Kyle Rittenhouse: Vigilante White Men

[Anonymous]

Kyle acted in self defense. Three adult men with violent criminal convictions attacked him. Thankfully he was armed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, the third person shot on the stand today as a prosecution witness. So far:

1. He admitted that KR shot him only after he had first pointed his gun at KR.

2. He chased after KR.

3. In an encounter earlier in the night, KR had asked him if needed medical assistance.

0. Rotten Kyle asked his mommy to drive him to Wisco so he could make trouble. He didn’t live there, he didn’t own a business there. He just wanted to make trouble.

I stipulate that everything you said is true. What bearing does that have on this trial?

Gaige Grosskreutz admitted on examination under oath he pointed his gun at Kyle first, and only then did Kyle raise his gun to shoot him. That’s self defense on Kyle’s part. That’s the bearing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kyle acted in self defense. Three adult men with violent criminal convictions attacked him. Thankfully he was armed.

Oh please! “attacked” him?

One of them only had a toy with him that night: a child’s toy skateboard for heaven’s sake!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, the third person shot on the stand today as a prosecution witness. So far:

1. He admitted that KR shot him only after he had first pointed his gun at KR.

2. He chased after KR.

3. In an encounter earlier in the night, KR had asked him if needed medical assistance.

0. Rotten Kyle asked his mommy to drive him to Wisco so he could make trouble. He didn’t live there, he didn’t own a business there. He just wanted to make trouble.

I stipulate that everything you said is true. What bearing does that have on this trial?

Seriously?

Yes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, the third person shot on the stand today as a prosecution witness. So far:

1. He admitted that KR shot him only after he had first pointed his gun at KR.

2. He chased after KR.

3. In an encounter earlier in the night, KR had asked him if needed medical assistance.

0. Rotten Kyle asked his mommy to drive him to Wisco so he could make trouble. He didn’t live there, he didn’t own a business there. He just wanted to make trouble.

I stipulate that everything you said is true. What bearing does that have on this trial?

Seriously?

DP. Seriously. Stupid kid, stupid Mom. Tragic, disgusting, but not a crime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^^When you have to go back over 50 years to cite an example, you have failed.

And, what evidence is it that the people shot by Rittenhouse were "fighting for civil rights?" Seems to me they were looking for trouble.

Why were people out protesting that night? What triggered that?

Yes, it’s mind boggling that we are still battling for civil rights 50+ years later. And people are still dying - even some white people.

The purpose of the protest has no bearing on whether he is a white supremacist or not. He seems to be a conservative gun nut who wanted to property. This may sound stupid (and it is) but it is not white supremacy. You've just been conditioned to believe that all stupid conservative gun nuts are white supremacists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^^When you have to go back over 50 years to cite an example, you have failed.

And, what evidence is it that the people shot by Rittenhouse were "fighting for civil rights?" Seems to me they were looking for trouble.

Why were people out protesting that night? What triggered that?

Yes, it’s mind boggling that we are still battling for civil rights 50+ years later. And people are still dying - even some white people.

The purpose of the protest has no bearing on whether he is a white supremacist or not. He seems to be a conservative gun nut who wanted to * property. This may sound stupid (and it is) but it is not white supremacy. You've just been conditioned to believe that all stupid conservative gun nuts are white supremacists.

*protect

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kyle acted in self defense. Three adult men with violent criminal convictions attacked him. Thankfully he was armed.

Oh please! “attacked” him?

One of them only had a toy with him that night: a child’s toy skateboard for heaven’s sake!

I'm a physician who worked in the ER/ED for decades. We saw many concussions, TBIs, skull fractures and other vicious wounds inflicted by skateboards. They can be a very deadly weapon.

[Anonymous]

Also: toy fire trucks. They ain't no joke.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kyle acted in self defense. Three adult men with violent criminal convictions attacked him. Thankfully he was armed.

Oh please! “attacked” him?

One of them only had a toy with him that night: a child’s toy skateboard for heaven’s sake!

I'm a physician who worked in the ER/ED for decades. We saw many concussions, TBIs, skull fractures and other vicious wounds inflicted by skateboards. They can be a very deadly weapon.

After examining this claim, it appears to be true:

https://abc7.com/starbucks-fight-santa-ana-man-dies-skateboard/1098183/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, the third person shot on the stand today as a prosecution witness. So far:

1. He admitted that KR shot him only after he had first pointed his gun at KR.

2. He chased after KR.

3. In an encounter earlier in the night, KR had asked him if needed medical assistance.

0. Rotten Kyle asked his mommy to drive him to Wisco so he could make trouble. He didn’t live there, he didn’t own a business there. He just wanted to make trouble.

I stipulate that everything you said is true. What bearing does that have on this trial?

Gaige Grosskreutz admitted on examination under oath he pointed his gun at Kyle first, and only then did Kyle raise his gun to shoot him. That’s self defense on Kyle’s part. That’s the bearing.

And that should acquit him

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, the third person shot on the stand today as a prosecution witness. So far:

1. He admitted that KR shot him only after he had first pointed his gun at KR.

2. He chased after KR.

3. In an encounter earlier in the night, KR had asked him if needed medical assistance.

0. Rotten Kyle asked his mommy to drive him to Wisco so he could make trouble. He didn’t live there, he didn’t own a business there. He just wanted to make trouble.

I stipulate that everything you said is true. What bearing does that have on this trial?

Gaige Grosskreutz admitted on examination under oath he pointed his gun at Kyle first, and only then did Kyle raise his gun to shoot him. That’s self defense on Kyle’s part. That’s the bearing.

And that should acquit him

This trial should have never happened.

[Anonymous]

The prosecution team appears rather incompetent at this stage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kyle acted in self defense. Three adult men with violent criminal convictions attacked him. Thankfully he was armed.

Who takes a gun to a protest? This is premeditated murder!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kyle acted in self defense. Three adult men with violent criminal convictions attacked him. Thankfully he was armed.

Who takes a gun to a protest? This is premeditated murder!

Taking a gun to a place you believe is dangerous is not evidence of premeditation. Of course it would be smarter not to go to the dangerous place in the first place, but Rittenhouse is not on trial for stupidity.