of sexual assault and harassment as unconstitutional. And I'm not constantly posting mean attacks about the personal appearance of Justin Baldoni on this website or other spiteful remarks about his wife or his marriage. But that's just me.

Nah, you’re just ruining an innocent man’s life so you can be a #BossGirl and control a movie, comparing him to the most disgusting serial predators and rapists, and then running to hide behind #metoo and legit victims.

Oh, and you ruined the career of a NYT Pulitzer winning journalist (and a woman) and literally are risking the legal standard that have allowed news/media companies to do their jobs, informing the public and acting as a watch dog, etc.

But yeah, you’re all good.

Don't forget Blake's very, very close ties to an actual known sexual predator in Harvey Weinstein. That is way out of bounds to post here! Report! Report! Report!

[Anonymous]

Out of curiosity:

1. How many people here have been sexually harassed or assaulted?

2. How many people have reported that harassment/assault to authorities, either police, workplace, or some supervising person?

I have been both sexually harassed and assaulted, but have reported none of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are multiple posters defending Lively fwiw.

If by multiple, you mean two, yes, we know.

I think it’s three actually but whatevs.

DP. I don’t totally disagree. Although I think one of them (or a 3rd poster) occasionally takes on the persona of a hateful anti Blake/pro Baldoni poster and then rants horrible things so that the others can run to say ‘look how ugly Baldoni people are!!!’

Look at the poster going on about the amicus lawyer. That tone doesnt match any of the posts on this chain.

Pro-Lively person here and that pro-Baldoni commenter has been posting their own particular brand of nasty for the last 400+ pages at least. It's vile and it's consistently vile and it's y'all, not us. You would surely see that sneak out in our other comments if we were like that. But nice try to make it our fault and not Team Baldoni's.

You all have just as much venom and condescesion as whomever you accuse.

I mean, I'm not accusing someone who reported being sexually harassed by her law professor of being a morally corrupt grifter who only had a fully consensual relationship with that teacher. And I'm not calling myself a male feminist while encouraging my attorney to overturn a law that protects victims of sexual assault and harassment as unconstitutional. And I'm not constantly posting mean attacks about the personal appearance of Justin Baldoni on this website or other spiteful remarks about his wife or his marriage. But that's just me.

Nah, you’re just ruining an innocent man’s life so you can be a #BossGirl and control a movie, comparing him to the most disgusting serial predators and rapists, and then running to hide behind #metoo and legit victims.

Oh, and you ruined the career of a NYT Pulitzer winning journalist (and a woman) and literally are risking the legal standard that have allowed news/media companies to do their jobs, informing the public and acting as a watch dog, etc.

But yeah, you’re all good.

Interesting how Twohey helped bring down Weinstein but Twohey didn't bother asking Blake about Weinstein? That must have been off limits.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Out of curiosity:

1. How many people here have been sexually harassed or assaulted?

2. How many people have reported that harassment/assault to authorities, either police, workplace, or some supervising person?

I have been both sexually harassed and assaulted, but have reported none of it.

Wait, that's not true. When I was doing on campus interviews during law school, and was approached by a firm to take my temperature on an interviewer's behavior (it sounded like they suspected he might be behaving inappropriately), I did report that he had made me feel uncomfortable (he asked just me out for a drink which I did not accept and made several very personal comments etc) and that I was not going to accept the offer for that reason.

But I have experienced other sexual harassment that I did not report.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elyse Dorsey isn't an "imperfect victim." She's not a victim at all. That relationship was consensual.

Especially when she was a student and Wright was her professor — that was totally great. And the subsequent 6 students he tried it on with.

Honestly, it’s depressing to hear you guys do this and make these arguments. Do you know you’re just proving my point? Maybe you should add some negative comments about her appearance, too, just to get it out of your system?

No question he was a predator who should have been fired. But fully three of the students, including Dorsey, had consensual relationships with him after they graduated that lasted 5 to 10 years each. He got two jobs at Wilson Sonsini and I believe two followed him to the FTC. Wright is a total scum bag, who did all kinds of inappropriate things as a FTC commissioner (basically influence peddling) and he was married throughout. And yet these former students actively competed among themselves for his attention. It would make one hell of a movie, but it certainly isn’t a textbook case of harassment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are multiple posters defending Lively fwiw.

If by multiple, you mean two, yes, we know.

I think it’s three actually but whatevs.

DP. I don’t totally disagree. Although I think one of them (or a 3rd poster) occasionally takes on the persona of a hateful anti Blake/pro Baldoni poster and then rants horrible things so that the others can run to say ‘look how ugly Baldoni people are!!!’

