Russians Compromising Trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They all need to be charged.

This is a big enough scandal--and the world is watching--so there must be action. We knew this was happening before Election Day, yet our system failed to respond. The US now looks weak and inept. Time to clean house and show the world that the US is still the greatest nation on the planet. Wouldn't Trump want that? For the US to be great again?

Wow. This is a record. The exact same post in three different threads. What are the odds?
Here is the same reply I posted to the two other exact posts:

Charged with what?

The articles I am reading have a few things in common...... the sources are unidentified, and if the phone calls actually happened, there is nothing to indicate that anyone on the calls knew they were speaking to Russian intelligence officials (if they were) and there is nothing outlining the content of the phone calls.

So, what exactly do you want to charge people with?

NP. You're weirdly. PP is allowed to post this, even three times if she wants. You think none of these yahoos should be charged? Not even Flynn? Not even "Buy Ivanka!" Kelly Anne?

“Weirdly?”
Nope. Not unless a crime has been committed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They all need to be charged.

This is a big enough scandal--and the world is watching--so there must be action. We knew this was happening before Election Day, yet our system failed to respond. The US now looks weak and inept. Time to clean house and show the world that the US is still the greatest nation on the planet. Wouldn't Trump want that? For the US to be great again?

Wow. This is a record. The exact same post in three different threads. What are the odds?
Here is the same reply I posted to the two other exact posts:

Charged with what?

The articles I am reading have a few things in common...... the sources are unidentified, and if the phone calls actually happened, there is nothing to indicate that anyone on the calls knew they were speaking to Russian intelligence officials (if they were) and there is nothing outlining the content of the phone calls.

So, what exactly do you want to charge people with?

NP. You're weirdly. PP is allowed to post this, even three times if she wants. You think none of these yahoos should be charged? Not even Flynn? Not even "Buy Ivanka!" Kelly Anne?

“Weirdly?”
Nope. Not unless a crime has been committed.

Flynn.

They tried to use him as a scapegoat. Calls and communications with Russians were intercepted, and they had proof on Flynn (and others, but let's stick with Flynn). Trump lied (through his minions) by saying he was never briefed. They have proof that Trump was briefed.

Add it up, pp. Plenty of evidence to take down this administration for colluding with Russia to impact the election.

[Anonymous]

Kellyanne has broken the law by using a federal position to advance a private business.

Flynn has purportedly broken the law by conspiring with a foreign state on behalf of the United States of America as a private citizen.

The onion is peeling and the smoke is thick. You can deny all you want but the Intel agencies and certain reporters have been following this for almost a year. The evidence has been there for anyone who was paying attention, which is why so many of us have been howling about this administration.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They all need to be charged.

This is a big enough scandal--and the world is watching--so there must be action. We knew this was happening before Election Day, yet our system failed to respond. The US now looks weak and inept. Time to clean house and show the world that the US is still the greatest nation on the planet. Wouldn't Trump want that? For the US to be great again?

Wow. This is a record. The exact same post in three different threads. What are the odds?
Here is the same reply I posted to the two other exact posts:

Charged with what?

The articles I am reading have a few things in common...... the sources are unidentified, and if the phone calls actually happened, there is nothing to indicate that anyone on the calls knew they were speaking to Russian intelligence officials (if they were) and there is nothing outlining the content of the phone calls.

So, what exactly do you want to charge people with?

NP. You're weirdly. PP is allowed to post this, even three times if she wants. You think none of these yahoos should be charged? Not even Flynn? Not even "Buy Ivanka!" Kelly Anne?

“Weirdly?”
Nope. Not unless a crime has been committed.

Flynn.

They tried to use him as a scapegoat. Calls and communications with Russians were intercepted, and they had proof on Flynn (and others, but let's stick with Flynn). Trump lied (through his minions) by saying he was never briefed. They have proof that Trump was briefed.

Add it up, pp. Plenty of evidence to take down this administration for colluding with Russia to impact the election.

First of all, ironic that you used the word, “scapegoat.” Perhaps you also read the fake tweet and thought it was real.
Secondly, all of your other accusations are, at this point, rumor. And, your take on events.
Right now I am seeing no conclusive proof of anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kellyanne has broken the law by using a federal position to advance a private business.

Flynn has purportedly broken the law by conspiring with a foreign state on behalf of the United States of America as a private citizen.

The onion is peeling and the smoke is thick. You can deny all you want but the Intel agencies and certain reporters have been following this for almost a year. The evidence has been there for anyone who was paying attention, which is why so many of us have been howling about this administration.

IC leaks are doing what NYC AG did to Comey about HRC: leaking enough info to ensure this is not buried by Trump administration.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

First of all, ironic that you used the word, “scapegoat.” Perhaps you also read the fake tweet and thought it was real.
Secondly, all of your other accusations are, at this point, rumor. And, your take on events.
Right now I am seeing no conclusive proof of anything.

