Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elyse Dorsey isn't an "imperfect victim." She's not a victim at all. That relationship was consensual.

Especially when she was a student and Wright was her professor — that was totally great. And the subsequent 6 students he tried it on with.

Honestly, it’s depressing to hear you guys do this and make these arguments. Do you know you’re just proving my point? Maybe you should add some negative comments about her appearance, too, just to get it out of your system?

Who cares, she was a consenting adult. White women are perfect angels and have no agency in your worldview, we get it. Doesn't change the reality that she's a #metoo grifter.

Just found out she was married too, wow. So she's not just a grifter, but she's a cheater herself. Or are cheaters exempt from being morally bankrupt because they're students?

She sounds like a you know what, but that doesn't mean she was defaming the dude by reporting what sounds like actual SH.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand what the big bombshell is supposed to be in that podcast.

Because you're ESL or just so darn thick? Ari is so powerful he made one of the most popular podcasts on the U.S. charts delete an episode under the guise of technical issues - the first ever such glitch in the podcast's like 20 year history! Imagine that. On said podcast Ari bragged he fired Justin, essentially signaling he was helping blackball him in Hollywood off this obvious hoax/scheme because he's so wedded to plantation Barbie and her zesty husband.

Wasn't it a live episode? Those are notoriously glitchy.

DP. You must be joking. No, they are not notoriously glitchy. Maybe when you play them back, there might be download issues, but that’s very different than losing an entire episode.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are multiple posters defending Lively fwiw.

If by multiple, you mean two, yes, we know.

I think it’s three actually but whatevs.

DP. I don’t totally disagree. Although I think one of them (or a 3rd poster) occasionally takes on the persona of a hateful anti Blake/pro Baldoni poster and then rants horrible things so that the others can run to say ‘look how ugly Baldoni people are!!!’

Look at the poster going on about the amicus lawyer. That tone doesnt match any of the posts on this chain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have a question. A legitimate question, since I know there are some aggressive and illiterate users here who interpret questions as statement of fact here or as arguments I'm trying to make. Not a lawyer, so forgive any incorrect legal terminology.

Let's say all of Justin's claims are dismissed. But Blake's prevails. Several months down the line, Blake decides she doesn't want to sue Justin. Can she...just decide to do that, and boom, this whole saga is over?

Are you asking for a friend? 😛

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Elyse Dorsey isn't an "imperfect victim." She's not a victim at all. That relationship was consensual.

And Louis CK did nothing wrong because he asked before he whipped it out!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a question. A legitimate question, since I know there are some aggressive and illiterate users here who interpret questions as statement of fact here or as arguments I'm trying to make. Not a lawyer, so forgive any incorrect legal terminology.

Let's say all of Justin's claims are dismissed. But Blake's prevails. Several months down the line, Blake decides she doesn't want to sue Justin. Can she...just decide to do that, and boom, this whole saga is over?

Are you asking for a friend? 😛

I'm asking because I think it'd be unfair for Justin if Blake decides she wants to back out and his claims don't survive (since some people here claim there's a group pleading issue). I'm pro-JB, but you are the type of person I was talking about in my comment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elyse Dorsey isn't an "imperfect victim." She's not a victim at all. That relationship was consensual.

And Louis CK did nothing wrong because he asked before he whipped it out!

Leave it to a pro-Blaker to compare sexual assault with a consensual relationship.

[Anonymous]

Blakers gonna Blake.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Vogue list of greatest power couples.

So many great couples here, including Scarlett/Colin and Taylor/Travis. Scarjo says that she finally learned that she needed to be with a compassionate person. I think she hit the jackpot with CJ!

https://www.vogue.com/slideshow/best-power-couples

So no one cares that Blake and Ryan are not considered a top power couple!
This is a very good list.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vogue list of greatest power couples.

So many great couples here, including Scarlett/Colin and Taylor/Travis. Scarjo says that she finally learned that she needed to be with a compassionate person. I think she hit the jackpot with CJ!

https://www.vogue.com/slideshow/best-power-couples

So no one cares that Blake and Ryan are not considered a top power couple!
This is a very good list.

They chose married and unmarried couples. Interesting!
This must be the new A-List!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a question. A legitimate question, since I know there are some aggressive and illiterate users here who interpret questions as statement of fact here or as arguments I'm trying to make. Not a lawyer, so forgive any incorrect legal terminology.

Let's say all of Justin's claims are dismissed. But Blake's prevails. Several months down the line, Blake decides she doesn't want to sue Justin. Can she...just decide to do that, and boom, this whole saga is over?

Are you asking for a friend? 😛

I'm asking because I think it'd be unfair for Justin if Blake decides she wants to back out and his claims don't survive (since some people here claim there's a group pleading issue). I'm pro-JB, but you are the type of person I was talking about in my comment.

Ok relax. And yes, of course she can withdraw. I suspect she would never want to go to trial

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elyse Dorsey isn't an "imperfect victim." She's not a victim at all. That relationship was consensual.

And Louis CK did nothing wrong because he asked before he whipped it out!

Leave it to a pro-Blaker to compare sexual assault with a consensual relationship.

He whipped it out and masturbated. Is that more of a SA than your teacher booking a single bed hotel room while taking you to a conference, where you have actual sex with him without fighting because you're not sure how to refuse without repercussions? In both cases the dude was in a position of power over the women, and in Louis CK's case no sex with the women happened.

To me it's the fact that the men are in positions of power over the women and they should know in that situation that the sexual situations they introduce may not be entirely consensual unless folks do a lot of talking about it beforehand. Honestly, didn't we figure out this position of power thing 20 years ago? It doesn't sound like many of you are convinced about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vogue list of greatest power couples.

So many great couples here, including Scarlett/Colin and Taylor/Travis. Scarjo says that she finally learned that she needed to be with a compassionate person. I think she hit the jackpot with CJ!

https://www.vogue.com/slideshow/best-power-couples

So no one cares that Blake and Ryan are not considered a top power couple!
This is a very good list.

No, I don't think another here would?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are multiple posters defending Lively fwiw.

If by multiple, you mean two, yes, we know.

I think it’s three actually but whatevs.

DP. I don’t totally disagree. Although I think one of them (or a 3rd poster) occasionally takes on the persona of a hateful anti Blake/pro Baldoni poster and then rants horrible things so that the others can run to say ‘look how ugly Baldoni people are!!!’

Look at the poster going on about the amicus lawyer. That tone doesnt match any of the posts on this chain.

Pro-Lively person here and that pro-Baldoni commenter has been posting their own particular brand of nasty for the last 400+ pages at least. It's vile and it's consistently vile and it's y'all, not us. You would surely see that sneak out in our other comments if we were like that. But nice try to make it our fault and not Team Baldoni's.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are multiple posters defending Lively fwiw.

If by multiple, you mean two, yes, we know.

I think it’s three actually but whatevs.

DP. I don’t totally disagree. Although I think one of them (or a 3rd poster) occasionally takes on the persona of a hateful anti Blake/pro Baldoni poster and then rants horrible things so that the others can run to say ‘look how ugly Baldoni people are!!!’

Look at the poster going on about the amicus lawyer. That tone doesnt match any of the posts on this chain.

Pro-Lively person here and that pro-Baldoni commenter has been posting their own particular brand of nasty for the last 400+ pages at least. It's vile and it's consistently vile and it's y'all, not us. You would surely see that sneak out in our other comments if we were like that. But nice try to make it our fault and not Team Baldoni's.

You post plenty of nasty crap, get over yourself.