
If this is the case, why are they moving the Brookfield ES kids into them for the next 2.5 years? Remodeling yes, but safety first! Ditto for the entire sixth grade at Greenbrier East who are now in trailers. |
DP with zero skin in this game (my kids are zoned to Oakton even though we are physically closer to Chantilly and South Lakes and we're fine with that). I'm not sure how these are even part of the same conversation -- kids that are zoned to Centreville or Chantilly wouldn't be the same kids that are zoned to Langley, so why is this a competition? Are you concerned that kids from Chantilly will break rezoned to Herndon but you'd rather rezone kids from Langley to Herndon? I don't understand what this argument is about. And what about Westfield? Aren't kids that go to Westfield closer to Chantilly and Herndon, too? |
Where else do you propose they put kids when their school is being remodeled? |
That’s the point. An earlier PP was suggesting modulars never be used, which would mean in the event of renovations, the entire county would have to adjust its boundaries to absorb the seats until they were finished being built. That’s not going to happen. |
They want kids from Centreville or Chantilly moved to Westfield and kids from Westfield moved into Herndon. Then, with more kids at Herndon, which now has hundreds of vacancies, they’ll argue kids in Great Falls who live much closer to Herndon than Langley should remain at Langley. The concern about overcrowding at other schools is feigned. They only care about a “fix” is if it fills up a school they don’t want to attend. |
Installing a modular is cheaper than building an addition but there are some significant sunk costs associated with the modulars currently installed or that will soon be needed. And teachers often prefer teaching in modulars since they can be quieter. If you ask parents whether they’d prefer being redistricted or sticking with a modular many would prefer the latter. If FCPS tries to avoid modulars entirely, that will mean more boundary changes and will raise all the questions around grandfathering and transportation they keep side-stepping. |
DP, I don't think the case being made is that modulars should "never" be used (e.g. in case of needed swing space during a renovation), I think it's that modulars shouldn't be used as a long-term capacity solution because of safety, equity/fairness, and the declining condition/durability of the county's current modulars. Use of modulars should aim to be "scaled back significantly" is probably more representative of the SB and FCPS and most people's feeling about them. |
That sounds nice as an aspirational goal but modulars are needed in some instances given the poor long-term planning that has plagued FCPS for many years. If they redistrict a ton of kids, they won’t be able to grandfather them because they won’t have enough buses to run multiple transportation routes while the changes are being phased in. Ask families whether they prefer a modular at their school or having their high school kids forced to switch high schools as rising sophomores or juniors. |
I agree with this. Modulars are the immediate solution with the long term solution being expansion or boundary adjustment (or in other cases to wait it out if it’s an abnormal growth trend.) The high schools with modulars are: - McLean, which will likely be alleviated by moving attendance islands. - Marshall, which will likely be alleviated by sending its western boundaries to Madison. - Annandale, which may no longer need modulars due to the downward trend in enrollment. - Centreville, which is being expanded. - Robinson, which is projected to grow more dependent on its modular, but could benefit from Centreville’s expansion (ie all of Union Mill stays at Centreville instead of being a split feeder) - Chantilly, which is the most challenging case, as it already has fairly tight boundaries, and is difficult to expand due to its footprint. This would be the only instance of having to choose between bussing kids to further away high schools or keeping them in modulars, I think. (Again, this is only with regards to modulars.) |
It costs somewhere around $2.5 million to install a modular at a high school. How many millions is FCPS going to eat because they’ve now decided to switch course and no longer treat modulars as the equivalent of other classroom space?
And how much higher will the transportation costs be with a bunch of boundary changes, assuming that at least rising seniors are grandfathered? |
It’s probably worth raising these questions to your school board rep. People on here are just describing what board members have said. |
The 10:25 post includes a lot of predictions that go well beyond what SB members have said, no? Reid has also said most of the changes will relate to ES but the prior post also focuses on HS, not ES. |
Northern part of chantilly could go to Westfield or south lakes, southern part could go to centreville. Centreville expansion is years away, and hasn’t even been fully approved by taxpayers. Options abound. |
When she says that the moves will focus on the elementary schools, I hear that as maybe changing those es borders, which will then feed those kids up to a different feeder. They already pushed the consultant through with a no bid contract, I would not rest easy. They are going for broke here. Don’t believe me? Go read Dunne’s newsletters. |
Reid said most of the changes would be at the ES level, but they can’t fix capacity issues at the high school level without making some changes. The McLean example removes two attendance islands (school board priority) and two split feeders (school board priority.) The Marshall example impacts the Westbriar attendance island whether it’s absorbed by the South Lakes pyramid or Madison (school board priority) and Wolf Trap which is a split feeder. The Robinson/Centreville example is another example of a split feeder that sends half its students to a further away high school (school board priority.) |