Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser

[Anonymous]

Barr is now gaslighting American about the role the FBI played in the 2016 election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Determined he [Flynn] wasn't being straight with the Vice President and others."

Is Reince Preibus lying in this interview from February 2017?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMWE2Hlb9ZU

I am waiting to hear what comes out in terms of what he said to the FBI and to the VP before I form an opinion on whether he lied to anybody.
At this point, I am not trusting the FBI to be truthful to the defense, the court, or the administration.

And instead want to trust the administration which has told 20,000 material lies.

This is a BS claim.
The WaPo keeps their little list, which THEY claim are lies that he has told. That list include lies he supposedly said about the FISA warrants, the Russian investigations and other issues that have since revealed to be accurate. Yet, the WaPo chooses not to edit its list.
Add to that list things he has said that are opinion, but the WaPo has "fact checked," the list is absurd.

I give it no credibility at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Determined he [Flynn] wasn't being straight with the Vice President and others."

Is Reince Preibus lying in this interview from February 2017?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMWE2Hlb9ZU

I am waiting to hear what comes out in terms of what he said to the FBI and to the VP before I form an opinion on whether he lied to anybody.
At this point, I am not trusting the FBI to be truthful to the defense, the court, or the administration.

And instead want to trust the administration which has told 20,000 material lies.

This is a BS claim.
The WaPo keeps their little list, which THEY claim are lies that he has told. That list include lies he supposedly said about the FISA warrants, the Russian investigations and other issues that have since revealed to be accurate. Yet, the WaPo chooses not to edit its list.
Add to that list things he has said that are opinion, but the WaPo has "fact checked," the list is absurd.

I give it no credibility at all.

Okay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Barr is now gaslighting American about the role the FBI played in the 2016 election.

He has the receipts. Of that, I am certain. Barr knows what he is doing and would not make the claims if he didn't have evidence.
Sorry - you are so convince that the IC under Obama was so squeaky clean that you cannot imagine that what he says is true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Barr is now gaslighting American about the role the FBI played in the 2016 election.

He has the receipts. Of that, I am certain. Barr knows what he is doing and would not make the claims if he didn't have evidence.
Sorry - you are so convince that the IC under Obama was so squeaky clean that you cannot imagine that what he says is true.

This is so funny. Barr was a nut under Bush. He's a nut now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Barr is now gaslighting American about the role the FBI played in the 2016 election.

He has the receipts. Of that, I am certain. Barr knows what he is doing and would not make the claims if he didn't have evidence.
Sorry - you are so convince that the IC under Obama was so squeaky clean that you cannot imagine that what he says is true.

He has the receipt from the 500 hamberders he’s eaten in the last month, of that I am sure. Those are the only “receipts.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Barr is now gaslighting American about the role the FBI played in the 2016 election.

He has the receipts. Of that, I am certain. Barr knows what he is doing and would not make the claims if he didn't have evidence.
Sorry - you are so convince that the IC under Obama was so squeaky clean that you cannot imagine that what he says is true.

The FBI did involve itself in the 2016 election, but not the way Barr is suggesting. none of the "Russia" stuff came out before the election. What happened before the election? It was all Hillary/emails, former Rep. Weiner and his laptop and Hillary's emails. there are all sort of theories around how this got played, including the manipulation by the FBI field office of Comey himself. Remember, Rudy and Erik Prince both went on TV and foretold what was to come.

This has all received a pass, as has Wikileaks and its relationship to Stone, Trump, Manafort etc.

But there was NOTHING from the FBI of Trump-Russia or any FBI investigation into Trump that impacted the election.

[Anonymous]

And who is Azra Turk?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Barr is now gaslighting American about the role the FBI played in the 2016 election.

He has the receipts. Of that, I am certain. Barr knows what he is doing and would not make the claims if he didn't have evidence.
Sorry - you are so convince that the IC under Obama was so squeaky clean that you cannot imagine that what he says is true.

This is so funny. Barr was a nut under Bush. He's a nut now.

Barr appears to be the only rational sober person to work at doj in 4 f&cking years.
Comey- crook
McCabe-crook
Strohk-crook
Mueller- at best woefully addled, at worst, crook.
Mueller’s investigative russia collusion team—all crooks
Holder-racist, crook
Lunch- incompetent, maybe not a crook
Can’t wait for the indictments from Durham. The adults are back in charge!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Barr is now gaslighting American about the role the FBI played in the 2016 election.

He has the receipts. Of that, I am certain. Barr knows what he is doing and would not make the claims if he didn't have evidence.
Sorry - you are so convince that the IC under Obama was so squeaky clean that you cannot imagine that what he says is true.

The FBI did involve itself in the 2016 election, but not the way Barr is suggesting. none of the "Russia" stuff came out before the election. What happened before the election? It was all Hillary/emails, former Rep. Weiner and his laptop and Hillary's emails. there are all sort of theories around how this got played, including the manipulation by the FBI field office of Comey himself. Remember, Rudy and Erik Prince both went on TV and foretold what was to come.

This has all received a pass, as has Wikileaks and its relationship to Stone, Trump, Manafort etc.

But there was NOTHING from the FBI of Trump-Russia or any FBI investigation into Trump that impacted the election.

Then "Russian stuff" DID come out before the election. Oct. 31 - NYTiimes https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/fbi-russia-election-donald-trump.html

We'll see what Durham comes up with. After all, they were SURE Hillary was going to win. I guess they kicked up their "insurance policy."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Barr is now gaslighting American about the role the FBI played in the 2016 election.

He has the receipts. Of that, I am certain. Barr knows what he is doing and would not make the claims if he didn't have evidence.
Sorry - you are so convince that the IC under Obama was so squeaky clean that you cannot imagine that what he says is true.

This is so funny. Barr was a nut under Bush. He's a nut now.

Barr appears to be the only rational sober person to work at doj in 4 f&cking years.
Comey- crook
McCabe-crook
Strohk-crook
Mueller- at best woefully addled, at worst, crook.
Mueller’s investigative russia collusion team—all crooks
Holder-racist, crook
Lunch- incompetent, maybe not a crook
Can’t wait for the indictments from Durham. The adults are back in charge!

Don't hold your breath, friend. I mean that sincerely.

[Anonymous]

Barr was single-handedly responsible for getting all of the Iran-Contra crooks off the hook. Total crook.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Barr was single-handedly responsible for getting all of the Iran-Contra crooks off the hook. Total crook.

Speaking of total crooks, do you mean just like Obama and Kerry did with Iran

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Barr was single-handedly responsible for getting all of the Iran-Contra crooks off the hook. Total crook.

Speaking of total crooks, do you mean just like Obama and Kerry did with Iran

Are you referring to the multi-lateral deal that the Europeans and US negotiated with the Iranians that repatriated Iranian money in exchange for proper monitoring of the Iranian nuclear program that was working and even bringing more moderates into the political fold before Trump blew it up? What was illegal about it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Barr was single-handedly responsible for getting all of the Iran-Contra crooks off the hook. Total crook.

Speaking of total crooks, do you mean just like Obama and Kerry did with Iran

Iran-Contra should have resulted in the leadership of Reagan-Bush in jail.

What did Obama and Kerry do that should have landed them in jail?