Anybody following the Karen Read trial in Boston?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I wonder if more people in that neighborhood have put up cameras after this event. I live in a similar suburb and lots of people in my neighborhood have cameras up, even back in 2022. I think it’s unusual that no one on that street had cameras.

We have a Ring doorbell but not a subscription that tapes. I don't see any utility in taping. The cops' job is not my job.

Lots of people do have the cameras tape though. When we were looking at cameras and we talked to neighbors for advice, most of them said that they had a subscription. They’re not terribly expensive and a lot of people like the idea of there being a record, should something happen.

Yes, I'm aware of it. When the police came to our house asking for our tapes, they seemed surprised. Alas.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I wonder if more people in that neighborhood have put up cameras after this event. I live in a similar suburb and lots of people in my neighborhood have cameras up, even back in 2022. I think it’s unusual that no one on that street had cameras.

We have a Ring doorbell but not a subscription that tapes. I don't see any utility in taping. The cops' job is not my job.

Lots of people do have the cameras tape though. When we were looking at cameras and we talked to neighbors for advice, most of them said that they had a subscription. They’re not terribly expensive and a lot of people like the idea of there being a record, should something happen.

Yes, I'm aware of it. When the police came to our house asking for our tapes, they seemed surprised. Alas.

Big reason why it’s surprising that it appears that no one on Fairview had cameras. Or that the investigators didn’t ask if any of the neighbors had cameras. Not sure which it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I wonder if more people in that neighborhood have put up cameras after this event. I live in a similar suburb and lots of people in my neighborhood have cameras up, even back in 2022. I think it’s unusual that no one on that street had cameras.

We have a Ring doorbell but not a subscription that tapes. I don't see any utility in taping. The cops' job is not my job.

Lots of people do have the cameras tape though. When we were looking at cameras and we talked to neighbors for advice, most of them said that they had a subscription. They’re not terribly expensive and a lot of people like the idea of there being a record, should something happen.

Yes, I'm aware of it. When the police came to our house asking for our tapes, they seemed surprised. Alas.

Big reason why it’s surprising that it appears that no one on Fairview had cameras. Or that the investigators didn’t ask if any of the neighbors had cameras. Not sure which it is.

Do you really think MSP did their job and asked the neighbors for recordings?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Karens a nut job. I hope she's found guilty soon since clearly she's the one who did it. She should never get out of prison. Ever.

What is your obsession? Are you his family?

They were all irresponsible, unprofessional, and corrupt. No sensible person thinks the prosecution has proven “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

If she killed him, the rest of them and every investigator has almost intentionally handed her a win by how badly they screwed up and with all their suspicious behavior.

If she killed him and they had nothing to do with it, they all would have done the best, most perfect investigation of their careers because it would have been personal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Karens a nut job. I hope she's found guilty soon since clearly she's the one who did it. She should never get out of prison. Ever.

What is your obsession? Are you his family?

They were all irresponsible, unprofessional, and corrupt. No sensible person thinks the prosecution has proven “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

If she killed him, the rest of them and every investigator has almost intentionally handed her a win by how badly they screwed up and with all their suspicious behavior.

If she killed him and they had nothing to do with it, they all would have done the best, most perfect investigation of their careers because it would have been personal.

100% this.

The verdict will be driven by the police actions, not Karen’s.

[Anonymous]

2 mistrial requests in one week reeks of desperation from the defense. They still have no defense. You can't say karen broke her tail light in a driveway then have the defenses one witness saying the tail light had to be broken at 35-40 mph. They literally contradict themselves. She's so guilty it hurts.

[Anonymous]

Why didn't the prosecution call karens reads dad to the stand? Its like he's trying to lose this case. She told her dad she hit him he gave interviews saying this. They're not trying too hard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I wonder if more people in that neighborhood have put up cameras after this event. I live in a similar suburb and lots of people in my neighborhood have cameras up, even back in 2022. I think it’s unusual that no one on that street had cameras.

We have a Ring doorbell but not a subscription that tapes. I don't see any utility in taping. The cops' job is not my job.

Lots of people do have the cameras tape though. When we were looking at cameras and we talked to neighbors for advice, most of them said that they had a subscription. They’re not terribly expensive and a lot of people like the idea of there being a record, should something happen.

Yes, I'm aware of it. When the police came to our house asking for our tapes, they seemed surprised. Alas.

Big reason why it’s surprising that it appears that no one on Fairview had cameras. Or that the investigators didn’t ask if any of the neighbors had cameras. Not sure which it is.

Do you really think MSP did their job and asked the neighbors for recordings?

That’s what I’ve been wondering. It seems that it’s pretty standard today to knock on doors and ask if neighbors have camera footage, but there’s no evidence that was done in this case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:2 mistrial requests in one week reeks of desperation from the defense. They still have no defense. You can't say karen broke her tail light in a driveway then have the defenses one witness saying the tail light had to be broken at 35-40 mph. They literally contradict themselves. She's so guilty it hurts.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why didn't the prosecution call karens reads dad to the stand? Its like he's trying to lose this case. She told her dad she hit him he gave interviews saying this. They're not trying too hard.

Did they call him last time? Hard to believe he would be cooperative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I wonder if more people in that neighborhood have put up cameras after this event. I live in a similar suburb and lots of people in my neighborhood have cameras up, even back in 2022. I think it’s unusual that no one on that street had cameras.

We have a Ring doorbell but not a subscription that tapes. I don't see any utility in taping. The cops' job is not my job.

Lots of people do have the cameras tape though. When we were looking at cameras and we talked to neighbors for advice, most of them said that they had a subscription. They’re not terribly expensive and a lot of people like the idea of there being a record, should something happen.

Yes, I'm aware of it. When the police came to our house asking for our tapes, they seemed surprised. Alas.

Big reason why it’s surprising that it appears that no one on Fairview had cameras. Or that the investigators didn’t ask if any of the neighbors had cameras. Not sure which it is.

Do you really think MSP did their job and asked the neighbors for recordings?

That’s what I’ve been wondering. It seems that it’s pretty standard today to knock on doors and ask if neighbors have camera footage, but there’s no evidence that was done in this case.

MSP is so corrupt. If they asked neighbors for videos, there should be a trail. Either they didn't ask (most likely), or they asked, got video, didn't fit their narrative, so they discarded. I am thinking it's the former.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:2 mistrial requests in one week reeks of desperation from the defense. They still have no defense. You can't say karen broke her tail light in a driveway then have the defenses one witness saying the tail light had to be broken at 35-40 mph. They literally contradict themselves. She's so guilty it hurts.

Brennan straight up lying to the jury in open court about the sweatshirt is grounds for a mistrial with prejudice. Full stop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:2 mistrial requests in one week reeks of desperation from the defense. They still have no defense. You can't say karen broke her tail light in a driveway then have the defenses one witness saying the tail light had to be broken at 35-40 mph. They literally contradict themselves. She's so guilty it hurts.

[phone] exactly!!! They're own witnesses are contradicting their defense. Creating "confusion" for the jury is not a viable defense. I hope jury had 12 brains and finds her guilty. They're grasping at straws now. Its embarrassing!