Kellyanne was on live national television, so there is plenty of actual proof, even though she was on Fox News when she did it, so you probably watched it live.

On w/r to Flynn, was his removal my imagination? If there was nothing wrong there, why is he out of a job?

This is all pretty ironic coming from someone who won the election because of illegal leaks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:


If we're going to build up the "Russia Controls Trump" conspiracy AGAIN, would you please provide some evidence this time? Russia/Trump is proving to be birtherism 2.0!

Evidence is all over the place!

Why, oh, why does Trump defend Putin at every turn?
Why, oh, why did Trump equate Putin's murderous ways with America's government?
Why, oh, why did Trump say a few weeks ago that he was open to lifting sanctions against Russia?
Why, oh, why won't Trump release his tax returns?
Why, oh, why was 19.5% of Rosneft sold to an unknown buyer and left in an account in the Cayman islands?
Why, oh, why has the author of the 35 page dossier on Trump disappeared?
Why, oh, why did Putin arrest or kill the people believed to be sources of the 35 page dossier on Trump?
Why, oh, why did the Russians hack the US election in favor of Trump?

I'm tired of typing. How's the weather in Moscow?

Given that everyone of these is your elaborate fantasy (Cayman Islands stuff is secret, who knows where it went?) based upon a few facts, I call "Russia Controls Trump" a quarter-baked idea that serves as a distraction from domestic issues. And that my friends, makes it Birtherism 2.0!

so are they fantasy or fact? you said they are based on a few facts... aren't facts - FACTS?

[Anonymous]

FBI Director James Comey just held closed door meeting with Senators on Capitol Hill about Russia -- @CNN

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FBI Director James Comey just held closed door meeting with Senators on Capitol Hill about Russia -- @CNN

He met with the Senate Intelligence Committee (plus Schumer) for over an hour in a SCIF. Afterwards the Senators were "unusually quiet" and wouldn't answer reporters' questions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They all need to be charged.

This is a big enough scandal--and the world is watching--so there must be action. We knew this was happening before Election Day, yet our system failed to respond. The US now looks weak and inept. Time to clean house and show the world that the US is still the greatest nation on the planet. Wouldn't Trump want that? For the US to be great again?

Wow. This is a record. The exact same post in three different threads. What are the odds?
Here is the same reply I posted to the two other exact posts:

Charged with what?

The articles I am reading have a few things in common...... the sources are unidentified, and if the phone calls actually happened, there is nothing to indicate that anyone on the calls knew they were speaking to Russian intelligence officials (if they were) and there is nothing outlining the content of the phone calls.

So, what exactly do you want to charge people with?

NP. You're weirdly. PP is allowed to post this, even three times if she wants. You think none of these yahoos should be charged? Not even Flynn? Not even "Buy Ivanka!" Kelly Anne?

“Weirdly?”
Nope. Not unless a crime has been committed.

Flynn.

They tried to use him as a scapegoat. Calls and communications with Russians were intercepted, and they had proof on Flynn (and others, but let's stick with Flynn). Trump lied (through his minions) by saying he was never briefed. They have proof that Trump was briefed.

Add it up, pp. Plenty of evidence to take down this administration for colluding with Russia to impact the election.

First of all, ironic that you used the word, “scapegoat.” Perhaps you also read the fake tweet and thought it was real.
Secondly, all of your other accusations are, at this point, rumor. And, your take on events.
Right now I am seeing no conclusive proof of anything.

The same standard wingnuts applied to the Clintons, amirite?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FBI Director James Comey just held closed door meeting with Senators on Capitol Hill about Russia -- @CNN

I'm not seeing it over there. Link?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FBI Director James Comey just held closed door meeting with Senators on Capitol Hill about Russia -- @CNN

I'm not seeing it over there. Link?

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/17/politics/comey-russia-senate/index.html

This quote was especially interesting --"Warner also said the committee has put in place a process to ensure the White House does not destroy documents lawmakers need for their investigation."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FBI Director James Comey just held closed door meeting with Senators on Capitol Hill about Russia -- @CNN

I'm not seeing it over there. Link?

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/17/politics/comey-russia-senate/index.html

This quote was especially interesting --"Warner also said the committee has put in place a process to ensure the White House does not destroy documents lawmakers need for their investigation."

Hey Trumpdumps!
So.... what's your sad little defense now?

[Anonymous]

And this one

But the amount of manipulation, why there's not more outrage about the fact there were close to 1,000 Russian internet trolls, actual people, working trying to manipulate our news.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And this one

But the amount of manipulation, why there's not more outrage about the fact there were close to 1,000 Russian internet trolls, actual people, working trying to manipulate our news.

That is really depressing, both that there were paid trolls and that no one seems to care. I wish they would go back to various webpages from pre-election and identify the trolls.