Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Today I learned that some people actually want the Gestapo to burst into women’s homes to search for improperly handled miscarriages. |
| It’s interesting that PP thinks the “ghouls” are the ones who are arguing that a woman traumatized by a stillbirth should be protected. |
Please state exactly what the patient should have done after the fetus was expelled from her vagina. I do not see any specific guidance for this woman in what you have shared. Should she have left it in the toilet? Should she have put it in anything but a bucket? Should she have put it in a sink? In the washing machine? On the bed? In a cardboard box? In a plastic bag? |
No. She did as state law required her to do. And she did as human decency required her to do, because babies aren’t legally or morally, publicly discarded in America. I am surprised that’s something you all think is ok, because I don’t ever recall that that was something civilized societies allow or approve of. Maybe you all can change the laws so it’s legal to throw your dead babies over 20 weeks out in buckets instead of burying them or letting the hospital or coroner take care of them in a safe and responsible manner. I am sure it’s going to be a lovely state of affairs when people who think what this woman did was acceptable in regards to the body of her dead baby. |
Also should be noted that Brittanny was charged under a different statute - not the vital records reporting. She is being charged with “abuse of a corpse.” notably there is no definition of “corpse.” presumably PP believes indeed that we have to have funerals for all of our tampons now, lest a busy body nurse report us. |
It doesn't appear that that's what she said though. She said it was in the backyard. Even if we think of the remains 100% as medical waste, there is a difference between "I discarded it in the trash" and "I left it outside unattended". If this was a used insulin syringe, or a condom, or any other medically related waste, discarding it in the trash would be considered differently from leaving it outside where children could have access. I am 100% not saying that she should be charged with a crime. She did what she could do in a very difficult moment, but if someone had left a used syringe outside because it was what they could do in a difficult moment, I would want someone to pick it up before a child accessed it. And then, under Ohio law, once an institution rather than the individual had custody of it, cremation seems like it's the legal solution. So, in my opinion, if the remains actually had been where Ms. Watts and the nurse both thought they were, the nurse should have been able to call the police to pick them up without any chance of Ms. Watts being arrested. The police could have picked up the remains, and then stored until Ms. Watts recovered enough from the medical emergency to talk to her medical team and make a decision about about whether they would be medically tested, or returned to Ms. Watts, and if both answers were no, cremated. |
You’re lying. NO state law required her to call the police. |
If you can’t describe the appropriate container to put the remains of a second trimester pregnancy loss into while you wait for someone to come dispose of them, then we have to assume you have no idea either. |
Exactly. PP is intentionally ignoring the actual issue here. The Ohio law put into place by religious sadists. |
Lay down on bed. Call 911. Medical professionals arrive. Woman is transported to hospital. She receives needed treatment. Coroner arrives, retrieves/removes baby from toilet. Lay down on bed. Call mom. Mom either calls 911 and above occurs, or mom takes woman to hospital to receive needed medical treatment. Mom informs medical staff of baby in toilet. Coroner retrieves/removes baby. Baby’s remains are taken care of according to wishes of family, either by private burial or cremation, or given to hospital/coroner. What doesn’t happen: baby left outside on bucket. Baby inside toilet and toilet clogged; family calls plumber to fix toilet, plumber finds body of dead baby. What is your working theory on how these situations should be handled? You definitely aren’t interested in following the law. |
Ok, you copy and paste what should happen with a link. From Ohio, their laws. Prove me wrong. |
I'm not the PP, although I have been active on this thread. I think a bucket is an appropriate place to put the remains while you wait. I don't think a bucket outside is an appropriate final location for the remains, and arranging for someone to come dispose of them. Since that's where Ms. Watts and the nurse thought the remains were, I can see why arranging for someone to come dispose of them seemed like a good idea, and that attempting to do so didn't mean that the nurse thought she should be arrested. I do think a toilet can be an appropriate final place, but in this case it wasn't because it rendered the toilet nonfunctional, so again, it did need to be removed. Once fetal remains are in the hands of someone who isn't the mother, I think that cremation is the appropriate solution. I think there are enormous differences between how different women would want the remains treated, and cremation seems like a respectful option since it is used to dispose of both corpses and medical waste. While, I think a woman who is miscarrying should be able to flush the remains, or put the in a bucket while she deals with her medical emergency and decides on next steps, it would be disrespectful for police dealing with remains, or a medical team dealing with the products of a D&C to do either of those things. |
It’s all part of her sadist fantasy. |
+1 Vile woman who wants to hurt other women. Just like some posters on here. Get your sick pleasure somewhere else. |
Exactly. The sadists get extra pleasure from judging and persecuting black women. |