Look at the poster going on about the amicus lawyer. That tone doesnt match any of the posts on this chain.

Pro-Lively person here and that pro-Baldoni commenter has been posting their own particular brand of nasty for the last 400+ pages at least. It's vile and it's consistently vile and it's y'all, not us. You would surely see that sneak out in our other comments if we were like that. But nice try to make it our fault and not Team Baldoni's.

You all have just as much venom and condescesion as whomever you accuse.

I mean, I'm not accusing someone who reported being sexually harassed by her law professor of being a morally corrupt grifter who only had a fully consensual relationship with that teacher. And I'm not calling myself a male feminist while encouraging my attorney to overturn a law that protects victims of sexual assault and harassment as unconstitutional. And I'm not constantly posting mean attacks about the personal appearance of Justin Baldoni on this website or other spiteful remarks about his wife or his marriage. But that's just me.

Nah, you’re just ruining an innocent man’s life so you can be a #BossGirl and control a movie, comparing him to the most disgusting serial predators and rapists, and then running to hide behind #metoo and legit victims.

Oh, and you ruined the career of a NYT Pulitzer winning journalist (and a woman) and literally are risking the legal standard that have allowed news/media companies to do their jobs, informing the public and acting as a watch dog, etc.

But yeah, you’re all good.

All three of the things I said above are true, actual things that happened. Whereas every one of the things you posted above have yet to be proven and, for now at least, are mostly in your head. So feel free to give that another try but ymmv.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elyse Dorsey isn't an "imperfect victim." She's not a victim at all. That relationship was consensual.

Especially when she was a student and Wright was her professor — that was totally great. And the subsequent 6 students he tried it on with.

Honestly, it’s depressing to hear you guys do this and make these arguments. Do you know you’re just proving my point? Maybe you should add some negative comments about her appearance, too, just to get it out of your system?

No question he was a predator who should have been fired. But fully three of the students, including Dorsey, had consensual relationships with him after they graduated that lasted 5 to 10 years each. He got two jobs at Wilson Sonsini and I believe two followed him to the FTC. Wright is a total scum bag, who did all kinds of inappropriate things as a FTC commissioner (basically influence peddling) and he was married throughout. And yet these former students actively competed among themselves for his attention. It would make one hell of a movie, but it certainly isn’t a textbook case of harassment.

Yeah, that was exactly his defense. "I slept with all of these students but I rewarded them all with jobz! So I did nothing wrong, and look at how they're defaming me now!"

I mean, I don't want my law school to work that way, and I am glad that the women reported this man and got him to resign, and that he lost most of the positions of power he had been privileged to hold. Am I going to blame the women because they got involved in relationships with him when they were his students and those relationships went on to last a while? Again, I don't need women who report SH to be perfect victims because I recognize that most perfect victims don't report at all. Why would they, when they could just move on? But feel free to attack these women since that seems to be where you are headed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elyse Dorsey isn't an "imperfect victim." She's not a victim at all. That relationship was consensual.

Especially when she was a student and Wright was her professor — that was totally great. And the subsequent 6 students he tried it on with.

Honestly, it’s depressing to hear you guys do this and make these arguments. Do you know you’re just proving my point? Maybe you should add some negative comments about her appearance, too, just to get it out of your system?

No question he was a predator who should have been fired. But fully three of the students, including Dorsey, had consensual relationships with him after they graduated that lasted 5 to 10 years each. He got two jobs at Wilson Sonsini and I believe two followed him to the FTC. Wright is a total scum bag, who did all kinds of inappropriate things as a FTC commissioner (basically influence peddling) and he was married throughout. And yet these former students actively competed among themselves for his attention. It would make one hell of a movie, but it certainly isn’t a textbook case of harassment.

Yeah, that was exactly his defense. "I slept with all of these students but I rewarded them all with jobz! So I did nothing wrong, and look at how they're defaming me now!"

I mean, I don't want my law school to work that way, and I am glad that the women reported this man and got him to resign, and that he lost most of the positions of power he had been privileged to hold. Am I going to blame the women because they got involved in relationships with him when they were his students and those relationships went on to last a while? Again, I don't need women who report SH to be perfect victims because I recognize that most perfect victims don't report at all. Why would they, when they could just move on? But feel free to attack these women since that seems to be where you are headed.

These are grown adults who followed this man around and exchanged sex for jobs. Sorry that’s gross, and insulting to all women lawyers. And that’s not sexual harassment, they affirmatively went from job to job, following him. These women should have full agency over their (bad) decisions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are multiple posters defending Lively fwiw.

If by multiple, you mean two, yes, we know.

I think it’s three actually but whatevs.

DP. I don’t totally disagree. Although I think one of them (or a 3rd poster) occasionally takes on the persona of a hateful anti Blake/pro Baldoni poster and then rants horrible things so that the others can run to say ‘look how ugly Baldoni people are!!!’

Look at the poster going on about the amicus lawyer. That tone doesnt match any of the posts on this chain.

Pro-Lively person here and that pro-Baldoni commenter has been posting their own particular brand of nasty for the last 400+ pages at least. It's vile and it's consistently vile and it's y'all, not us. You would surely see that sneak out in our other comments if we were like that. But nice try to make it our fault and not Team Baldoni's.

You all have just as much venom and condescesion as whomever you accuse.

I mean, I'm not accusing someone who reported being sexually harassed by her law professor of being a morally corrupt grifter who only had a fully consensual relationship with that teacher. And I'm not calling myself a male feminist while encouraging my attorney to overturn a law that protects victims of sexual assault and harassment as unconstitutional. And I'm not constantly posting mean attacks about the personal appearance of Justin Baldoni on this website or other spiteful remarks about his wife or his marriage. But that's just me.

Nah, you’re just ruining an innocent man’s life so you can be a #BossGirl and control a movie, comparing him to the most disgusting serial predators and rapists, and then running to hide behind #metoo and legit victims.

Oh, and you ruined the career of a NYT Pulitzer winning journalist (and a woman) and literally are risking the legal standard that have allowed news/media companies to do their jobs, informing the public and acting as a watch dog, etc.

But yeah, you’re all good.

All three of the things I said above are true, actual things that happened. Whereas every one of the things you posted above have yet to be proven and, for now at least, are mostly in your head. So feel free to give that another try but ymmv.

Huh? Justin didn’t do any of the things you’re saying. He’s responsible for trolls on the internet? So if he’s responsible for random posts on here, then BL is certainly responsible for the things I mentioned.

And twoheys career is clearly tainted. That’s obvious. So much for Blake caring about others.

And his lawyer made a filing in a legal motion related to a lawsuit he doesn’t deserve to have to deal with because he did not harass anyone.

Sorry, that doesn’t make him a bad person, as much as you’ve tried.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are multiple posters defending Lively fwiw.

If by multiple, you mean two, yes, we know.

I think it’s three actually but whatevs.

DP. I don’t totally disagree. Although I think one of them (or a 3rd poster) occasionally takes on the persona of a hateful anti Blake/pro Baldoni poster and then rants horrible things so that the others can run to say ‘look how ugly Baldoni people are!!!’

Look at the poster going on about the amicus lawyer. That tone doesnt match any of the posts on this chain.

Pro-Lively person here and that pro-Baldoni commenter has been posting their own particular brand of nasty for the last 400+ pages at least. It's vile and it's consistently vile and it's y'all, not us. You would surely see that sneak out in our other comments if we were like that. But nice try to make it our fault and not Team Baldoni's.

You all have just as much venom and condescesion as whomever you accuse.

I mean, I'm not accusing someone who reported being sexually harassed by her law professor of being a morally corrupt grifter who only had a fully consensual relationship with that teacher. And I'm not calling myself a male feminist while encouraging my attorney to overturn a law that protects victims of sexual assault and harassment as unconstitutional. And I'm not constantly posting mean attacks about the personal appearance of Justin Baldoni on this website or other spiteful remarks about his wife or his marriage. But that's just me.

Nah, you’re just ruining an innocent man’s life so you can be a #BossGirl and control a movie, comparing him to the most disgusting serial predators and rapists, and then running to hide behind #metoo and legit victims.

Oh, and you ruined the career of a NYT Pulitzer winning journalist (and a woman) and literally are risking the legal standard that have allowed news/media companies to do their jobs, informing the public and acting as a watch dog, etc.

But yeah, you’re all good.

All three of the things I said above are true, actual things that happened. Whereas every one of the things you posted above have yet to be proven and, for now at least, are mostly in your head. So feel free to give that another try but ymmv.

Huh? Justin didn’t do any of the things you’re saying. He’s responsible for trolls on the internet? So if he’s responsible for random posts on here, then BL is certainly responsible for the things I mentioned.

And twoheys career is clearly tainted. That’s obvious. So much for Blake caring about others.

And his lawyer made a filing in a legal motion related to a lawsuit he doesn’t deserve to have to deal with because he did not harass anyone.

Sorry, that doesn’t make him a bad person, as much as you’ve tried.

Blake only cares about Blake.